Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The womens liberation movement essay
The women's liberation movement essay
The womens liberation movement essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The womens liberation movement essay
In this essay I will discuss how the glorification of women’s role in the liberation movements has silenced their real and lived experiences during the struggle. I will explore the gender hierarchy in the camps and I will also explain how the gender roles within the liberation movements in Southern Africa worked. Firstly I will discuss how the liberation movement viewed women; secondly I will explore the lived experiences of the women in the movements and their interactions with the men in the struggle. Lastly I will explore how and why the glorification of women’s role in the liberation movement occurred.
Gender is seen as a societal construction that refers to the characteristics that differentiate between a man and a woman; and gender roles refers to the social and behavioural expectations deemed ‘appropriate’ for a specific gender, male or female (Kessler,1990).
The gender hierarchy and gender roles within the liberation movements
During the Southern African liberation movement many women joined the struggle in the fight for independence against apartheid. The African National Congress (ANC) of South Africa was seen as the first liberation movement to excel at striving for gender equality in its political organisation. Even though it had applied its ‘equality’ clause the real live experiences of women in the struggle was vastly different to the ideal of equality (Hissam, 2004). The liberation camps were mainly male-dominated, and women were seen as second class citizens or second class members of the ANC; women’s participation in the liberation struggle was largely due to the set terms made by men.
Women were seen as a collective that was a supportive structure to the men in the camps, for men the ‘real work’ was seen as ...
... middle of paper ...
...minated by their resulting political positions in the democratic system in South Africa after the liberation movement. The glorification of women after the struggle is a way of silencing the women’s voices about their lived experiences in the liberation movement and a form of control. By creating a ‘symbolized’ figure of the ideal women during the struggle has a political purpose that benefits the men in a patriarchal society. Men in power intentionally promoted the glorification of women’s roles in the struggle in order to diminish the plight of women during the liberation movement. The glorification of women functioned as a way to create a definite role for women that is seen as being equal but in reality is socially, politically and economically subordinate to men; it is a men’s vanguard of giving women a conditional and restrictive purpose in defining society.
The First World War presented European women with ample opportunity to step up and demonstrate their strength; however men of this era had conflicting opinions of how capable women were to take on a man’s occupation. Therefore, it was necessary for women to prove their abilities and destroy the widespread belief of their stupidity and ignorance. To begin, it was during this era of World War 1 and directly after this that women were able to prove themselves as vital members of the economy and society of Europe. In Document 1, a picture depicts the harsh patriarchal society that women were forced to change by showing a woman being ignored by a man. The purpose of this photo of a female figure arguing that women were strong enough to save men
In addition, these women were often subjected to control, domination, and violence by men” (Global). This validates Azuela’s stance on how women should stay within their traditional roles because fighting for equality has been ineffective even today.
...nd bloodshed. Women gave a reason to go to war, a reason to come back from the war, and oddly, a reason to want to return to the war. The men were in a fraternity of life, and with no women around for so long they began to rely on themselves, and no longer had the needs that were provided them by women. They wanted to play in the jungle with their friends, only this time with no guns. They missed the life that they spent together eating rations and swapping stories. When they went home they were veterans, like the old men of the World Wars. If they stayed, they were still heroes, warriors, and victims. They still loved deeply the women at home, because they had no reason to fight or bicker, or possibly realize that the women they assumed would be waiting for them had changed in that time. The men were torn between love of women, and the love of brotherhood.
We must also understand the exclusion of gender from revolutionary discourses as being part of patriarchy that is not challenged in certain revolutions. The exclusion of gender equality from what Lumumba struggled for is where there is a certain patriarchy, and this kind of patriarchy is evident in almost all revolutionary anti-colonial writing.
It is believed by the author that the feminist movement in many ways parallels the struggles faced by African Americans in the US during the same time period. The authors will offer ideas on where the pro...
