Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics and divorce
Ethical and moral issues about divorce
Ethical and moral issues about divorce
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics and divorce
A wife is wanting a divorce after discovering her husband’s unfaithfulness, however, the husband does not wish to get a divorce. Rachel Anne contacted an attorney in order to begin the divorce proceedings and Eugene seemed accepting of the divorce until child custody became a controversy point. Rachel Anne and Eugene agreed to enter mediation with Greg as their mediator. (ACU, 2015).
Minister’s Role as Counselor and Mediator
I am or have been in the past both minster and friend to both Rachel Anne and Eugene and hold these relationships as significant, however, for the purposes of this mediation I am also serving as your mediator. Because I have been meeting with Eugene at church, privately for counseling, everything said during those private
…show more content…
283). Rachel Anne is from a tradition religious family and was brought up to value the teachings of the church and adultery is an ethical issue which goes directly against her faith. However, Eugene comes from a different type of upbringing, being raised by a single mother without a steady father figure in his life.
Pre-marital Sex
Though Rachel Anne knew of Eugene’s pre-marital sexual relations and he admitted the transgressions, it still is an important ethical issue for Rachel Anne. Pre-marital sex “refers to sexual relations that occur prior to marriage” and is referred to as fornication in the Bible (Thiroux and Krasemann, pg. 275). Rachel Anne admits Eugene’s behavior prior to their marriage bothered her before the recent events and she states she does not want the children to think it acceptable to partake in such acts.
Homosexual Sex
Homosexual sex, in this case, the “sexual attraction or love for a man by a man” (Thiroux and Krasemann, pg. 281) violates the traditional teachings of Rachel Anne’s religion. (Thiroux and Krasemann, pg. 272). Eugene has admitted he had participated in such acts before his marriage to Rachel Anne but did not disclose these acts until after their
In his play “On Tidy Endings, a lover and ex-wife have gathered to sign documents and tie up loose ends after the death of a man. It was during the conception of this play that most Americans mandated being homosexual was a crime against god. These actions came because of a belief that god created man for woman, and woman for man. I believe Mr. Fierstein’s theme is to show people same sex marriage does not differ from any other, but it is the judgment by those who do not unde...
Marcello became a conformist to conceal his homosexuality. He is sexually awkward with his very attractive wife and compensates for it by bragging about his sex life with male companions, such as Italo. When Italo asks Marcello why he is marrying the simple-minded woman, he tells him “normalcy, stability, and security”. When Marcello spoke with the priest about how he’s pursuing a normal life he told the priest he is marrying a woman who is “all bed and kitchen”. He knows he is different from others and this
At the onset of assessment by a staff-counseling psychologist, the woman seemed to relax and share some of her thoughts and feeling. As the assessment process continued, the psychologist was able to ascertain that the issue with depression appeared to be a relevantly recent development. Additionally, the depression appeared to be the result of heighten conflicts between the woman and her husband pertaining to alleged extra material affairs. In conversation with the psychologist, the woman claimed to feel “overwhelmed”; her husband filing for divorce triggered the feelings she inferred, which reportedly lead to her breakdown. However, the psychologist has since discovered that the husband denies the affairs and attributes this to the depression. Additionally, the husband claims that the termination of the marriage is a result of the deterioration of his wife’s mental state.
In this divorce case, we determine whether the evidence presented to the trial court sufficed to set aside a written property settlement agreement on the grounds of unconscionability and constructive fraud or duress. Sandra Derby argues that the trial court erred in holding the parties' separation agreement invalid since George Derby did not prove fraud, duress, or undue influence. She also argues that George Derby did not prove adultery by clear and convincing evidence and that the judge therefore erred in awarding Mr. Derby a divorce.
He does go on to suggest that those who are sections of androgynes are “adulterers” “adulteresses” (191 d-e), but this can only show the rather bizarre belief that sexual intercourse with a member of the same sex does not constitute adultery.
