Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational Structure and Culture
Impact of change in organizations
Organizational Structure and Culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational Structure and Culture
According to Dawson (1994) organisational change therefore refers to any alteration in activities or tasks. It is a modification or transformation of the organisations structure, processes, or goals. It may involve minor changes in procedures and or operations or transformational changes brought about by rapid expansion into international markets, mergers, or major restructuring. McLagan (2002) claims that “the phenomenon of change has become a central management issue in modern organisations and whilst it has always been an issue, creating, sustaining and managing change continues to be a challenge in today’s society” (p. 28). Change is also expensive, onerous, and has an intellectually demanding effect. These effects are experienced as organisations try to implement complex, unprecedented, organisation wide proposals such as reengineering, diversity interventions, globalisation, installing quality and productivity programmes, or entering into intricate agreements, mergers and acquisitions. According to Paton and McCalman, (2001) change is therefore an inseparable part of organisations, and it will certainly “not disappear or dissipate” (p. 5). Organisations no longer have a choice: they are pressured to change or else face their possible downfall moreover the rate of organisational change is clearly accelerating today. The content of organisational change refers to the particular areas of transformation that are being examined. According to Walsham, (1993) the organisation may be seeking to change technology, products, systems, manpower, geographical positioning, or corporate culture. The process of organisational change refers to the actions, reactions, and interactions from various interested parties in an attempt to move the ...
... middle of paper ...
...d Mayson (2005) the standardization of university education in connection with its commercialisation and the wide spread of flexible precarious forms of teachers’ employment, undermine the autonomy of faculty and destroy professional skills. Here we should note that if the true creator of knowledge is an integrated personality that can express innovative ideas, think systematically, perceive holistically and in depth a number of subjects, then the progress of cognitive activity in society can be achieved through the provision of the optimum conditions for the education of people in terms of multifaceted cultivation of their personality. However, in the mass universities of modern capitalist society, the education of the many is downgraded into the acquisition of fragmented information, without the potential for substantial development of their intellectual skills.
S, Rawat 2001, Organisational Change and Forces Prompting Change, Academic Paper Review, Shovoong viewed on 2nd April 2011, on http://imgs.shvoongstatic.com/images/2011/_v_070420111027/scp.PNG">
I believe in change and all the good things that change can bring. Every person likes change whether it be a new phone or a new car. But the best change that has happened to me was when we changed churches. We have been going to a really big church called gateway for about 6 years. Most sundays mornings we woke up at nine changed clothes and left. When we got there i worshiped for an hour and put on a fake smile when seeing some of my mom's very talkative friends on the way out the door. Which i was fine with because i wasn't doing any talking and we were usually playing xbox by eleven. So when my parents asked my brother and i if we wanted to switch to another church called the hills. At first i was a little
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
Unfortunately, the purpose of the education system, as seen in most institutions of higher education, is in fact to instill in people the notion that they are incapable of learning. The standardization of education highlights the underlying assumption that people “cannot learn without a pre-determined set of institutionalized options forced upon them” (Kyhall. Online).
This paper will be broken down into six sections profiling each critical part of implementing and managing change in an organization. The sections included are; outline for plan creating urgency, the approach to attracting a guiding team, a critique of the organizational profile, the components of change, and how to empower the organization.
Catherine Liu, the author of American Idyll: Academic Antielitism as Cultural Critique argues that, “The very mission of universities has changed. We don’t educate people anymore. We train them to get jobs”(Anti-Intellectualism). Even if our society different from outside, in inside our world becoming more likely like Brave New World. Our society doesn’t care about learning but more care about their grades. Our society doesn’t care about how much they’re learning but how our learning will get us a job. It is the same to World State where they don’t care about learning because they already conditioned to just learn what they have to learn from the government. They are conditioned so they never want to do anything they shouldn’t done by the government.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Universities are where we locate our future's pioneers and issue solvers. They give a commercial center to thoughts, where understudies are instructed to think basically and be available to new translations. Bill Nye, one of the best masterminds and teachers of our time once stated, "Everybody you will ever meet knows something you don't. " Universities endeavor to grow balanced people by grasping comprehensiveness; recognizing that all understudies are remarkable with various foundations and encounters, and to best comprehend the world we live in, we should think basically by being available to new thoughts and articulations.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Change in an organization occurs when an organization identifies an area of where necessary change must be undertaken, examines it thoroughly and adapts to it. This may lead to gaps where employees may not adapt to a certain change and therefore it is important that an organization takes into considerati...
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.
The world is constantly changing in many different ways. Whether it is technological or cultural change is present and inevitable. Organizations are not exempt from change. As a matter of fact, organizations have to change with the world and society in order to be successful. Organizations have to constantly incorporate change in order to have a competitive advantage and satisfy their customers. Organizations use change in order to learn and grow. However, change is not something that can happen in an organization overnight. It has to be thought through and planned. The General Model of Planned Change focuses on what processes are used by the organization to implement change. In the General Model of Planned Change, four steps are used in order to complete the process of change. Entering and Contracting, Diagnosing, Planning and Implementing, and Evaluating and Institutionalizing are the four steps used in order to complete the process of change in an organization. The diagnostic process is one of the most important activities in OD(Cummings, 2009, p. 30).
One of the first scholars to describe the process of organizational change was Lewin (1974). He described change as a three-stage process that consists of unfreezing, moving and freezing stage. During the unfreezing stage the organizations become motivated to change by some event or objective. The moving stage is like implementation when the organization actually makes the necessary change. Furthermore the freezing stage is reached when the change becomes permanent. Organizational change has also...
In relation to social transformation I have gathered materials that focusses on programs provided for ‘refugees’ living in New Zealand. The purpose of my findings are based on the societies support for ‘refugees’ in terms of human security and directions of life before settling in their new destination. There are stories about ‘refugees’ that need to be shared and stories that need to be forgotten, because it can produce controversy within the society or the universe. But where can these ‘refugees’ go if the place they call home is unsafe or too risky for the lives of their families and for themselves. It’s hard enough to migrate into a new country, but it is devastating for refugees who have experienced the loss of homes and loved ones.