Ethical Guidelines that are Broken in Milgram's Study on Obedience

663 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Summary of milgram's obedience study

Ethical Guidelines that are Broken in Milgram's Study on Obedience

The ethical guidelines suggest that debriefing the participants after

the experiment is essential, which Milgram has done it thoroughly in

order to reveal the aim and the true purpose of his study. Although he

did not expect the out come of his research, but his ethics shows that

the research is beneficial of understanding the welfare of World War

II.

However, it is unethical at some point of his research because he

breaks the guidelines of deception and the right to non-participation.

Gross deception by telling lies to the participants that the learner

in the room would be punish by electric shocks when giving an

incorrect answer to the question, while it is actually fake. ‘

Although the shocks may be painful, there is no permanent harm.’ In

terms of psychological harm, this may cause the participants with

long-term mental harm; when the participants refuse to go further with

putting through the electric shocks, the authority figure takes away

the right of the participants to withdraw from experiment with prods

such as ‘ Please continue’, ‘ You have no choice, you must go on.’

which can make the participants feel uncomfortable and depress.

As a whole, this is a defense because Milgram did not expect people

would go that far from his research.

First problem Milgram will face in attempting to produce ethical work

is that sometimes it will be difficult to gain informed consent,

because if the participants fully understand the experiment’s aim

their behaviour will change. He cannot tell the participants that the

study is about obedience levels being investigat...

... middle of paper ...

...y are not told to be blame if things

go wrong. The participant will only be told off for several times when

they do not obey or listen to the policeman. However, if the

participant is failed to park into the space, they will then be

debriefing with the aim of this research. This research will affect

quite a lot when it has taken out the element of harm and by making

the instructions less harmful. In addition, less demand

characteristics gets less effective in showing how powerful of an

authority figure is, as this situation does not involve with physical

harm.

In conclusion, the behavioural study of obedience of Milgram shows

that introducing fear to learning process destroys performance. He

predicts far lower levels of obedience than it is found, which is an

unexpected nature since he thought nobody would do it.

Show More
Related

  • Morality of the Decision Made in Claire McCarthy's Dog Lab

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sometimes one must make a decision that puts to question what they believe is right, what they believe is wrong, and what they are willing to give up to make the decision. In the essay “Dog Lab” by Claire McCarthy, she recounts a story from when she was in medical school and her teacher gives them a choice on whether or not to participate in an experiment to learn about the vascular system. This experiment involves taking a perfectly healthy dog and putting him under anesthesia, cutting them open and pumping them full of different chemicals to see what they do to the heart. And then putting the dog down. Some would say that the decision is very cut and dry, either you do the experiment or you don't. But a very important thing to factor in is ho incredibly dedicated to her school work she was, in beginning of the essay she tries to explain why she became so focused in school with the phrase “My study now carried responsibility”. And she was correct, if there was ever a time that she wouldhave needed to buckle down and focus on her studies it would have been then. But she also tells ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's Behavioral Study Of Obedience

    1241 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is human nature to respect and obey elders or authoritative figures, even when it may result in harm to oneself or others. Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist, conducted an experiment to test the reasoning behind a person’s obedience. He uses this experiment in hope to gain a better understanding behind the reason Hitler was so successful in manipulating the Germans along with why their obedience continued on such extreme levels. Milgram conducts a strategy similar to Hitler’s in attempt to test ones obedience. Diana Baumrind, a clinical and developmental psychologist, disagreed with Milgram’s experiment in her article, ”Some Thoughts on Ethics of Research: After Reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of obedience”, Baumrind explains

    Read More

  • Obedience to Authority as Showcases in A Few Good Men

    1927 Words  | 4 Pages

    Obedience may be a simple word, yet it has a powerful impact on the daily lives of millions. Obedience is simply when one follows the orders or directions of another figure, presumably in an authoritative position. This is something nearly everyone bows to everyday without even realizing it - and it can drastically change our lives as we know it. Obedience is, for example, how the holocaust happened. The Germans were ordinary people turned into murderers because they followed the orders of one man - their dictator, Adolf Hitler. Of course, obedience does not always result in horrid results such as the holocaust or result in such a large catastrophe. Obedience can have drastic effects on the lives of only a few men as well; this is showcased in the movie A Few Good Men.