Two centuries ago there was a women’s rights movement forming in order to fight an oppression. Women were poorly treated and seen as inferior to men. It is believed the women’s rights movement was “inspired-or rather provoked-by the insufferable male supremacy” (Davis 46). Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton among other women received unfair treatment at the World Anti-Slavery Convention in London. At this convention they were “fenced off behind a bar and a curtain similar to those used in churches to screen the choir from the public gaze” (Davis 47). They were excluded because the men believed their view at this convention was useless. Women during this time had to live up to the standards society had of them. If they did not follow,
The writings of women in West Africa are similar to the writings of men in reaction to the distorting images and representation projected by the imperial colonial masters. Authors like Chinua Achebe and others wrote to tell the African man’s story by an African in order to set ‘the record straight.’ In doing this, they bring to the fore their own bias and stereotypes about women in the society. Their writings were replete with the ‘African way’ of treating women – objects, properties, and expendable (Boyce Davies 1994). While women like Flora Nwapa and other earlier writers told the African woman story without an appearance of opposition to the male hegemony, “male literary critics have tended to marginalize women’s writing and to dismiss foundational
History accounts for the great contributions of women in promoting social justice, particularly in uplifting the morale and functions of women in the society. From being the oppressed gender, various women managed to change the traditional roles of women by fighting for their rights to be heard and for them to given equal opportunities. These women boldly stood against gender stereotypes of women and proved the entire world that they could defy conventions. Particularly at the turn of the 20th century, women battled against the oppressions brought by patriarchy in different ways. These activist women had crusaded for the promotion of their civil rights, sexual freedom, and pursued careers which were once forbidden to them.
For centuries, educated and talented women were restricted to household and motherhood. It was only after a century of dissatisfaction and turmoil that women got access to freedom and equality. In the early 1960’s, women of diverse backgrounds dedicated tremendous efforts to the political movements of the country, which includes the Civil Rights movement, anti-poverty, Black power and many others (Hayden & King, 1965). The Africa...
Olive Schreiner was a South African author who spoke out against the social injustices of her time. She advocated against British imperialism and campaigned against racism and sexism in the British Empire. Olive Schreiner focused on women 's emancipation, and she displays this through her book titled, Woman and Labor. As early twentieth-century South Africa was under the influence of the British, Olive Schreiner fought to change the perceptions of women in the society she lived in. In Woman and Labor, Olive Schreiner provides readers with an idea of how women were portrayed and treated in twentieth-century South Africa. Throughout the text and based on its historical context, the female body during Olive Schreiner 's time was perceived as
During the 20th century women in third world countries had very limited to no rights at all. They could not speak their minds; They were unable to work outside their home; They had to remain completely covered from head to toe and they were denied the right to be educated. Women were forced to obey outrageous laws that kept them silent for many years without having any say or any way of defending their rights. As the years have passed, there have been many works of literature showing the experiences that women have suffered. The role of women in third world countries is questionable as evidenced by the way women are portrayed in A Thousand Splendid Suns.
Imagine being a woman living in Europe during the war, taking on many important leadership roles and having a good amount of power. All of a sudden, the war ends and all of these roles and powers are taken away. Europe made women feel equal to men when everything was being sacrificed for a cause, and then threw them back into being a housewife and oppressed as soon as the war ended. Once seeing how much a woman can truly have, she was not going to go back to having nothing. This is what some consider to be the initial spark of the Women’s liberation movement and the second wave of feminism across Europe. In the 1960s, women liberationists saw themselves as an oppressed group and started to demand radical change all across the continent. The way each country reacted to this demand however, was somewhat different. Although after the war, women all across Europe were fighting for liberation, they only completed strides in everyday cultural and social life and gained little to no influence in political life.
Hafkin, Nancy. Women in Africa: Studies in Social and Economic Change (1976). California: Stanford University Press, 1976.
Although by the 1960s women were responsible for one-third of the work force, despite the propaganda surrounding the movement women were still urged to “go back home.” However the movement continued to burn on, and was redeveloping a new attitude by the 1970s. The movement was headed by a new generation that was younger and more educated in politics and social actions. These young women not only challenged the gender role expectations, but drove the feminist agenda that pursued to free women from oppression and male authority and redistribute power and social good among the sexes (Baumgardner and Richards, 2000). In just a few decades, the Women’s Liberation Movement has changed typical gender roles that once were never challenged or questioned.
A feminist analysis on the other hand shows that Anowa is a woman who is struggling against the 1870’s African feminist identity (the identity of weakness). The drama surrounds the story of a young woman called Anowa who disobeys her parents by marrying Kofi Ako, a man who has a reputation for indolence and migrates with him to a far place. Childless after several years of marriage, Anowa realises that Kofi had sacrificed his manhood for wealth. Upon Anowa’s realisation, Kofi in disgrace shoots himself while Anowa too drowns herself. In a postcolonial analysis of “Anowa”, we can see some evidence of colonialism.