Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of Durkheim's theory of suicide
Relevance of Durkheim's theory of suicide
Relevance of Durkheim's theory of suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relevance of Durkheim's theory of suicide
One of the more shocking and disturbing facts related to the fallout of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq is this: the number of suicides among the US active duty military personnel has now surpassed the number of troops killed in battle (Williams.) That number reflects the fact that essentially 22 soldiers killed themselves every day, or one every 65 minutes. This troubling trend has been rising since 2005. In addition, the suicide rate of military members in the US is twice as high as it was before the start of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. There have been many social scientists that have developed ideas about what causes people to commit suicide: individual dynamics, social factors, or a combination of both. Emile Durkheim, in his landmark work regarding suicide, developed four different categories of suicide: fatalistic, egoistic, anomic and altruistic. This paper will discuss the issue of suicides among the military, using the framework of Durkheim’s theory of suicide, and focusing on the fatalistic, egoistic, and anomic categories to explain this alarming phenomenon. Durkheim’s theory of suicide illustrated his approach as a positivist theorist; he was a strong believer that sociology should be studied scientifically in a way that those utilized by other natural sciences in order to establish the field as a credible one. Essentially, this involved the establishment of cause-and-effect associations using hypothetical and deductive reasoning. In his study of suicide, Durkheim attempted to explain how the field of sociology could uniquely describe elements of society and human behavior in a way that differed from that offered by other disciplines. His beliefs regarding suicide involved his conviction that suicide may happen as... ... middle of paper ... ... to this population that are specific to this group. The result has been an alarming rise in suicide, caused by a multitude of factors but which can be explained by Durkheim’s framework for suicide: fatalism, anomie, and egoism, all of which leave these vulnerable troops and veterans at high risk for harming themselves. As Durkheim described, these troops are vulnerable to engaging in egoistic suicide because of their feelings of detachment from people and society as a whole; fatalistic suicide because of their vast experiences witnessing death and injury; and anomic suicide because of a sense that the structure of society has become chaotic based on what they have experienced in the theater of combat as well is coming home to a world filled with unemployment, personal and financial stress, and a lack of resources necessary to address the problems of the military.
Durkheim’s concept of social integration refers to social groups with well-defined values, traditions, norms, and goals. These groups will differ in the degree to which individuals are part of the collective body, also to the extent to which the group is emphasized over the individual, and lastly the level to which the group is unified versus fragmented. Durkheim believed that two types of suicide, Egoistic and Altruistic, could stem from social integration. Egoistic suicide resulted from too little social integration. Those people who were not sufficiently bound to a social group would be left with little or no social support in times of crisis. This caused them to commit suicide more often. An example Durkheim discovered was that of unmarried people, especially males, who, with less to connect them to stable social groups, committed suicide at higher rates than married people. Altruistic suicide is a result of too much integration. It occurs at the opposite end of the social integration scale as egoistic suicide. Self sacrifice appears to be the driving force, where people are so involved with a social group that they lose sight of themselves and become more willing to take one for the team, even if this causes them to die. The most common cases of altruistic suicide occur to soldiers during times of war. Religious cults have also been a major source of altruistic suicide.
Courage is categorized as a big act of heroism in face of danger, but no act of courage is too small or fruitless, but an act of courage is what helps the development of individuals and growth of society. In the American Scholar’s Article, To Live Is an Act of Courage, Jennifer Mitchel Hecht talks about suicide throughout history and the implications that come with the act, she refers to Greek mythology and follows with the philosophy of Seneca to then emphasize the suicide crisis in today’s military and how the act of living is courageous itself even though the idea seems minute it plays a critical point in our society. Post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental illnesses make it harder for people to continue living, suicide has increased drastically throughout the twentieth century and we have seen this great fall through many heroes from military, celebrity, profession, and school suicides. Hecht quotes Seneca, a Roman philosopher, “I saw not my own courage in dying, but his courage broken by the loss of me. So I said to myself, ‘You must live.’ Sometimes even to live is an act of courage.”(Seneca qtd. in Hecht) Noting that true courage comes from sparing ourselves in times of emotional agony. Sparing other people from a repeated mission of suicide, accomplishing courage by not succumbing to agony and therefore giving way for others to gain courage too. Unlike,
According to Durkheim, two types of suicide arise from the different levels social integration. One cause of suicide is extremely low social integration, which is referred to as egoistic suicide. Durkheim argues that this is the case because others give the individual’s life meaning, so without this support from the group the person may feel hopeless (Conley 188). The other type of suicide, altruistic suicide, reflects the opposite situation: when an individual is too socially integrated (Conley 189). This type of suicide occurs when members of a group or community become so totally engrossed by the group tha...
Within a recent context, the intangible, and often dismissed damage that war inflicts on a soldier’s mental health, has been reaffirmed and reexamined. The invisible injuries of war, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, anxiety, and depression, have proven to be as deadly as noticeable damage, such as infections or wounds. This issue of the mental health has been given an increased importance in light of the gruesome influx of suicides and murders committed by unstable returning soldiers. With the potential increase of the United States’ military involvement in the Middle East being a relevant issue, it is incredibly important for all people, from those with direct power to those who have the sole power of their voice, to thoroughly understand the potential long-term repercussions that are involved with war, before committing men and women to fight in this conflict. Most crucially, society must ensure that proper care and services are made easily accessible for returning soldiers, in order to assist with their successful transition back to civilian
Military Sexual Trauma, also known as MST. What is it and why is it important? MST refers to psychological trauma resulting from a sexual assault or repeated, threatening harassment experienced during military service (pg. 3). Now, let us take a moment and think about the relevance of this subject? When we think of our women in combat, what do we see? We see strong and courteous females. But have we ever thought about what could be lurking underneath all that armor?
