Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of ethics in the social work profession
Understanding social work ethics
Identifying and Understanding Ethics in the Clinical Social Work
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction The National Association of Social Workers (NASW, 2008) defines social work as a helping profession in which individuals, groups and/or communities are assisted by social workers to enhance or restore their ability to function. NASW also notes that: social work practice consists of the professional application of social work values, principles, and standards in helping people obtain services; providing counseling and psychotherapy with individuals, families, and groups; helping communities or groups provide or improve social and health services; as well as participating in relevant legislative processes. As a result, social workers are routinely challenged to make decisions that involve ethical issues or dilemmas (Dolgoff, Harrington & Loewenberg, 2012). Some decisions involve disclosing confidential information without a client’s consent (for example, when a client threatens to harm himself, herself, or someone else); limiting a client’s right to self-determination against his or her wishes (for example, when a social worker pursues involuntary psychiatric hospitalization of a troubled …show more content…
client); or social contact with a former client (Reamer, 2002). Successfully identifying and resolving ethical dilemmas are essential skills for guaranteeing the best interest of clients while reducing the risk of legal and/or ethical complaints. In an effort to resolve an ethical dilemma, social workers should follow an ethical decision making process. This process involves examining the Social Work Code of Ethics as well as applying Ethical Rules and Principles which service as a guide when the social worker must choose between two or more contradictory ethical directives. This paper will explore this ethical decision making process. Ethical Decision Making Process According to Dolgoff et al. (2012), the source of ethical problems lies in competing values (two or more choices) and competing loyalties (conflicting groups making claims). As a result, social workers should consider the following questions when engaging in ethical decision making: who is my client? What obligations do I owe my client(s)? Do I have professional obligations to people other than my client(s)? What are my obligations to my own family, my agency, and my profession? What are my own personal values? Are these values compatible with the values of my profession and with societal values? What are my ethical priorities when these value sets differ or even conflict? And finally, what is the ethical way to respond to conflicting professional responsibilities to different people? Social workers base their professional values on societal values (Dolgoff et al., 2012). The Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW, 2008) which summarizes the core values of the profession and should be the first source a social worker consults when facing an ethical dilemma (Dolgoff et al, 2012). When consulting the Code to determine which, if any, of the rules are applicable, a social worker must remember that these rules take precedence over a social worker’s personal value system. If one or more of the Code rules apply, then a social worker should follow the Code according to Ethical Rules Screen (ERS) (Dolgoff et al, 2012). However, if the Code does not address the specific problem or several Code rules provide conflicting guidance, then a social worker should use the ethical Principles Screen (EPS) (Dolgoff et al, 2012). The EPS, formulated by Kitchner, cites that all ethical principles are important; however, when more than one ethical principle is involved, then the ranking order of the principles in the EPS can be used to make a decision (Dolgoff et al, 2012). The ranked ethical principles found in the EPS are: 1-Protection of Life; 2-Social Justice; 3- Self Determination; 4-Least Harm; 5-Quality of Life; 6- Privacy and Confidentiality; and 7-Truthfulness and Full Disclosure. In a case of principles in conflict, the satisfaction of the of a higher–order principle takes precedence over the satisfaction of the lower-order principle. There are also additional factors to consider when making an ethical decision. Ethical theories (Osmo & Landau, 2006) and trauma informed practice (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2014) are also used to assist social workers in recognizing and understanding the principles on which their ethical decisions are based. Osmo & Landau (2006) define two kinds of ethical theories: 1) those that focus on the principles of actions such as deontological (i.e.: respect for the individual person and recognition of the user’s right to freely make their own decisions and choices); and 2) those with utilitarian orientations (i.e.: utility and justice). SAMHSA (2014) which take into consideration the correlations among traumatic stress, substance use disorders, and co-occurring mental health disorders that may overwhelm an individual’s capacity to cope, resulting in substance abuse, alcoholism, and smoking as ways to cope with trauma symptoms, behaviors which can complicate the helping profession. Whatever method a social worker chooses to resolve ethical problems; the decision should go a through a well thought out process that can be clearly noted for future reference. The Ethical Dilemma An exemplar was chosen for this purpose of this paper, from appendix A of the textbook, Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice (Dolgoff et al, 2012)—specifically, Exemplar 4, Potential Harm Versus Confidentiality.