    Read More

  • Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience, by Diana Baumrind and Obedience, by Ian Parker

    890 Words  | 2 Pages

    Upon analyzing his experiment, Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, concludes that people will drive to great lengths to obey orders given by a higher authority. The experiment, which included ordinary people delivering “shocks” to an unknown subject, has raised many questions in the psychological world. Diana Baumrind, a psychologist at the University of California and one of Milgram’s colleagues, attacks Milgram’s ethics after he completes his experiment in her review. She deems Milgram as being unethical towards the subjects he uses for testing and claims that his experiment is irrelevant to obedience. In contrast, Ian Parker, a writer for New Yorker and Human Sciences, asserts Milgram’s experiments hold validity in the psychological world. While Baumrind focuses on Milgram’s ethics, Parker concentrates more on the reactions, both immediate and long-term, to his experiments.

    Read More

  • The Milgram Experiment: The Relationship Between Obedience And Authority

    742 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a series of experiments conducted from 1960 to 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram, sought to examine the relationship between obedience and authority in order to understand how Nazi doctors were able to carry out experiments on prisoners during WWII. While there are several theories about Milgram’s results, philosopher Ruwen Ogien uses the experiment as grounds for criticizing virtue ethics as a moral theory. In chapter 9 of Human Kindness and The Smell of Warm Croissant, Ogien claims that “what determines behavior is not character but other factors tied to situation” (Ogien 120). The purpose of this essay is not to interpret the results of the Milgram experiments. Instead this essay serves to argue why I am not persuaded by Ogien’s

    Read More

  • Can The Science Help Us To Make Wise Ethical Judgements By Paul Kurtz Summary

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    A famous thought experiment in quantum physics is that of Schrödinger’s cat. In this experiment, a cat is placed in a box with poison that has a chance to either explode, killing the cat, or not explode, allowing the kitty to live. Although some would object, we ought to open the box to see if the cat is alive or not. Similarly, we should attempt to uncover reality instead of accepting the current dogma. In his article, “Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgements?” Paul Kurtz argues that not only can science help through inquiry but it already plays an active role in shaping our moral conduct. According to him, ethical judgement and science meet somewhat halfway and although we cannot come up with a specific set of instructions

    Read More

  • Ethics Video Paper: Conformity Bias and Fundamental Attribution Error

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    When considering business related ethics, it is important to take into account ethics in general. Two such important sub topics within ethics are the dangers of Conformity Bias and the threats imposed by the Fundamental Attribution Error. On the “Ethics Unwrapped” site, two videos, each relating to and named after one of the previously mentioned topics are helpful in gaining knowledge about what these two topics are about and the potential ethical dilemmas they create. I believe these two topics are important to discuss because of the fact that everyone, especially including those in business environments, have fallen prey to these two concepts more often than other sub topics relating to ethics.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's Obedience

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    Obedience is something most people are taught at a very young age. They are taught to listen to the commands of their parents, older siblings and family members, adhere to the instructions of teachers. People are taught that obedient behavior was rewarding, and defiant or disobedient behavior would most likely lead to punishment. That seems like a simple concept to comprehend, but what happens when being obedient means causing harm to others. Blind obedience is a term that, put simply, means doing something because you are told, without putting any thought of your own into the decision. This type of obedience has been used to describe the actions of people involved in notorious events in world history; most notably, the actions of Nazi officials

    Read More

  • Dangerously Compliant: Yale University's Experiments on Compliance Behavior

    561 Words  | 2 Pages

    How far would you go to be obedient? At Yale University, Stanley Milgram set up an experiment testing how much pain a person would cause to an ordinary citizen, only with the reason of being told to do so by an experimental scientist. The subject is told that they are helping with an experiment on punishment-based learning and believe they are conducting this test on someone other than themself. What the subjects do not know is that the true experiment is testing them, not another person. The subjects send an increasing amount of pain to another person. If the subject wishes to discontinue, he must complete the experiment or clearly resist authority. What Milgram found in this study was that adults would go to severe lengths to obey their authority’s commands.

