Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of a survey as a research method
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of a survey as a research method
Survey research is defined as, "A research method in which an investigator asks questions of a respondent" (Beins, 2013). This type of research is particularly useful for numerous reasons, but also has drawbacks that threatens its validity. Some of these benefits include a large population to select a sample from, the ease of gathering data from the sample, as well as the ability to quickly come to a conclusion regarding the data at hand. However, there are more disadvantages present with survey research. Some such disadvantages include the type of question and its ambiguity, response bias, as well as ethical and cultural issues that present during a survey.
There are two main type of questions within a survey used for research. The first
…show more content…
"Ethical standards also protect the confidentiality and anonymity of the subjects. This is the primary ethical issue in survey research, especially if the survey contains sensitive questions" (Ethical Concerns, n.d, para.7). In addition to keeping respondents anonymous and their data safe, there is numerous other issues that can present during this type of research. One such issue is unlike in a laboratory setting, the researcher cannot aid the respondent if they require aid. Also, unlike in other research settings, researchers conducting survey research cannot guarantee beneficence to the respondents, as while most surveys have descriptions of what it will be used for and by who, there are some that do not, which indicates an ethical …show more content…
I began with questions that would give me insight as to whether any affective disorders were present with the individual prior to the onset of dementia. I then developed questions that would gauge at what severity did the individual with dementia's demeanor changed, as well as how quickly the change took place. In addition I asked several open ended questions regarding whether the affective disorder caused a greater burden on the respondent, and how the affective disorder affected the individual's cognitive impairment. In the Journal of Neuropsychiatry a paper titled "Prevalence of Apathy, Dysphoria, and Depression in Relation to Dementia Severity in Alzheimer's Disease", researchers found that apathy was a very common disorder in those with severe mental degradation. "This study examined the relative frequency of these syndromes and their relation to disease characteristics in 131 research participants with probable or possible AD. Apathy was more prevalent than dysphoria or major depression and was more strongly associated with global disease severity, cognitive impairment, and functional deficits" (Landes, Journal of Neuropsychiatry,
Kelley, K et al. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Oxford Journal. 15 (3): 261-266.
Alzheimer’s disease is a form of dementia, “a brain disorder that seriously affects a person’s ability to carry out daily activities (Shenk 14)”. Alzheimer’s is a progressive and irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys a person’s memory and ability to learn, make judgments, communicate, and accomplish daily activities. As Alzheimer’s progresses, individuals may also experience changes in personality and behavior, such as anxiety, suspiciousness or aggravation, as well as illusions or hallucinations.
The research is not without its limitations. One of the challenges that would be faced would be establishing the accuracy and bias in the various answers given by respondents. Some of the information may be dishonest, biased and unclear. This would render the report unreliable.
Once a participant has given their consent, they are then expected and obligated to be truthful when giving their answers. The other end to this research participant obligation is the obligation of the researcher to keep all answers confidential. When a researcher receives information from a participant regarding their research study, they are required to keep the answers to themselves and refrain from sharing the information with others. However, this obligation can work both ways. Sometimes a researcher may reveal sensitive information to the participant with the expectation that the participant keeps it confidential. Overall, “confidentiality helps ensure truthful responses,” which is the obligation of the research participant (Zikmund & Babin, 2013). An example of the use of confidentiality in a research study that I have been involved in is the promise not to share my email or other contact information when taking an online survey. Before signing up to take surveys, the organization conducting the survey will typically post a confidentiality statement ensuring the participant that they will keep their personal information private. “Ultimately, confidentiality is an issue of trust between respondents and researchers” (Cho & LaRose,
Focusing on surveys and questionnaires, and quantitative research methods, it varies on the person getting questioned as to which method they prefer. Some individuals may prefer to fill in a questionnaire, as it is quick and simple for them, whereas someone else would rather have a face-to-face interview because they may find questionnaires to complicated. Giving people the choice gives the more chance of getting a response overall. It is important that the researchers are aware of the advantages and disadvantages because they will then be aware of what method to use, and will know what method is best to use. It is also an advantage to work with experienced researchers in order to find out the best results.
The questionnaire is a self-completion questionnaire which is sometimes called a self-administered questionnaire. It is to say that respondents completed the questionnaires themselves (Bryman and Bell, 2003). The research conducted an online survey through a professional website called ‘survey monkey’. There is no doubt that it is a cheaper and easier way to collect information for researchers. In addition, it is convenient for respondents as well.
