More handpicked essays just for you.
Humor in a shakespeare play
Short comment on the taming of the shrew
Short comment on the taming of the shrew
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Humor in a shakespeare play
Do plot twists develop a story?
Shakespeare’s use of comedic devices in his story, The Taming of the Shrew, is one of the many reasons it has remained alive throughout so many decades. A comedic device is a literary tool many writers use to lighten the mood and keep the audience's attention. Examples include: a dramatic plot twist, humorous play-on words, and disguises played by other characters to fool the rest. Using these devices the author is able to ultimately bring the story to its demise.
A plot twist is a drastic change in events that were not foreseen by the reader. In this case, Petruchio shows up late to his wedding wearing old, dirty clothes and riding a broken horse and people did not expect him to show up like this. He did this
to embarrass Kate, and begin to start “taming the shrew”. This twist in the story shows grabs the reader’s attention as it shows how far Petruchio is willing to go to show dominance over Kate, and make her do as he commands. A disguise is changing your appearance to conceal your old identity. The use of this device is shown by Lucentio as a latin tutor, Hortensio as a music teacher, and Tranio as Lucentio. All three are being someone they are not, in order to be with Bianca. When using a tool like this one it can help characters do things they originally would not be able to like be with someone. The benefit that these writing tools help the plot move on. It does so by changing events and adding more details for the reader. Many more are used in Shakespeare's writing and taming of the shrew provides more than enough examples for people who read.
Different Interpretations of the Relationship Between Kate and Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew
In Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew the elements of farce are exemplified in terms of character, plot, and writing style. The stereotyped characters in The Taming of the Shrew are typical of a farce. Katherina is an outstanding example of a farcical character. Katherina, although stereotyped as a boisterous shrew, can be portrayed as a person needing sympathy due to Baptista's favoritism. The quote, "She is your treasure, she must have a husband: I must dance barefoot on her wedding day…" (A. II S. 1 L. 36-37), makes it obvious that Baptista favors Bianca. In terms of plot, Shakespeare devises the plot to resemble a situation comedy. Although the subplot is more romantic, both the subplot and the main plot revolve around the principle of a favoristic father who is outwitted by his child and her lover.
The Taming of the Shrew is a comedy written by William Shakespeare between 1590-1594. In many ways, it can be likened to a romantic comedy film, and in a romantic comedy, many things can be expected. Usually, films in this genre center on ideals like the power of true love. The audience can also expect a romantic comedy to involve funny plot-lines, a resolution between the two main characters and sometimes, another love match. In this essay, I will explain how Act Five, Scene Two is an appropriate ending for Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew.
The entirety of “The Taming Of The Shrew” is essentially a giant parody. Full of imitations and disguises itself, Shakespeare focuses on a typical situation in his society, several men trying to court a woman, and having to deal with an intolerable woman. Through this imitation, the ridiculousness of the characters can be seen. This absurdity is incredibly obvious to us today, because our society
Consequently, in the play The taming of the Shrew and the sources of author Elizabeth Hutcheon, Marion Perrett and Dale Priest they have ideas amongst those sources and my three other sources have the common theme of women being objectifified and therefore the idea between those sources is that women’s roles become reversed when they let themselves be shrewed like the character Katherine did when it came to Petruchio. Amongst the first source the moral of it is one that Linda Boose argues that “Shrew and similar terms were transposed from their origin as contemptuous expressions for lower-class males into terms that gendered such hostility, displacing it away from the threat of male class revolt which remained real throughout the era and redirecting
In The Taming of the Shrew, the concept of love is a means of emotional manipulation, and manipulation is nothing more than a means of control between men and women. William Shakespeare critiques the patriarchal social structure by ironically employing the manipulative stance Petruchio takes towards winning Katherine as his wife by charming her with words and manipulating her psychologically, and then taming her after their marriage through legal, physical, financial, and psychological control and manipulation. Though Petruchio may think he yields power over his wife, Katherine uses obedience as a tool of manipulation and has the control of the household, as can be seen by her ironic speech at the end of the play, where she claims women must serve their men. Shakespeare uses the irony of a man using manipulation as a tool for control to magnify the significance of the power women yield through manipulation, thus proving that men and women engage in a power-shifting struggle.
In most societies, women are seen as subordinates to men. During the Elizabethan period of England, men were superior to women, because women were looked upon as less valuable during this period of time. Occasionally, women gained recognition from men. However, men took responsibilities, and were seen as more important. In the Shakespearean comedy, Taming of the Shrew, author William Shakespeare displays disrespect towards women by including sexist remarks. He also portrays women as being obedient to men, who are more significant in that time. Shakespeare portrays women being obedient to their husbands and the men being more appreciated and significant in his play Taming of the Shrew.
