Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The six ethical principles
Reflection on ethical principles
Fundamental principles of ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The six ethical principles
Ethical Principles Notes
There are many ethical principles.
e.g. a woman has a right to control what happens to her body
we should respect life
we should do no harm to others
we should help others
there should be justice in the distribution of resources
Some principles are more general than others. So some principles are special cases of more general ones. For instance, the right to control what happens to one's body is a special case of the principle of autonomy, the right to control one's own life.
Hébert identifies 3 main general principles:
Autonomy, Beneficence, and Justice.
There may be other principles which are not special cases of these, e.g. respecting life.
We can generally all agree to general principles, such as autonomy and beneficence. The disagreement comes over cases where the principles conflict, e.g., in abortion right, autonomy conflicts with beneficence.
If a principle covers a case, it creates a duty.
For example, it a person wishes to do something you disagree with, you have a duty to respect her autonomy.
However, duties can be divided into two kinds:
"Prima facie" and "Absolute"
A prima facie duty is something you should do if there are no stronger reasons for doing something different. Prima facie duties can be trumped by other moral considerations.
An absolute duty is something you should do no matter what. Nothing can trump an absolute duty. (There is some dispute about whether any absolute duties exist.)
Rights and Duties
If a person has a right to X, then she must get X (other things being equal.)
If a person has a duty to do Y, then she must do Y (other things being equal).
Not all right and wrong can be expressed in terms of rights or duties.
But some good actions are not duties. Someone can go above and beyond the call of duty. I can be kind to someone I don't like even though I may have no moral duty to do so.
The fact that a person has a right to do Y does not mean that Y is good.
Duty may be performed without strain or reflection of desire, which means your duty, or responsibility, should be performed without hesitation. “Dutifulness could be an account of a morality with no hint of religion” (Murdoch 364). Religion’s demand for morality and being good trumps a person’s decision to
The prima facie duties that William David Ross has listed include duties of fidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, and non-maleficence. Duties of fidelity and reparation rest on previous acts that one has performed, and acting on these duties are acts such as promise-keeping (duties of fidelity) and making amends for previous wrongful acts (duties of reparation), while duties of gratitude rest on previous acts that others have performed. There is a duty associated with the distribution of pleasure or good regardless of its recipient, and this is termed as duties of justice. An additional duty rests on the mere fact that there are other beings in this world to whom we can be of assistance to: duties of beneficence. Duties of self-improvement claim that there are intrinsic moral reasons for one to improve oneself and finally, duties of non-maleficence states that there are intrinsic moral reasons to not harm others. Duties are placed on the list only when they have been judged to be basic moral reaso...
Human Beings have been divided into different categories .There are certain kind of jobs to do in this world. Whatever the job we do, we have to do it sincerely and it is our responsbility to fulfill all the requirements our job requires from us.Once committed to our job, we have to be sincere, honest, devoted and responsible.
This act also covers sexual harassment in the workplace. Discrimination disrupt good order and discipline and creates a hostile environment. These actions are considered immoral and as law-abiding citizens, it is our duty to intervene to curtail these types’ actions. Duty theory talks about two approaches, the first imply we all have a catalog of instinctive obligations. The Ten Commandments is a perfect example because it speaks about not killing, committing adultery, covet thy neighbor things and bear false witness. These practices have been adopted by many cultures, which play an important role in their
...iable above all the others. This principle is the framework of what the code of conduct is based on.
We as a society have acted upon our obligations in the past, such as during World War 2, yet the occasional dose of action is not what we are supposed to desire as humans. We can not say “I will help these people who are being abused today, yet these people yesterday are on their own.”. Moral obligation is not something so fickle as we wish to make it seem. Although the proposal I have left you with is tough to chew on, it is the right principle to act upon if we are to improve human life and live morally good lives.
According to Kant “… nothing can protect us from a complete falling away from our idea of duty and preserve in the soul a well-grounded respect for duty’s law except the clear conviction that, even if there never have been actions springing from such pure source, the question at issue here is not whether this or that happened but that reason of itself and independently of all experience commands what ought to happen.” (Kant, Page 20(lines 407-412)). Kant points out that the duty is done not because of the ends but because of what is fundamentally good or
In order to act, one must have will, which is the determination of the mind to act. Kant argues that we need good will because it is not only good in itself but to develop it, we also must have reason behind it. According to Kant, one’s personal will is only good if they are motivated by nothing other than duty. Kant argues that to fulfill our moral obligations, we must act from duty and offers three essential principles. The first proposition states that an action must be done from duty in order to have moral worth. Therefore we must act from duty rather than act in accordance with duty because then our action would not be morally worthy. The second proposition, maxims, states that an action done from duty has moral worth in the maxim that guides it. Kant clearly proposes that an action must be done for its own sake instead of the sake for anything else, “an action from duty h...
...ulness. These principles are great supportive decree to the dilemma you may encounter. These principles also serve as the cornerstone of ethical guideline in the counseling profession (Corey, Corey & Callanan, 2011).
As opposed to Naturalism, the ethical theory of duty occupies a completely different domain. Immanuel Kant, the major advocate of this ethical appro...
“The traditional professing of duty states an intention to serve the community rather than merely to seek income.” (Macionis, Page 384)
I will also articulate my positions regarding proposals from John Arthur, Peter Singer, and Immanuel Kant. John Arthur, an American philosopher, states that “this idea can be expressed rather awkwardly by the notion of entitlements, by which I have in mind the thought that having either a right or justly deserving something can also be important as we think about our obligations to others.” The other side of the coin would be the views of Peter Singer, an Australian moral philosopher, states that “...if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.” Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, believes that “The practical necessity of acting on this principle -- that is, duty -- is not based on at all on feelings, impulses, and inclinations, but only on the relation of rational beings to one another, a relation in which the will of a rational being must be regarded as lawgiving, because otherwise it could not be thought of as an end in
The importance of duty varies and depends on how one thinks about a rule or how absolute the rule is, because it sets absolute rules. Dr. Wigand was inclined towards his duty by giving his interview, even though it produced bad results for himself. He did also break a promise to the tobacco company. Wigand’s duties are in conflict and it makes it difficult for him to decide which duty is more important. In my opinion, I would not say doing my duty is more important compared to the moral obligation that must be satisfied.
have regard for another man’s well-being. Just like the duty to self-preservation, this principle may
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, duty is” the action and conduct due to a superior, homage, submission; due respect, reverence; an _expression of submission, deference, or respect. The writer feels that a duty based would not lye to another person or lye for another person the writer feels that if someone thought you were lying to him or her, you cannot be trusted. When you start out lying about something you have to keep on lying to cover up the first lye you started out with. Most people that lye are scared of getting in to trouble. Other peoples that lye just like telling stories. Some people can look you right in the face and they will be lying to you. You can make things worse if you lie for someone, for them and for yourself. They can wound up getting in to trouble for lying. The person for whom they are lying can say they have no clue what that person is talking about. They can say they never asked anyone to lye for them. If you lye for someone else, you are just as guilty as the person you are lying for. If someone asks you to lye for them, you should ask yourself why are they not telling the truth. The writer feels that you shou...