Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
International relations theories
International relations theories
Theories of international relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: International relations theories
1. The European integration roots back to the suggestion of the image of power and nations’ superiority with cooperation with what is foreign to one’s own nation. This suggests the concept of nation-states as an idea that groups together the differences of international regions; the concept of nation-states also pedigrees from the idea of a foreign policy. This suggested a strategic an ideal interplay of interests that suggest the benefits in knowing and cooperation with other nations.
2. A contextual analysis of the European Integration as proposed by the Grand Theory with disrespect and respect to the idea of nation states. The theory offers three main points concerning the EU integrations, (a) Neofunctionalism, (b) Intergovernmentalism
…show more content…
There is the Eurosceptic notion of the United Kingdom that has more or less an influence on the international view on the EU that hinders smooth-sailing integration. The United Kingdom stand to be in different terms on what the EU should be and has inclination for a better deal for the UK, but seems to be in incongruity with other nation-states.
6. The nation-state builds the union, but at the same time it is one that gives room for the international to criticize its legitimacy and credibility for further integration. The capacity of the EU for integration is as limited and as varying as one would suggest it to be. The idea of an integrated EU will not a an easy road because the EU itself has no constant definition of the idea of integration because the members states suggests different levels of with they would like to integrate, which limits, as whole, the integration.
5. The vast variation of the EU has been at an intellectual level of analysis, been the root cause of its challenges because the union has ‘bitten off, more than it can chew’. With a vast amount differentiated nation-states and the unions constant changes in short time periods, they are not able to handle crucial complications among the member states. Further integration is highly beneficial but the process towards it may have an otherwise non-beneficial
Working unitedly is a basic thing to do if you have one to 10 people, but with almost a whole country working as a union is a significant and a spontaneous deal. Which Union am I talking about? The European Union, of course! This Union holds virtually all of the European Countries with 28 countries. Unfortunately, some countries never did join because of losing sovereignty.
Do you believe that the European Union has united Europe? A supranational cooperation is a when countries give up some control of their affairs as they work together to achieve shared goals. The European countries have used supranational cooperation to create the European Union because they want to prevent future wars, and rebuild the weak economy that had formed after the two wars. The European Union has united Europe because it has made Europe have a common currency called the Euro, has a common “government” for the European Union, and has all of the countries influenced when one country that is part of the European Union be in “trouble”.
The European Union is an example of successful political globalization as there is stability in the region. The European Union has united several countries, specifically “twenty seven European countries” (Davies 1) and there has been benefits to this system. There has been a “reduction in crime, a rise in population, life expectancy and income as well as an improving government.” (Rich 3). Through this political system there has been improvement in not only in the government but in the people’s wellbeing.
”Examine the extent to which the benefits of UK membership in the European Union outweigh the costs” Economic integration is the joining of economic policies between different states/regions. This eliminates tariff and non-tariff barriers to the flow of goods, services and factors of production between the regions. Economic integration has varying levels referred to as trading blocs; these are a form economic integration. A trading bloc is a group of nations that have been made a bilateral or multilateral agreement. There are four types of trading blocs.
On the other hand, UK is playing a major role in the single market. Thus, by leaving this market, UK
Both the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) are strategies developed by the European Union in regards to their dealings with the ‘outside’ world. The European Neighborhood Policy finds its obstacles in the once superpower of the Russians, and their conflicting neighborhood policy. Whereas the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy finds its obstacles through its numerous memberships which on the outside one would consider a boon of combined knowledge, but when their insurmountable differences become involved it is a burden. The European Union unfortunately has become known for being a hypocritical organization, playing the mantra ‘do as I say not as I do’. Moreover, the European Union takes its power for granted and assumes “itself as a superior embodiment of soft power and a model of peace, democracy and prosperity in the region.” After the Cold War, the EU set out to develop a new phase of expansion and integration. One of the topics related to the process of European Union integration is the concern of a European Identity, and what it means to be ‘European’. The EU has struggled to define itself as a “Multicultural community sharing a set of universal values” , conversely defining what it means by ‘multiculturalism’ has become the center of political conflict within its governments. The conundrum may be if the European Union wants to keep the European feeling, then why should it bring in a country that is not European? But then again what is European? The debate over this term is one that surrounds the history of Europe and the possible futures available for the European Union. Is the EU or any nations allowed within it defined by the geographic constructs shown on th...