In Shakespeare's comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare has a woman as one of the story's main characters. Katherine Minola (Kate) is off the wall, and kinda crazy. Because of her actions, the “male centered world” around her doesn't know what to do with her.
Deceit in The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare ‘The Taming of the Shrew’ is a play written by William Shakespeare, an English playwright and poet born in 1564. It was first performed in 1593 in Shakespeare’s first period as a playwright. It was later published for the first time in 1623, seven years after Shakespeare’s death. Despite the fact that Shakespeare is mostly known for his tragedian plays, here in ‘The Taming of the Shrew’, he proves that he was capable of writing comedies as well.
During the Shakespearean era, obeying husbands and fathers was looked at so highly that it matched obeying the King of England; the uppermost pedestal was reserved for the Shakespearean man. Gender roles lead to the development of self-individualism which divided the men from the women by establishing a deep distrust of women into the men along with an authoritative dominance, and in hand locked women into a permanent submissive position. One of the most oppressed groups throughout history has been women, which were socially, economically, educationally and religiously oppressed during the time period of Shakespearean society. Social normality and political views has been throughout time, arguably the most extreme oppression enforcement over social outcaste subgroups. Society also held a strong grip on artists and the creative messages of the work that artist deliver to the world, which can depict a sometimes hidden, or subtle dropping of opinions of the hard hitting issues at hand during the present time period. Shakespeare is deemed as one of the greatest known writer’s in English history, not only because he was tremendously attentive towards the Elizabethan era and the diverse struggles that haunted the streets of England in everyday life’s routine, but because he did more than just take notice, as he acted upon the travesties he observed by weaving the representation of the world he came to know through his artwork, leaving the world with irreplaceable pieces of literature and insightful history of Shakespearean society.
In Shakespeare time, marriage was seen as a wealthy and social commitment and didn’t involved love. In the Elizabethan Era, women were believed to be inferior to men and were expected to obey men without exceptions. Marriage was seen as business relationships were money was involved, this explained the relationship between men and women and their interests in marriage. Marriages between wealthy families were very common in that time, and were expected to increase the family fortune. For marriage women were expected to have their own ‘dowry’ which in that time was their money and properties they inherited after marriage. However, in their marriage the women lose all their possessions and came to be their husband’s properties. A good example of a marriage done by social commitment is the marriage between Petruchio and Katherina. The only reason Petruchio wants to be with her is because of her money. As a result this shows how men show no romance towards women.
...and works very seriously. William Shakespeare is the best writer of all time in the field and time he resigned in. He is widely known as the best and is very famous for his works. He used humor to create the laughter from his audiences. He wrote many works with humor called comedies. His comedies transformed into different type of comedies. Another one of Shakespeare’s techniques is the use of irony. He uses dramatic irony, situational irony, and verbal irony. Irony plays a very large role throughout all of his works along with comedy. He has contributed so much to the English language and literature. William Shakespeare uses everything from new words to new techniques. He created many new words and phrases. Now the English language can always thank the one and only great William Shakespeare for all that he has done for the English language throughout all his works.
The Taming of the Shrew, written by William Shakespeare, is historical proof that flirting and temptation, relating to the opposite sex, has been around since the earliest of times. Because males and females continue to interact, the complications in this play remain as relevant and humorous today as they did to Elizabethan audiences. This is a very fun play, full of comedy and sexual remarks. It's lasting impression imprints itself into the minds of its readers, for it is an unforgettable story of sex, flirting, and happiness. The Taming of the Shrew remains as relevant today because of its relation to the age-old story of the battle of the sexes and dynamics of marriage, as well as the woman's struggle with both of these.
In William Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew, it is clear that marriage was an economic institution of which wealth and prestige were taken into account more than love or any other factor such as charm or desirability. When Petruchio states “I come to wife it wealthy in Padua, If wealthily, then happily in Padua.” (I, i, 76-77), it is evident that money was the driving factor in deciding who to marry back then and that wealth, not love from a marriage brought happiness. By the same token, when Petruchio asks Baptista “Then tell me, if I get your daughter’s love, What dowry shall I have with her to wife?” (II, i, 112-113) the parallels of marriage to an economic institution only grown. The fact that Petruchio's first question was about
...disguise to add comic effect by encouraging humour of an audience via the ‘theories of laughter’. Comic effect is accurately demonstrated by Shakespeare’s incorporation of confusion, disorder and farce. However, it can be concluded that Shakespeare’s use of mistaken identity and disguise was for the purpose of more than just for comic effect, but to highlight the audience more serious topics and challenge social norms and values of the period. Ironically, it can be inferred that Shakespeare has masked his underlying purpose of mistaken identity and disguise with comedy.