More handpicked essays just for you.
Describe laws and rules of the code of hammurabi
Describe laws and rules of the code of hammurabi
Hammurabi laws and modern laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Destiny L. Humphreys Coach Smith Ancient World History 25 September 2017 Hammurabi's Code: Was It Just? Does he have mercy,she cheated on my husband so they tied up and through in the river. Hammurabi,he was a ruler. He wrote a 292 laws down on stone and was going to make life fair, These laws was harsh, but I believe they were fair. We will be disgusting if Hammurabi's code was Just or unjust. in other words fair,Was Hammurabi’s code FAIR? Was Hammurabi’s laws fair or unfair to the people.I believe that Hammurabi’s code was JUST. In this essay I will be discussing my reasons why I think Hammurabi’s code was just. I believe that Hammurabi’s code is just because of the punishments he give for personal injury laws.In law #196, the law states,” If a man knocked out the eye of a free man,his eye shall be knocked out. …show more content…
“So, why do I believe that his law is just I mean it’s harsh? Well, you have ever thought in the bible it says “ do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, so if someone knocks your eye out they should have their eye knocked out. I mainly agree with the property laws, because he is fair.
In law #23 Hammurabi’s law states “ If a robber is not caught,the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has last before a god,....... Shall replace for him whatever he has last. I think it's fair,because if they can't catch the person who robbed him/her shouldn’t have to go without their stuff. Therefore the god should replace whatever he lost.I mean it’s like if someone stole your stuff would you want to go without all your stuff or would you want it all back. The justice of Hammurabi's laws can be justified in several ways.In the family laws, law 129 it states “If a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water.” , And in law 148 It talks about how “ if a man has a married wife and a disease has seized her….he shall not divorce the wife …. She shall dwell in the house they have built together,and he shall maintain her as long as she shall live.”, as you can see Hammurabi is fair he doesn't think that neither the husband nor the wife shall use one another, simply because that wouldn't be
fair. Although the Hammurabi code was harsh and cruel,because the punishments were cutting of body parts and death,Hammurabi was trying to make it fair but not too lenient. Punishing those who did wrong was necessary overall I believe Hammurabi's code was JUST.
I think Hammurabi’s Code was just because, one of his laws was. If a free man was to know out the other man’s eye was to be knocked out as well. Therefore, it’s protecting the victim’s eye. That was law 196. In my opinion, I don’t think this law was bad, it’s protecting the free man but if a slave’s eye was to be knocked out. The other person would have to pay have of the slave’s owner ship to his master.
Hammurabi is best known for his succession in writing down the first complete set of laws, titled Hammurabi’s Code. He strived as a king to bring protection, fairness, and justice to the weak of society using laws from the God of justice, Shamash. Hammurabi’s Code was written on a large stone pillar called a stele. In addition to writing a set of 282 laws, he expanded the territory of Babylon northward and westward, encouraged agriculture, and oversaw the erection of many buildings and temples. One may argue that since Hammurabi changed and eliminated some of the laws before he published the complete set, he was changed by the times. However, revising some of the laws was necessary to ensure the best protection and fairness for the people. Overall, King Hammurabi laid the foundation for the laws that we have today and his legacy continues on in our justice
The Hammurabi Code is the oldest and most comprehensive set of laws in the world. The 282 laws set the structure for the civilization of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi, who was the sixth king of Mesopotamia, created these laws for a sense of order and peace. However, when investigating these laws further, they seem unfair and unjust for many reasons. People would be punished differently based on their class status. The punishments were harsher towards the freemen, rather than slaves. Although the Hammurabi Code worked to keep order and justice, discrimination existed between slaves and freemen, men and women, and adults and children.
The Hammurabi Code of Law was the original father of our “penal and civil laws” of today. It provided guidance on creating a general code that sought to be just and applicable to all classes of citizens. Hammurabi can be considered as the forefather of the modern justice system; we should be very thankful to past societies and rulers for their contributions.
The formers of the Hammurabi’s Code of Laws surely created strict rules with severe punishments for their violation. In fact, these laws played a big role in organization of Mesopotamian society. Reading these laws, reader may learn about ideals people of Mesopotamia had about crimes, their attitude to the lower and higher social classes, and legal rights between men and women. Reading the laws I noticed that many crimes were punished by death penalty. Many laws tell that guilty person has to pay the same price for the physical harm one did to another person or one’s relative. For instance: law 196 states (encyclopedia.com): “ If a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out.” In addition, at that time, people were penalized to death for many crimes or wrongdoings that almost never would be penalized with capital punishment at a modern time. Among such felony and misdemeanors are stealing, robbery, accusation, adultery, and desertion. Hammurabi’s Code also, reveals inequality between social classes. Slaves were not treated by the laws the same as free-born people. According to the Code of Hammurabi, women had some legal rights, but these rights were not equal to men’s. Married women had a right to divorce as well as men. In fact, in order to acquire the right for divorce, a woman has to find a reasonable explanation for her desire, and only than the divorce could be possible.