In the chosen exemplar, a 15-year-old female client told her social worker that she was dealing drugs with her boyfriend, who was recently release from jail for selling drugs. The client’s parents have forbidden their daughter to have contact with the boyfriend and asked the social worker to contact them if their daughter tells her she is seeing him again. As I reviewed the Code and thought about what to do, I was reminded of one of the questions social workers should consider when making an ethical decision. Who is my client? I know my client is the 15-year-old female but since she is an under age adolescent are her parents also my
clients?
Working with people can be challenging, but so rewarding all at the same time. As humans, we are certainly not perfect and we are making mistakes daily. Making decisions is one thing that does not come easily to us, and depending on the day you can get multiple different answers to one situation. The NASW Code of Ethics is an extremely helpful tool when we are working with clients and something that does not ever waiver in ethical decision-making. If we are working in the Social work profession, then we must insure we are making the correct decision for everyone who is involved with the client.
Handon, R. M. (2014, December). Client Relationships and Ethical Boundaries for Social Workers in Child Welfare. The New Social Worker, (winter), 1-6.
As a student new to social work, The Code of Ethics written by the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) is in the forefront of my mind whenever practicing my freshly learned skills. According to the Code, these rules were written as the “values, principles, and standards to guide social workers’ conduct” (Code of Ethics - NASW, n.d.). Within my most-recent session, certain aspects of this code were relevant, including informed consent, privacy and confidentiality, a commitment to the client, the dignity and worth of a person, the importance of human relationships, integrity and competency of the worker, and social diversity.
To conclusion this, ethical issues rising in social work have regularly received substantial attention but responses to them have habitually been premised on the conviction that professional boundaries are clear for all to see and are professionally determined on the basis of separation and passivity as opposed to connection and dynamism. Working together with the client in the setting of professional boundaries is most likely to have a optimistic impact on the quality of the relationships we have with clients itself a vital factor in successful outcomes.
The ethical dilemma in my conflict is that I, as an individual providing information and listening to the stories of domestic violence survivors, do not allow my past life experience to affect the outcomes of clients. Being that my agency oversees the eighteen domestic violence agencies in the State of Connecticut, I work with a very diverse population and at times encounter situations where self-disclosure is a complex issue. Self-disclosure to clients raises numerous boundary issues which in turn can result in conflicts of interest in a relationship with a client. By over identifying with clients, I risk the boundary line becoming blurred and the possibility of treating my own needs and experiences rather than my clients. The Code of Ethics (2015) states that a social worker should not let their own personal problems interfere with their professional judgement and performance which can jeopardize the best interest of the people for whom they have a professional responsibility.
Social workers will face ethical dilemmas when working with clients throughout their career. As a social work intern, it is important to understand the ethical standards of the profession in order to make the best possible decision in regards to any dilemma that might be encountered. Relevant to social workers today, especially in regards to working in a school setting with clients who are minors, there seems to be a conflict that exists between the standards of self-determination/confidentiality and professional conduct. Students tend to disclose a lot of information that brings these standards into conflict and the professional social worker has to use their judgment in deciding how to handle the situation.
Loewenberg, F. M., & Dolgoff, R. (1996). Ethical decisions for social work practice (4th ed.). Itasca, Ill: F.E. Peacock Publishers.
As a part of the National Association of Social Workers, social workers may face different kinds of ethical dilemmas in their scope of practice. The code of ethics is put in place so that these professionals may be able to act wisely and make the most suitable and appropriate decisions thereby positively benefitting the client likewise themselves. An ethical dilemma is a conflict between two or more ethical principles. These ethical principles aim to provide beneficense, least harm, respect for autonomy, and provide justice. I will discuss three ethical dilemmas affecting human rights in social work.
