Introduction
Over the past decades, casual employment in Australia has become a phenomenon of great concern. With the soaring numbers of casual employment, the debates about the benefits and drawbacks of causal employment have become fiercer. Casualization is a very important form of employment in Australia, which has been protected by workplace law. The majority of casual labor force constantly contact with their potential employers to apply job and confirm the arrangement of working time from month to month, or even week to week. In term of wages, causal workers cannot get paid for the annual holiday leave. However, they can receive more paid than the full-time workers for the same working hours. In this essay, how casual employment is defined in Australia and casual employment trend in recent years will be introduced. This article will critically discuss the benefits and harms for both employees and employers in terms of growing casual employment in Australia.
Definition of casual employment
Casual employment is often connected with unpleasant working condition including irregular working hours, low wages, intermittent employment and employment insecurity. Casual employment is usually dubbed with as employment with few benefits and rights. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), casual employees are defining as the employees who cannot get paid for their sick leave or annual leave. This definition reflects the most important aspects of causal works (Buddelmeyer, and Wooden, 2011).
Casualization in Australia
Over the past decades, the number of casual employees increase sharply .as it is shown in Figure 1 , the size of casual employees only account for no more than ten per cent of the total workfor...
... middle of paper ...
...tion, 4th ed., The Federation Press. Sydney
Ferguson, J. (1997), Casual Employment Contracts: Continuing Confusion when Protection and Free Market Clash, New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(1): 123-142
Harbridge, R. and Walsh, P. (2002), Globalisation and labour market deregulation in Australia and New Zealand: Different approaches, similar outcomes, Employee Relations, 24(4): 423-436.
Macintyre, S. (1987), Holt and the Establishment of Arbitration: An Australian Perspective, New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(3): 151-159.
O’Donnell, A. (2004), “Non-Standard” Workers in Australia: Counts and Controversies, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 17: 1-28.
Reveley, J. (1999), From “Supplementary Seagulls” to “Cut Price Casuals”: Changing Patterns of Casual Employment on the New Zealand Waterfront 1951-1997, Labour and Industry, 10(1): 35-56.
Precarious employment, also known as precarious work, is a type of employment that is unstable, doesn't provide job security, may have high risk working conditions, often does not provide much in the way of benefits nor the option for workers to join a union, and typically provides low wages that usually are, on their own, insufficient to support a basic household. Precarious employment can include part-time, temporary, self-employment and contract work categories. In recent years during tougher economic conditions, this type of employment has become more and more common in some of Canada’s most populated major cities, such as Toronto and Hamilton, and it continues to be on the increase. Employers are taking advantage of this less expensive
An ordinary man may get depressed about being unemployed and automatically accept it as his own personal problem. He will be condemned as being ‘lazy’ or ‘work-shy’ and labelled simply as a. The ‘scrounger’. The ‘scrounger’. However, there are thousands of other individuals also. unemployed, Mills argues it should then be treated as a ‘public’.
The case Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd[1] confirms the long held doctrine that employers are vicariously liable for the negligence of their employees during the course of their employment. In comparison to cases such as Humberstone v Northern Timber Mills[2] and Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd[3], which appear to contribute to the development of the application of common law to evolving social conditions, the Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd case may be considered as taking a step back in affirming the traditional notion of ‘control’ when determining the nature of employment relationships. The following will critically analyse the ratio and the legal and commercial implications prevalent in this case.
Foulkes, Arthur. "In Defense of Employment-at-Will." Ludwig von Mises Institute. N.p., 23 Mar. 2005. Web. 17 Apr. 2011. .
...e Bargaining, Managerial Prerogative and the Protection of Workers Rights: An Argument on the Role of the Law and Regulatory Strategy in Australia under the Workplace Act 1996 (Cth). Retrieved on April 9, 2013, from http://www.google.co.ke/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.unimelb.edu.au%2FE8812500-7599-11E2-84E10050568D0140&ei=t0RkUdT0K62V7Ab48IC4Bw&usg=AFQjCNEfV17R8n5eNatsPXKQRxB9bqvUig&bvm=bv.44990110,d.ZGU.
In 1997, thirty percent of workers were employed in non-standard work arrangements ("HomelessnessÉ"). These consist of independent contracting, working for temporary help agencies, day labor and regular part-time employment. This type of work typically offers lower wages, fewer benefits and less job security. The underemployment rate stands substantially higher than the unemployment rate. Measures of underemployment reflect not only individuals who are unemployed, but also involuntary part-timers that want to work full-time.
The use of contingent workers is on the rise. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics defines contingent workers as anyone who "does not have an explicit or implicit contract for long-term employment" (Phillips & Gully, 2011 pg 51). This definition includes independent contractors, freelancers, consultants, and temporary workers who may or not work for an agency. In the past 50 years, temporary workers have been crucial to many businesses, and their role in business is growing. Companies must recognize potential problems and concerns brought about by employing temporary workers, and adjust their approach to staffing.
When Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister the first thing she wanted to do was limit union power. She felt that union power applied to nationalized industrial monopolies resulted in poor service at exorbitant cost to the taxpayers. She pointed to inefficient work practices, overemployment and restrictive employment conditions such as the all union “closed shop”. These rules were dictated by union contracts and served to tie the hands of managers and the government alike. Mrs. Thatcher’s greatest grievance concerned the powers union leaders had over strikes ( Moskin 100).
Wykoff, Simon. "Unemployed And Working Hard." The Composition of Everyday Life. Ed. John Mauk and John Metz. Brief ed. Vol. 4. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, 2013. 395-97. Print.
An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy. Bibliography Byars, L. L. (1997). The.
There is a contrast between ‘core’ permanent workforce and ‘peripheral’ non-permanent. The general idea is that an increasing mixture of non-standard employment forms will be more efficient and cheaper.
Gies, T. P., & Bagley, A. W. (2013). Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes: What's new and what's next?. Employee Relations Law Journal, 39(3), 22-33.
Over the years, employers have established employment arrangements with workers that include working in shifts, on "temporary" assignments, in a part-time capacity, and through independent contract work. The impetus for these arrangements is the organizations desire to realize its short-term service and production goals and to reap the low-cost benefits of a contingent work force.
The theory holds work to be governed by a wide range of formal and informal rules and regulations, which cover everything from recruitment, holidays, performance, wages, hours, and a myriad of other details of employment. It asserts that these rules are what industrial actors try to determine, that their establishment is influenced by the wider environmental context in which the actors operate, and that the actors themselves share an interest in maintaining the processes of negotiation and conflict resolution. On the back of these assertions four elements are held to make up the system of industrial relations rule-making. The first is industrial actors, which consists of employers and their representatives (i.e., employer associations), employees and their representatives (i.e., trade unions), and external agencies with an interest in industrial relations (i.e., government departments and labour courts). The second is the environmental context, which
The purpose of this report is to analysis and evaluate any management problems that are current in todays workforce in accordance to the well known ‘sick leave day’ also known as the Australian ‘sickie’ This report will be mainly focusing on the case study; Sick Leave Costing Employers (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014). Management of a business consists of 4 major functions, these include: Planning, Controlling, Organising and Leading (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014, p. 332). Sick leave is leave that employees are entitled to when they are unable to attend work due to the fact that they are either sick or injured (Schermerhorn, Davidson, Poole, Woods, Simon, & McBarron, 2014, p. 334). Within this report management problems will be identified, a discussion of these problems will occur and also any recommendations for the organisation that need to be implemented will be identified.