Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of minimum wage laws
Effect of raising federal minimum wage
Effects of minimum wage law
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The “Fair” Work Commission has ruled that over six hundred and fifty thousand Australians working in retail and hospitality, would have their penalty rates diminished at the government's decisions to scrap weekend penalty rates. Unfortunately for some workers, they are amongst the lowest paid in the country and as a result of, Sundays and public holidays, essentially a day for Australians to “rest”, will have workers on those days being paid less. Many Australians will become disheartened by this decision as Australia swears to have a proud nation of democracy and many of our workers who already are enduring assiduous physical work at a very low pay already will have their pay slashed even further. Already struggling to make ends meet, employee’s minimum wage paying jobs will have their penalty rates lowered to a staggering degree. Many rely on these rates to provide utility and pay for their basic needs; food, water, shelter. Approximately, those working on Sundays will lose around sixty …show more content…
Australia swears to exist as a nation of democracy, yet disappoints its growing generation. A recent poll shows that 82% of Australians support the compensation for working outside the usual working week- which is a ridiculously high number. Australian youths that are taking part in the workforce, are also juggling the struggles of studying, maintaining a healthy social life, fitness etc. Therefore taking up more hours at work will heighten stress and cause further complications in their lifestyle. The penalty rates should not be cut for it can have a variety of detrimental effects on society and Australian culture. It will add to the struggle of our already hard-working employees earning the bare minimum to cover essential resources for life. By lowering pay on public holidays and Sundays, this decision ruled by the fair work commission contradicts Australian values for parsimonious
Labor’s rights, this issue have been bothering many worker since the 19th century and can still be a problem today. As John L. Lewis has said in his speech “I repeat that labor seeks peace and guarantees its own loyalty, but the voice of labor, insistent upon its rights, should not be annoying to the ears of justice or offensive to the conscience of the American people” (John L. Lewis), which under his words meant that labor is something that can be done right and peacefully but it needs rules and benefits that come with those rules which labor asks for and when labor asks for those rules and benefits it shouldn’t be taken like some annoying kid’s demands but more as something that needs to be done and done with a right mind set. Labor today consists of a man or woman going to work, working their hours, and finally getting paid for those hours at the end of the week, at least a minimum of $7.50 an hour (United States Department of Labor), but before it wasn’t like that before many workers would get paid very poorly even thought they would work for a lot of hours and they wouldn’t get benefits from their work or safety when working such as in the mines like the mine workers, but one man stood up for them and his name was John L. Lewis (John Llewellyn Lewis, Encyclopedia).
Mainly, the article focuses on the injustices people have encountered in a work environment. Rhodes appeals to her audience as everyday “average” people who identify with the plight of another. Although she makes a compelling argument referencing studies and personal stories of people this has happened to, there are flaws in her argument that could discredit the validity of her reasoning. The logic in her article highly finds favor with the general working public. It is both consistent and appropriate. However, it is not complete, nor fully believable. I will discuss the following in the next paragraphs. Her use of research and anecdotes are mostly one-sided and while it brings valid points for the workers, fail to portray opposing views on the issue, that of the employer. She also neglects to further explore and compare the validity of this claim against wel...
Imagine having to clock out mid-shift to prevent getting paid overtime, but not leaving for another hour or two. Having to punch out for break but work through it, or having a paid vacation taken away as if it never existed? Situations relative to these are reality and are classified as wage theft, defined by the wage theft website as “a variety of infractions that occur when workers do not receive their legally or contractually promised wages” (Wage Theft). The public is generally uneducated of the concept of wage theft and the effects it has on our society, let alone what can be done about it. The Wage Theft Prevention Act, an act established in 2011 by the state of New York, provides laws protecting working citizens, and is an act that should be effective nationwide. As a country, we support the terms “freedom”, “equality”, and “rights”; however, we need to focus on the working citizens of the United States and ensure equal rights for everyone.
O’Donnell, A. (2004), “Non-Standard” Workers in Australia: Counts and Controversies, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 17: 1-28.
...f] Queensland: Queensland Law Reform Commission. pp. 2 - 20. Available through: QLD Government http://www.qlrc.qld.gov.au/wpapers/wp37.pdf [Accessed: 2 Mar 2014].
