Ethical Egoism Essay

1157 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The role of ethics in psychology

Egoism is the philosophical concept of human self-interest and the relationship between ethics, altruism, and rationality (Robbins). Psychological egoism and ethical egoism are the two concepts or positions that explain how one is or ought to be motivated to obtain their self-interest. The difference between ethical and psychological egoism is that the former deals with how a person should act and the latter deals with a universal concept practiced by all. With the theory of psychological egoism, selfishness proves it to be false; thus, can true ethical egoism be possible? Ethical egoism is the normative view that each individual should seek out their own self-interest (Robbins). One ought to act and do what is in one’s own maximum interest, benefit, or advantage; and, the action must be moralistic for it to produce happiness. According to this theory morality is based on everyone promoting their self-interest or selfish motives. In the article “Ethical Egoism” by Jan Narveson. Narveson quotes Bishop Joseph Butler’s theory of rational behavior as “the rational agent acts so as to maximize the realization of one’s interest.” Meaning that one will only act if they are carrying out an action with the intention to achieve their interest to its full extent. In …show more content…

With morality, one may refrain or do certain things whether they want to or not. According to Narveson in his paper “Ethical Egoism”, there are two principles that reflect egoism and how their morals effect their actions: first person and general. First person appraises all actions of all persons on the basis of the interest of the profounder alone - I believe I ought to do whatever, and only whatever, conduces to my best interest; and, everyone else should, too. General states that each person ought to do whatever is in that person 's interest - If I believe I ought to do whatever is in my own interest, but so should the next

Show More
Related

  • Psychological Egoism in Plato's Republic and Other Literature

    1546 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic and in Rachels' Egoism and Moral Scepticism, the authors attempt to combat psychological egoism, which is the ethical theory which asserts that all human motivation is ultimately self-interested. Each author rejects the possibility of this being a valid conclusion of philosophical ethics, and each instead offers an alternate solution to the origin of human motivation. Whether we are capable of acting out of non self-interested ways directly affects the implementation of ethics around the world. If psychological egoism is true, then ethical philosophy will only be useful when it is specifically beneficial for the individual rather than the collective society. I disagree with this ethical theory, because it is possible for one to act for the benefit of others and his or her own detriment. There are many example cases of an individual doing so and each of which undermines the core belief of psychological egoism: each individual acts solely for his or her own benefit. Instead, through taking pieces of psychological egoist theories I will be able to define a better, dynamic view of the origins of human desires.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ethical Egoism

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    In other words, ethical egoism states that there are objective moral facts and an action is morally good if and only if it promotes my personal happiness and it is morally wrong if and only if that action hinders my personal happiness. Apart from Ethical Egoism there is another topic to be known clearly, it is called Psychological Egoism. Psychological Egoism It is the claim that each person, in fact, pursues his/her own happiness.

    Read More

  • Ethical Egoism Analysis

    1086 Words  | 3 Pages

    However it is agreed upon on the existence and need for morals, thus the call for a minimum conception of morality. Every theory must have this minimum in order to be considered a true moral theory. In essence, it must “guide one’s conduct by reason while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual who will be affected by what one does” (Rachels p.14). This poses a problem for ethical egoism as a moral theory since ethical egoism does not meet either of the requirements. Ethical egoism is a mistaken theory in that it leads to logical contradictions (Rachels p.87). If one were to protect one’s interest that would require one to prevent another from carrying out their duty to their self, it would be both right and wrong to do so. However that is not logical and self-contradictory, thus not would not be basing conduct on reason. To reiterate, the theory of ethical egoism states that one should put his or her own needs before others, this fails the second part of the minimum conception of morality. Furthermore in advocating that one treat others in differently when there are no factual differences is unjustifiable and makes this an arbitrary doctrine. Since there is no relevant factual difference between oneself and others, thus no real logic or reason, then the needs of others are equally important, which goes against the main principle of conduct for ethical egoism. Yet still the theory would not see the need to regard other individuals who may be affected by one’s actions, which again fails the minimum

    Read More

  • Egoism And Ethical Egoism

    2219 Words  | 5 Pages

    • Once more, the ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest. Ethical egoism as diametrically opposite of ethical altruism which obliges a moral agent to assist the other first, even if sacrifices own interest. Also, ethical egoism differs from both rational and psychological egoism in ‘defending’ doctrine which considers all actions with contributive beneficial effects for an acting individual

    Read More

  • Psychological and Ethical Egoism

    1876 Words  | 4 Pages

    Psychological egoism, a descriptive claim about human nature, states that humans by nature are motivated only by self-interest. To act in one's self-interest is to act mainly for one's own good and loving what is one's own (i.e. ego, body, family, house, belongings in general). It means to give one's own interests higher priority then others'. "It (psychological egoism) claims that we cannot do other than act from self-interest motivation, so that altruism-the theory that we can and should sometimes act in favor of others' interests-is simply invalid because it's impossible" (Pojman 85). According to psychological egoists, any act no matter how altruistic it might seem, is actually motivated by some selfish desire of the agent (i.e., desire for reward, avoidance of guilt, personal happiness).

    Read More

  • Bud Light Stereotypes

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moral egoism and moral altruism (Rathbone, M 2020) defines altruism as “a concern for the well-being of others, without evaluation of the possible benefits for oneself as a guiding moral principle.” This makes reference to what is good for society is the common good as it is good for the community as a whole. When taking the needs of a community into account, the priorities of the business shift from their profit to being an organization that is set in the interests that contribute to and benefit the community where they currently operate. On the other hand, (Rathbone, M 2023) moral egoism is set in the foundation of egoism that illustrates an individual’s actions are set in their self-interest. Moral egoism further describes this idea by conceptualizing the fact that people are more worried about their self-interested desires so businesses will function under the same precept.

