Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The reconstruction period in american history essay
The reconstruction period in american history essay
The ways in which political, social, and economic realities changed America after the Civil War
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The reconstruction period in american history essay
Alongside the brutal, bloody Civil War and makeshift post-war reconstruction in the South were several monumental changes within the United States. As federal power increased, so did the power of the Constitution, as it began to expand and shift to encompass more and more people. With this also came a social change; millions of blacks, now freed by the thirteenth amendment, had the potential to be just as successful as their white brethren. As time went by, however, numerous pitfalls and opposing viewpoints challenged the idea of constitutional and social transformation. While there was a constitutional revolution occurring from 1860-1877, there was little to no social revolution happening at the same time. The Constitution itself, the foundation …show more content…
The writers of the petition believed two things: that the South Carolina government’s emphasis on state’s rights would never give blacks their long deserved property, and that the constitution now applied to them because they were free from slavery. In response, Washington created the Freedmen 's Bureau to guarantee African Americans a chance at the pursuit of happiness, and passed the 14th amendment under the constitution to secure the rights of African-American citizens. The intervention of the federal government in the south was a godsend for its black population, and the first time it has encompassed those of a different race. Senator Lot Morrill in congress recognized the Constitution’s new moral code, and in a passionate speech proclaimed, “We have revolutionized this Constitution of ours to that extent...” (Doc F). Morrill, in response to the Civil Rights bill being passed to help protect the rights of black citizens, understood the new responsibilities of the Constitution, and supported them fully. He knew that as a country changes, so must its government, and the shifting of the constitution to reflect the changing values of the people was fitting. There were some, however, that disagreed with …show more content…
There was somewhat of a push for progressive treatment of newly freed blacks, and several documents, like A. R. Waud’s The First Vote captured their newfound freedom. In The First Vote, it shows an older black man casting his vote at the ballot box, quite possibly the first as indicated by the title (Doc G). The picture is not drawn in a malicious or caricatured way, so the author was not biased in his depiction of southern black voters in the reconstruction era. Rather it is a realistic representation of new voting rights blacks attained under the fifteenth amendment, and perhaps sheds a hint of optimism for the future of freed blacks. Aside from others beginning to treat black people as equals, they themselves began to stand up for themselves and hold their life in higher regard. A convention of black soldiers in Tennessee petitioned the government for representation, claiming, “Is this the fruit of freedom, and the reward of our services in the field?” (Doc C). These men, who had laid their lives down to help bring the union back together, were wanting the right to vote just like their white comrades. After protesting and petitioning it enough, they eventually got it in the form of an amendment to the constitution. Despite best intentions, there was quite a bit left unchanged in southern society after the Civil War, cartoons like Thomas Nast’s Worst than
Most Americans are aware of the effects of the Civil War, particularly on the abolition of slavery. But there is a great deal of ignorance on how the War and aftermath of enacting black civil rights shaped our modern government. In his article “To Begin the Nation Anew: Congress, Citizenship, and Civil Rights after the Civil War”, Robert J. Kaczorowski outlines the power struggle that occurred between local and federal government when it came to granting citizen’s rights. Though the battle wasn’t bloody, the war of government had nearly as profound effects as a physical war.
After abolition of slavery, new challenges became present; one of them, the readmission of the Southern states was required into the Union. " The goal of Reconstruction was to readmit the South on terms that were acceptable to the North-full political and civil equality for blacks and denial of the political rights of whites who were the leaders of the secession movement" (Wormser, 2002). Easier said than done, reconstruction, in the sense originally though by President Lincoln took many years to become a reality due to a series of issues. The "Black codes" permitted, although dubious, displayed the resistance of the South, this and the lack of opportunities for blacks to owe land, as well as the obstacles they encountered to vote were the most prominent issues to overcome during reconstruction. After these problems were ironing out, equality in education, voting rights, and land ownership were established for blacks. Many historical figures defended the rights of those marginalized. Among them President Abraham Lincoln, who instituted the abolition of slavery in 1865 and set the basis for reconstruction in 1862, Frederick Douglas, a former slave who spoke for slave's freedom and after emancipation, for the rights of the newly freed, and Susan B. Anthony, a Quaker abolitionist, whom together with others started the suffrage movement.
