Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on creativity
Effects of technology on creativity
Effect of social media on branding
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on creativity
Diatribes occupy a large chunk our scope in the living life of this new millennium. In a society transfixed on maintaining a vital root in both the visual world and the virtual, rants are gaining power. The power of the open letter can wipe a person’s public image clean. Just like that, one can crown themselves as an outcast from their past workings and convictions, removing the gravity of think pieces and banal podcasts hungry for signs of vulnerability. Opinion boards breed without second contemplation at this rate, with the virtual, prose trash-bins dating back to the early stirrings of the Internet. Self-validation is not an illness plaguing the modern world propped on hackneyed Western ideologies, but a way of being. It is but a simple way to garner connections in the technology age, to gain recognition. Cacophony of public introspections aside, it has grown difficult to decipher distinct voices in the masses and experts are beginning to doubt their ability to determine validity, to critique without fear. It is due to the incomplete, underdeveloped standards being adopting at an alarming rate. While the art world wages war against the strengthening bond between capitalism and the creative world, it is not hard to identify with Detective “Rust” Cohle as he shoots back jet black pontifications on the crumbling society before him. The television crime drama, True Detective, shines best with this particular character's cutting discourse and its ability to entice questions. I think it evokes a need within the audience to dissect what is in front of them, as if their senses are always lying to them. Rust’s disdain, his almost biting disappointment on the state of things rings clear in my head whenever I try to look towards the ar... ... middle of paper ... ...der to find ingeniousness and golden talking points for progress in the sea of opinions. She also argues that art should exist without context and theory, but that the two were interchangeable now in contemporary language and process. Left to their own devices, some artists will continue to protest the consensus. More intellectuals must dig, remain steadfast in showcasing honest artists and write. Write. Write even it is wrong, making mistakes all away to strike conversation. Without artists like Evan who do not only rely on process and dogma to spring their work to life, there will be more misguided blog posts. More think pieces, ego stroking, complacency. Artists need to stick to their logic and eagerness when taking the next step, doing it because it is what they need. Maybe we are all doing it wrong, but some artists are out there just trying to create substance.
In conclusion, Carr and Gladwell’s essays have proven that the internet positive effects are outweighed by its negative effects. Carr has found he is unable to finish a full text anymore or concentrate. He thinks that the internet has taken our natural intelligence and turned it into artificial intelligence. Gladwell discusses how nowadays, social activism doesn’t have the same risk or impact as former revolutions such as the Civil Rights Movement. The internet is mostly based on weak ties based among people who do not truly know each other and would not risk their lives for their
She recalls a disagreement that took place on Facebook between her and a close friend over a few comments placed on her timeline. Wortham describes how she felt embarrassed over the pointless argument. She discloses “I’m the first one to confess my undying love of the Web’s rich culture and community, which is deeply embedded in my life. But that feud with a friend forced me to consider that the lens of the Web might be warping my perspective and damaging some important relationships” (171). Introducing her personal feelings and perspective of how she feels Facebook is taking over her own emotional response online weakens her argument. Wortham reasons that others feel the same as she does. She says, “This has alarmed some people, convincing them that it’s time to pull the plug and forgo the service altogether” (171). Wortham does not bring in other testimonies of those who feel the same as she does, therefore the readers are only introduced to her personal
...ses a threat of humiliation and maltreating from other individuals that can have a detrimental effect on their lives. A person can go from being a normal school student to a laughing stock on a popular social network or even trend from a emotionally stable individual to a deranged, depressed critter who now hides in the shadows of society hoping never to be revealed. The informative thought of the re-occurrence of public shaming throughout history from Bennett allows the reader to question if this is an issue that is perpetual and something that will never go away. Furthermore, the author conveys the idea that publicizing oneself can be a burden; the darkside of Internet fame. Wrapping up her article, Bennett portrays a warning to the reader stating, “Shame...will always be with you”(115). Harassment from Internet fame can alter a person's life-forever.
... E. (2011). The net delusion. The dark side of internet freedom. New York, NY, USA: PublicAffairs.
