Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Green marketing theory
A theory useful for green marketing
A theory useful for green marketing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Green marketing theory
A negative word originating from the term “whitewashing”, “greenwashing” was originally coined in 1986, by New York environmentalist Jay Westervelt, and was added to the Oxford Dictionary in 1999. The term was originally only used to describe misrepresentative instances of advertising, but as advertising grew more diversified, so did the definition of greenwashing. It is now used to describe the efforts corporations go to in order to portray themselves as more environmentally friendly than they actually are, which include, but are not limited to, event sponsorship, environmental reporting, the creation of a front group, or the distribution of educational materials. For most corporations, however, the main objective of greenwashing is to give consumers the impression they are taking steps to reduce, or manage, their ecological footprint, without having to sacrifice their bottom line. In this essay, I will explain and discuss greenwashing, with a focus on how Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility are influential factors in driving a company to greenwash, while proving that the above claims regarding greenwashing are valid.
Ford Motor Company announced the launch of the Escape Hybrid SUV in a National Geographic magazine in 2004, with one ad reading; “Green vehicles. Cleaner factories. It is the right road for our company, and we’re well underway”. They continued to try and persuade readers of their commitment to the environment with the remodelling of their River Rouge factory, but they failed to mention that only 20,000 of these promised Hybrid SUVs would be produced per year, or that they would continue to commission almost 80,000 F-series trucks a month. Additionally, a short time before the ads release, the Envir...
... middle of paper ...
...nsumers wanting corporations to be social responsible, yet as companies are driven by profits, many do not see the long-term goal of becoming more environmentally responsible, opting for short-term fixes, such greenwashing with their PR portraying a green image that is not necessarily a representation of the facts. A number of companies have now committed to producing annual social reports, which can be seen as a step towards the inevitable movement towards greater transiency and disclosure within business. NGO’s have widely dismissed these, however, as “PR exercise” and “greenwashing”, but the fact that corporations are beginning to accept that they will be held accountable for their wider impact on society is a noteworthy step. Until the triple bottom line method is introduced globally, however, corporations have no incentive to stop the practise of greenwashing.
Sports Utility Vehicles have long maintained the reputation of being gas guzzlers and detrimental to the environment. In the article, “Why Environmentalists Attack the SUV,” Mr. John Bragg presents the argument that the SUV is a symbol of Americanism. While it is easy to understand his thinking, it is largely based upon subjective reasoning. Conversely, the SUV.org article, “Environmental Double Standards for Sport Utility Vehicles,” postulates that SUV’s represent a paradox to consumers. Additionally, cartoonist, Khalil Bendib takes a drastic approach by overtly stating that American automotive corporations are directly contributing to the degradation of the environment.
Increasing environmental awareness, coupled with a responsible American government and improved technology, have all contributed to the comeback of low-and zero-emissions vehicles in the US. It remains to be seen whether the automakers and oil companies will once again work to halt this progress, or embrace it as the technology of a more responsible future.
Green washing: The disinformation disseminated by an organization so as to present an environmentally responsible public image. In order for big companies to stay on top of the market today, they are forced to think of advertising strategies to help their public image and advertise their product. Over the years the system has become very complex and also very questionable. Companies are willing to lie, change their logo, and sometimes even their company name just to keep their name and image clean in front of the public just to make sure that they are making their money. Green washing helps this by advertising to the public that they are environmentally supportive and responsible. Most people that are into buying “green products” do not even realize that the company they are buying from is green washing in some sort of way just so that they can attract attention to the public. Green washing companies may advertise that they are “eco-friendly”, but when it comes down to it, the facts hidden behind the curtains beg to differ. Just like in the green washing video we watched in class, the companies may look great compared to the worst companies, but that does not mean what they are doing is still productive for our environmental movement. One company that has been notorious for their green washing efforts for the past couple of decades is the Oil/energy company: British Petroleum a.k.a. Beyond Petroleum. They are one of the world’s largest leading oil companies who has also becoming a large energy supplying company with presence in petrochemicals, gas, and solar divisions. Over the past twenty years BP has been the cause of several deadly disasters in the oil business in the U.S. and around the world. Despite their green washing effor...
The Naked Brand documentary (Rosenblum, Huang, 2014. Burg, Dumont) discusses the importance of corporate transparency in terms of marketing and the effect advertising methods such as good customer service, helpful employees, and transparency can have on the consumers and ultimately the business. This documentary acknowledges the way customers react to eco-friendly businesses through the advertising medium, and how they react to unethical behavior as well as social and environmental irresponsibility.