In order to unite the nation, intense dispute had aroused. Through various laws both African Americans and ex-Confederates were affected by the reconstruction period. Although the Reconstruction Era had gained a negative legacy, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were a breakthrough in the life of African Americans. The continuous development of polices was to reach the intended goal that the Reconstruction Era was sought for, to unify the United States of
...dom and right to vote established by the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, blacks were still oppressed by strong black codes and Jim Crow laws. The federal government created strong legislation for blacks to be helped and educated, but it was ineffective due to strong opposition. Although blacks cried out to agencies, such as the Freemen's Bureau, declaring that they were "in a more unpleasant condition than our former" (Document E), their cries were often overshadowed by violence.
From 1860 to 1877, the American people faced several constitutional and social issues. For example, the after-effects of the Civil War, power struggle between the state and federal government, issues with civil liberties and suffrage, the rights of free black men, and resentment of white men, have all become critical issues. These critical issues needed immediate resolutions. Therefore, resolutions were created to solve these problems and those resolutions called for new constitutional and social developments that have amount to a revolution.
After the American Revolution, slavery began to decrease in the North, just as it was becoming more popular in the South. By the turn of the century, seven of the most Northern states had abolished slavery. During this time, a surge of democratic reform swept the North to the West, and there were demands for political equality, economic and social advances for all Americans. Northerners said that slavery revoked the human right of being a free person and when new territories became available i...
In the latter half of the 18th century, freed slaves possessed the right to vote in all but three states. It was not until the 19th century that states began to pass laws to disenfranchise the black population. In 1850, only 6 out of the 31 states allowed blacks to vote. 1Following the civil war, three reconstruction amendments were passed. The first and second sought to end slavery and guarantee equal rights. The third, the 15th amendment, granted suffrage regardless of color, race, or previous position of servitude.2 The 15th Amendment monumentally changed the structure of American politics as it was no longer the privileged whites who could vote. For some it was as though hell had arrived on earth, but for others, it was freedom singing. However, the song was short lived. While many political cartoons from the period show the freedom that ex-slaves have for voting because of the 15th Amendment, they often neglect to include the fact that many African Americans were coerced into voting a certain way or simply had their rights stripped from them.
The American Revolution was a “light at the end of the tunnel” for slaves, or at least some. African Americans played a huge part in the war for both sides. Lord Dunmore, a governor of Virginia, promised freedom to any slave that enlisted into the British army. Colonists’ previously denied enlistment to African American’s because of the response of the South, but hesitantly changed their minds in fear of slaves rebelling against them. The north had become to despise slavery and wanted it gone. On the contrary, the booming cash crops of the south were making huge profits for landowners, making slavery widely popular. After the war, slaves began to petition the government for their freedom using the ideas of the Declaration of Independence,” including the idea of natural rights and the notion that government rested on the consent of the governed.” (Keene 122). The north began to fr...
The Constitution is the foundation of our county it represents liberty and justice for all. We are able to live freely and do, as we desire because of the constitution. The constitution was, signed September 17, 1787 at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. It took time and many debates were held before an agreement was achieved in both the drafting and ratification of the constitution. These disagreements came with several compromises before the constitution was fully ratified on May 29, 1790, with Rhode Island being the last and the thirteenth. The First, challenge was the Articles of Confederation; it was a sort of a draft of the Constitution but was weak and inadequate. Second, obstacle was the Anti-Federalists fight for more
In this excerpt from Democracy in America Alexis Tocqueville expresses his sentiments about the United States democratic government. Tocqueville believes the government's nature exists in the absolute supremacy of the majority, meaning that those citizens of the United States who are of legal age control legislation passed by the government. However, the power of the majority can exceed its limits. Tocqueville believed that the United States was a land of equality, liberty, and political wisdom. He considered it be a land where the government only served as the voice of the its citizens. He compares the government of the US to that of European systems. To him, European governments were still constricted by aristocratic privilege, the people had no hand in the formation of their government, let alone, there every day lives. He held up the American system as a successful model of what aristocratic European systems would inevitably become, systems of democracy and social equality. Although he held the American democratic system in high regards, he did have his concerns about the systems shortcomings. Tocqueville feared that the virtues he honored, such as creativity, freedom, civic participation, and taste, would be endangered by "the tyranny of the majority." In the United States the majority rules, but whose their to rule the majority. Tocqueville believed that the majority, with its unlimited power, would unavoidably turn into a tyranny. He felt that the moral beliefs of the majority would interfere with the quality of the elected legislators. The idea was that in a great number of men there was more intelligence, than in one individual, thus lacking quality in legislation. Another disadvantage of the majority was that the interests of the majority always were preferred to that of the minority. Therefore, giving the minority no chance to voice concerns.
