Charismatic Leadership Theory Essay

985 Words2 Pages

1. Transformational leadership
This theory shapes followers into future leaders by providing them a freedom to control their behavior, elevates followers’ concerns from physical to psychological needs, and inspires subordinates to consider a group rather than self-interests and communicates designed outcomes to let subordinates perceive changes as wealth while. Transforming leadership has an elevating effect on both sides, leader and the led, because it improves the level of conduct and human interaction.
Transforming theory of leadership is considered as a moral process due to interaction of leaders with followers based on their shared values, motives as well as goals (Burns, 1978). The theory comes by recognizing the needs and motives of …show more content…

Charismatic Leadership Theory
According to the theory of charismatic leadership, a charismatic leader is a leader who displays certain behaviors and expertise when certain situations exist, and this combination causes followers to attribute charisma back to the leader. Charisma is a trait that is being felt and then attributed to a leader by followers. This makes charisma rare but easily observed when in existence. Max Weber believed that Charisma occurs during a social crisis, when a leader emerges with a radical vision that offers a solution to the crisis (Yukl, 2006)
An example of a person used this theory was Ronald Reagan who brought effective communication, vision, integrity, humor, and delegation to the leadership task at a time when there were problems in social, economic, and foreign policy facing the nation(Mark Bell, 2013).
Followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors. Traits and personality are related to charismatic theory and people can be trained to exhibit charismatic behaviors
The following are the four characteristics of charismatic …show more content…

Laissez-Faire leadership (Non-leadership)
Following versions of transformation and transaction theories, a third theory Laissez- Faire emerged. This represents an absence of effective leadership and describes the type of leader who is passive or indifferent to direct reports (Bass, 1997). Example this can happen when a leader avoid from accepting his/her responsibility or sometime delay or fail to make follow up on his or her requests. The leader who pertains with that example he or she follows under Laissez-Faire leadership. Also in this theory a leader cannot or can have little efforts on addressing followers’ needs.
According to Laissez-faire leaders’ perspectives, the key to success is to build a strong team and then stay out of the way. This theory does not fit every organization, some fit for this theory example Advertising agencies and startup social media companies. A leader can give option to followers like ‘Whatever others want to do is ok for

Open Document