Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
John locke essay on government
Importance of natural rights
John locke essay on government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: John locke essay on government
The Effectiveness of Spain’s Government John Locke, an English philosopher, believed that an effective government would protect people’s natural rights; life, liberty, and property. Spain is a country in Southwestern Europe with a parliamentary constitutional monarchy. The leader of their government is the Prime Minister, Mariano Rajoy. It has a population of 48,958,159, the main language amongst them being Castilian Spanish. Following John Locke’s standard, Sapin is doing a good job at protecting citizens natural rights, although there are definitely areas that could be improved. The first natural right is the right to “life.” this right means that the government should protect people’s lives. According to the information on NationMaster.com, spain has a low average of .9 murders per 100,000 people of the population. It does have a significantly higher amount of assault cases. The average assault rate per 100,00 of the population is 414.7. It ranks 11 out of 66 counties surveyed. Despite this Many travel sites such as TripAdvisor claim that Spain is “one of the safest European Countries to visit.” The main warning on these sites are of pickpocketing crimes on tourists in densely populated areas. …show more content…
The second natural right is the right to “liberty.” This right says that citizens have the right to be free in most aspects such as freedom of speech, expression, and so on.
The Heritage Foundation says that Spain is number sixty nine on the scale of most economically free out of one hundred eighty countries. This puts Spain in the “moderately free” category. Spain is in the upper half of the spectrum, half, of course, being ninety. Along with this, Wikipedia’s list of Freedom Indices state that Spain is “moderately free” and in a satisfactory
situation. The final natural right is the right of “property.” This right states that people should have the right to own objects, and nobody else should be able to take or use them without the owner's consent. NationMaster.com states that an average of about 878.9 burglaries occurred per one hundred thousand people of the population. It also mentions that 271.9 per one hundred thousand of the population are victims of auto theft. The Heritage foundation claims that Spain does protect the right of property. They are however slow at enforcing contracts. The Spanish government is constantly flooded with property related crimes, this leads to the government being slow at protecting the people. With this information in mind, Spain is doing a decent job at protecting the citizens natural rights, however there are definitely areas that can be improved. If I were to suggest an improvement, I would say to add cameras in densely populated areas and tourist attractions, this way the crime among visitors will go down and criminals will be caught. I would also suggest higher surveillance on these areas. My final suggestion is to have more workers to enforce contracts, this would result in much less if a wait for property related crimes. Overall Spain is considered a safe place to visit and does protect people’s natural rights.
People in both Venezuela and in Fahrenheit 451 are not allowed to speak out or go against the government without the government's harsh retaliation. Both of these instances show suppression of freedom of speech, but this theme is more strongly expressed by Maduro’s actions.
The difference between the two monarchies’ plan for a centralized state was the method in which both were carried out. In the time of the New Monarchies, religion was integral to unifying the state. Monarchs such as Isabella of Castile tried to unify their countries as a result of religious purification. Isabella believed firmly that a stable Spain would only stem from a Catholic Spain. As a result, the reconquista was initiated and unification took place around the church. The monarchs insisted on religious conformity. In addition, parliamentary institutions were ignored or even sometimes abolished in order to centralize and bring peace to the state. Townspeople, the target of monarchs for support, were willing to let parliaments be dominated by the king, for parliaments p...
The first main difference in Spanish countries is food traditions. Most of the food there is ritualistic and sacred. With the different foods that they have, they have different
Everywhere in the world something happens. No place is safe. Often this is due to the lack of laws, but in other cases is only terrorism. Safety is something similar between Venezuela and Miami because in the two places that I have lived, there have been terrorist attacks. For example, in 2009 and in 2010 two synagogue in Caracas ware attacked and destroyed. Last year a rabbi was killed walking in the streets. By chance these two attacks are against Jews, but not only these things happen to Jews because every day you hear something different. It is true that are places where insecurity is more than
Who has the greater legitimacy to represent the people? The president or the legislatures. In comparing the Chilean 1970 Presidential Election to 1979 Spanish appointment of Adolfo Suirez as Prime Minister, Linz notes “Allende received a six-year mandate for controlling the government even with much less than a majority of the popular vote, while Suirez, with a plurality of roughly the same size, found it necessary to work with other parties to sustain a minority government”. Linz supports the fusion of the executive and legislative branches because it forces a sense of cooperation. He points out that “presidential systems may be more or less dependent on the cooperation of the legislature; the balance between executive and legislative power in such systems can thus vary considerably” Linz admits that “presidential elections do offer the indisputable advantage of allowing the people to choose their chief executive openly, directly, and for a predictable span rather than leaving that decision to the backstage maneuvering of the politicians.” but qualifies it by stating that it is only and beneficial if the majority of the people of spoken. In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Shugart’s critical appraisal of “The Perils of Presidentialism” they offer counter arguments when they suggest that a bicameral parliament can just as easily have dual legitimacy issues as a President and legislative body. It should be recognized that Linz does not address the checks and balances that allows for a more regulated government ensuring that power is not concentrated in the hands of one group. Nor does he address that elections
The Spanish Inquisition was used for both political and religious reasons and founded by the Catholic Kings in 1478 . Spain at the time was a nation-state that was born out of religious struggle between numerous different belief systems including Catholicism, Islam, Protestant and Judaism. Following the Crusades and the Reconquest of Spain by the Christian Spaniards the leaders of Spain needed a way to unify the country into a strong nation.
