Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the function of criminal law in society
Origins of criminal justice
History of us criminal justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the function of criminal law in society
At first thought, we associate laws as prohibited activities and lawyers as people who have high quality suits and expensive brief cases. However, law is not nearly as simple as it appears to be on the surface. There has been no time within human civilization where law was not present. Implementation of laws can be recalled back to New Testament times in the Bible where murder was a condemned crime that would be punishable by death. Law is defined as the principles and regulations created by a community or some authority applicable to its people. If we did not enforce laws or punishments, how many more crimes would be committed on a daily basis? In this paper, I will be discussing what Criminal law is, its historical contributors and its …show more content…
For example, Brown v. Board of Education was a pivotal historical Supreme Court case during the Civil Rights Movement that challenged the fourteenth amendment in 1954. It challenges the illegitimate racial segregation of schools made legal by Plessy v. Ferguson 1896, which stated that segregated public facilities were lawful as long as white facilities were equal to one another. However, during the mid-twentieth century, civil rights groups challenged racial segregation legally and politically. Alex McBride a former law student at Tulane Law School stated that “it put the Constitution on the side of racial equality and galvanized the nascent civil rights movement into a full revolution.” Although Brown v. Board of Education did not fully succeed in desegregating public schools, it showed that separate is essentially unequal. Another influential case was Gideon v. Wainwright 1963, a Supreme Court case that occurred in favor of the sixth amendment when Gideon was denied a defense attorney because he could not afford a lawyer. These are two of many landmark cases that show how the Federal Constitution promotes …show more content…
Criminal law is intended to protect people from public harm, maintain social order, support social values, punish those who commit crimes and most importantly assuage victims of crime. An old definition of a crime by William Blackstone is “an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law either forbidding or commanding it.” However, Frank Schmalleger uses a more descriptive definition which defines a crime as “any act or omission in violation of penal law, committed without defense or justification, and made punishable by the state in a judicial proceeding.” Criminal cases brought before the court are separated into three main categories misdemeanors, felonies or treason. Misdemeanors are minor offenses that can be settled with fines or jail sentences less than a year. Felonies are severe crimes that require harsher penalties such as being sentenced to a federal penitentiary. Lastly, treason is the violation of allegiance to one’s own country most commonly known as selling government
The Plessy v Ferguson case would be overturned, ruling the “separate but equal” law to be unconstitutional. Melba Beals was in school that day and was sent home early with the warning to hurry and stay in groups. Even so, it had been decades since the passing of the Fourteenth Amendment. No much had changed. Melba’s teacher knew that this ruling would cause rage among the citizens of Little Rock and she was right.
The decision to integrate Boston schools in the 1970’s created negative race relations and later fueled a political debate that would change schools across the country. Most desegregation efforts in the United States began with the case of Oliver Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954. The case ruled that segregation on the basis of race was prohibited because it violated citizen’s rights under the Constitution. On June 21, 1974 in the case of Morgan vs. Hennigan, Judge Garret made a ruling that accused the Boston School Committee of engaging in racial segregation. “This ruling later would serve to fuel one of the prominent controversies embedded in our nation’s ongoing struggle for racial desegregation.” The busing policy created extreme acts of violence, invaded personal freedoms, hindered students’ education and
The case started with a third-grader named Linda Brown. She was a black girl who lived just seen blocks away from an elementary school for white children. Despite living so close to that particular school, Linda had to walk more than a mile, and through a dangerous railroad switchyard, to get to the black elementary school in which she was enrolled. Oliver Brown, Linda's father tried to get Linda switched to the white school, but the principal of that school refuse to enroll her. After being told that his daughter could not attend the school that was closer to their home and that would be safer for Linda to get to and from, Mr. Brown went to the NAACP for help, and as it turned out, the NAACP had been looking for a case with strong enough merits that it could challenge the issue of segregation in pubic schools. The NAACP found other parents to join the suit and it then filed an injunction seeking to end segregation in the public schools in Kansas (Knappman, 1994, pg 466).
In the U.S. Supreme Court case of Brown v Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, the issue of segregation in public schools was addressed. Oliver Brown, a local welder, assistant pastor, and african american, along with several other african american parents, filed a suit against the Topeka Board of Education because their children were denied admission because of their race. The Court decided in favor of Brown and ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court is perhaps most well known for the Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954. By declaring that segregation in schools was unconstitutional, Kevern Verney says a ‘direct reversal of the Plessy … ruling’1 58 years earlier was affected. It was Plessy which gave southern states the authority to continue persecuting African-Americans for the next sixty years. The first positive aspect of Brown was was the actual integration of white and black students in schools. Unfortunately, this was not carried out to a suitable degree, with many local authorities feeling no obligation to change the status quo. The Supreme Court did issue a second ruling, the so called Brown 2, in 1955. This forwarded the idea that integration should proceed 'with all deliberate speed', but James T. Patterson tells us even by 1964 ‘only an estimated 1.2% of black children ... attended public schools with white children’2. This demonstrates that, although the Supreme Court was working for Civil Rights, it was still unable to force change. Rathbone agrees, saying the Supreme Court ‘did not do enough to ensure compliance’3. However, Patterson goes on to say that ‘the case did have some impact’4. He explains how the ruling, although often ignored, acted ‘relatively quickly in most of the boarder s...
In 1896, the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision set that “separate” facilities for blacks, and whites was constitutional. With the Brown v. Board of Education decision, Plessy was overturned along with the separate but equal implementation. The Brown v. Board of Education case all started with African American children who were denied acceptance in white schools. In a PBS Article the author discusses how a case was filed against the Topeka Kansas school board by Oliver Brown. Alexander McBride states “Brown v. Board of Education was filed against the Topeka, Kansas school board by representative-plaintiff Oliver Brown, parent of one of the children denied access to Topeka 's white schools. Brow...
The next big step in the civil rights movement came in 1954, with the BROWN vs. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA case, where Thurgood Marshall, representing Brown, argued that segregation was against the 4th Amendment of the American constitution. The Supreme Court ruled, against President Eisenhower’s wishes, in favour of Brown, which set a precedent in education, that schools should no longer be segregated. This was the case which completely overturned the Jim Crow Laws by overturning Plessy vs. Ferguson.
A criminal is obviously an individual who commits a crime, but what is crime? A crime is any act or omission of an act in violation of a public law. Though most laws are common throughout America, some laws are also established by local and state governments as well. Criminal laws and penalties vary from state to state. Crimes include both felonies and misdemeanors. Felonies are serious crimes like murder or rape and are punishable by imprisonment for a year or more. The consequence for felonies such as murder and treason can be the death penalty. Misdemeanors are less serious crimes like petty theft or speeding and are punishable by less than a year in prison. Fines are also punishments of both misdemeanors and felonies. The fine’s amount is determined by the seriousness of the case. However, no act is a crime unless it has been stated as such by an American law or statute.
In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
In the 1954 court ruling of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation of schools was unconstitutional and violated the Fourteenth Amendment (Justia, n.d.). During the discussion, the separate but equal ruling in 1896 from Plessy v. Ferguson was found to cause black students to feel inferior because white schools were the superior of the two. Furthermore, the ruling states that black students missed out on opportunities that could be provided under a system of desegregation (Justia, n.d.). So the process of classification and how to balance schools according to race began to take place.
I have been interested in law ever since I was a little kid. It was not until I was in middle school did I know I wanted to go into criminal law. Criminal law has always been interesting to me because I am fighting for someone who does not have a voice. Some people might say I can do that for every other type of law, but that is not necessarily true. With criminal law there is the always the possibility that the person will end up in jail. I will be a prosecutor who is able to help get Justice for a victim, by representing the state. But before I go into a position of being a crusader of Justice for the state, I needed to know how the other side lives. The other side is the adult public defender’s office. It is their job to do what is in the
Law is the foundation of central structures of social life on which society’s integrity depends, which is why Petrazycki, Ehrlich and Habermas perceive it to be a key steering mechanism in society,
Laws serve several purposes in the criminal justice system. The main purpose of criminal law is to protect, serve, and limit human actions and to help guide human conduct. Also, laws provide penalties and punishment against those who are guilty of committing crimes against property or persons. In the modern world, there are three choices in dealing with criminals’ namely criminal punishment, private action and executive control. Although both private action and executive control are advantageous in terms of costs and speed, they present big dangers that discourage their use unless in exceptional situations. The second purpose of criminal law is to punish the offender. Punishing the offender is the most important purpose of criminal law since by doing so; it discourages him from committing crime again while making him or her pay for their crimes. Retribution does not mean inflicting physical punishment by incarceration only, but it also may include things like rehabilitation and financial retribution among other things. The last purpose of criminal law is to protect the community from criminals. Criminal law acts as the means through which the society protects itself from those who are harmful or dangerous to it. This is achieved through sentences meant to act as a way of deterring the offender from repeating the same crime in the future.
Law is in place as a basis of a type of rule to govern the behaviour between people, offering a structure for society to ensure the protection of the rights of every individual. The absence of the law in place there would be an absence of order and stability in the society. With the development of a complex legal system, the law is not only rules, but is embedded with an akin of moral concepts in the society. On the other hand, lawyers are professions who ‘exercise their power in court by manipulating the thoughts and opinions of others through the skilful use of language’. I see lawyers as an exponent in upholding justice in society: as to how rights should be respected and protected, how the moral perceptions are ingrained and manifested through law. What aspires me to become a criminal lawyer is my receptivity to the juxtaposed relationship of moral and law. I agree that criminal law aids the establishment of ‘a moral imperative in civilized society’, enhancing the moral development in society through the
Over the past century law has become crucial and important part of human life. Law has developed significantly throughout the world and continues to improve and change as a result of globalization, fast advances in technology, and the development of administrative regulations. Before continuing the essay, first of all, the notion of law should be discussed. What is law? During the decades, the legal writers have given records of law which take their focal issue the different capacities which law should perform in a general society. Raymond in his work mentions that ‘law as fundamentally a vehicle for the protection of individual rights, the attainment of justice, or economic, political, and sexual equality’ (Wacks, 2008, p3). One of the classic