Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social order
The nature and function of leadership
The study of followership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social order
Introduction
Order in the society is established and sustained through effective group communication. The most essential being group communication since societies always have a leader-follower dimension within different contexts. Understanding this dimension is key to unlocking cohesive coexistence in societies. Initially, research responded to the need for this understanding by focusing discourses on how people become effective leaders. Confucius, Plato, Lao Zi and Aristotle all discussed the making of a leader. However, recent evolutions in thinking and perception of societies have prompted scholars to focus on strategies and attitudes associated with followers of leaders (Kelley, 1992). Such studies are not only essential in aiding followers in their development, but also in facilitating effective group communication. There can be no leaders without followers; hence, leadership is in a constant dialectic with followership. Among the most significant contributors to the flip side is Robert E. Kelley in his theory of followership.
This paper will carry out exploration of Kelley’s followership theory inlcud9g its description, rationale for exploring the theory as pertains to practical import, theoretical import and intrinsic interest. Literature that support and challenge the theory will also be explored as well as critiques of the theory. The critiques will be explored as well, highlighting evidence supporting or disapproving them.
The origin of the followership theory by Kelley can be traced to religion. He reflected on how the followers of Jesus Christ changed the world and thus thought of the fundamental issues that make followership effective. The theory of followership was first published in the Harvard Business Review ...
... middle of paper ...
...oes not speak to their different cognitive styles since there are numerous factors that determine what an individual decides other than their disposition. For instance, a worker may decide that they will not speak up, not because they are sheep, but because they do not see the immediate priority as being speaking up.
References
Kelly, R. E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. Harvard Business Review, 6, 142-148.
Kelly, R. E. (1992). The Power Of Followership: How to Create Leaders People Want to
Follow and Followers Who Lead Themselves. New York: Doubleday.
Kelly, R. E. (1998). How To Be A Star At Work: 9 Breakthrough Strategies You Need To
Succeed. New York: Crown Business.
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice
Hall
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. NY: Oxford University
Press.
Küpers, W. (2007). Perspectives on Integrating Leadership and Followership. Retrieved 4 22, 2014, from International Journal of Leadership Studies: http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol2iss3/kupers/kupers.htm
In this book, the authors Tom Rath and Barry Conchie examine the question “What are the keys to being an effective leader?” To answer this question they had a team that reviewed data collected from Gallup polls. The data came from interviews from 20,000 senior leaders, over a million teams and more than fifty years of Gallup Polls of the most admired leaders in the world. The authors then had the team do a study of more than 10,000 followers to find out why they follow the influential leaders in their life.
Groups are an essential component of society as they allow individuals to affiliate themselves with certain people, typically those who are most similar to themselves. Groups also provide social support and a greater sense of belonging for the individual, which is not provided by crowds. Due to the significance of groups, it is important that groups are maintained in organized structures that encourages group harmony and group cohesion. It is essentially the leader’s task to maintain these ideals since the leader has authority over the members of the group.
Kelley, R.E. (2008). Rethinking Followership. In Riggio, R., Chaleff, I. & Lipman-Blumen, J. (Eds.). (2008). The Art of Followership (pp. 5-16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cult activity has been on the rise over the past few decades. With it there has been an increase in the fear surrounding it. From this fear, society has learned much about cults, how they get members and what to look out for as far as cult recruiters go. Society as a whole has also learned what can be done to deal with cults.
Reicher, S., Haslam, S., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547-568. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
Mlls, D. Q. (2005). Leadership How to Lead, How to Live. Boston: Harvad Business School Press.
It has been stated how the transformational effect of charismatic leaders lead to increased follower motivation (Humphreys, 2009). Due to the various attributes that transformational leaders have, such as charisma and understanding, they are likely to motivate others to follow after the examples that they may display. There is also Effective followership. Effective followership prepares a person to be an Effective leader since being a follower is considered as a prerequisite to leading. According to Humphreys (2009), organizations are comprised of groups of followers and leaders, who are listening and taking direction from one
Good prototypical leaders gain a greater amount of trust from their followers. However, the issues that challenge this concept of prototypicality are that it is utmost importance that the leaders represent the group well and have unwarranted trustworthiness. Thus meaning that prototypical leaders are viewed more importantly than the ingroup followers and yet this doesn’t determine how well they will perform; the outlook of the leader is analyzed more so that than their input in the group. Another issue is that prototypicality can cause followers to have false perceptions of the leader’s effectiveness (Gissner 2008). The followers may interpret the leader as being representative of their group and leader them well although it may simple be because of the position the leader
Ivey Business Journal. (n.d.). Followership: the other side of leadership. Retrieved January 14, 2014 from http:iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/leadership/leadership/followership-the-other-side-of-leadership#.UtbFeaFMHIU
However, each of the behaviors can be used individually or collectively as different situations call for different behaviors (Whitener, 2007). Follower characteristics describe how an individual will interpret ...
A significant part of effective leadership is the close connection between the leader and the follower, which often determines the success of the leader's mission. Unfortunately, this leader-follower relationship cannot be created according to some simple formula. Young leaders of today face special challenges as they try to communicate and interact with their followers and potential followers. By exploring global perspectives, human diversity, and ethics, young leaders can take yet another step forward in their development and preparation for twenty-first century leadership.
This theory shapes followers into future leaders by providing them a freedom to control their behavior, elevates followers’ concerns from physical to psychological needs, and inspires subordinates to consider a group rather than self-interests and communicates designed outcomes to let subordinates perceive changes as wealth while. Transforming leadership has an elevating effect on both sides, leader and the led, because it improves the level of conduct and human interaction.
There are some who are never reached physically by the messages of the leader and remain at best what shall be called potential followers. And there are others who, although reached, do not for a variety of reasons respond in the prescribed manner. These individuals are called the non-followers.” (Fagen,
Leadership can be traced back to many ideologies over the history of time. There have been individuals that have achieved great success and accomplishments through inspiring others to believe and follow their leadership. This paper will explain some of the theories that philosophically explain how those great people inspired others to believe in their vision and goals.