    Read More

  • Perils Of Obedience

    366 Words  | 1 Pages

    This experiment is a test to see if people are naturally aggressive. Milgram does not believe that people are naturally aggressive. Although some people think people are naturally aggressive. Ordinary people can be part of a bad course of actions without having any anger toward then victim.

    Read More

  • Ethical Violations in "The Monster Study"

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Monster study is speech impediment experiment that was done on the children that lived in the orphanage. This experiment was conducted to find out if stuttering was inherited or did environment play a key factor. Wendell Johnson was the speech pathologist that conducted this study to find the cause and cure for stuttering. This study violated a lot of ethical issues because the children were psychological harm, informed consent was not given and the subjects were deceived. Wendell Johnson had a biased opinion in this study because he was a stutter himself and was desperate for a cure. In this paper, I will discuss the background of this experiment and the violations of ethics that were done in this study.

    Read More

  • Stanley Milgram’s Behavioral Study of Obedience

    1781 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemmas and Normative Theories

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    Business is an organisation or economic system where products and services are traded for money, a product or services. Businesses need investment or customers to make a profit and survive. In business, ethical issues may arise for example false advertising, misleading the public, exaggerations and disclaimers. In this case study the ethical issue identified is an exaggeration of how much the company makes and falsifying of documents by signing off on an order that has not yet been finalised. Business ethics is the study of business situations, activities, and decisions where issues of right and wrong are evaluated. “Business ethics, ultimately, is just business in its larger human context” (Solomon, 2009, p.37). Ethical dilemmas such as financial management, corporate social management, corporate governance, shareholder relations, insider trading, and discrimination are examined by business ethics. Ethical dilemmas arise in situations where there is no right or wrong answers, usually a complex moral issue that needs to be resolved, a choice needs to be made between ‘right’ and ‘right’; choosing the best of the worst. It is not normally easy to reach an outcome but the dilemma can be solved in different ways depending on each person’s situation, background, personality, beliefs, life experiences as well as taking factors of law, morals and society norms into account when analysing, processing and making a fully informed morally ethical decision. The process of solving such complex issues involves analysing the issue itself, looking at possible consequ...

    Read More

  • Evaluation of Milgram's Obedience Study

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    Evaluation of Milgram's Obedience Study. Stanley Milgram was from a Jewish background and conducted the experiment to see how people can obey an apparent authority figure. e.g. Germans in World War II. He advertised for participants in a newspaper offering a payment of $4.50. Volunteers were told that the experiment looking at the effects of punishment on learning.

    Read More

  • A Critical Analysis of John Stuart Mill’s "On Liberty"

    1403 Words  | 3 Pages

    Complete free exercise of will inhibits individual and societal freedom. According to Mill, one may act as one chooses unless one is inflicting harm onto others. He argues that one is free to behave “according to his own inclination and judgment in things which concern himself” as long as “he refrains from molesting” (64). The problem arises in the freedom allowed to the individual performing the potentially dangerous act. People are often blinded by the situation in which they are in and by their personal motives which drive them to act. Humans, by nature, have faults and vices that are potentially harmful. It is the responsibility of society to anticipate harm, whether to oneself or to others. Once dangerous patterns and habits are recognized it is imperative to anticipate and prevent injury from reoccurring. To allow any individual to be inflicted harm forces citizens to lose tr...

    Read More

More about Ethical Guidelines that are Broken in Milgram's Study on Obedience

Open Document