Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hammurabi's code: what is it? the DBQ project
Hammurabi's code mini q
Hammurabi's code mini q
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Hammurabi Code: Women’s Rights is a paper I wrote for my Foundations of Western Civilization class taught by Dr. Munson. His goal was for all of his students to write a paper about a topic that interests us during a certain time era. The Code of Hammurabi played a significant role in how women were treated, as well as their rights during Old Babylonian civilization. The Code of Hammurabi was created in 1780 B.C.E. and represents as the oldest written document in the development of human legislation. The “eye for an eye” principle comes from this code and states that if someone injures another person, then the person penalized to the same degree with the same action. Hammurabi’s code reflected three different classes which were; the …show more content…
Women did not control her own wealth, so therefore, a woman’s family wealth, was controlled by her father or her husband. Law 128 in the Code of Hammurabi states, “If a man take a wife and do not arrange with her the (proper) contracts, that woman is not a (legal) wife.”1 (Hammurabi 45). A woman would receive a dowry once she was married and left her family. A dowry is a financial gift such as money, property, or goods, which was a gift to her husband once they got married. Once a man married a woman, he then had access to the family’s dowry and the property, money, or goods were then, controlled by him. If the man were no longer married to the woman and if the woman died childless, then the dowry returned back to the father of her family. If the father has already passed away, then the dowry was returned to the woman’s brothers. If the woman had any children that were boys, then the boy, or brothers, would share equally2 (“WOMEN…”). If women wanted out of the marriage, then she would take the dowry with her and go back to her father’s house. The father would then receive the dowry back. Law 138 in the Code of Hammurabi says, “If a man would put away his wife who has not borne him children, he shall give her money to the amount of her marriage settlement and he shall make good to her the dowry which she brought from her father’s house and then he may put her away.”3 (Hammurabi 49). In reality …show more content…
No doubt the concept “an eye for an eye” was a big part of the Code of Hammurabi. Although, when it came to women, this principle does not apply equally as it did with men of the Babylonian civilization. For example, if a man were to practice adultery while he was married, he would get a very minor punishment for whatever good reason he came up with. If a woman were to practice adultery on her husband, she and the other man she was having an affair with were both thrown into a river while being tied up to one another. Basically women were constantly addressed as a piece of property just as slaves were treated. Hammurabi’s Code demonstrated how the rights of women individually were not acknowledged as men’s rights were taken. King Hammurabi was the sixth Babylonian king and he gave all of the power to the men in the civilization. It can be proven that a woman, in Hammurabi time didn’t have as many rights, even right to defend herself. There are three major issues that were taken place during the Babylonian civilization. The first issue, was about a woman’s family wealth being controlled by her husband or her father. The second issue was about women’s sexuality being sacrificed to ensure legitimacy. The last issue talked about a woman needing society’s help if she was divorced. The Hammurabi Code describes all of women’s rights and
The Hammurabi Code is the oldest and most comprehensive set of laws in the world. The 282 laws set the structure for the civilization of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi, who was the sixth king of Mesopotamia, created these laws for a sense of order and peace. However, when investigating these laws further, they seem unfair and unjust for many reasons. People would be punished differently based on their class status. The punishments were harsher towards the freemen, rather than slaves. Although the Hammurabi Code worked to keep order and justice, discrimination existed between slaves and freemen, men and women, and adults and children.
The Hammurabi Code of Law was the original father of our “penal and civil laws” of today. It provided guidance on creating a general code that sought to be just and applicable to all classes of citizens. Hammurabi can be considered as the forefather of the modern justice system; we should be very thankful to past societies and rulers for their contributions.
The formers of the Hammurabi’s Code of Laws surely created strict rules with severe punishments for their violation. In fact, these laws played a big role in organization of Mesopotamian society. Reading these laws, reader may learn about ideals people of Mesopotamia had about crimes, their attitude to the lower and higher social classes, and legal rights between men and women. Reading the laws I noticed that many crimes were punished by death penalty. Many laws tell that guilty person has to pay the same price for the physical harm one did to another person or one’s relative. For instance: law 196 states (encyclopedia.com): “ If a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out.” In addition, at that time, people were penalized to death for many crimes or wrongdoings that almost never would be penalized with capital punishment at a modern time. Among such felony and misdemeanors are stealing, robbery, accusation, adultery, and desertion. Hammurabi’s Code also, reveals inequality between social classes. Slaves were not treated by the laws the same as free-born people. According to the Code of Hammurabi, women had some legal rights, but these rights were not equal to men’s. Married women had a right to divorce as well as men. In fact, in order to acquire the right for divorce, a woman has to find a reasonable explanation for her desire, and only than the divorce could be possible.
