Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influence causes anti social behavior
An essay for social learning theory
Social Learning Theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media influence causes anti social behavior
This assignment will evaluate two theories of aggression; Lorenze’s ethological approach and the Social Learning Theory. It will then determine the role of media on pro and anti-social behavior and will finally discuss individual, social and cultural diversity in pro and anti-social behavior.
Aggression has been defined by social psychologists as ‘any behavior whose proximate intention is to harm another person.’ (Fiske, 2004, P.495) This definition emphasizes that intention has an important role to determine the type of aggression. Psychologists have determined that there are two types of aggression; the first, hostile aggression, has a sole aim of hurting another, this is usually impulsive, automatic and derives from anger. The second is
…show more content…
Ethologists consider aggression to be a vital part in the development of the species. It is what allows us to adapt to our environments and survive them, by protecting our territory and competing for resources. Lorenze (1966 ) defined aggression as ‘the fighting instinct in beast and man which is directed against members of the same species.’ (cited in Gross, P.496) However this theory is mainly based on the study of non-mammals such as fish and insects and we cannot generalize this to humans as humans are more …show more content…
One of these being that he has completely ignored the influences of learning and cultural factors that may affect aggression and solely focused on the biological factors. Cultural differences have been shown to play a very big part in determining the acceptability of the degree and kinds of aggression. Siann (1985) also criticized Lorenze’s theory as he believed that humans are naturally ‘hunter-gatherers’ who rarely come into contact with others rather than ‘warriors’ as suggested. Lea (1984) also disproved Lorenze’s claim that non-human aggression ends before an animal of the same species is killed, by pointing out cases such as when a lion takes over a new pride and kills any male cubs.
Another theory surrounding aggression is the Social Learning Theory, which proposed that ‘aggressive behavior is learned through the reinforcement and the imitation of aggressive models.’ (Bandura, 1965, P.501)
Social Learning Theorists do not view aggression as being innate rather they believe that it is all learnt behavior. Humans learn aggressive behavior by observing others behaving aggressively. They observe in which situations aggressive behavior is rewarded (vicarious reinforcement) and when it is punished and as such learn which aggressive behaviors they can imitate so they can be rewarded and which one not to repeat in order not to be
One example of the “Social Learning Theory” is the Bobo doll experiment conducted by Albert Bandura in 1961. In this experiment children were either exposed to an adult exhibiting aggressive behavior or non-aggressive behavior towards the doll. When it came time for the children to interact with the doll, the children who were exposed to aggressive behavior were more likely to exhibit aggressive behavior (Nolen, n.d.).
In a study conducted by Barratt, Stanford, Dowdy, Liebman, and Kent (1999), a group of 216 college students were asked to evaluate their own aggressive acts with a self-report survey. The resulting aggressive acts committed were divided into the two categories of impulsive and premeditated aggression. Impulsive aggression was frequently followed by feelings of remorse and confusion after
Nurture brings out the aggressive behaviour in humans. Mikal Gilmore’s book, Shot in the Heart, correlates with the aspect of aggressive behaviour nurture because of how he turned out unlike the other four, who did not have a this ability to kill. The nurture of a child into adulthood develops and creates the aggressive behaviour within the environment. The aggressive behaviour can be found in every human, but it is not until the cognitive development of a child that the aggressive behaviour can start to form and become overpowering. Though the basis of aggression is found in people it is not until a child is exposed to an aggressive
This essay will provide an analytical comparison of the approaches of Psychodynamic perspective and Behaviourist perspective, in understanding Aggression. One assumption about human behaviour from the psychodynamic perspective is that all behaviour including aggression is determined by our genes. In contrast, the behaviourist perspective argues that aggression is shaped by our environment.
One of the most researched topics in the history of psychology is aggression. One goal of social scientists has been to define aggression. Some believe that aggression is biologically preprogrammed, others look toward situational factors and this study suggests that aggression is learned. This study was conducted by Albert Bandura and his associates in 1961 at Stanford University. The researchers proposed that the children be exposed to adult models with either aggressive or nonaggressive ways, they would then be tested without the models present to determine if they would imitate that aggression they observed in the adult.
The issue of whether or not criminal or aggressive behavior and violence is caused by biological or environmental factors has proven to be one that has caused a dispute for many years now. The biological or genetic factor of violent/criminal or aggressive behavior is certainly a much talked about topic. The idea that certain individuals could be predisposed to violence is something definitely deserving of doing research about. The nature vs. nurture topic has been a continuing debate for many aspects of human behavior, including aggression/violent behavior and criminal behavior. There have been many studies indicating that chemical relationships between hormones and the frontal lobe of the brain may play a key role in determining aggressive behavior as well as genetics, while other studies have explored environmental and social factors that have been said to control patterns in human aggression. Aggressive/violent behavior can’t be answered directly if it is caused by either nature or nurture; instead it is believed that both cause it.