... the safety net of modern awards, the ten national employment standards introduced by the fair work act 2009, and annual adjustments to the National minimum wage provided minimum levels of income and working conditions to workers with low skills and low bargaining power in the labour market. Other components include government spending on public health, education, housing, transport and community services which provide a safety net for low income earners. Macroeconomic policies such as monetary and fiscal policies supports aggregate demand as the GFC and recession impacted adversely on the Australian economy. The main concerns were to support economic growth, household incomes and living standards in the short term, to minimise the increasing rate of unemployment in the medium term, and increase public investment in infrastructure to increase productive capacity.
Fair work commission, as the Australia’s national workplace relations tribunal, they have responsibilities to protect the maintain employment conditions such as the minimum wages, working environment, and also the other series
Australia is facing a large challenge at the moment of the loss of jobs. Because this world and Australia included, heavily relies on technology therefore jobs are limited meaning more people are becoming homeless. This is bad for the people who are old and losing their jobs, because it is harder to get a job when you are older (before retirement age). Therefore this means those people have loss of money and tend to struggle to get
The concept of a fair go is to Australia what the American Dream is to America. It defines us. It directs us. But, just as predicted by Scott F. Fitzgerald’s almost a century ago, it decays. And with it so do we: from an egalitarian nation to a stratified parody with an ever growing gulf between the rich and poor and an ever shrinking middle class. To a future poisoned by materialism, greed, and inequality.
Mr Abbott spoke out and told the reporters “It is a very important economic reform, as well as a very important social reform.” He said many families come to the conclusion working to pay for childcare can be “hardly worth it…we are changing the economics of going back to work.”
Women earn 24% less than men on average, U.N. Report (April, 2015). In Australia, men had a 51% benefits over women get only 36% In terms of the employment. Wherein, UK men had a 47% benefits over women get only 35% shows quite similar. In Australia, between 2000-10, the rate of men working part time increased from 12% to 39% while women employment rate was 39% and remained steady. Whereas in UK, the rate of men working part time increased from 11% to 39% compare to women employment rate was 41% which slightly decreased. Moreover, condition of women in employment shows high rate of gender discrimination in both countries.
Social inequality and stratification are becoming increasingly prevalent in Australian society, consequently becoming more harmful towards individuals receiving the short end of the stick (M. McCrindle, 2016). Looking at the recent figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) from around 2014, Australia is above the OECD average Gini coefficient and is the 15th most unequal country of the 34 OECD countries (ref). This may come as a surprise for many Australians, an idea of an egalitarian and classless society had been established firmly into Australian identity, however, these ideologies are under threat and becoming further from the truth.
One in three Australian women aged 15 years and older has had to experience physical violence perpetrated against them, and one in five has experienced sexual assault. As a result, this will amount to $15.6 billion per year by 2021, at the expense of the Australian economy. Focusing on the inequality ethnicities face, a greater proportion of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participating in the labour force were unemployed, at 17.2% compared with 5.5%, the unemployment rate of the indigenous is more than three times higher than that of the non-indigenous. Education opportunities for the indigenous of Australia is poor as well, with the proportion of Indigenous 20–24 year olds completing year 12 or equivalent was 59% compared with 86 – 88% for non-Indigenous Australians. Fiorina claiming that the only limitations that gender and races have are the ones they create for themselves, is statement can that be falsified in more than one country. As now, it is becoming more aware that there can be no advantage gained in a seemingly biased
The submission from the SVdPS raises several key issues in regards to the adequacy of the allowance payment system. The submission noted that the current rate for single persons is now less than half of the full-time minimum wage (SVdPS, 2012) and argues that it makes it harder for people to find employment as it locks recipients in to a more permanent form of poverty. The cost of living increases as public transport costs more, and is sparser and less frequent in areas that rent is lower, credit and loan repayments cost more, and recipients have to pay more for basic services (ACOSS, 2012). Moreover, SVdPS state that poverty lines set by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, place recipients of the Newstart Allowance as living below poverty line and with the assistance of extra benefits, it only places recipients marginally above the poverty line (SVdPS, 2012).
For the past three decades minimum wage has been seen to rise several times. Only helping some but more than anything harming most. So who are the ones feeling the effects? Certainly not the wealthy, it never is them, mainly it would be the working poor, unskilled and teenagers. Raising minimum wage would cripple the public even more than what it would actually help.