Social workers have responsibilities to their clients to respect their privacy, and if the client cannot trust us in that, a rapport will never be form. Social workers must fight for the confidentiality of individuals, including families. Social workers are legally obligated to respect the privacy of their clients, and keep their information away from any third parties (NASW, 2008, p.7-8). Advocating for all those standards, would assure clients that social workers are really looking out for their well-being. When rights are taking away from clients, it’s our job as social worker to take up the necessary role and connect the clients with resources. For example, if a client’s health information has been violated by an insurance it’s our job to connect them to a better
Social work is a profession. For its profession, social workers must have knowledge of special areas, and follow its ethics and values. They also have skill sets to do their practices. Being a student of social work, and an intern at a center for adult day health care, I prepare myself to step on the career pathway of practicing social work in all macro-mezzo-micro levels, and promoting the values and ethics for this profession. The rest of this essay is a hypothetical case study that me as a school social worker engages with in practice with multiple systems involving individuals, families, groups, organizations, institutions, communities, and societies, along with applying the standards of the NASW Code of Ethics, relevant laws, and regulations, models for ethical decision-making to demonstrate ethical and professional behavior.
Conditions of “engaging in appropriate study, training, and consultation,” while having competent people in intervention or techniques providing supervision is ethical (Code of Ethics, n.d.). Another criteria that defines competence in the field of social-work recognizes the role of the practitioner regarding identifying and targeting families that are troublesome, along with the negotiation of access which requires special consideration (Spratt, 2011). The profession of the social worker is to design alternative examples while viewing issues in order to understand and act upon social problems (Spratt, 2011). Through the continued required development of support and one’s understanding, along with the appreciation of the position the practitioner might take in the development of solutions rendering it effective, and considerations are made regarding what leads to harms taking place over the life-span (Spratt, 2011). As an example to substantiate this claim of competence, we see social workers working within their professional boundaries, while attempting to perfect their development in the field in order to “advance their expertise” (Code of Ethics,
In reading the Jones case, it is apparent that there are many different ethical dilemmas present throughout the entire scenario, and not only do many of these dilemmas violate the social workers Code of Ethics, they also violate Laws and standards of practice (SOPs). While analyzing the ethical dilemmas, I kept in mind the core values of social work and thought of multiple different strategies in which I could apply these values to positively impact the Jones family and practice ethical behavior.
The social worker is guided by a professional code of ethics in assisting people to achieve an effective level of psychosocial functioning and effecting social change to improve the well-being of everyone. Social work is founded on the principles of service; social and economic justice; personal dignity and worth; the importance of human relationships; integrity; and competence” (Daley &Haas, 2011, p.3).
The social work profession and its Code of Ethics dictate that social workers must act in the best interest of the client, even when those actions challenge the practitioner’s personal, cultural and religious values. In practice; however, ethical decision-making is more complex than in theory. As helping professionals, social workers are constantly faced with ethical decision-making or ethical dilemmas. As noted by Banks (2005), an ethical dilemma occurs “when a worker is faced with a choice between two equally unwelcome alternatives that may involve a conflict of moral principles, and it is not clear what choice will be the right one” (as cited in McAuliffe & Chenoweth, 2008, p. 43). In addition, ethical decision-making is a process that
Especially, section 1. Social workers’ ethical responsibilities to clients. Within section 1, there is 1.02 self-determination. According to the NASW (2008), section 1.02 which states “Social workers respect and promote the right of clients to self-determination and assist clients in their efforts to identify and clarify their goals. Social workers may limit clients’ right to self-determination when, in the social workers’ professional judgment, clients’ actions or potential actions pose a serious, foreseeable, and imminent risk to themselves or others.” Self-determination is one of the foundation of social work’s sole mission and