Moon Landing Essay

1232 Words3 Pages

The moon landing of 1969 was a simultaneous example of human ingenuity and human skepticism. There are still those who believe that the moon landing was a concoction of Hollywood special effects and NASA complicity to fool the public into believing that man walked on the moon. This paper will attempt to examine these events from a Cartesian, Humean, and Kantian point of view and try to reconcile these differing opinions. Descartes proposed that “true knowledge is produced by thinking which is reflective, logical, and analytical, independent of our sense experiences in the world” (Chaffee, 2013, p. 257). Hume is regarded as a true skeptic, using a two-pronged approach to the world. Humean thinking uses reason and tries to negate the …show more content…

Hume believed that, in order to be valid, ideas and impressions must stand on their own. Kantian thinkers propose that the mind is an active participant, not passive, and that we actively “select, organize, order, structure, and interpret sensations, shaping them into an intelligible world about which we can develop insight and knowledge” (Chaffee, 2013, p. 321). On July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 landed on the moon, marking the first time humans stepped foot on another celestial body. The lunar landing was the culmination of a political and scientific competition between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), coined “The Space Race”. This competition between the world’s superpowers began in the 1950’s when, in 1957, the USSR launched the world’s first man-made satellite, dubbed “Sputnik”, into Earth’s orbit (Wasser, 2005). Sputnik’s launch spurred President John F. Kennedy and his Vice-President and successor Lyndon B. Johnson to fear for the safety and security of the American people. President Kennedy issues his famous challenge that the U. S. would send people to the moon and return them safely to the Earth. This began an influx of funds to spur the scientists at NASA to increase their …show more content…

In this way, followers of Hume could doubt the success of Apollo 11 without disregarding their beliefs. There is a common thought that pictures have a single meaning, especially when in the context of the media postings of a historical event; however, this thought is flawed as it leads one to think that believing is seeing, especially since most people view events in the world through pre-existing experiences and prejudices (Perlmutter, 2008). In short, people believe what they want to believe and two diametrically opposed points of view can occur through the viewing of one particular photo. This difference in understanding would come from the view of the scientific data, photographs of the astronauts planting the American flag on the moon’s surface, as well as the video and voice capturing’s that were taken of the moonwalk. However, those who believe in the conspiracy of a faked landing, point out that the flag appears to be blowing, and since there is no wind on the moon, that would be impossible. This train of thought would lead one to believe that the landing never truly occurred as the media and the government presented it. Kant’s epistemology fuses the logical mind and the senses

Open Document