Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History - China under Mao Tse Tung
The world during mao zedong
Mao Zedong's political ideology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History - China under Mao Tse Tung
The political compass represents the people’s political views based on two separate and individual axes: economic and social. The economic axis is a left to right line that evaluates an individual’s stance on how the economy should run. The left side of the economic axis defines one’s desire to have an economy be totally controlled or be managed by a cooperative collective organization. For example, Mao Tse Tung is someone who is committed to a total controlled economy and his views would be on the left side of the economic axis. The right side of the economic axis defines one’s desire to have a free market economy or managed by competing individuals and organizations. For example, General Pinochet is someone who is committed to a free market
economy and his views would be on the right side of the economic axis. The social axis is an Authoritarian-Libertarian line that determines an individual’s political stance in a social viewpoint. The authoritarian side of the social axis defines one’s belief that authority and tradition should be followed or have some form of government that has a strong central power and limits one’s political freedom. The libertarian side of the social axis defines one’s belief that personal freedom should be exploited more and emphasize on individual judgment, self-rights, freedom of choice, etc. An example of an authoritarian would be Kim Jong-un, the supreme leader of North Korea whereas a libertarian would be Thomas Jefferson, the founding father and the third president of the United States.
The four cornered, two dimensional grid is a breakdown of ideologies. Using the four cornered ideological grid focus on how much government control someone wants in economic and cultural matters. The gird is divided in to four ideologies: liberals, libertarians, economic liberals/ cultural conservatives, and conservatives. The two dimensional grid is more appealing because most people are not strictly conservatives or strictly liberals most people are in the center depending on the topic and the two dimensional grid support this mind set. The traditional spectrum is divided in two the right and the left. The problem with the traditional spectrum is that there is no middle ground; the linear model is not complex to show all it sides.
Diamond discusses the importance of ideology and the ways in which they “pave road” for society to appropriately organize upon. Diamond specifically outlines the ways in which changing an ideology can alter society in Chapter 14, From Egalitarianism to Kleptocracy, as society evolves through the spread of an ideology. Both Diamond and Hunt agree about the importance of ideology in society, but their standpoints are critically different in their perspectives. Diamond focuses on other aspects just as well, such as immunity to germs or resource production, whereas Hunt specifically focuses on the ways in which changes in ideology impact the development of capitalism. Thus, both Hunt and Diamond have different thought’s on economic history, but converge in the ideal of signifying ideological
In conclusion, I am a centralist in my economic and social beliefs. However, there are some stances that I may take which would place closer to the Libertarian ideology. Generally, I believe in a fair and humane approach to citizenship as this separates democratic nations from socialist and dictatorial ones. Although most of my political beliefs are influenced by my upbringing, I am gradually developing my own ideologies as I learn more about modern politics and the impact of economic and social policies. I have learnt from the Nolan Test, that I am predisposed to the moderate view and do not possess a pure political stance.
To apply the political term "authoritarian" to an ontological account may at first seem to be a simple category mistake. However, this first impression fails to recognize that many of the terms that have come
The Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, a period of political turmoil in Europe. Its meaning in today’s capitalistic world is a very controversial issue. Some people, such as the American government, consider socialism taboo and thus disregard the manifesto. They believe that capitalism, and the world itself, has changed greatly from the one Marx was describing in the Manifesto and, therefore, that Marx’s ideas cannot be used to comprehend today’s economy. Others find that the Manifesto highlights issues that are still problematic today. Marx’s predicative notions in the Communist Manifesto are the key to understanding modern day capitalism.
1) What is political culture? What is the makeup of the political culture in the United States? Give two examples of how the political culture of the United States helps to unite Americans, even in disagreement.
