Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why ineffective leadership is a problem
Socialized charismatic leaders
Characteristics of laissez faire leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why ineffective leadership is a problem
1. Transformational leadership
This theory shapes followers into future leaders by providing them a freedom to control their behavior, elevates followers’ concerns from physical to psychological needs, and inspires subordinates to consider a group rather than self-interests and communicates designed outcomes to let subordinates perceive changes as wealth while. Transforming leadership has an elevating effect on both sides, leader and the led, because it improves the level of conduct and human interaction.
Transforming theory of leadership is considered as a moral process due to interaction of leaders with followers based on their shared values, motives as well as goals (Burns, 1978). The theory comes by recognizing the needs and motives of
…show more content…
Charismatic Leadership Theory
According to the theory of charismatic leadership, a charismatic leader is a leader who displays certain behaviors and expertise when certain situations exist, and this combination causes followers to attribute charisma back to the leader. Charisma is a trait that is being felt and then attributed to a leader by followers. This makes charisma rare but easily observed when in existence. Max Weber believed that Charisma occurs during a social crisis, when a leader emerges with a radical vision that offers a solution to the crisis (Yukl, 2006)
An example of a person used this theory was Ronald Reagan who brought effective communication, vision, integrity, humor, and delegation to the leadership task at a time when there were problems in social, economic, and foreign policy facing the nation(Mark Bell, 2013).
Followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors. Traits and personality are related to charismatic theory and people can be trained to exhibit charismatic behaviors
The following are the four characteristics of charismatic
…show more content…
Laissez-Faire leadership (Non-leadership)
Following versions of transformation and transaction theories, a third theory Laissez- Faire emerged. This represents an absence of effective leadership and describes the type of leader who is passive or indifferent to direct reports (Bass, 1997). Example this can happen when a leader avoid from accepting his/her responsibility or sometime delay or fail to make follow up on his or her requests. The leader who pertains with that example he or she follows under Laissez-Faire leadership. Also in this theory a leader cannot or can have little efforts on addressing followers’ needs.
According to Laissez-faire leaders’ perspectives, the key to success is to build a strong team and then stay out of the way. This theory does not fit every organization, some fit for this theory example Advertising agencies and startup social media companies. A leader can give option to followers like ‘Whatever others want to do is ok for
...selbein and Cohen, “organizations that take the time to teach leadership are far ahead of the competition. By becoming familiar with the transformational leadership approach and combining the four I's, managers can become effective leaders in the business world.” (1999, p. 263). Transformational leadership can be applied in one-on-one or group situations. Using this approach, the manager (leader) and the associates (followers) are “transformed” to enhance job performance and help the organization be more productive and successful. All of these leaders have the attributes mentioned here. History will decide the greater impact they had on society as it is being written every day. Therefore, the qualities of transformational leadership make the essence of transformational management and the key to successful management of transformational organizational changes.
Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approaches, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.
This style has been defined as ( Abdicates responsibilities avoid making decisions)(Robbins 2001). That would mean leaders are not involved in taking decisions at all and they are available only to provide their employees with materials and answering questions, the subordinates have complete freedom to take decisions and set objectives (Chaudhry and Husnain 2012). In other words, this theory lacks any kind on powerful leadership. Hence, there would be lack of motivation, low levels of performance, and poor work practices(Packard 2009). However, if the employees are already motivated and have full understanding and high level of knowledge regarding the mission at hand, Lassies- Faire model might works fine (Gustainis and Roosevelt 2004) .
According to Grant, (2012, p. 466), the Bass’ Transformational Leadership theory states, that it is the essential quality of a leader to influence the followers through building the paradigms of trust, integrity, and respect using the approach of ‘give and take’, which signifies the leader being a true influencer rather than being
In the past people believed that leaders are born not made. Now the definition of leadership has been changed because now we believe that leaders can be made through education. Leadership plays important part in every field and organization to achieve higher goal. According to Kelly, “leadership is a process of influence in which the leader influences others toward goal achievement” (Kelly & Crawford, 2013, p. 168). Nowadays there are many leadership theories and have different perspective and suggestion. I have chosen two theories to discuss in this paper that is Autocratic leadership theory the Transformational leadership theory. Both theories are total contradictory with each other because both have a different perspective.
