Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pro designer babies essay
About designer babies
About designer babies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pro designer babies essay
Ethical Considerations of the Savior Child A savior child is a child that is used to help save a sibling’s life. This can be done by using their organs, bone marrow, blood, tissue, or cord blood to help their terminally ill sibling. The savior child may be a sibling that is a match. If there are no family members that are a match, the parent may consider creating a savior child through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (Jackson, 2015). In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the process of combining a sperm cell and an ovum, and implanting the fertilized embryo in the uterus of the woman. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a technique used to identify genetic defects in embryos created through IVF. This …show more content…
State interference with parental discretion tends to be triggered only when a significant risk is imposed on the child. The word ‘significant’ indicates that there is a level of less significant harm which children could be expected to tolerate as part of normal family life (Jackson, 2015). It is asking a lot of a child to succumb to countless medical exams and testing that is not necessary to sustain their own health. Testing is scary for anyone, but especially a small child that does not understand why they are being put through what they often view as torture. Along with the emotional turmoil the child is feeling they may have physical scars from going through multiple lab tests, bone marrow biopsies, or even organ transplantation. This can cause a lot of undue stress for the child. The child may feel guilt for not wanting to put themselves through any more tests to save their sibling, or they may have guilt from not being able to save their sibling despite all the efforts. This may lead to them feeling ashamed for letting their parents and sibling down. Some would say it is in the best interest of the savior child to have a healthy sibling and happy parents. This would make for a more positive childhood than a dying sibling and devastated parents (Jackson, 2015). The mental and physical health of the savior child must be considered. …show more content…
In other countries there are laws governing how this process can be used, currently in the United States there are no laws governing this process (Trifiolis, 2014). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is widely accepted when used to avoid serious illness in a child. It reduces the chance of having a child with genetic or chromosomal disorder. When preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is used for this purpose, it is in the best interest of the embryo, savior child (Trifiolis, 2014). Controversy arises when preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is used solely for tissue typing, this type of screening will only benefit the sick child (Trifiolis, 2014). Tissue typing is used to check compatibility of tissues prior to transplant (Trifiolis, 2014). Many believe having the ability to select certain genes is the gateway to “designer babies”. Couples could potentially design the perfect child, choose the eye or hair color, even the sex of the child. There should be regulations established in our country to regulate the use of this
‘Is it ethical to have a child for the purpose of saving another child’s life?’
After the discovery of genetically altering an embryo before implantation, “designer babies” was coined to describe a child genetically altered “to ensure specific intellectual and cosmetic characteristics.” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). This procedure combines genetic engineering and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) to make sure certain characteristics are absent or present in an embryo (Thadani n.p.). The procedure also includes taking an embryo to be pre-implementation genetically diagnosed (PGD), another procedure that doctors use to screen the embryos (Stock n.p.). An embryo’s DNA goes through multiple tests to obtain an analysis of the embryo, which will list all the components of the embryo including genetic disorders and physical traits such as Down syndrome, blue eyes, and brown hair, for instance (Smith 7). Although the use of PGD is widely accepted by the “reproductive medical community” and the modifying of disorders or diseases is to a degree, once the characteristics are no longer health related “72% disapprove of the procedure” (“Designer Babies” n.p.). At this point the parents make decisions that would alter their child’s life forever and this decision is rather controversial in the U...
In recent years, great advancement has been made in medicine and technology. Advanced technologies in reproduction have allowed doctors and parents the ability to screen for genetic disorders (Suter, 2007). Through preimplantation genetic diagnosis, prospective parents undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) can now have their embryo tested for genetic defects and reduce the chance of the child being born with a genetic disorder (Suter, 2007). This type of technology can open the door and possibility to enhance desirable traits and characteristics in their child. Parents can possibly choose the sex, hair color and eyes or stature. This possibility of selecting desirable traits opens a new world of possible designer babies (Mahoney,
Two of the most popular technologies used today for sex selection are, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) (Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2015). IVF involves combining the egg cells and the sperm cells outside the uterus. Once fertilized, the egg is then implanted back into the women’s uterus or stored for future use.
What do one think of when they hear the words “Designer Babies”? A couple designing their own baby of course, and it’s become just that. Technology has made it possible for there to be a way for doctors to modify a babies characteristics and its health. Genetically altering human embryos is morally wrong, and can cause a disservice to the parents and the child its effecting.