One of the most important aspects of any society is the ruling system. A society simply could not function without any sort of rules or regulations. With the tremendous growth of Babylonian society came the need for law systems. Perhaps one of the most well known law systems was Babylonian ruler Hammurabi’s compilation of Mesopotamian laws known as Hammurabi 's Code. Hammurabi 's Code contained laws pertaining to trade, marriage, property, crime, social class, and more (Judge and Langdon, 25). So much can be learned about early societies through this famous artifact. Although these laws may have been accepted by the Babylonian citizens at the time, it is now clear to see that the code was extremely unjust. Hammurabi 's Code uncovers the social
The Hammurabi Code was a very strict, action and consequence series, whereas the Beatitudes are suggestions of the types of people who could easily enter Heaven. The Beatitudes are the blessings that Jesus talked about in the Sermon on the Mount, and they offer an entirely different moral code, one which is inviting rather than prohibitive. According to Dan Barker, “Five of the eight beatitudes have nothing to do with morality. They are more of a pep talk than a code of ethical behavior. None of them are truly ethical in themselves since they are all conditions for a future reward. A true ethical code might mention the benefits of certain actions, but should stress the inherent value of the behavior on its own merits before detailing the gain or loss for the individual.” The Hammurabi Code speaks of punishment, rather than moral values. The main principle was "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." This phrase, along with the idea of written laws, goes back to ancient Mesopotamian culture that prospered long before the Bible was written or the civilizations of the Greeks or Romans flowered. Hammurabi is the best known and most celebrated of all Mesopotamian kings. Although he was concerned with keeping order in his kingdom, this was not his only reason for compiling the list of laws. Hammurabi needed one universal set of laws for all of the diverse peoples he conquered. Hammurabi states that he wants "to make justice visible in the land, to destroy the wicked person and the evildoer, that the strong might not injure the weak." The laws themselves support this compassionate claim, and the vulnerable from being harmed or exploited. The phrase "an eye for an eye" represents what many people view as a harsh sense of justice based on revenge, but the entire code is much more complex than that one
Hammurabi’s code however was not without fault. Pervasive throughout the archetype of modern law are inequitable punishments determined by one’s social standing. For example, the 8th law of Hammurabi’s code states, “If any one steel cattle or sheep, or an ass, or a pig or a goat, if it belong to a god or to the court, the thief shall pay thirtyfold therefore; if they belonged to a freed man of the king he shall pay tenfold; if the thief has nothing with which to pay he shall be put to death” (King). Both the social standing of the violator and the victim of the crime played a large role in determining what the penalty would be. Today, our view of justice has ostensibly metamorphosed, to the extent that most people today would recognize that the 8th law from Hammurabi’s code was prejudiced and wrong. Although some may wish to remove themselves from such an unjust system, the reality is that we are not far from it. The mode...
The form of the Code of Hammurabi is significant in the way that it is written. The simple language used to write the Code allowed the average member of Babylonian society to understand the expectations placed on them. Each of 282 laws was written separately with specific examples of indiscretions that were illegal, and the precise form of punishment that would occur. The Code also sets guidelines for the fees that were paid to doctors, veterinarians, shipbuilders, ferryboat operators, and to the owners of rented livestock.
Hammurabi’s Code provides evidence for early documents that signify law and order. For instance, Hammurabi’s says in his code if a man wrongs another with his false accusations, he shall be subjected to death (1, 3). His laws illustrate a judicial system in which someone has to pay someone that they wronged in either the same way that they wronged him or through money depending on the person’s social status. It is also said in his code of law that there were penalties for those who disobeyed his laws. For example, Hammurabi says, “If that man do not pay attention to my words…may the great god, the father of the gods, ...