The Code of Hammurabi has a slightly different way of describing the way a society should maintain stability and avoid chaos. In this code of conduct it is more on the lines of something similar to the Bill of Rights where each idea is stated in form of a law. For example, in the 15th amendment of The Code it staes “15: If any one take a male or female slave of the court, or a male or female slave of a freed man, outside the city gates [to escape], he shall be put to death.” It is a listed set of laws followed by a consequence whether it is minor or as harsh as the death penalty. If such harsh punishments were informed, I believe the law makers or theorists saw it as a type of scare which would prevent people from committing the crime. There are those people who do break the law and make stupid decisions, but it would keep the amount of people making stupid decisions and breaking the law to a
Hammurabi’s laws are unfair to society because the amounts of deaths and curl punishment people had to face when they break a law. In law 218,
...cause, and may his heart be set at ease!" (EAWC Anthology: Hammurabi's Code of Laws)
The form of the Code of Hammurabi is significant in the way that it is written. The simple language used to write the Code allowed the average member of Babylonian society to understand the expectations placed on them. Each of 282 laws was written separately with specific examples of indiscretions that were illegal, and the precise form of punishment that would occur. The Code also sets guidelines for the fees that were paid to doctors, veterinarians, shipbuilders, ferryboat operators, and to the owners of rented livestock.
Hammurabi’s Code provides evidence for early documents that signify law and order. For instance, Hammurabi’s says in his code if a man wrongs another with his false accusations, he shall be subjected to death (1, 3). His laws illustrate a judicial system in which someone has to pay someone that they wronged in either the same way that they wronged him or through money depending on the person’s social status. It is also said in his code of law that there were penalties for those who disobeyed his laws. For example, Hammurabi says, “If that man do not pay attention to my words…may the great god, the father of the gods, ...
The code of Hammurabi was the first set of written laws to have been created. There were a collection of 282 laws which were recorded. Hammurabi states in his codes the reason for his laws. As stated in The Making of the West by Hunt, "to show Shamash that he had fulfilled the social responsibility imposed on him as a divinely installed monarch" (p.16). This meant that Hammurabi clearly felt that he was accountable for the justice and morals of his people, and that they should abide by them. One of the major points of the moral code included equal punishment under the same class. Code 196 states "If a noble man puts out the eye of another noble man, his eyes shall be put out." This clearly implies that the equal punishment law was severely followed by the Babylonians. Another important point was how woman were of lesser importance compared to men. Code 132 states how if a woman is not caught sleeping with another man she should jump in the water for the sake of her husband. This shows how woman were expected to be faithful and follow by their husbands side. While, if a man was to create adultery with his daughter he would only be exiled. The making of the West by Hunt states "A wife could divorce her husband for cruelty; a husband could divorce his wife for any reason" (p.16). This evidently shows how indisputably biased Hammurabi was towards woman in that society. Slaves' conducts and rules were also listed in the codes. They had absolutely no rights at all, even if they were to be killed by another being.
There are many facts that support that Hammurabi's code was unfair but we don't have all day so i will be telling you only three. First, one quote from the law is in Law 25 it says If fire break out in a house, and someone who comes to put it out cast his eye upon the property of the owner of the house, and take the property of the master of the house, he shall be thrown into that self-same fire.” It means that if someone goes and helps someone else in a fire, and takes something from their property, they will be thrown into the same fire they tried to put out.This shows that Hammurabi's code was unfair because if someone tries to help you in a fire and they risk their
As most of the classmates mentioned, it was very surprising to read about the code of Hammurabi that shows the sternness of the code. While I was reading the lecture, I found one contradiction in the code of Hammurabi (at least I think). It is understandable that king Hammurabi made the code extremely stern so that people fear it and would not commit crimes. With his attempting on severe punishments for equality between an assailant and a victim, like an eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth, the code called right to be called the first punishment that fit the crime among equals. However, punishments depended on people’s social position. If a royal killed a slave, then the royal would not be executed but paying proper compensation to an owner
The laws that Hammurabi created show that he valued family life very much. His laws did not tolerate adultery at all. One example of this is Hammurabi’s law number 129. It states, “If a man’s wife be surprised with another man, both shall be tied and thrown in the water, but the husband may pardon his wife and the king his slaves.” This tells us Hammurabi will show no mercy to those that do not honor family values and cheat on their spouses. However, the husband can save his wife’s life if he knew that the man had forced himself on her and she had not given her consent. This shows us Hammurabi was a reasonable man by not punishing the man’s wife if she was innocent. He just wanted a man and a wife to have a pure and healthy relationship.
The Code of Hammurabi played a significant role in how women were treated, as well as their rights during Old Babylonian civilization. The Code of Hammurabi was created in 1780 B.C.E. and represents as the oldest written document in the development of human legislation. The “eye for an eye” principle comes from this code and states that if someone injures another person, then the person penalized to the same degree with the same action. Hammurabi’s code reflected three different classes which were; the