Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors influencing organisational behaviour
Individual factors that affect organizational behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors influencing organisational behaviour
Doing Business between Two States: Order & Chaos Starting from ancient Babylon to todays’ Boston, we can see human created group, team, and community to survive or achieve a common goal. Every group, team, organization or community always strived for order in their eco system. Most of the human activities across the civilization and over the time have been spent to make rules, trying to find pattern, train people to follow discipline to create order. Instead of these cumulative mammoth efforts, it’s very sad to see the end result: there is no full proof success to create order to match uncertainty of external environment. Same story continues for business scenarios also. For long time CEOs are working hard to tame uncertainties, establishing ultimate order in businesses to ensure future success! But alas most organizations in the process of attaining ultimate order either stopped growing or became a part of the history! Their internal pseudo stability has failed to battle with external business chaos. Very few companies, who succeeded to survive the test of time, are considered to be innovative, doing things out of the box, creating new rules for the game or a game changer itself. Whenever they faced crisis, they defied the order of the system and created something new to survive. What ‘Order’ Means? Can it help Organizations? Standardization, Processes, SOPs, rulebooks, policies all are signs of ‘order’ or stability in an organizations. It is indeed favorite for all big companies like Motorola, Dell, Maruti etc. The biggest argument in the favor of ‘order’ is cost reduction, time reduction, confusion reduction. These claims are not wrong. It’s true they help to do all these for short term or in a situation where you don’t need ... ... middle of paper ... ... order totally? 2. How much chaos is not madness? The objective of this position paper is to establish, those days are gone when business can claim they are stable. Nobody is stable and cannot be in this dynamic turbulent socio-economic situation. Organizations have to accept this fact and try to find a solution to tackle the problem. Chaos can beat chaos … this should be the mantra for today’s organizations. But what is really meant by chaos? Is it complete madness to allow people whatever they want to do without particular objective in an organization or can there be any hidden underlying pattern in the making an organization ‘chaotic’? We’ll try to find answers of these questions and in this process we’ll try to reinforce our idea of how chaos can be a part of organization’s strategy to survive and beat uncertainties of harsh reality. Market Focus & Position:
I have experiences organizations that lacked consistency and thought around their goals and as a result constantly restructured. Organizations that are constantly running after new ideas lack focus therefore can’t achieve their goals.
This book is important to business students because it shows that even the most seasoned executive runs into unexpected challenges and can find themselves in uncharted territory. Jim Barton’s experiences and lessons can be lessons for anyone. Any employee, whether they are support staff or a top executive, should always maintain an open mind and be ready to learn from a situation or the people around them at any time.
A key theme in William Faulkner’s novel The Sound and the Fury is the deterioration of the Compson family. May Brown focuses on this theme and explains that Quentin is the best character to relate the story of a family torn apart by” helplessness, perversion, and selfishness.” In his section, there is a paradoxical mixture of order and chaos which portrays the crumbling world that is the core of this novel.
Abstract: I will show how chaos is can be found in art, specifically in literature, and analyze John Hawkes's Travesty to show the similarities between literature and chaos.
Ecology of order has been apart of the science of ecology from the very beginning. The chaos theory has been apart of the sciences for some time, but was just recently accepted by ecology. But when it was accepted ecologists studied it and observed ecosystems with this mindset and saw that this theory is very present in nature. Charles Elton once said, “The balance of nature does not exist and perhaps never has existed”. In this paper I will discuss both ecology of order and chaos and will present examples from both sides along with the ecologists that believed in each theory. I am arguing that while there is still some since of stability in our environment, as a whole the ecology of chaos theory seems to be ever present in our ecosystems.
Nowadays, organizational change has a serious implication for the survival of an organization (Furst & Cable, 2008). Change is critical, necessary, and has becomes a key factor to win the game.
3. Organizations must change in order to meet the needs of the changing workplace, environment, technology, and economy in order to be competitive. Change is good for an organization if it is done in a controlled and structured manner. Change is also risky because it is often met with resistance. For example, people may feel threatened and fear power loses and subsequently, resists the change. Change can also be ineffective if it is narrow and doesn’t concern itself with people and is over determined. In Enron’s case, the organization was constantly changing with no collective rhyme or reason.
As the organization grows in this stage, the entrepreneurs must learn how to manage the organization. It is at this point that a crisis of leadership emerges. In the beginning, the organizational is so busy getting started and developing new products and markets that they fail to understand the importance of managing the organizational resources. The crisis can be averted, and growth can continue to stage two, if the organization can learn the skills necessary to manage the organization.
• Strategic management is fluid and complex. Change creates original combinations of conditions requiring shapeless non-repetitive responses.
It is a scientific fact order can never come out of disorder; this is shown by looking at the second law of thermodynamics, entropy and negative entropy or “negentropy.” An example of how entropy is useful in disproving evolution can be done by dropping marbles in to a box and recording the results.
Cultivating a taste for failure and chaos Schmidt encourages it: “Please fail very quickly—so that you can try again.. he had praised an executive who made a several-million-dollar blunder: “‘I’m so glad you made this mistake. Because I want to run a company where we are moving too quickly and doing too much, not being too cautious and doing too little. If we don’t have any of these mistakes, we’re just not taking enough risk.’”
...ople for stability. In this todays modernised world, change has become inevitable and there is no doubt that change has to occur in order to survive and achieve success through a number of ways such as focusing on internal strengths, exploiting external forces and making potential threats into opportunities. In the long run, there are clearly more benefits rather than disadvantages because change does not have to be met with negativity. It needs to be embraced through cooperation between managers and employees, clear organisational culture and rewards that improve performance that are not based on tightly structured procedures. Ultimately, overcoming the difficulties of organisational change shows how management systems and people rewarded for stability is not just black and white but is shades of grey and how it is approached will determine its success or failure.
... Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11) is two significant factors that make the organization’s change difficult. Management systems are designed affects every level in the organization structures and processes when make change. On the other hand, people rewarded for stability impact organizational change seriously because people like working in a stability environment and they resist change. It is very difficult for organization to make changes in those two areas.
Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.
Is There a Science of Society, and Does It Affect Scientific Study of Social Phenomena that Effect Norms?