Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Taming of the shrew vocabulary act 1 short ans answers
The Taming of the Shrew Act III summary
Shakespeare play about power
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Taming of the Shrew is a comedy written by William Shakespeare between 1590-1594. In many ways, it can be likened to a romantic comedy film, and in a romantic comedy, many things can be expected. Usually, films in this genre center on ideals like the power of true love. The audience can also expect a romantic comedy to involve funny plot-lines, a resolution between the two main characters and sometimes, another love match. In this essay, I will explain how Act Five, Scene Two is an appropriate ending for Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew.
The story of The Taming of the Shrew involves quite a complex structure. The main five acts consist of a main plot, which concerns Katherina's taming and Petruchio's methods, and a sub-plot, which features a competition between suitors for Katherina's more agreeable sister, Bianca. Both the main plot and the sub-plot begin together at the start of the play, when Baptista Minola, Katherina and Bianca's father, announces that sweet, amiable Bianca would not be married until her shrewish and ill-tempered sister Katherina is married first. This leads to an agreement between one of the suitors and a friend, which happens to be Petruchio, to woo Katherina and marry her. But at this point the sub-plot becomes more complex than the main plot, when Lucentio adds to Bianca's suitors several disguises are made. It then becomes easier for the audience to focus on how Petruchio 'tames' his wife. Therefore the final scene is appropriate to the play because it finally brings together all the principal characters in one big celebration, tying the main plot and sub-plot together again. This creates a much more rounded-off ending, as it answers most of the questions posed at the start of the play (such ...
... middle of paper ...
...w. Shakespeare has used the number three many times in his plays. This might perhaps be because the Elizabethan society is well known to be very superstitious, in many ways the number three was seen as lucky “three times lucky”. Perhaps the number three was used to symbolise the happiness achieved by the three couples after their present troubles were sorted out.
To conclude, I think that Act Five, Scene Two was a very appropriate ending for The Taming of the Shrew. There were many questions posed in the build-up to the ending, and I think that Act Five, Scene Two answered them. It also answered whether Katherina was in fact, “tamed”. In my opinion, she was not, as I have said before, she echoes the mens' tactics of disguise, but instead, using the words in her final speech. In the end the audience was made happy with the happy ending that the play ended with.
We see the girls in both “The Taming of the Shrew” and “10 Things I Hate About You” become very close to a boy, but for extraordinarily different reasons. This coincides directly with the idea that marriage was arranged during the time of Shakespeare, and now it is typically a mutual relationship between two people.
I think Kate's final speech can be interpreted in endless amounts of ways but it comes down to how someone's individual view of the play is. Personally I felt Kate's speech was very ironic and a coincidence since through out the play she's very mean to Pertuchio and her view on the whole marriage was pretty negative. Pretty much how I saw this play in a modern aspect is Kate was the girl with the bad attitude and Petruchio was the douche-bag who likes girls who are a challenge i.e. Kate and in some weird way Kate ended up seeing that her attitude isn't what someone like her or a women that is married should be presenting. Her final speech to me was her seeing her own demons in a sense through Pertuchio and she was having an epiphany on how
Shakespeare's Taming of the shrew Act 1 contains two parts, including the induction. None of Shakespeare's other plays begins with this, in which a full five-act play is performed within another play.
A long time ago, a drunken man fell asleep outside an alehouse. This man, Christopher Sly, was discovered by a mischievous lord who took him into his home. The witty lord then convinced Sly that he was a lord, as well. The lord then put on a play for him. The play, The Taming of the Shrew, was about the two young daughters of Baptista. The youngest daughter, Bianca, wished to wed but her father, Baptista, would not allow this until his eldest daughter, Katherina, was married. Under normal circumstances, it would be easy to find a husband for Katherina with all her beauty, but all her beauty was covered by her shrewd personality. By this time Bianca's suitors were growing very impatient, so they decide to team up and find a husband for Katherina. In jest they mentioned their plan to a friend, Petruchio, who surprisingly agreed to marry Katherina. All her beauty and wealth were enough for him. Katherina reluctantly was wed to Petruchio and she was taken to his home to be tamed. With Katherina out of the way, Bianca was now allowed to marry Lucentio, who offered her father the highest dowry for her. In the final scenes of the play, Katherina proves that she is tamed by winning an obedience contest at a dinner party. Katherina is now even more in accordance with her wifely duties than Bianca. A fare is a type of comedy based on a ridiculous situation. The Taming of the Shrew, an eminent example of a farce, is the first of three farces written by Shakespeare.