In 1984, the Party teaches "that the proles were natural inferiors who must be kept in subjection, like animals, by the application of a few simple rules" (Orwell 91). The Party says to the people that proletarians are not equal to the Party. The rules of conformity show that the proletarians are inferior to the Party but have much more freedom than them. On the other hand, the Party are the well-educated people but, are watched at every moment. The hierarchical system of government and rules of conformity keep the Party in power and treat them differently compared to the proles. In Anthem, the World Council of Scholars condemns Equality's presence by crying "A Street Sweeper walking in upon the World Council of Scholars!... It is against all the rules and all the laws!" (Rand 25). The distinction between the different classes of people shows that the Council is in power. The hierarchical system of government represents the Council as the high class. To maintain this power, they bound their people to the rules of status and conformity. People from different social classes are treated differently based off of their social class. The Council is the highest level of authority in society due to the rules of conformity and has the most power in society. The piece of art, All for One or One for All?, show the faceless people are in different
Kohn, P.M. (1972). The Authoritarianism-Rebellion Scale: A Balanced F Scale with Left-Wing Reversals. Sociometry 35, 1, 176-189.
In this essay I will be arguing about 2 political ideologies; this essay will be highlighting the comparison and contrast between the 2 ideologies and their elements. The 2 ideologies that will be discussed are liberalism and conservatism, the essay will explain what ideology is, a brief explanation of their elements and the comparison between them. In my opinion the best between both ideologies is liberalism, the reason I think that is because liberalism places an ontological supremacy upon the individual and has no value more important than freedom because man’s natural state is when he is free unlike conservatism that has a very pessimistic view of humans and claims that individuals are morally corrupt.
Schumaker Paul, Dwight C. Kiel, Thomas Heilke, Great Ideas/Grand Schemes: Political Ideologies in the 19th and 20th Centuries, New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 1996. Schumaker Paul, Dwight C. Kiel, Thomas W. Heilke, Ideological Voices: An Anthology of Modern Political Ideas, New York, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1997.
After taking the test, I realized where I stand with certain current topics and how I was never forced to answer such questions and it really made me think. This was because I was never involved politically and I didn’t get much exposure to some of the issues. The results showed my political compass assessment as an; Economic Left/Right:-3.75, and a Social Libertarian/Authoritarian:-1.28. I was standing more towards Gandhi’s personal political convictions over others. What was interesting about the chart was as you go left the political convections are more communistic/collectivism.
Morgenthau said that “International politics, like all politics, is a struggle for power.” The world of global politics is dynamic where every action results in a complex outcome. International relations are affected by sovereign states, militias, terrorists, strategic alliances and global organizations. However, there is uncertainty in the world due to natural disasters, environmental changes, economic instability and geographic, as well as demographic changes. In order to process the intricate global dynamics, power is distributed through the system of polarity. Polarity is the state of having opposite or contradictory opinions or ideas. Three types of polar systems exist: unipolar, bipolar and multipolar.
Anarchism and liberalism are two ideologies which have developed into different strands over time. The diverse views within anarchism and liberalism allow similarities between the two to be found, however, anarchism as a whole is distinct from liberalism when comparing beliefs of human nature and political authority. Anarchists and liberals find some common ground when identifying individuality as an integral part of human nature, although social anarchism diverges by arguing that humans have a greater instinct for social cooperation. Moreover, anarchists and liberals also share similarities in their dislike of a great state role and its institutional apparatus because it limits freedom, however, anarchism argues for the complete removal of
In the political approach, political authority is divided between a central government and the provincial or state governments. This means that some provinces or states are accorded a substantial measure of constitutional or legal sovereignty, although they still remain subordinates of the central government in certain constitutional or legal respects. The political approach promotes the political values of military strength, economic development, union, and representation. In addition, it is characterized by three central features: state sovereignty, bicameralism, and multiple layers of representation.
No consensus has been reached on the definition of political development; however most scholars agree it is multi-faceted concept. Comparative politics often promotes itself as an empirical field of study; however the categories, statistics and indicators we choose to measure a particular concept often reveal, at best a subconscious bias, and at worst an overt normative agenda. Furthermore, whichever definition and subcategories we decide are sufficient, political development often encompasses attributes that are difficult to measure numerically.