Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American history 1900 to 1910
Women's rights in nineteenth century america
American history 1900 to 1910
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American history 1900 to 1910
The first half of 20th Century America was indeed an exciting time in history! We saw in a span of just 50 years wars going from being fought on the ground by massed infantry to decisive campaigns waged in the air. Automobile ownership was no longer just a luxury of the elite class, but also of the working class. Mass communication could be viewed on a television, no longer limited to the radio. Many fatal illnesses and diseases found treatments and cures – all due to a rapid progression in science and technology. Coincidentally, it wasn’t just science that was changing the face of America, it was the faces of America that were changing America. In the same fifty years, women of America broke through social restrictions and began to demand an equal place among men in society. In large part, the catalyst for this movement was the fight for, and subsequent acceptance of the birth control pill. It seems fitting, then, that Elaine Tyler May released her book, America and the Pill, A History of Promise, Peril, and Liberation, on the semi-centennial anniversary of the FDA’s approval of the oral contraceptive.
I think that May set out in her book to illustrate how valuable the fight to legalize the oral contraceptive (“the pill”) was in creating independence and ownership for women of their own lives and bodies. This campaign for women’s power should not be confused with that fought for during the Feminist Movement, although they occurred concurrently. Margaret Sanger spearheaded the fight for the pill, and did so through two world wars and one cold war – during a time of widespread poverty and global overpopulation. The effort to legalize the pill began as a way to provide women with the ability to have control over the size of their f...
... middle of paper ...
...e where it belongs – on men” (Tone, 246). The social landscape at this point in America seems to be a stark contrast from where women were when Sanger and McCormick began their fight. In fact, Sanger and McCorkmick were adamant that contraception be entirely in the hands of women (May, 109). The whole purpose was to provide women with the ability to decide when and if they wanted to conceive, and that they should otherwise have a safe and effective means to prevent it. Women had come along so far in their right to be heard that what the pill had done to liberate them and give them control of their bodies was no longer enough in and of itself – it should be men who suffer the side effects just as much, if not more than they. It certainly wasn’t for a lack of effort; a safe, non-permanent male contraceptive was researched and tested quite extensively, but to no avail.
Sanger continues backing her statement with the examples in education, labor, and that the church had caused women to be looked down upon. Sanger spoke on principles of Birth Control, they include: “it should be available to every adult, that every user should be taught how to use it correctly, that women should have the right to control their bodies and whether to have children.” (Jenson, 166). If Wardell would have included some specifics from Sanger’s speeches, the argument would have been made
Margaret Sanger was, at large, a birth control activist, but this speech was more about the questioning of birth control corrupting morality in women. People must remember, in the day and age where Sanger presented this speech, November 1921, women were considered very far from equal and much closer to servants or maids. In her speech, I saw that ethos was present in the sense that she gave herself credibility. Through Sanger’s detailed words and actions, and her statements including the presence of scientists and, or, professionals, the masses of listening people could infer that she was very well informed and solid in her statements. Though she presented herself as agreeable, Sanger was firm in her beliefs. In addition, Sanger says, “We desire to stop at its source the disease, poverty and feeble-mindedness and insanity which exist today, for these lower the standards of civilization and make for race deterioration. We know that the masses of people are growing wiser and are using their own minds to decide their individual conduct” (Sanger, par.15). To me, Sanger made herself appeal to the audience by using the word ‘we.’ In the practice of ethos, this focused on the author more than...
...still a vital part of world today. Planned Parenthood is not segregated to color or affluence and has definitely changed the world as we know it today. Margaret Sanger though a determined selfish women did not get everything the way she wanted it to be. She hung up fliers in immigrant neighborhoods just so the poor or colored would go to the clinic. She wanted these people to go to the birth control clinics so they couldn’t reproduce. Margaret believed that if you couldn’t support the family you already have you shouldn’t have more children and she was a strong believer that the inferior race should not be able to reproduce. All of Mrs. Sanger’s actions said more then what her voice said. Margaret Sanger was a powerful strong woman who was celebrated as an advocate of women’s rights; however her motives were for all the wrong reasons.