Aggression is defined as any behavior intended to harm another person who is motivated to avoid the harm according to Baumeister & Bushman (2014). A study was conducted in 1967 by Leonard Berkowitz and Anthony LePage, to determine whether the presence of weapons would elicit aggressive behavior from an individual (Baumeister & Bushman, 2014). They hypothesized that participants were likely to associate weapons, particularly firearms, to aggression and violence, which would cause observing a weapon to elicit an aggressive response. The experiment determined that the presence of weapon can elicit an aggressive response from people ready to act aggressively. In the study, participants were shocked up to seven times then given the opportunity to
Many psychologists have studied the effect of the media on an individual’s behavior and beliefs about the world. There have been over 1000 studies which confirm the link that violence portrayed through the media can influence the level of aggression in the behavioral patterns of children and adults (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2001). The observed effects include, increased aggressiveness and anti-social behavior towards others, an increased fear of becoming a victim or target of aggressive behavior, becoming less sensitive to violence and victims of violent acts, and concurrently desiring to watch more violence on television and in real-life (A.A.P. 2001). According to John Murray of Kansas State University, there are three main avenues of effects: direct effects, desensitization, and the Mean World Syndrome (Murray, 1995, p. 10). The direct effects of observing violence on television include an increase in an individual’s level of aggressive behavior, and a tendency to develop favorable attitudes and values about using violence to solve conflicts and to get one’s way. As a result of exposure to violence in the media, the audience may become desensitized to violence, pain, and suffering both on television and in the world. The individual may also come to tolerate higher levels of aggression in society, in personal behavior, or in interpersonal interactions. The third effect is known as the Mean World Syndrome, which theorizes that as a result of the amount of violence seen on television and also the context and social perspective portrayed through the media, certain individuals develop a belief that the world is a bad and dangerous place, and begin to fear violence and victimization in real life (A.A.P. 2001).
Additionally, exposure to total TV was not a significant predictor of why some children were more socially aggressive than others. Conversely, exposure to televised social aggression was a positive predictor of children’s social aggression, specifically stronger for girls than boys (Martins & Wilson, 2011, p. 62). This data allowed Martins and Wilson to conclude that rather than TV as a whole, TV that illustrates social aggression specifically, is correlated with socially aggressive behavior in young
My argument is that animal behavior can explain a very basic level of human behavior. “Evolution can explain why humans exhibit aggression because it is a primal emotion like any other, experts say” (Whipps). If we can accept and support the idea that children possess the basic need of love when they are being raised, then we must realize that this concept was first witnessed and tested in animals. The presence of compassion and love in the early life of an offspring raises his/her potential for success and increases his/her quality of life for a longer length of time. As biologist David Carrier agrees, he states that “[j]ust as compassion for your offspring increases your genes' chance of survival, violent tendencies may have been similarly useful for some species”
Freud believes that aggression is a primal instinct, and civilization thwarts this instinct, making man unhappy. Civilized society controls man's tendency toward aggression through rules and laws and the presence of authority. These mechanisms are put in place to guarantee safety and happiness for all individuals in a society. However, the necessity of suppressing the aggressive drive in m...
Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and Prosocial Behavior: a Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature." Psychological Science (2001). EBSCO. DePaul Library. 7 Mar. 2008.
Behavior and social learning are two theories that are inherently intertwined. Behavior to some extent is taught for social reasons, and social learning can very much shape and create behaviors. While behavior is something intentionally taught, social learning can teach and reinforce many unintentional behaviors, such as dishonesty or aggression. In order to adequately discuss these two interrelated topics, theory exploration is in order.
The field of psychology has opened different hypothesis from a variety of theories with the aim of studying the behaviour of humans being as a result they concluded with five psychological perspectives. Behaviourist, Biological, Psychodynamic, Cognitive and Humanistic perspectives are the deduction after a depth study of mental activity associate to human behaviour. In this essay I will be comparing two psychological perspectives according to aggressive behaviour.
Aggression has been and is still is a complex form of emotion to understand. This term aggression cannot be precisely defined due to the different attribute of behaviours presented amongst organisms. According to Buss (1961, p1) as cited in Green (1990, p2) the definition of aggression “is a response that delivers noxious stimuli to another organism”. This definition by Buss (1961) is now what psychologist have now generalised as the standard definition of aggression. Therefore aggression is a behaviour that aims to injure a directed individual.