    Read More

  • Individualism Essay

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    The idea of Individualism can be traced all the way back to England before America’s existence. As we know, individualism has been interpreted in many forms throughout history. The 19th century is no different, taking hold of its own idea of individualism, called transcendentalism. Transcendentalism suggests freedom should not be confined to those focused on money and superficial gains. Instead, people should depend on no one but themselves. This movement focused on “greater individualism against conformity” (Corbett et al.). Heavily influenced by the Romantic period, transcendentalism adopted the belief that reason was more important than logic as Benjamin Franklin has believed. Reason must also include unique emotion and spirit (Corbett et

    Read More

  • Hospers: Self-Interest And Selfishness

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the development of modern society, many people say that the society has become miserable, and people only care their own profit. The self-interest is becoming the object of attacking. Thereupon, when we mention self- interest, people always mix up the concept of self-interest with selfishness. As we all known, the idea of selfishness is, “Abusing others, exploiting others, using others for their own advantage – doing something to others.” (Hospers, 59) Selfish people have no ethics, morals and standards when they do anything. At the same time, what is self – interest? Self- interest can be defined as egoism, which means a person is, “looking out for your own welfare.” (Hospers, 39) The welfare people talk about is nothing more than

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Ethical Egoism

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ethical Egoism states that we should pursue our best self-interests of the long run. Morally right actions are those, which benefits our-self. Egoism is focus on oneself but differs in the context of psychology and philosophy. Psychological egoism defines our actual behavior. Psychological egoism states the people always pursue their own interest, while Ethical egoism states people should act in the context of their own interest. In other words, psychological egoism defines how we do behave and ethical egoism defines how we ought to behave (Rachels, p.77). To better understand, one must fully understand what ethical egoism clearly means.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ethical Egoism And Utilitarianism

    1135 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethical egoism is arbitrary and puts ourselves above everybody else for no apparent reason. Ethical egoism splits everybody into two groups, ourselves and everyone else, and says that we are the morally superior. This brings up the question, why are we, ourselves, morally superior to everyone else? Failing to answer this question, means that the ethical egoist has no rational reason to choose ourselves over anybody else. So, with similar rational, it could just have been that everyone else is morally superior to ourselves. The ethical egoist seems to be completely arbitrary in this decision. This theory doesn’t even know why it is putting us, ourselves, above everybody else. One can compare this to a racist who says white people are more superior to blacks (Rachels). Several decades ago they would rationally argue that blacks are intellectually inferior and a threat to the world peace but today there is substantial amount of evidence to refute these claims. Now the racist has no reasons for the racial discriminations and white people and black people are equal, meaning that being racially against black people is arbitrary and has no rational reasoning. Indeed, ethical egoism is just as arbitrary as racism is, but once again, utilitarianism

    Read More

  • A Brief on Consequentialism

    1564 Words  | 4 Pages

    Egoism is the act of pursuing a particular course of action that is driven by 'sel...

    Read More

  • Ethical Theories Essay

    1660 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ethical theories are a way of finding solutions to ethical dilemmas using moral reasoning or moral character. The overall classification of ethical theories involves finding a resolution to ethical problems that are not necessarily answered by laws or principles already in place but that achieve justice and allow for individual rights. There are many different ethical theories and each takes a different approach as to the process in which they find a resolution. Ethical actions are those that increase prosperity, but ethics in business is not only focused on actions, it can also involve consequences of actions and a person’s own moral character.

    Read More

  • Ethical Egoism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

    610 Words  | 2 Pages

    This justification is presumed upon the value of general welfare, which is exactly the thing that ethical egoism says isn’t important. Rather than saying that our own interests only matter, this argument says that paying attention to our own interests is the most effective way to promote everyone else’s interests. This method of thinking is an experimental claim about the best way to benefit people in general, not an actual claim about whose interests should count. Another argument for ethical egoism is that altruistic ethics (which is showing selfless concern for others and their wellbeing) requires one to forgo ourselves for the benefit of others, and that we were to go along with altruistic ethics we would have nothing to give one's projects, goals, and relationships. However, those things are exactly what make life valuable; thus, altruistic ethics claims no importants on those things, which are the things that make life valuable.

    Read More

  • Is Ethical Egoism A Good Moral Theory

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethical Egoism is defined as “The theory that the right action is the one that advances one’s own best interests. One’s only moral duty is to promote the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself. Each person must put his or her own welfare first”. (Lecture notes) Is ethical egoism a good moral theory? I believe that being ethical egoism fails as moral theory because it’s important to have self-interest before having interest in others.

    Read More

  • Ethical Subjectivism Essay

    998 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the most notorious saying we grow up to know and embody is one that concerns are greatest possession, are family. “Family comes first no matter what, because at the end of the day they are the ones who are always there”. To most this is means to do anything possible to provide and protect our loved ones. If thrown into a situation, could you practice what you preach?! Society has guided us to believe that stealing is wrong but when placed in the footsteps, could one think differently. For every situation moral theories is used as to explain rather an action was right or wrong. It is depicted as being wrong in society but society never thinks about the normal people and their life. Society believes stealing bread to feed a starving family is wrong and immoral, as they look at as the concept of stealing, not the bigger picture. Normal people see it as a means of supporting as they are the ones in the footsteps being walked. For this reason stealing bread to feed your starving family is moral.

    Read More

More about Ethical Egoism Essay

Open Document