Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hammurabis laws unjust
Conclusions for how Hammurabi's laws are unjust
Code of hammurabi and justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hammurabis laws unjust
Imagine living in a city where punishment was death, or severe injury. A world like this was an ancient city called Babylonia, Babylonia was an ancient city in Mesopotamia. The ancient city was ruled by a man named Hammurabi, Hammurabi had three sets of laws, Family, Injury, and Property. Hammurabi's laws were harsh and extreme, and the longer people have lived we have realized how wrong and awful rules like this were, but in ancient Babylonia, citizens thought these rules were perfect! But truly, we can all agree how unjust these rules were. Let's start by diving into law 129. Can you imagine being bundled up with a grown man, and being thrown into a river to drown, all for cheating on your husband? Of course now, we just would divorce, and that shows us how unjust this law was. Law 129 specifically states, "If a Married lady [in adultery] is caught with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water" This, as …show more content…
the exact law written, is proof to how us fair the laws in Babylonia were. This law, is obviously very awful. The law explains a woman being thrown into a river were she cannot swim, for she has cheated on her husband, this helps my argument, that these laws were unfair. One way this helps my statement is, the law obviously kills a young man and woman, and of course today we have come up with much simpler laws, break up. Next, there is the law 195, the law is, if a son has struck his father, his hands will be cut off. Now if you are looking at this from a Babylonia citizen this law is perfect for your time, but now we find these awful laws to much. These laws were cruel, and partially sad to think that a city once had to cope with laws like these. This law argues with me because is once again is clear abuse. A punishment were hands are to be chopped of would cause, extreme pain, blood loss, and may even cause death for pressure points being bothered, and organs too. We can obviously see that law 195 is cruel and unfair, and shall never be a part of our society, I hope. Our last law is a simple property law, the law is that if a man is robbed and the robber is not caught, the man shall pray to gods for help.
Now at first this law may seem like it is fair, not harsh injuries, no death. But when you think about it, Hammurabi does nothing to help, the man just has to ask gods, who may not respond. He may not get his stuff back. To me it is almost like Hammurabi just pushing them away and saying, I'm not helping, this is not my business! And when we think about it, it is very cruel. And as I said, it is a better law for not having death, or injury, but the law does not help the man that was robbed, and the robber gets away. So if anything, this rule helps the robber and pushes away the man. As you can see, Hammurabi's code was very well unjust, and although many of the laws were cruel and in fair, some laws were made for good reasons and were set to protect citizens. But otherwise, Hammurabi's laws were in fair, and are luckily no longer used. In conclusion the laws of the ancient Babylonia king were
unfair.
I think Hammurabi’s Code was just because, one of his laws was. If a free man was to know out the other man’s eye was to be knocked out as well. Therefore, it’s protecting the victim’s eye. That was law 196. In my opinion, I don’t think this law was bad, it’s protecting the free man but if a slave’s eye was to be knocked out. The other person would have to pay have of the slave’s owner ship to his master.
Hammurabi is best known for his succession in writing down the first complete set of laws, titled Hammurabi’s Code. He strived as a king to bring protection, fairness, and justice to the weak of society using laws from the God of justice, Shamash. Hammurabi’s Code was written on a large stone pillar called a stele. In addition to writing a set of 282 laws, he expanded the territory of Babylon northward and westward, encouraged agriculture, and oversaw the erection of many buildings and temples. One may argue that since Hammurabi changed and eliminated some of the laws before he published the complete set, he was changed by the times. However, revising some of the laws was necessary to ensure the best protection and fairness for the people. Overall, King Hammurabi laid the foundation for the laws that we have today and his legacy continues on in our justice
Ancient laws were brutal. Babylonian laws, like Hammurabi's Code, included physical torture and death as punishments. The rule behind these punishments was "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."Hammurabi was the name of the king in the city-state of Babylon who ruled for nearly 4,000 years ago.This code was a set of 282 laws that maintained order. Hammurabi's Code was unjust because accidents were punished, punishments for intentional damage was extreme, and it focused on revenge instead of preventing future crime.
The Hammurabi Code is the oldest and most comprehensive set of laws in the world. The 282 laws set the structure for the civilization of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi, who was the sixth king of Mesopotamia, created these laws for a sense of order and peace. However, when investigating these laws further, they seem unfair and unjust for many reasons. People would be punished differently based on their class status. The punishments were harsher towards the freemen, rather than slaves. Although the Hammurabi Code worked to keep order and justice, discrimination existed between slaves and freemen, men and women, and adults and children.