The Advantages and Limitations of Social Surveys in Sociological Research To survey something, is to carry out a systematic overview so that a researcher can produce a comprehensive general report on it. Survey method is often used by positivist sociologists seeking to test their hypotheses, and to investigate causes and examine variables. As with every other sociological research, survey has its own advantages and limitations. Positivist research, which is in the scientific tradition, begins with a hypothesis that can be either confirmed or rejected according to the data collected. One of the significant advantages of survey method is that, it can be used to collect data that is a representative of a larger population.
This particular research had ethical approval from the Cardiff University Ethics Committee. The research says, “The study protocol incorporating the survey questionnaire satisfied all ethical requirements relating to the use of human subjects; formal ethical approval was obtained from the Cardiff University Ethics Committee.” According to Cardiff University Ethics Committee, it’s their job to protect the safety of research subjects while at the same time providing the highest academic standards. The ethical research conducted satisfies the Ethical
There are ethical challenges to be considered in both qualitative and quantitative research. Ethics are “the rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the conduct of the members of a profession” (Lecture 2, Atkinson, 2018). The research must follow the guiding principles of ethics in both qualitative and quantitative research: “ethical goals, protection of rights of human subjects and unbiased research.” (Lecture 2, Atkinson, 2018). Risk to the participant is assessed based on consent, harm, privacy and deception. Quantitative research involves data that are analyzed in the form of numbers. Qualitative research involves data that is recorded and analyzed in the form of descriptions, but not numbers. It is the role of the
Surveys are an effective and popular method for research because of the efficiency, versatility and generalizability. Generalizability is the ability to sample and draw research conclusions for large populations (Bachman & Schutt, 2012). In order to effectively maximize outcomes in survey research, surveys must be structured to avoid unclear or confusing questions. Demographic related questions should be avoided if not pertinent to the research study (Bachman & Schutt, 2012). Generally, the motivation of the researcher is clearly identified in a survey, and the respondent has the option of declining involvement in the survey. There are fewer ethical dilemmas with survey research than other types of research methods.
...sis, which could make all results invalid. With any research projects, limitations will be present. It is important to attempt to eliminate some of these causes in order to complete a thorough, accurate study. In future projects, this study could go about researching the issue in different ways. Perhaps using a larger sample size would be conducive for accurate results. A larger sample size helps reduce and even out any possible errors caused by those who do not answer truthfully. Also, keeping the surveys mainly anonymous would help to receive more truthful and accurate responses from participants. Participants may be fearful of judgments on open interviews or phone interviews, which could affect responses. In order to obtain as accurate results as possible, a future study would need to find ways to survey participants in a confidential way that feels comfortable.
Research questions are formulated in a study to inquire about variables, both independent and dependent variables, and the relationship between them. Research questions are categorized into two, that is, qualitative and quantitative research questions. Qualitative questions are used in qualitative research like case studies, surveys and action research where the approach is non-numerical and analyses special phenomena that occur in nature. Quantitative research on the other hand is more of a systematic approach with measurable numerical quantities that go through analysis to prove a hypothesis. Finally, the research hypothesis is either approved or disapproved with regards to the results of the analysis (Laureate Online Education B.V. 2010). Hypotheses differ from research questions in that, they are predictions that researchers come up with about variables and expected relationships between them (Creswell 2008). Hypotheses are mostly used in experimental exercises and are used in making comparison of groups. Hypotheses are basically formulated in two forms; null and directional hypothesis. Null hypotheses predict the lack of relationship between groups. Alternative hypothesis is categorized into two; directional hypothesis which predicts on an expected outcome and non-directional hypotheses which make predictions without specifying differences and relationships due to lack of past information that can be used to predict the differences. The difference between a hypotheses and a research question lies on the fact that a hypothesis is a tentative statement which is more precise/specific and predicts an outcome. A research question is a general statement compared to a hypothesis (eNotes.com, Inc 2011). A hypothesis predicts an outc...
According to Babbie (1990), it provides a quantitative or numeric description of trends, attitudes, or opinions of a population by studying a sample of that population. It includes cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using questionnaires or structured interviews for data collection, with the intent of generalizing from a sample to a population (Creswell, 2009). It is a popular and common strategy in business and management research and is most frequently used for exploratory and descriptive research. Surveys are popular as they allow the collection of a large amount of data from a sizeable population in a highly economical way. Often obtained by using a questionnaire administered to a sample, these data are standardized, allowing easy comparison. In addition, the survey strategy is perceived as authoritative by people in general and is both comparatively easy to explain and to understand (Saunders et al.