A. A. The "Best Possible Child" Journal of Medical Ethics 33.5 (2007): 279-283. Web.
Picture a young couple in a waiting room looking through a catalogue together. This catalogue is a little different from what you might expect. In this catalogue, specific traits for babies are being sold to couples to help them create the "perfect baby." This may seem like a bizarre scenario, but it may not be too far off in the future. Designing babies using genetic enhancement is an issue that is gaining more and more attention in the news. This controversial issue, once thought to be only possible in the realm of science-fiction, is causing people to discuss the moral issues surrounding genetic enhancement and germ line engineering. Though genetic research can prove beneficial to learning how to prevent hereditary diseases, the genetic enhancement of human embryos is unethical when used to create "designer babies" with enhanced appearance, athletic ability, and intelligence.
In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) is a complex series of procedures used to help those who want children but struggle with infertility. The process consists of extracting eggs from a woman and collecting a man’s sperm sample then manually combining them in a lab dish. Once the embryo(s) are created they are transferred to a woman’s uterus. IVF is commonly used in woman who cannot conceive on their own due to different reasonings. “These include but are not limited to blocked or damaged fallopian tubes, male factor infertility, woman with ovulation disorders, genetic disorders, woman who have had their fallopian tubes removed and unexplained infertility.” (American Pregnancy)
"Imagine the reaction there would be if organ transplantation were prohibited because it is 'unnatural' -- though that is what some people called for when transplantation was a medical novelty.” This quote from Dr. Roger Gosden describes how the general population felt in regards to the first transplant procedures that took place. Those fears have since been extinguished due to the success of transplant surgeries. Designer babies are a similar medical miracle due to the possible wipeout of genetically inherited diseases. Designer babies are babies whose genetics have been specifically chosen in order to allow a certain gene to be absent or present.
In my opinion, In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is one of the greatest breakthroughs in Medical Biotechnology in the last 50 years. Finding out you are infertile can be heart-breaking and distressing. After trying for long periods of time, some couples are not able to conceive. Thankfully, this problem many couples have can be fixed by In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), a process that was developed and used in Britain first more than 30 years ago by Doctors Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards. In 1978, the world’s first IVF baby was born into the world and since thousands and thousands of babies have been born every year using this method.
IVF are designed to stimulate the ovaries to produce several eggs rather than the usual single egg as in a natural cycle. Multiple eggs increase the potential availability of multiple embryos for transfer and ultimately increase the probability of conception. The most healthy ones are chosen for implantation while the others are frozen for possible later use, or destroyed outright. Biologically, a human embryo is a living human being at its earliest stage of development. If the couples do not really need IVF to create a life, the destruction of embryos in the
I believe that parents are not morally justified in having a child merely to provide life saving medical treatment to another child or family member, but that this does not mean that the creation of savior siblings is morally impermissible. By having a child solely to provide life saving medical treatment, you are treating this child merely as a means rather than an end to the individual child. By having the child solely as a means to save another, you are violating this savior sibling in that you are treating them as a source of spare parts that can be used by the sickly child in order to solely promote the prolonged life of the currently sick child. This view that having a child merely as a way to provide medical treatment does not consider the multitude of other avenues that this newborn child can take, and presupposes that the child will only be used for the single purpose of providing life saving medical treatment through use of stems cells or organ donation. What this view fails to consider is that these savior siblings are valued by families for so much more than just as a human bag of good cells and organs that can be used to save the life of the original child. Instead, these savior siblings can be valued as normal children themselves, in that they can be valued in the same way that any other child who is born is valued, yet at the same time they will also be able to provide life-saving treatment to their sibling. My view runs parallel to the view held by Claudia Mills who argues that it is acceptable to have a savior sibling, yet at the same time we can not have a child for purely instrumental motives, and instead should more so value the child for the intrinsic worth that they have. Mills presents her argument by puttin...
Another ethical debate could be the ability to give informed consent. It can be argued that a child cannot fully be aware of what is happening until they reach a certain age (in South Australia, the age of medical consent is 16 years old) and therefore they cannot express their full informed consent for medical procedures until the age of 16 (MIGA, 2011). In any medical procedure, the patient must be informed about any risks and possible complications that may arise during the procedure and must be able to understand these risks and possible
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most common and most effective type of assisted reproductive technology (ART) to help women become pregnant. The IVF procedure involves fertilizing an egg outside the body, in a laboratory dish, and then implanting it in a woman's uterus. Interpretations of the graphs The results from the survey were 50/50 because most of the results were split evenly when the survey was handed out to 12 different people.
This is a win-win situation for both participants in the scenario: the child is saved from drowning and I am monetarily rewarded. The desirable consequences may appear very greedy to others, but what matters is that the child is alive and I did not abandon him or her to