In a study released by Brown University, their psychology department shed some light on common myths and facts surrounded suicide. These m...
In 1897, Emile Durkheim (1997) showed that the suicide – perhaps the most personal of all decisions – could be analysed through the conceptual lenses of sociology.
The deaths that were experienced in Vietnam due to Agent Orange and other jungle diseases have become well known by the general public. However, it is suicide that has resulted in the deaths of over 150,000 Vietnam soldiers during and after the war. An enormous amount of suicides resulted from what most people call “protecting our country”. The Vietnam War brought more than fifty-eight thousand deaths and is to some one of the darkest battles in United States history. If not killed during the war, many believe any Vietnam veteran would return home great and proud. But this is not the case. Many Vietnam veterans have committed suicide before, during, and after the war.
The United States of America possess a major complication, which is the high amount of suicides in the military. Most people are unaware of the risks from being in the military until it is too late to assist them. Serving in the military can cause PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), which then leads to complications with family situations, financial issues, and depression. Without proper therapy, many soldiers are at high risk of committing suicide. According to researchers, suicide is the second leading cause of death in the U.S. military, with rates ranging between 9 to 15 deaths per 100,000 service members (Bryan, et al. 1). Typically, Caucasian male service members are more at risk of suicides than any females (****). This affects multiple civilians that have family or friends who are serving in the military. Furthermore, this matter is important because not only are they civilians who commit suicides, but they are the leaders who stepped up to protect and defend our country. America needs to aid its troops for the sake of the nation’s defense. In order to reduce the amount of suicides during and after being deployed from the military, the military must require soldiers to know of ways to help themselves and others in need of assistance. A few ways to aid soldiers are suicide hotlines, counseling
A very important group within the American population has been increasing rapidly as well in suicides. The rate of suicides in the U.S. military is so high now, that in 2012, more service members died from suicide than combat exposure. Determining the driving factors behind this increase is not only important in mission readiness and the safety of our nation but can provide information on whether or not key individuals (whites, males) should not be used in combat situations if already prone to suicide. Because it is already proven in the civilian world that these individuals are more prone to commit suicide, one must wonder if this is true in the military. What characteristics predict whether or not an American soldier will commit suicide? Is it the same as in the civilian world? And if there is any difference, it may be important to know in prevention and treatment as well as selection for service and screening measurements.
The transition to civilian life has left many young veterans desperate as suicide rates among veterans are much higher than that of the civilian population. In fact according to (Basu, 2013), “the annual suicide rate among veterans is about 30 for every 100,000 of the population, compared with the civilian rate of 14 per 100,000. The analysis of records from 48 states found that the suicide rate for veterans increased an average of 2.6% a year from 2005 to 2011 -- more than double the rate of increase for civilian suicide.” As these brave men and women have given so much to protect this country it is important to look at why suicide rates among veterans are so high and propose a possible solution to this horrible problem.
... the evidence changed in his later works). He has been widely criticised for his use of official statistics, which are open to interpretation and subject to possibly systematic misreporting, and therefore may not represent the true pattern or rates of suicide. It is also argued that he was confused between the distinction between egoism and anomie, and that he failed to substantiate his claims of the existence of altruism and fatalism; this is argued to such an extent that it has even been suggested that there is only one cause of suicide (egoism) that Durkheim could claim to be true. However, whilst acknowledging some of Durkheim’s own contradictions or confusions, some sociologists have gone on to develop and substantiate the ideas that he developed, and there is no denying that his study of suicide is a far-reaching and legacy-building work of substantial value.
This bill was introduced to “enforce the Secretary of Veteran Affairs to conduct annual evaluations of mental health care and suicide prevention programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs.” In essence, it was proposed because of the high suicide rates that occur with veterans and as a way to help those individuals with increase access to better quality health care and ultimately decrease the statistics of veteran suicide. The bill wants to propose three different acts if passed. First it would like to increase health care by programs, peer community groups, and online resources to help individuals going through mental trauma. Secondly, it wants to start a program to pay the college loans of students in psychiatry in order to easier recruit
Emile Durkheim, is the founder of sociology who conceived many theories, in the concept of suicide and its relationship with society. Durkheim’s book “Suicide” makes a distinction between suicide and suicide rate in relation with society. Durkheim conducted his research in a longitudinal study from various countries. He studied the suicide number and compared the mortality rate of different regions. His case study of suicide, explored the differences of suicide rates between social, economic and religious groups. He found people felt intertwine of social surrounding of social factors that produce suicide and, different social classes emerged from the discovery.
Although sociologists like J.D. Douglas would question the reliability of the statistics, due to the coroners decision being final, most sociologists would agree that Durkheim's study into suicide was successful, and indeed many have tried to develop and improve on his theory. Overall, this essay has shown that one type of methodology may not always be suitable for the particular research carried out. Both Interpretative sociology and the Positivist approach equally show that they are valid methods for carrying out research, but like everything, nothing is one hundred percent accurate. Therefore, there is always room for flaw, but in the study of Sociology, there is always room for more ways of obtaining and interpreting data.