Thomassen, J. 2009. The Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. In: Thomassen, J. Eds. The Legitimacy of the European Union after Enlargement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 67-86.
The EU is a union of sovereign European states who share sovereignty based on treaty. The union also possesses competences in policy sectors with exclusive jurisdiction in the area of Economic and Monetary Union while others are shared with Member States (MS), the other powers belong to MS as derived from the conferral of powers art 5(2) TEU, 2(1) TFEU art.3 & 4 TFEU additionally other powers have been offered by the decisions of the European Court for direct effect on citizens
Much of the political case for regional economic integration stems from national security. Another case study provided by Hill is the European Union. The nation states of Western Europe bonded together in an effort to deal with the political giants of the USSR to the east and the USA to the west. Further, regional economic integration can facilitate political harmony between nations due to their increased level of
Many authors have examined solidarity within the European Union. Ferrera concludes that solidarity beyond the nation-state has grown (2008). She basis this on a study of the EU, and the growth of member state sovereignty. Sangiovanni also examines the EU, concluding that the EU...
The European Union stands on the threshold of unparalleled change over the coming years. The next waves of enlargement will be unprecedented in nature and continental in scale. This process has gained so much political momentum that it is now irreversible.
The enlargement of the European Union (EU) in 2004 and 2007 has been termed as the largest single expansion of the EU with a total of 12 new member states – bringing the number of members to 27 – and more than 77 million citizens joining the Commission (Murphy 2006, Neueder 2003, Ross 2011). A majority of the new member states in this enlargement are from the eastern part of the continent and were countries that had just emerged from communist economies (EC 2009, Ross 2011), although overall, the enlargement also saw new member states from very different economic, social and political compared to that of the old member states (EC 2009, Ross 2011). This enlargement was also a historical significance in European history, for it saw the reunification of Europe since the Cold War in a world of increasing globalization (EC 2009, Mulle et al. 2013, Ross 2011). For that, overall, this enlargement is considered by many to have been a great success for the EU and its citizens but it is not without its problems and challenges (EC 2009, Mulle et al. 2013, Ross 2011). This essay will thus examine the impact of the 2004/2007 enlargements from two perspectives: firstly, the impact of the enlargements on the EU as a whole, and thereafter, how the enlargements have affected the new member states that were acceded during the 2004/2007 periods. Included in the essay will be the extent of their integration into the EU and how being a part of the Commission has contributed to their development as nation states. Following that, this essay will then evaluate the overall success of the enlargement process and whether the EU or the new member states have both benefited from the accessions or whether the enlargement has only proven advantageous to one th...
This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics.
...en a success, from six to twenty-seven member states. Despite the one major concern, the loss of national sovereignty, many countries reap benefits of being an EU member. As with the primary signing of treaties upon becoming a member of the EU, countries choose to give up part of their individualism. All countries that have joined despite internal sceptics, have acknowledged the benefits of tackling problems at a global level with collective decision-making, which they could have not possibly alter working as a lone nation. As to what direction the EU will take is for now down to the member states, but it is evident that the continuous pooling of sovereignty is essential in order to achieve the shared objectives and if countries want to see change they can protect their sense of identity while sharing sovereignty and continually building on the “ever closer union”.
In answering the question which is more applicable to the EU situation we must look first at the challenges that need to be overcome, as the EU transitions from its position now into a complete government. The most difficult part of forming a true European Federation is convincing its increasingly Eurosceptic population that there can be a Pan-European government in which member states will still be able to preserve their national identity and remain in control of areas of politics that can also be handled at state