Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits and cost of diversity
Advantages and disadvantages of diversity in society
Diversity in organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits and cost of diversity
Does America Cherish Diversity Essay Diversity in America has been a growing problem lately; and due to recent events, you have every right to be skeptical. Events such as the Oscars shortlist have led many people to believe that America truly does have a diversity problem. But it seems that a majority of those people don’t fully understand the opposing side. I believe that America does cherish its diversity because that is why this country is where it is today. Long ago when George Washington became president, he had an idea to change the future of America. He said, “The Government of the United States… gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should …show more content…
demean themselves as good citizens.” (Making The Future Better Together). By this he meant that citizens of this new nation are to be treated like equals, no matter where they are from, or what they believe. That they would be encouraged to make friends with their fellow citizens who may be of other backgrounds, and to contribute to their society. I agree with Eboo Patel when he states that Washington’s words define the essence of our nation, as it was built on the idea that although we may be different, we are equal. Washington had many good reasons for his ideas.
His outlook on diversity is actually more in-depth than some may think. Washington took his ideas for diversity with him to his private life. One day, when seeking a carpenter, he said, “If they are good workmen, they may be of Asia, Africa, or Europe. They may be Mohometans, Jews or Christians, or they may be Atheists.” (Making The Future Better Together). Basically, what Washington was trying to say was that it does not matter who does the job, but how well it gets done. This is the case with most Americans these days also. They need a job done, so they call someone with the expertise, and that’s it. This relates to diversity because certain people of certain races may be better at things than people of other races. Without these people, America would not be in the shape it is in today, and we would be left with learning how to do jobs ourselves. Now, some may argue that we should do jobs ourselves, a way to be truly independent, as we are said to be. Although this can be considered a valid point, why do something ourselves, when we can have it done professionally at a cost? Helping others while helping ourselves. Working together and uniting as one, how we were meant to be all
along. Media plays a large role in our lives as Americans. It is designed to bring us close, even when we may be far. The idea behind this nation can be described the same way. Even when we are far, in a sense of different customs, races, beliefs, we are close because we are united. Many may argue that media is not diverse enough. They took the Oscars shortlist as an example, which consisted of all white males and no females, and automatically thought there was a diversity problem throughout Hollywood. These people fail to realize that this hasn’t happened since 1998, and it all comes down to who is responsible for the nomination. An obvious reason to support America’s diversity is that our current president is black. Who better to set an example of this country’s diversity than someone who can be described as different? At this point, it’s just common sense. In short, diversity in America is important to have because it is what allows the citizens to come together to achieve great things. If America didn’t have diversity, then it would not be where it is today. We have achieved great things through coming together and uniting with one common goal, to make the future better.
When we discuss the topic of diversity, half of the class and Jena McGregor will agree that America does not cherish diversity. In Patel's story he supports that America does cherish diversity. Based on the debate, I believe the opposite of the class and Jena McGregor, and I agree with Patel by making the claim that America does cherish diversity.
Booker T. Washington was an African American leader who established an African-American college in 1181. Then in 1895 delivered the Atlanta Compromise Speech to an audience of mainly Southerners, but some Northerners were present. In his speech he made a few points. He said, “No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem.” Washington believed that the African American race needed to learn first that manual labor was just as important as the work of intellects. He thought that until they learned this they were not worthy of becoming intellects themselves. The color line is thus important in teaching them this lesson. He also said, “It is important and right that all privileges of the law be ours, but it is vastly more important that we be prepared for the exercise of these privileges.” His opinion was that one day blacks would deserve to have equal rights with the whites, but right now in 1895 the blacks needed to be...
submissive. The snare of the snare. Washington wanted blacks to try and get along with society. trying to fit in. He was encouraging blacks to become educated in the the "white man's world".
Booker T. Washington believed that blacks should not push to attain equal civil and political rights with whites. That it was best to concentrate on improving their economic skills and the quality of their character. The burden of improvement resting squarely on the shoulders of the black man. Eventually they would earn the respect and love of the white man, and civil and political rights would be accrued as a matter of course. This was a very non-threatening and popular idea with a lot of whites.
The year of Washington's death marked the beginning of the Great Migration from the rural South to the urban North. He is known as one of the best civil rights leaders for the African American people in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s.
He points out that negroes have just gotten out of slavery and can’t expect to start at the top of society, instead he takes a more practical approach. He proposes that his race should invest their “Brains and skill into common occupations of life” (Washington 2), where they can be successful and still maintain as much dignity as anyone else. Washington develops this idea through the use of an extended metaphor that says “Cast down your buckets where you are” (Washington 1). This extended metaphor means blacks were encouraged to make friends to the whites despite their past relations. And, the white people were encouraged allow blacks to buy their land and work in their factories. Washington continues the metaphor by saying the bucket will be filled with “sparkling water from the mouth of the Amazon River” (Washington 1). With this he is showing that both whites and blacks are good people that just have to be give each other a chance. Washington’s bold plan for the future is definitely slow moving, but if carried out it could create long lasting racial
While trying to help make life easier for African Americans in the south, Washington also tried to ease the fears of the whites on blacks wanting to integrate socially. Even though Du Bois understood the importance of the speech, he felt Washington was asking’s blacks to give up pushing and wanting equality in education for their youth and civil rights, which he felt were the exact things that they needed to be trying to
In his speech, Washington addresses both whites and blacks. “I would say cast down your bucket where you are, cast it down in making friends in every manly way of the people of all races by whom we are surrounded.” (Washington, Atlanta Compromise, pg.2). This quote is a good indicator of Washington’s ideology on black progression in American society. Essentially, the quote is addressing African-Americans to try and make the best of their situation because their situation is much better than what it would have been thirty to forty years prior. Throughout the speech, Washington maintains this tone of “compromise”. “It is at the bottom of life we must begin and not the top. Nor should we permit our grievances to overshadow our opportunities.” (Washington, