Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of social stratification
Importance of social stratification
Nature of social inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of social stratification
Society is divided into different levels of class that demonstrate how people with different status’ interact and behave. Some behaviours can be described by analyzing which level of class an individual or group belongs to and their influence on the societal structure. Smoking is a common behaviour among all classes and is more pronounced among those of lower class. This essay will explore research to answer the question; What is the relationship between smoking and socio-economic status? This essay will explore socio-economic status through the levels of different classes in relation to smoking and the sociological view of functional theory. Socio-economic Status Socio-economic status is a term that is used when describing the social standings of a group or individual. The social and economic position of an individual or group is based on four main determinants; education, income, occupation and wealth (Piff, Stancato, Cote, Mendoza-Denton & Keltner, 2012). These four determinants are relevant in all realms of class and hold a large influence on the behaviours of each position in the social structure. Each class stresses a different determinant more than others because they are more relevant. For example, the wealthy individuals within the social structure put a lot of stress on their children’s education, whereas the lower class stresses the need to obtain work (Piff, Stancato, Cote, Mendoza-Denton & Keltner, 2012). This can allow people to use socio-economic status as a means of predicting the behaviour of each class. Upper Class The upper class are known to have high socio-economic status. They have a higher disposable income, are often highly educated, work high profile jobs and usually inherit their money from f... ... middle of paper ... ... encourage the lower class citizens to work harder to move up within companies and are motivated to succeed in order to better their life (Teppermen, 2011). Inequality allows individuals to demonstrate their talents and identify those that are willing to work for what they want and deserve. Conclusion This paper looked at the socio-economic status within society through the relationship between the different levels of classes and the effects of smoking, as well as the functionalist view of societal structure. Smoking is a common occurrence among the classes and is even more prevalent among those in the lower classes. Behaviours can be explored in more depth through the analysis of the social structure of society and their impact on individuals and groups. These levels allow for diversity and thus allow for different reactions and interactions among the classes
The smoking issue is very complicated and some of the arguments are beyond the scope of this essay. Still, we can obtain a balanced outlook if we consider the following: the facts of smoking, individual right, societal responsibility, and the stigma of smoking. Haviland and King write essays which contain very important points, but seem to contain a bias which may alienate some people. To truly reach a consensus on the smoking issue, we must be willing to meet each other halfway. We must strike equilibrium between individual right and societal responsibility.
Gregory Mantsios presents himself as an expert in this essay because he states a lot of facts. The author uses stats, his own opinion, and my favorite thing that brought me in was the myths that he told the reality’s for later in the essay. Mantsios believes that no matter what social or economic class that you fall into, you have a fair chance at succeeding in life. I feel that the intended audience is the citizens of America or people in the workforce since they are the ones that have to deal with this situation. The thesis of this essay is “Perhaps, most importantly, the point that is missed is that inequality is persistent and structural-
There is little to no mention of any statistics that might show when, and thereby, why, cigarette smoking gained popularity. The author also fails to provide cultural context in many areas. Alleged masculine values in America are presented as fact, when there is no evidence, aside from the author’s word, that this is true. The arguments would be much stronger had the author successfully differentiated between correlation and causation. At times, the article is unbalanced, such as the argument surrounding post-World War Two advertising. Within the article, it is unproven that there was a spike in cigarette smoking in men. It was also unproven that the advertisements had an effect. The article ignores the possibility that the increase in smoking among men was merely a consequence of reaching a few opinion leaders. As cigarettes are such an addictive product, simple curiosity in the privacy of one’s home may have turned some men into smokers.
One of the purposes behind the absence of such activities may be that the acquaintanceship of dictator antismoking deliberations at working environments, on open transport, and in schools with the Nazi administration stayed for a long period in famous memory. This might be one of the numerous variables outside of the control of present day health promoters which influence whether individuals begin smoking in any case or stop once they have begun. The historical backdrop of smoking and health in Germany, which can't be taken to begin in the post war world with a populace free of confinements on smoking, shows the deficiency of straightforward dispersion models, whether of examination into open approach or of developments in conduct from the more taught to less instructed areas of pop culture.
Despite the typically imaged definition of socioeconomic class being based entirely on the wealth of the individual, there are many complex social factors at play as well. Not only does it stem from Max Weber’s concept of Socioeconomic class (wealth, status, and power), there is a mobility to it as well. Anyone can permanently or temporarily
(2010) Socioeconomic disparities in quit intentions, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence among smokers in four western countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tobacco Research, Suppl:S20-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq051.
