Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effectiveness of law reform
The effectiveness of law reform
Impact of technology on legal profession
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effectiveness of law reform
Introduction What is the definition of unlawful conduct? What circumstances and influences impact why certain conduct is considered unlawful, and what sources impact its reform? Unlawful conduct is a broad term and conduct can be considered unlawful in numerous ways. It is influenced, for example, by technological developments, social climate, and economics; as these are forever changing they all have a noticeable effect on what is considered to be unlawful conduct. The methods of law reform are just as broad, there are many organisations which can bring about reform, for example: Parliament, The Judiciary, and Law Commission to name a few. These facets of unlawful conduct will now be discussed in greater detail. Defining unlawful conduct Unlawful conduct is conduct which is contrary to or forbidden by law. This definition does not only include criminal law, criminal acts such as murder, assault etc. but also in civil disputes, crimes which are committed at business level such as tax evasion, copyright etc. Civil disputes can also occur between private parties e.g. neighbours with boundary disputes; or individuals and companies, for instance, a customer not paying for received goods, and negligence of the employer. Civil and criminal law There are differences between civil and criminal law with regard to remedies available. For instance in criminal cases when convicted for unlawful conduct the sanctions are more severe: incarceration, fines, and community service as opposed to civil disputes which often result in payment of compensatory damages. Another difference is that in criminal cases the state commences prosecution and is responsible for burden of proof the litigation against the defendant is the Crown known ... ... middle of paper ... ...ogy advancing so rapidly law trying to keep up sometimes being a step ahead & then effecting more change having to take place/never ending. Reader pg. 50 legal reasoning and legal change in the age of the internet In this age of cyberspace and global connectivity, reliance on statutes and stare decisis simply cannot keep up with a rapidly evolving technological environment. Traditional law…might condemn rules regulating conduct in cyberspace to perpetual obsolescence.37 Continuous conflict between need to acknowledge pre-established rules & need to facilitate change in view of changing & economic conditions. Law must be static and dynamic, must change but also continue on its old path. If always changing it would lose its certainty predictability order and safety ever changing law would increase uncertainty, social instability and economic insecurity.
Criminal law attempts to balance the rights of individuals to freedom from interference with person or property, and society’s need for order. Procedural matters, the rights of citizens and powers of the state, specific offences and defences, and punishment and compensation are some of the ways society and the criminal justice system interact.
Only an act that is defined by the validly passed laws of the nation state in which it occurred so that punishment should follow from the behaviour
.When it comes to defining crime, criminal law has 7 basic principles to do so, which are, legality, human conduct, harm, causation, mens rea, concurrence and punishment requirement. Legality: "principle that every crime must be clearly defined by common law or legislation prior to its commission." (Alder et al, 2012, p.109) In other words, an individual cannot be held guilty for conduct that has not been legislated before the act was committed. Human conduct
In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
Laws have an important role in maintaining order within society. Understandably, society comprises of different individuals with differing aspirations, beliefs, personalities, and merits – just to name a few. Allowing individuals to push their personal desires using resources available to them would not only lead to a disordered society, but also one that embraces injustice and prejudice. Laws are the common principles that guide the conduct of individuals in society while ensuring that society upholds the rights of everyone who is part of it. Such laws accrue as a resemblance of morality for entities in society to which all members are held accountable irrespective of their race, social class, or popularity. However,
principle differentiating the two is the intent of the perpetrator of either an assault or battery. A
This theory looks at how the sovereign and its officials created the law based on social norms and the institutions (Hart, 1958). However, hard cases such as this makes for bad law, which test the validity of the law at hand based on what the objective of the law was in the first place. The law should not be so easily dismissed just because it does not achieve justice in the most morally sound manner (Hart, 1958). Bentham and Austin understood that there are two errors in the way law is understood, what the law is and what the law should be (Hart, 1958). He knew that if law was to become what humans perceived the law ought to be, the law itself would be lost, but he also recognized that if the opposite was to occur where the law replaced morality, than any man would escape liability and there would be no retribution (Hart, 1958). This theory looks at the point of view of the dissenting judge, Justice Gray, which is that the law is what it is, even if it may conflict with morals. Austin stated that “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry (Hart, 1958).” This case presents the same conflict that Bentham and Austin addressed, that the law based on the statute of the
Crime is seen as deviant behaviour that violates prevailing norms which are the cultural standards prescribing how humans ought to behave normally. This violation of a law;-offences against the person, violent offences, sexual offences and offences against property, causes injury to the public or an individual and a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine are possible penalties.#
The Lex mercatoria was an international law of commerce governing the trades and disputes based on the customs and practices of merchants. By the nineteen century, the law of merchant was fully incorporated in the Common law, but the development of commercial law led to a conflicting mass of case law . Following the commercial community recommendations, European countries started to rationalized the commercial law by building codes . English law didn’t follow this path, but instead adopted a series of Act of Parliament focusing on specific area, such as Bills of Exchange Act 1882 and the Sale of Good Act 1893 . Finally, the rise of the consumerism forced the Parliament to recognize the separateness of certain commercial transaction and to adopted an interventionist approach that aimed to create a body of laws protecting consumers, such as the Unfair Contract Terms ACT 1977 and Consumer Protection Act 1987
At first thought, we associate laws as prohibited activities and lawyers as people who have high quality suits and expensive brief cases. However, law is not nearly as simple as it appears to be on the surface. There has been no time within human civilization where law was not present. Implementation of laws can be recalled back to New Testament times in the Bible where murder was a condemned crime that would be punishable by death. Law is defined as the principles and regulations created by a community or some authority applicable to its people. If we did not enforce laws or punishments, how many more crimes would be committed on a daily basis? In this paper, I will be discussing what Criminal law is, its historical contributors and its
It can be argued illegality as a ground for judicial review was first established in the case of Entick v Carrington . The legal principle which emerged from the case was that, executive authorties are precluded from doing things which are not stipulated in common law or statutory provisions. This was to be the foundation for what Lord Diplock would term illegality in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister
Law is the foundation of central structures of social life on which society’s integrity depends, which is why Petrazycki, Ehrlich and Habermas perceive it to be a key steering mechanism in society,
certain acts and persons become fitted with the label `criminal’ i.e. the process of crime interpretation by the courts
There simply is no alternate system of laws that can maintain the calm and peaceful environment for people of the world besides “law”. One can easily see the need for each and every nation to enforce its own set of rules. While all of the countries of the world have their own individuality – they all have one considerable feature which is a system of law. It has no significance what type of government is the command, the rules are all appropriate to the people in their community.
Criminal and Civil Law – Criminal law is the law through which public commitment of crimes are prosecuted by governing bodies, whereas civil law is the law through which private parties may bring lawsuits against one another for real or imagined wrongdoings. E.g. criminal law would deal with the prosecution of a crime such as one person hitting another with their car, and civil law would deal with the lawsuit, as the person hit would sue the driver of the car for monetary compensation.