The code of Hammurabi was the first set of written laws to have been created. There were a collection of 282 laws which were recorded. Hammurabi states in his codes the reason for his laws. As stated in The Making of the West by Hunt, "to show Shamash that he had fulfilled the social responsibility imposed on him as a divinely installed monarch" (p.16). This meant that Hammurabi clearly felt that he was accountable for the justice and morals of his people, and that they should abide by them. One of the major points of the moral code included equal punishment under the same class. Code 196 states "If a noble man puts out the eye of another noble man, his eyes shall be put out." This clearly implies that the equal punishment law was severely followed by the Babylonians. Another important point was how woman were of lesser importance compared to men. Code 132 states how if a woman is not caught sleeping with another man she should jump in the water for the sake of her husband. This shows how woman were expected to be faithful and follow by their husbands side. While, if a man was to create adultery with his daughter he would only be exiled. The making of the West by Hunt states "A wife could divorce her husband for cruelty; a husband could divorce his wife for any reason" (p.16). This evidently shows how indisputably biased Hammurabi was towards woman in that society. Slaves' conducts and rules were also listed in the codes. They had absolutely no rights at all, even if they were to be killed by another being.
"If a man has knocked out the eye of a free man, his eye shall be knocked out." This is one of the most well-known laws of Hammurabi. Hammurabi's code was made in Babylon, Iraq in the 18th century B.C. His code contained 282 written laws that he wrote by the command of Shamash, to protect his people. So even though a god commanded him to create the law, Was Hammurabi's code just? There are three areas of law where Hammurabi's code can be shown to be unjust. These are Personal Law, Family Law, and Property Law.
Hammurabi’s Code was a set of written was to end personal revenge. It was an important accomplishment because The need to unite was to bring justice and fair treatment to the people. The idea of law was to see what the punishment was and justice to the people. The idea of justice for all was fair treatment to the people.
Unlike the Hebrews, the focus of Babylonian law was justice. Hammurabi, the king who created the Code of Hammurabi, based his judicial philosophy on, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” Each law was paired with a specific consequence; however, consequences were not universal. Social status determined what penalty was received for certain actions. A person’s role in the community determined their position in the hierarchy. For instance, physicians and priests sat atop the social pyramid, while the base was composed of slaves. The Code of Hammurabi divided the citizens of Babylon with this method of governance, whereas the Ten Commandments sought to unite all Hebrew people. Nevertheless, the code of Hammurabi achieved the same basic goal of the Ten Commandments, to preserve the
Q2:What values or ideals governing the code are expressed in these excerpts? Hammurabi was the creator of the “eye for an eye” laws. However a hierarchy still exist inside these laws. If a crime occurs between two upper class citizens the punishment is equal to the crime. If a crime occurs between an upclass and lower class citizen a small payment is made for compensation.
A well-known writing that is connected to Hammurabi was the Code of Hammurabi, which is a large stone pillar that contains hundreds, maybe even thousands of laws and codes that the people of Mesopotamia were to follow. It is believed that Hammurabi believed in a black-and-white justice system (Hill 8-26-15). Law 196 in the Code states that, “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed” (The Judgements of Hammurabi, 16). This brings a literal demonstration to the saying “an eye for an eye”. Even though this seems to be a harsh penalty to some, this shows that Hammurabi believed in his own take of equality in punishment. This is an example of Hammurabi’s teaching to his people of morals and ethics; if a person were to do a wrong action to another that same action would be done to him or her in response. However, the “eye for an eye” justice doesn’t only apply towards the offender themselves, but to others in his or her life. Law 230 in the Code of Hammurabi states that in a certain situation that if a person were to build a house for another and the house was not built properly and “the child of the householder is killed, the child of the builder shall be slain” (The Judgements of Hammurabi, 17). Again, another extreme display of “an eye for an eye”; except this form of justice punishes a wrongdoer’s child and not themselves. This is also
Hammurabi’s code was a just law system that used the influence of gods and harsh punishments to scare people away from crime to maintain the order of his society. Hammurabi was an 18th century BCE king in Babylonia, in addition to his big title he was famous for the creation of a 282 law code. His laws were very exact in that there was a law for any situation. These laws are famous for the harsh punishments Hammurabi allotted for crimes committed by people living under his rule. The question asked when looking at his laws are were they just? But if you look at the categories of family, property and injury it is clear that they are.