Everyday people try to find their place in society and by doing so they look at their social status in society. This individual paper will be discussing how one is given a social status in society and having this particular status may influence one to act or behave differently then they usually do to keep up with their status. Moreover will be looking particularly at the social status I hold with the role expectations that comes with the status, look closely at status and role in more detail and further more examples of situations faced with thus status.
People throughout the time have been worried about some acts that people make; these acts are sometimes performed unconsciously or without realizing these are affecting they negatively affect others. Some reasons why this happens, they do not realize they are making someone uncomfortable, or they simply do not care about it. Smoking is one of these activities. For a long time, smoking in public places has been extremely popular regardless of age or gender. Many smokers believe they are free to smoke wherever and whenever they. Even if they realize the damage they are causing to themselves, which is a personal decision, when they smoke in public places they ignore the collective damage they are causing others. It has been claimed that despite not engaging in the activity themselves, “passive smokers suffer the same horrifying bad consequences as active smokers” in the form of second-hand smoke (Ecobichon & Wu, 1990, p. 43). Smoking is thus a dangerous activity that is becoming more and more popular in campus every day and is becoming a social and educational problem. Schools should ban smoking from their campus, and those that have should implement stricter methods of enforcing such rules.
Class affects the experiences around us-how we grow up, the people we associate with, the schools we attend, our health, and our opportunities in life. Those who grow up in the upper class have the opportunity to attend the best schools, have plenty of food to eat, associate with what society deems the “best” people. The underclass, or the poor, often have a poor education, are on welfare, and are deemed the undesirables of society.
(House of Commons Health Commitee , 2009) There are many factors that lead to poor people having unhealthier lifestyles than those with higher incomes, for example, a lot of people do not have access to healthy foods whether because of where they live or just the fact that healthier foods are not as affordable for them as more unhealthy alternatives. Another contributing factor to unhealthy lifestyles is smoking. In Scotland, smoking prevalence amongst the most deprived tenth of the population is 43%, this is 19% above the national average and a massive 34% above the prevalence among the tenth most privileged. (ASH Scotland, 2011) This shows that the more impoverished the individual, the more likely they are to take up smoking and potentially damage their
Thesis: It is imperative for smokers to quit because it benefits society as a whole as well as themselves. Fighting against the use of tobacco is important because it causes many diseases and is a player in air pollution.
The opportunities diprived from the lower class are better education earlier, healthy lifestyle, and affordability (The outliers).
Almost 80% of the worlds smokers are lower middle class to lower class. (who.int) This statistic that was taken from the World Health Organization, W.H.O., shows that around the globe it is the less educated making these choices.
Smoking is one of the dangerous habits that people perform in their lives. This habit affects the health and causes several diseases, such as lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary disease (Institute of Medicine, 2012). In the family I visited, the father is a smoker. He strongly approves with the idea of smoking while the mother strongly disapproves the idea of smoking. Both of them know that smoking is harmful to the smoker, but the father does not know that smoking is harmful for other people who are called: second hand smokers. In addition, the father was at the age of 15 when he started smoking cigarettes. There is more than one reason that pushed the father to start smoking when he was a teenager. One of these reasons is copying the behavior of his father. He believes it would be difficult for him to give up smoking. I agree that quit of smoking is difficult since cigarettes contain nicotine, which is more addictive than heroin and also smoking becomes part of his daily routine (Giovanni, 2012).
“…..Nearly half the adult population regularly performs a bizarre act which is necessary neither for the maintenance of life nor for the satisfaction of social, sexual, cultural, or spiritual needs; an act which is acknowledged, even by its adherents, to be harmful to health and even distasteful” (Aston and Stepney 1982: VII). Regarding the above statement a vast majority of anti-smoking campaigners believe that the restriction on smoking in public locations should be increased and effective actions should be taken by governments in order to reduce the consumption of tobacco. On the other hand, addicted smokers consider smoking prohibition as interference in their civil freedom. Though they argue that they have the right to smoke whenever and wherever they want; governments consider passive smoking’s threats as a major priority to deal with. This essay will discuss the policies taken by governments to decrease or even stop smoking among the public. Moreover, it will present smoker’s arguments regarding their right to smoke in public places.