The speaker has presented his lover with evidence for his argument that being sexually involved with him would be no more sinful than being bitten by a flea because essentially they both involve the same actions; the mixing of bodily fluids, the marriage of the couple, and the conceiving of an innocent beautiful child. We can conclude that sexual acts are not something to be ashamed of, but something that brings two people closer together and creates a deep passion and beauty that simply should not be considered to be shameful or dishonourable.
This ties back into the disgust point in that people generally will inflict their disgust response against women who have had sex before marriage and it does not matter if it was the woman's choice or not. In the book, Beck makes a comment about how sex often is looked upon as unclean or impure, “Sex isn’t just ‘wrong’: there is something ‘unclean’ and often disgusting about the activity” (p.160). When outside people look at those who have had sex before marriage, especially in the christian society, they are looked at as being unclean. However, this generally only applies to women. When men have sex before marriage they usually get a “slap on the wrist” or a talking to. Some even are given encouragement. Women are treated much differently in this situation. This can even be seen in the Bible when Mary is found with child after her engagement to Joseph, “Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly” (Matthew 1:19). Joseph was part of a rare group of people because he did not want Mary to go through the disgrace of the public because the people would not have understood the situation. They would have seen here as disgrace and it would have humiliated her family and back then, engagement was taken very seriously. One could not simply “break up”, it was more like
It is said that, the basic principle of such tradition is that humans communicate through symbols, which are a common currency through which a sense of self is created through interaction with others. Mead's theory neatly avoids the trap of positing a sense of self that is constructed entirely through symbols and society by making a distinction between two different selves: "I" which is the unsocialized self; the font of individual desires and needs, and "me," the socialized self, the self within society. (p. 184) Elliot rightly identifies the flaws of symbolic interactionism: namely, the obsession with rationalism and the wholesale disavowal of the emotional aspects of the self. The American sociologist Irving Goffman would seem to articulate a rather more fluid version of selfhood. Irving's self is constantly engaged in per formative space, routinely playing specific roles within particular scenes of social interaction. (2001) This conceptualization of self too is not without its flaws, for although Irving maintains that there is a self behind the masks, it is not this self but rather its per formative role-playing that appears to be analyzed in Irving's theory.
Divorces are easy to obtain in the United States but the decision needs to be carefully examined. According to statistics, “divorce makes sense in the 10 percent to 15 percent of troubled marriages that involve high-level and persistent conflict with severe abuse and physical violence” (Dafoe 1). In the other 85 to 90 percent of marriages, the marriage can and should be reconciled. Many couples simply take the easy way out, find a lawyer, and end the marriage without ever trying to examine whether or not a conclusion can be reached other than divorce.
Modernist writings have always been hailed for its nuanced relationship with sexuality. This paper looks at the ways E.M. Forster, one of the modernist writers on the fringes, deals with the discourses of sexuality different in ways different from other high modernists against the backdrop of the socio-cultural milieu which was extremely intolerant to homosexuality through his novel Maurice, written in 1913-14 and published posthumously in 1971. To what extent Forster’s homosexuality and his novel on same sex love negotiate with other homosexual writers and activists of the period? The mere fact that Maurice was published posthumously shows the grim situation of homosexual men and women of the time. Now our job is to closely look at the novel and situate its transgressions and liberation in the larger context of same-sex writings of the early twentieth century.
Some of these acts include sodomy, homosexuality, adultery, rape, or simply being a hermaphrodite. He describes all of these acts as “doubtless acts “contrary to nature”” (38).
The story took place from 1642 to 1647, the time when Puritan society in Massachusset believed strongly in the concept of living a perfect life. Hence, such sin like adultery was always considered a mortal sin. The awkwardness came into
Wilde’s view on marriage is known through the characters. For example, Lane insinuates that marriage is boring by stating that the wine is better in the hous...
Mediation is an extension of the negotiation process and shares some similarity with conciliation process.
In order to address this issue, one must first define the concept or meaning of marriage. However, this is a rather subjective approach, because the way we define marriage depends on our own views and interpretations.