..., at the annual meeting of the Equal Rights Association, Douglas addressed the urgency of the vote of black men. With the establishment of the fifteenth amendment extending the vote to black men and not women friction was created between the two causes and greatly split them. “Douglass claimed that it was the “negro hour” and their rights had to be secured first.” ( Huggins, 121).
President Johnson believed that the emancipation of blacks was the means to break down the planter aristocracy, not to empower blacks. He saw no reason to punish the South as losing their slaves and labor force was punishment enough. As our textbook notes, “Johnson’s views, combined with a lack of political savvy and skill, left him unable to work constructively with congressional Republicans, even the moderates who constituted the majority” Another reason Radical Reconstruction failed was because in the early 1870s, growing economic problems grew stronger as white Northerners became more irritated with the struggles to protect the rights of freed people, as Northerners felt they had done enough for black Southerners. As Hewitt and Lawson suggest, “More and more northern whites came to believe that any debt owed to black people for northern complicity in the sin of slavery had been wiped out by the blood shed during the Civil War.” This led the nation to shift from focusing on social matters to economic matters. A third reason why Radical Reconstruction failed was because focusing on social matters opened the door to legislation limiting the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. United States v. Cruikshank (1876), for example, ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment protected blacks against abuses by the government, but not from private groups. After that case more and more legislation was passed, putting a stop to Radical Reconstruction
The 18th century the United States created a new constitution. The Constitution was made to layout the principles of the American government in what they can do to their people. It complete this task by outlining the basic rights of the citizens and detailing what the government can do to govern its people. Without the Constitution America probably would have ended up failing. Although there are some people that think the Constitution needs to change with the times while others think that it needs to remain the same. It is my belief the Constitution's basic structure should stay the same but I'm not against a new adaptation of the Constitution and agree with treating it as a
A constitution is the totality of laws and principles that any governing body or nation has acknowledged to be ordered. It provides guidelines to the government on how the country’s governing bodies are to be administered. It also plays up the fundamentals and principle structures, purposes and limits of governing bodies. The constitution also can be expressed in both the written or unwritten methods. Hence, this essay will discuss around the first appearance of a written constitution in the United Kingdom and the view regarding to a relatively straightforward legislative task.
The focus of this essay will be centralized upon arguing that the inherent weakness of “Australian Constitutional Jurisprudence ” lies in omission of a framework which explicitly protects civil and politic rights of Australian citizens. Nevertheless, this may be remedied by the incorporation of a constitutionally entrenched Bill of Rights which will ensure that implied constitutionally rights and freedom will become absolute . Thus in countries such as Canada which has its own Canadian Charter of Rights “the electoral system is subject to less judicial intervention ” as “contrary [to the Charter] the legislature may not legislate and the executive may not act ” this enables “the courts to invalidate legislation and conduct which infringes the Bill of Rights. ” Firstly, this essay will critique the undue restrictions placed on the voting rights of prisoners by the High court through a humanist perspective – noting both arguments in favour and in opposition of the decision. Following this, this essay will explore the less controversial case of Rowe v Electoral Commissioner . Furthermore, the essay will conduct a close analysis of the freedom of political communication and the restrictions which it entails.