In William Shakespeare’s play The Taming of the Shrew, Petruchio acts as a master tamer by depriving Katherine of her necessities, being a mirror image of her, and making her agree with him. Petruchio displays the qualities of a master tamer by making her agree with all of his opinions. Acting as a mirror image, Petruchio proves he holds the role of a master tamer and will do whatever he wants. In order to be a master tamer to Katherine, Petruchio deprives her of all her basic needs and necessities.
By charming her with kind words, Petruchio is able to manipulate Katherine into marriage and woo her, but in an unaccustomed way, as Kate is not used to men being so nice and direct with her. Petruchio is able to achieve this end by manipulating Katherine’s words. He twists what Kate says and makes it seem as if she is coming on to him sexually, while in reality he is the one implying the sexual innuendo. This manipulation can be seen when they have an argument about whether or not the wasp carries his sting on his tail or tongue, and Petruchio says “What, with my tongue in your tail? Nay, come again, good Kate. I am a gentleman—” (II, 1; 230-231). By contorting the words he ...
middle of paper ... ..., suggests that Shakespeare’s exploration of the theme of love is to bring us closer to the nature of the reconciliation harmony which it embodies. This is because everyone is peacefully engaging with each other and enjoying the play, since the conflict has been resolved. Not only this, but different social classes emerge together. This is paralleled with, the relationship between Titaina and Oberon. Shakespeare explores the theme of love by the tensions built up to create comic resolutions, therefore helping to diffuse possibly unpleasant impact of themes.
Marriage in William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew At the time Shakespeare wrote The Taming of the Shrew the idealistics
Reading the play now, it seems hard to believe that the unusualness of the ending could have gone apparently unnoticed for so long. With the stage set for the usual comedic ending of multiple marriages, the news of the Princess's father's death comes as a complete shock: Marcadé enters at a moment of such carefree mirth that the Princess playfully chides him, "thou interruptest our merriment" (5.2.712). A moment later, his news is told and the atmosphere of the play has noticeably changed, as Berowne himself acknowledges when he says, "The scene begin...
... for both sides. In the case of Katherine and Petruchio, the battle is won because they both love each other and live happily ever after. The battle of the sexes between Bianca and Lucentio is lost because neither is willing to love each other.
The classic play Romeo and Juliet by the famous playwright William Shakespeare is one of the most beautiful love stories of all time and has captured and inspired readers everywhere. Regardless of the fact that it was written in the 1500’s, it is still being performed and extolled today. There is a multitude of reasons for such continuance of the play. First of all, its everlasting themes of love and hate enable people to deeply relate to the story. Secondly, its memorable characters deeply imprint on the minds of readers. And lastly, above all, is its magnificent language which many writers today regard in awe. These three elements make the acclaimed play, Romeo and Juliet, one of the most timeless stories of our lives.
Shakespeare’s play Twelfth Night revolves around a love triangle that continually makes twists and turns like a rollercoaster, throwing emotions here and there. The characters love each another, but the common love is absent throughout the play. Then, another character enters the scene and not only confuses everyone, bringing with him chaos that presents many different themes throughout the play. Along, with the emotional turmoil, each character has their own issues and difficulties that they must take care of, but that also affect other characters at same time. Richard Henze refers to the play as a “vindication of romance, a depreciation of romance…a ‘subtle portrayal of the psychology of love,’ a play about ‘unrequital in love’…a moral comedy about the surfeiting of the appetite…” (Henze 4) On the other hand, L. G. Salingar questions all of the remarks about Twelfth Night, asking if the remarks about the play are actually true. Shakespeare touches on the theme of love, but emphases the pain and suffering it causes a person, showing a dark and dismal side to a usually happy thought.
The effect the scene has on the audience is that it confirms their fate and set the lovers on a course where no matter what they do the people around them will not ever understand them until their death at the end of the play.
yet never means to wed where he hath wooed" (act 3 Scene 2 Lines 15-17).... ... middle of paper ... ... In this play, as any other, Shakespeare proves to be a visionary.
Two of the greatest masters of British literature, Shakespeare and Chaucer, tended to look to the classics when searching for inspiration. A lesser-known example of this lies in an ancient tale from Greece about two star-crossed lovers. There are many variations on the names of these lovers, but for the purpose of solidarity, they shall henceforth be referred to as “Troilus and Criseyde” for Chaucer and “Troilus and Cressida” for Shakespeare. Chaucer’s “Troilus and Criseyde” offers up a classic tale of love that is doomed, whereas Shakespeare’s “Troilus and Cressida” is not only tragic but also biting in its judgment and representation of characters. This difference may be due to the differences in time periods for the two authors, or their own personal dispositions, but there can be no denying the many deviations from Chaucer’s work that Shakespeare employs. Shakespeare’s work, by making the characters and situations more relatable, builds upon Chaucer’s original work, rather than improving it or shattering it.