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
In the recent years of the 21st century, the human race has come upon a golden age of communication, where we have seen the rise of the internet’s power to inform and fuel massive movements. While this is true, on the other side of the monitor, Humanity struggles to overcome its base instincts. “The Backfire Effect”, written by David McRaney, is a reflection of people’s current state on their own thoughts in comparison to other opinions. This titular mechanism, as described by the author, negates this ease of access to vital information (possibly an idea or fact contradictory to our own views) due to our mind protecting core beliefs. As we can see, this is stifling to the goal of a world where technology and reason is king, a world we all
Mr. Berger states in his essay, “The reciprocal nature of vision is more fundamental than that of a spoken dialogue. And often dialogue is an attempt to verbalize this- an attempt to explain how, either metaphorically or literally, “you see things” (120). This statement is a use of the rhetorical strategy, ethos, which is what Mr. Berger uses to gain influence and trust with the academic audience that he is intending to instill new knowledge in. This is a strong use of ethos that leads into how art is viewed so
Pollock uses different aspects of writing to back up her thesis and to emphasis that there is more to the subject the artist use in their creation. By using a variety of resources and counter-arguing them, she is backing up her own thesis and proving that there is a stereotype in art history where art historians do not explain past the artistic influence thus does not fully explain an artist or their artworks. She makes a point that because of this, there has to be changes to art practices today in order to fully understand the meaning behind artworks.
It is with this that it is sufficient to say that yes, artists are no longer obliged to present a physical entity to be labelled art and subsequently a locus for discussion but it is ample to provide any form of context that can evoke discussion and change, however, there must be some element of conventional art understanding ie status of artist, placement in a traditional art institution.
American Rhetoric. Web. The Web. The Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. https://suite.io/matthew-ferraton/2rta2fv>. The "Forces for Change." BBC News. BBC, n.d. -
Also available are numerous social outlets and ways to connect with a seemingly limitless number of people. However, this effortless ability to voice opinions and beliefs is not without repercussions. Many times, content found in the comment section of online forums and blogs is deliberately offensive, laced with racist, sexist, and homophobic language used to push the limits of civility and attract attention (Zimmerman). In his article, The Online Disinhibition Effect, Dr. John Suler reveals an in-depth analysis of this newly trending behavior.
The public sphere has been falsely represented as a virtual place where one can share and debate opinions; ...
"The problem of reality is always; social reality The problem is always the difficulty or impossibility of coping with or recognizing social reality, that is, human reality, the reality of other humans." (Robins pg.77) One of the main differences between the internet and cyberspace is the fact that cyberspace allows you to visualize and personally experience your own perception of reality whereas the internet simply as a narrative or interactive space is used for the purpose of allowing you to see other peoples interpretations of the world around them. At the same time there is something that cyberspace loses in creating this personal narcissism. Further into the article, Robins emphasizes the significance of reality in the lives of society. Politics, responsibility, self-identity, and meaning are all explained as things that preserve our humanity, things that cyberspace cannot intrinsically supply but that the internet still has. Because cyberspace is less concrete and more an idea, somewhere out of nowhere, I cannot supply an example in that respect. However, to illustrate the want and/or need that people have to instantiate their own reality in an interactive space, one need only look to message boards on the internet. It is here where people discuss and most often argue about everything from instant oatmeal to intelligent design. Every person forcing their opinion, their perception of reality on the other, trying to present their opinions in such a way that any who oppose would have to eventually surrender and see it the other way.
...ernet freedom and demand real identities is bound to revert the gains made on social platforms. It will be an infringement of the right of expression and will, if not curtailed itself, further lead to the erosion of human rights. Virtual communities offer a chance for individuals in the digital age to interact without the issues that accompany living or interacting in the real world. For example, since individuals design their own online characters and choose their virtual communities, it is less likely that the group dynamics will support blatant persecution. The considerable effort expended in designing online identity increases the chances that individuals will offer unreliable information. The online mask provides a glimpse of the person behind; even in cases where the identity is entirely fictional, one can still learn that the person behind lacks self-esteem.