Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Obesity problem in america
How obesity is a big problem in the united states
Obesity problem in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Obesity problem in america
Obesity in the US is considered an epidemic. According to the Weekly Standard, “Obesity is the new smoking.” They go on to say that “health researchers at Harvard have discovered that obesity is ‘associated’ with 112,000 deaths in the United States every year.” One way lawmakers are trying to combat the problem is by creating a soda tax. Based on the available statistics, a soda tax would be beneficial to the waistline of the average American and the health care system. The soda tax, also known as a sugar tax, is being proposed as a tax on sugary beverages designed to reduce consumption. A similar tax was created to reduce the amount of smoking. The Weekly Standard reported, “An increase of $1.25 in tobacco taxes saves more than 37,000 lives and $5 billion in health care costs.” Could a tax on beverages be as effective? The Weekly Standard estimates that “Paterson's 18 percent tax on sugary soft drinks will reduce consumption by 5 percent.” In addition, according to Veronique de Rugy, “Five experts on health and economics insisted that a penny-per-ounce tax on sugared beverages could lead the average consumer to reduce soda consumption by about 10 percent and lose two pounds.” The available data suggests a soda tax would be effective in reducing sugary beverage consumption. …show more content…
The article then explains that the soda tax would add 50 percent to the price of a two-liter and 45 percent to a 12-can case. Therefore, a soda tax would certainly reduce consumption. Furthermore, the tax revenue could be quite useful. A team of doctors, scientists, and policy makers, like the New York City health commissioner, Thomas Farley, and Arkansas surgeon general, Joseph W. Thompson, predict that a sugar tax “would raise $14.9 billion in its first year, which could be spent on health care initiatives”
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
Mayor Bloomberg’s plan is to decrease the amount of sugar intake that Americans digest. However, to do this successfully, he would need to include all sugary products that affect Americans, not just the most popular products, which happens to be soda. When you take away soda, people will start to replace the drink with something more available. The replacement drink could easily be something more caloric or sugary than the banned drink. Therefore, no change is made. Pure juices have the potential to be unhealthier than soda. These factors need to be considered when deciding what or what not to ban. It would be unfair to target soda and the companies that profit off of soda, without considering the other sugary products and their effect on the world. Some could argue that juice comes from fruit, while soda is artificial. Also, sugars in juice are more natural than the high fructose corn syrup. All the while, this is suppose to support the idea that juice is healthier than soda. However, according to the journal, Nutrition, fruit juice, on average, has a fructose concentration of about 45.5 grams per liter. 45.5 grams per liter is only a bit less than the average 50 grams per liter for
Drenkard, S. (2010). Overreaching on Obesity: Governments Consider New Taxes on Soda and Candy. Retrieved from http://heartland.org
This article is talking about a mayor banning beverages larger than 16 oz. at restaurants, sports arenas and movie theaters. The reason this mayor wants to ban large sodas is because he is afraid for all of New York’s health. That’s a good thing because a lot of us don’t know what we drink and eat most of the time. We just eat our food we don’t even bother to look what’s really in side such as calories, fats and oils in our food. This Mayor is doing New York a huge favor by banning large sodas. He’s helping everyone in New York about their health but people of New York doesn’t see that. There are people who are trying to not let him pass this law because some of them probably drink 16 oz. every day of once a week or twice a week or even more.
While nobody denies we have a problem with taxation in this country for food, beverages, and everything that we buy in general, I believe that we should have a fat tax to detour people from buying soda and other fattening foods. We should also ban sodas and other fattening foods from vending machines in schools, and replace them with more healthy selections.
However, according to this point of view, we should tax sugary drinks. The supporters of this article say that increasing taxes will decrease the possibilities of getting cavities, tooth decay, obesity, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and type two diabetes. Most of the supporters argue that increasing the price of soda by 20 cents would lead to a 16 percent drop in sales.
The obesity epidemic is one of the most pressing issues at this point in both American society and U.S. public policy initiatives. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention 35.9% of U.S. adults over the age of twenty are obese (CDC, 2013). The CDC further notes that 69.2% of U.S. adults twenty years of age and over are overweight (this percentage includes those who are obese). The obesity problem is not exclusive to the adults in the U.S. The CDC notes that 18.4% of adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 are currently obese (CDC, 2013). These statistics illustrate the severity of the obesity epidemic in this country, but what can be done to address or even correct this problem? Many people have proposed solutions, but few are as radical as the proposal from Michael Bloomberg (the New York City Mayor) in 2012.
Mark Bittman’s article, “Taxing Sugar to Fund a city,” emphasizes that on one hand, the taxation of sugar sweetened beverages would be a bonus. On the other hand it could continue to not be supported by the people and government. Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages is being considered in many different places throughout the world. The taxation was becoming a failure everywhere, until it worked for the first time in several cities. Cites such as Northern California, San Francisco, Albany and Richmond. These cities opened up their ideas to this new type of taxation, once those places became supportive many others begin to also be supportive of this new taxation. Philadelphia plans to use the taxes received for the needy, community schools, public parks, recreation centers and libraries. Some cities support using the money this way rather than using the tax for safe free drinking water like in Berkley and Mexico. Taxed products
Sugary soft drinks should be taxed in order to change people’s habit of drinking these towards the goal of
A soda tax aims to stop consumers from buying soda to help those who are obese. This will not be effective. Therefore, a soda tax will not be good public policy. A soda tax is a tax that will add an extra cent per ounce to a bottle or can of a sugary drink, including juice, tea, coffee, energy drinks, and soda.
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans overeat because of their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed, but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation, and putting a stop to it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised to help prevent American obesity.
Have you ever thought how much soda you consume and how bad it can be for you? Many people will drink soda instead of water, simply because it tastes better. The government should limit the intake of sugary beverages because it can lead to many different problems such as heart disease, obesity, and overall it is an unhealthy life-style. “The average person consumes almost 100lbs of sugar a year, with the single biggest source being soda.” A sugary beverage occasionally would be ok, but drinking it every day would cause problems for you overtime. People drink, more soda than they do water. People should be consuming at least eight 8-ounce glasses a day. Mostly no one will drink that amount of water a day. In today’s society, it can be easy to grab a soda for one dollar and carry on. They may taste better but they are not better for your health. “Sugary drinks include soda, fruit punch, lemonade, and other “aides” sweetened powdered drinks, and sports energy drinks.”
The obesity epidemic one of the serious issues also can be handled. The society could also reduce calories and follow the diet as shown in food pyramid to maintain their health. Besides, higher tax on soft drink and junk food can give many positive impacts on various aspects such as improving the health of individuals and the economy of a country. As we know,junk food is unhealthy but people eat junk food because it’s tasty,cheap and easily to get.. However, by increasing tax imposed on junk food, it’s become tasty but expensive and unhealthy. Lower tax prices of junk food is the reason why people can’t stop eating junk food I hope that the parties involve are responsible to do something and awareness among consumers about the increase in taxes on soft drinks and junk food, such as advertising on television, distributing pamphlets and speeches in public . The more taxes imposed on junk food, the healthier society we
Manitoba, a place knew for adoring new and high taxes, refused to add junk food taxes because they knew that it was going to be a waste of time and there would not be any positive results (5). The many studies of junk food taxes have soon other countries that it is not going to work. People will find other alternative to get the sugary high they need. A study in a small city showed that soda intake decreased for a small amount of time and then it increased again, as well as the sales on beer increased (Luciani P.