The majority of people, especially in America, cannot go about their daily lives without a car. Automobiles have instilled themselves in peoples’ lives and shown their usefulness since their debut in 1769. Since then, humans have redesigned and refined the automobile thousands of times, each time making the vehicle more efficient and economical than before. Now as the world approaches an ethical decision to dwarf all others, many people look toward automotives for yet another change. The emergence of the hypercar due to ecological turmoil exemplifies the change the world has demanded. Hypercars alter everything people know about automotives, modern ecology, and fuel efficiency. Not only do hypercars offer a solution to many ecological problems humans are faced with now, they also represent the only logical area for the automotive industry, and by some stretch American society, to expand.
According to George Bernard Shaw, “Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything” (Shaw, p. 330). In order to truly make a change, one must change the minds of the people. America’s automobile industry has done a stellar job at this. In recent years fuel economy has surpassed make, body style, and “beeps and whistles” to become the number one factor people considered when purchasing a new car or truck (Choi). This shows that not only are vehicle manufacturers working to reduce vehicular pollution by improving how our cars are built, but even those that aren't directly involved with the manufacturing process are aiding the cause by choosing to purchase vehicles they know will produce fewer pollutants and consume less gas per miles driven. This discredits Jackson’s claims that Americans don’t care about the
Companies have presented investigations about their motivation towards voluntarily social and environmental as insolvent. This paper argues in agreement with Adam’s view that the goal of CSR reporting is to promote credibility and corporate image of stakeholders operating in a particular industry. Whereas companies must focus their efforts on enhancing their profitability, they should also ensure that the welfare of other stakeholders is protected.
middle of paper ... ... doi:http://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2012-13/blueprint-strategy. Hughes-Cromwick, E. (2011). The 'Standard'.
The author argues TATA is dishonest by using CSR as a tool to distract public opinion in order to hide their cares about profit and their market reputation more than addressing the issues of society and environment betterment. In addition, they argued that corporate social responsibility is just a mask that the TATA wanted to wear because, there is no such company that tries to both improve the community as well as aim to displace and pillage their people. This in return causes expulsion from indigenous stakeholder’s land, leaving many homeless. The TATA Company have the ability to make significant changes to encourage a revelation about economic social and environmental sustainability by achieving new tactics that produce better
Humans have been destroying the planet since we were able to stand on two legs. As a society, we need to work to reverse these terrible effects that our existence has on the planet. Sustainability is one way to begin reversing these effects, while still living our daily lives. In 2006, Al Gore presented his documentary, “ An Inconvenient Truth”, as a way to show the world the evidence behind global warming, climate change and the destruction of our planet. This documentary shocked the world. It was clear that changes needed to be made, but the destruction was more intense than previously thought. SInce this revelation in 2006, companies have tried to cut down on their greenhouse emissions, as well as offered sustainable products to their customers. Through a debate of morals and
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...
As a result of modern corporate scandals and rapid development of international business environments, social responsibility (SR) has become a key aspect of corporate competitive contexts. (Brammer, Williams and Zinkin, 2007). Businesses are under increasing pressure to incorporate SR amongst their profit-driven aims and have become increasingly accountable for their social and environmental actions. Increased interest in CSR developed in the mid 1990s as consumers began to lack their former trust in companies due to both environmental and financial scandals and it became noticeable that society was moving towards values incorporating harmony, quality of life and environmental conservation (Carrasco, 2007) Additionally, major corporate failures over the past two decades have resulted in increased demand for stronger, corporate governance (CG) rules. (Sui, Wright & Evans, 2007). Superior CG rules are needed in order to preserve the integrity of corporations, financial institutions and markets and the health and stability of world economies. (OECD Website)
With the development of the science and technology, more and more people are going for healthy and green products. According to this situation, there are many companies claim their products are “green”. However, there are thousands of so-called “green” products, but not all of them live up to their claims, a considerable part of products not only damage the human’s body, but also pollute the environment. People called these companies “greenwashing”. Greenwashing refers to the practice of deceiving consumers into believing that a company is practicing environmentally friendly policies and procedures. Seems like anything and everything has “gone green” these days. Such as airlines, car companies, retailers, restaurants, even networks and stadiums. Thankfully, more often than not, that’s a good thing. It is only bad if it is greenwashing — that is bad for the environment and consumers, because of businesses doing the greenwashing.
A world in which we live in consists of constant complexity and tenseness. How can one find inner peace within themselves through it all? A method of finding tranquility and serenity for me specifically is finding it through the benefits nature has to offer. The outdoors can provide an individual with plenty amount of simplicity and peace that is so refreshing. The outdoors can range from a random hiking trail in the middle of a local forest or spending time at the beach. Behind all the commotion of technology, work and school, the stress combined can simply be eliminated by breaking away from it all and spending time with the green world around us. For me personally, playing a sport at a random