In law #23 Hammurabi’s law states “ If a robber is not caught,the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has last before a god,....... Shall replace for him whatever he has last. I think it's fair,because if they can't catch the person who robbed him/her shouldn’t have to go without their stuff. Therefore the god should replace whatever he lost.I mean it’s like if someone stole your stuff would you want to go without all your stuff or would you want it all back.
The Hammurabi Code of Law was the original father of our “penal and civil laws” of today. It provided guidance on creating a general code that sought to be just and applicable to all classes of citizens. Hammurabi can be considered as the forefather of the modern justice system; we should be very thankful to past societies and rulers for their contributions.
Before he died, Hammurabi was a person who created many laws. He created a code of 282 fair laws (BGE). He created his law on a stone seal. He made the laws to control the city-state of Babylonia. He was a ruler of a huge city-state in Mesopotamia for 42 years. He made laws for 1,000,000 people that each person had to follow or they would be punished on what they did. The way they were punished depended on what they did. There were 3 categories Family law, Property law, and Personal-Injury law. Was Hammurabi’s code just? Hammurabi’s laws were just because of 3 categories, Family Laws, Property Laws, and Personal-Injury Laws.
One of the most important aspects of any society is the ruling system. A society simply could not function without any sort of rules or regulations. With the tremendous growth of Babylonian society came the need for law systems. Perhaps one of the most well known law systems was Babylonian ruler Hammurabi’s compilation of Mesopotamian laws known as Hammurabi 's Code. Hammurabi 's Code contained laws pertaining to trade, marriage, property, crime, social class, and more (Judge and Langdon, 25). So much can be learned about early societies through this famous artifact. Although these laws may have been accepted by the Babylonian citizens at the time, it is now clear to see that the code was extremely unjust. Hammurabi 's Code uncovers the social
The two laws have some basic similarities such as, an eye for an eye, the punishment of death for adultery, fundamental respect for women, and reality that stealing is wrong. The initial ideas and groundwork for laws are the same, but the outcomes and consequences are immensely different, on what will happen, how will
The Code of Hammurabi has a slightly different way of describing the way a society should maintain stability and avoid chaos. In this code of conduct it is more on the lines of something similar to the Bill of Rights where each idea is stated in form of a law. For example, in the 15th amendment of The Code it staes “15: If any one take a male or female slave of the court, or a male or female slave of a freed man, outside the city gates [to escape], he shall be put to death.” It is a listed set of laws followed by a consequence whether it is minor or as harsh as the death penalty. If such harsh punishments were informed, I believe the law makers or theorists saw it as a type of scare which would prevent people from committing the crime. There are those people who do break the law and make stupid decisions, but it would keep the amount of people making stupid decisions and breaking the law to a
The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi, who began ruling the Babylonian Empire in about 1800 BC. Hammurabi came to power using his strengths as a military leader, conquering many smaller city-states to create his Empire. Hammurabi believed that the gods appointed him to bring justice and order to his people, and he took this duty very seriously. Not long after his ascent to power, he created his Code, 282 laws written to define all relationships and aspects of life in the kingdom. The laws were displayed in a public place so that all the people could have the opportunity to study them. The laws applied to everyone, though application of the laws and punishment differed according to social class. The punishments for disobeying the laws were swift and harsh, further encouraging compliance.
Hammurabi’s Code provides evidence for early documents that signify law and order. For instance, Hammurabi’s says in his code if a man wrongs another with his false accusations, he shall be subjected to death (1, 3). His laws illustrate a judicial system in which someone has to pay someone that they wronged in either the same way that they wronged him or through money depending on the person’s social status. It is also said in his code of law that there were penalties for those who disobeyed his laws. For example, Hammurabi says, “If that man do not pay attention to my words…may the great god, the father of the gods, ...
fairly decide the matter and make peace. The laws were there to make sure that everyone; man, woman, and child, were treated fairly and with respect. Because of the wisdom that the Brehons held, and the knowledge of the laws of the society, they too, like the Bards, were held with much respect.
In the ancient times Babylonian king, Hammurabi, formed his code of laws, in the year 1750 BC. The code of Hammurabi consisted of 282 laws that were engraved in stone; this made the King believe the laws came directly from the sun god. Unlike earlier laws the code was written in Akkadian language, which was the common language of Babylon. The purpose of the code was to use governmental authority to make common bonds among the people of the Babylonian society.
Yet, not even the Bible considers an act to be wrong in and of itself -- the scriptures are loaded with exceptions and qualifications to the law. To those who believe that the only exceptions to the law should be those that the Judeo-Christian God gives us, then there are three places to find those exceptions: the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the writings of Christian leaders in the 2,000 years since. Unfortunately, there are profound problems with using any of these three sources to qualify the law -- all three condoned slavery, for example. Therefore these are not reliable guides for establishing moral absolutes.