As the Declaration of Independence states, everyone should be able to uphold the rights of “the enjoyment of life and liberty…and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety” (“Declaration of Independence”). A well organized government can ensure these rights.
Juan Linz – The Perils of Presidentialism. Discussions of which constitutional form of government best serves the growing number of democratic nation’s are in constant debate all over the world. In the essay “The Perils of Presidentialism”, political scientist, Juan Linz compares the parliamentary system with presidential democracies. As the title of Linz’s essay implies, he sees Presidentialism as potentially dangerous and sites fixed terms, the zero-sum game and legitimacy issues to support his theory. According to Linz, the parliamentary system is the superior form of democratic government because the Prime Minister cannot appeal to the people without going through the Parliament, creating a more cohesive form of government.
La Movida began when Dictator Francisco Franco died in Madrid on November 19th, 1975. Franco’s 36-year reign had been one in which rigid public and church laws preserved the traditional role of family, enforced formal relations between the sexes, and controlled expression in the press and media. Eager to distance themselves from Franco’s repression and censorship, Spain quickly began the move to democracy called the “Transition”. King Juan Carlos I helped the transition by quickly naming Adolfo Suárez Prime Minister. Spain’s first democratic vote in over 40 years took place in 1977, and a new constitution was signed in 1978. That constitution is still in place now. In 1979, Enrique Tierno Galván became the mayor of Madrid, the capital of Spain. In this position he had a lot of power to help or hinder La Movida. His choices helped Spain to move past its repressive past. Then, in 1982 the Socialist PSOE party, headed by Felipe González, was voted in by a landslide and became Spain’s first leftist government since the 1930s.
Franco craved tradition and order regardless of the cost or the will of the people it was impacting. His strict application of Spain-exclusive Fascism supported the long sustaining Fascist rule. Peter Preston authored The Spanish Holocaust Inquisition and Extermination in Twentieth-Century Spain in which he notes the atrocities which occurred in Spain were over looked or unknown by many people of the time despite its historical significance. “In quashing democracy and timid agricultural reform, and in restoring the traditional hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, the army, big landowners and an authoritarian state, the Spanish version of fascism was very much a fundamentalist movement.”(Hochschild- Process of Extermination) Preston notes although Spanish Fascism did not have the stigmatism of the Holocaust attached to it or the numbers to compare, Spain and Franco’s Fascism should be recognized for its impressive ability to stay operable after the downfall of Fascism in Europe after the War. He attributes this success to Franco as a leader. One of the best explanations of Franco and his intentions is described in the Country Study of Spain commissioned by
In order to understand the effects of the Spanish Civil War, the atmosphere of Spain prior to 1936 needs to be understood as well. Spain, unlike major European powers, never experienced a bourgeois revolution and was therefore still dominated by a significant aristocracy. However, Spain had gone through several civil wars and revolutions making violence one of the most common devices for change. It, also, had undergone several cycles of reform, reaction from the opposition, and reversal by military uprising led by a dictator before 1936 (Preston 18).
Mexico politics take framework of presidential representative whose government that is based on congressional system. The country has the president as head of both state and government, and multi-party system. The government represents Mexico and divided by three branches that are: executive, legislative and judicial. Currently the president of Mexico is Enrique Pena Nieto that is trying to transform Mexico for a better future. The paper, New Internationalist, expressed doubt because he comes from the Inst...
Spain, the third largest country in Europe, has a strong history and diverse culture dating back to when the Iberians first inhabited the land. The country lies between the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean and the land ranges from mountains to meadows. Over hundreds of centuries, many different civilizations have inhabited the land influencing the people there today. From the Visigoths and Celts to the Romans of the Middle Ages, Spain has received a rich history and background. One of the strongest of its cultures is the food. All of these cultures brought a particular type of food and combined and blended with the food that exists there today. Spain is very popular for olives, vineyards, and citrus fruit. Another well-liked food is garlic, including varieties of peppers and spices. Once spice specifically—golden saffron—is essential in many recipes, including the Spanish Paella. There are many distinguished Spanish foods that encompass the daily life and culture of the country.
Francisco Franco was an army general and dictator that ruled over Spain from 1939 until he died in 1975. He made his rise to dictatorship during the Spanish Civil War. Help from Germany and Italy set up his forces to overthrow the Second Republic. Adopting the title of “El Caudillo”, The Leader, Franco persecuted his political opponents and repressed the culture and language of Spain’s regions. He censured the media and took absolute control over the country. If it wasn’t for the lack of involvement in World War II, Franco’s dictatorship may have been brought down or not lasted until his death.