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
Certainly, an army would not be able to battle in the war without a commander who in charges of the whole strategy. Correspondingly, any organisations cannot function without leaders. Leader is the most substantial element of successful organizations. Becoming outstanding leaders, leadership skill is vital in order to drive the organizations forward. Several leadership principles are extensively used these days. Burns (1978) identified two types of leadership comprise of transactional and transformational leadership. Hence, leaders should be capable to indicate which theory should be applied in accordance with organization’s culture and objectives. This essay aims to evaluate the resemblances and the differences between transactional and transformational leadership as well as the feasibility to utilize a mixture of them by giving the definitions and examples followed by the supporting researches and studies.
CHARISMATIC LEADER THEORY Max Weber first proposed charismatic Leader Theory at 1947. It is a link that can improve the relationship between the leaders and the followers. Although the charm is the innate quality in personal, but the charismatic leadership can be generated additionally between the leaders and followers (XXXX). The theory of charismatic attribution proposes that leadership qualities such as perseverance, strongness, self-confidence, boldness, energetic, passionate, strong sense of mission, superior speech ability and so on can increase the likelihood of the attribution of charismatic leaders (XXXX). Steve Jobs seems to meet all these elements.
This method implies that leaders and follower have combine motives that can be beneficial to both parties. When theses task are assigned, there is a designed reward or punishment for the followers. This method of leadership can also be associated with managing in a sense. Transactional leadership in a sense is like management in that it does not look to inspire or promote change, it is in fact more about ensuring a particular process, and procedure meets the desired results.
Transformational leader is considered ethical in nature. Transformational leader helps followers, understand their followers ‘problems and give them solutions to tackle problems. Followers get personally attached with their leaders and do in the same manner as the leader wants. Transformational leader is may a source of employees’ satisfaction and commitment.
Many great leaders have one thing in common and that is charisma. Charismatic leaders are those that have the capability to inspire and encourage people to do more than they would normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice. (Daft, R.L, pg. 364) Charisma is what provokes energy and commitment out of its followers. These leaders possess the power to motivate their followers to do almost anything. They create an atmosphere of change and express an ideal vision of a better future. The most common characteristics of the charismatic leader involve maturity, communication, humility, and inspiration. These unique qualities impact their followers and conduct themselves in such a way that allows for remarkable results. Then one wonders, is charisma something you are born with? And if not, is it possible for it to be developed or even trained through life experiences?
According to McLaurin & Al Amri (2008) charismatic leaders can be defined as those who have a high self confidence, a clear vision, engage in unconventional behavior and action as a change agent, and while remaining realistic about environmental constraints. When you hear the names President Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King Jr., Mother Theresa, Adolf Hitler or Larry Ellison; whether or not one can categorize their leadership style, most people are familiar with the effect that these leaders have had on society or business. These leaders have demonstrated qualities that have caused them to be known as “charismatic leaders.”
Trait theories are theories that consider personal qualities and characteristics that differentiate leaders from nonleaders." Early results aimed at confirming this theory were inconclusive. Many research studies were conducted and each identified key traits supposed to differentiate leaders from nonleaders. The problem is that they didn't get the same results, thus failing to discover common traits, which should have shown in each research study. When applying the Big Five Personality framework (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness to experience) to the study and research of leadership traits, results were more encouraging. They showed that the most important trait for leaders was extraversion. Still, this founding sh...
They are able to articulate a compelling or captivating vision, and are able to arouse strong emotions in followers” (p. 1). Similarly, Haberfeld (2013) indicate that “Charismatic leaders are self-confident and are able to manage their image, articulate visions, communicate high expectations, and instill confidence in followers” (p. 51). Police supervisors need to incorporate charisma into their style of leadership in order to provide clear visions of what they want to accomplish, and how that goal should be done. The charismatic qualities of police leaders determine whether they are able to gain their subordinates’ trust and inspire commitment to their
Another aspect of leadership includes leadership traits such as being influential and inspirational. There also different contexts of leadership, e.g, leading oneself, leading other individuals, leading groups, leading organizations. Some traits that are often associated with being an effective leader include a measure of intelligence, high energy, self confidence, dominance, and a need for achievement. An effective, charismatic leader must lead by example. That leader must be able to know what is going on, the job or task that is being accomplished, and be able to lead the group into performing the task at hand successfully.