It is true that birth control may not have been the sole factor in the women's movement and freedom of self, but without this key element the
One can see as a result of her fight and her persistent distribution of Birth Control how determined she was to help women have control in their lives. Sanger didn't necessarily fight just for the sake of women to have access to Birth Control but she also fought for equality. It is unfair that only wealthy women could decide how many children they will have when the poor women were the ones who were in trouble of not being able to provide for all of the
Both sources approach an issue from a different demographic, the married young housewife and the of age generation in the roaring twenties respectively. If we compare intent, we see Sanger's is a politically motivated piece seeking empathy compared to what appears to be a balanced study from New Girls for Old. Therefore the more representative source is that of the uninfluenced survey, while we can't discount that they are selectively chosen; in comparison to Sanger's selected testimonials are likely the most pressing and emotive letters written to her. This contrasting factor of intent also leads to their influence varying, as Engelman presents it was Sanger's pivotal activist role that when combined with the radicals, socialites and professionals that led to the successive progress of the birth control movement as one of the few women led social movements i...
...rothels: a statement that needs to be eliminated from the American mindset. Having birth control available is not going to result in a ridiculous amount of promiscuity; it is very important to acknowledge that this is not a matter of self-control. This is a matter of being able to have freedom and rights, the fundamental theme in the feminist movement.
The Roaring Twenties were known as a time of economic boom, pop culture and social developments. This was a time when women began to break norms, they acted rebelliously such as wearing releveling clothing, smoking, and drinking. These women were known as “flappers” who wanted to change their roles in the 1920’s. Birth control activist, Margaret Sanger sought to change the world where women had access to a low cost, effective contraception pill. In “The Morality of Birth Control” Sanger battled opponents who claimed that contraception would cause women to become immoral. The author uses rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and fallacies to back up her claim while touching on issues in the church, advancements of women, and the source of disease in the world.
This lecture on the Pill will focus on the introduction, controversies, and outcome of women’s control of contraception during the mid 20th century. It will also discuss how the Pill became an influential stepping-stone for women activists. I chose to focus this discussion on three questions. First, what did the Pill teach us about the role of women in the middle 20th century? Second, what were the arguments for and against the Pill? Lastly, how safe was the Pill and what effects did women experience from taking it? By centering in on these questions, I hope to provide insight on the struggles women faced before and after this birth control technology became readily available to women in the United States.
Birth control pills gave women the right to be in charge of their own conception or lack thereof.
But when the “Women’s Movement,” is referred to, one would most likely think about the strides taken during the 1960’s for equal treatment of women. The sixties started off with a bang for women, as the Food and Drug Administration approved birth control pills, President John F. Kennedy established the President's Commission on the Status of Women and appointed Eleanor Roosevelt as chairwoman, and Betty Friedan published her famous and groundbreaking book, “The Feminine Mystique” (Imbornoni). The Women’s Movement of the 1960’s was a ground-breaking part of American history because along with African-Americans another minority group stood up for equality, women were finished with being complacent, and it changed women’s lives today.
Sanger organizes her argument by first presenting a series of questions that were sent out to “the most eminent men and women in the world.” These questions pertained to the opinions of these men and women on the topic of how birth control and awareness could potentially affect their society. She then talks about the
Watkins, Elizabeth Siegel. Genesis Of The Pill. On the Pill: A Social History of Oral
During the early 1900s, American nurse Margaret Sanger led the birth-control movement in the United States. She and others opened clinics to provide women with information and devices. Although frequently jailed, she and her followers were instrumental in getting laws changed. In subsequent years, laws against birth control gradually weakened, and more effective methods were developed.
"People and Events: The Pill and the Sexual Revolution." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. 12 May 2014.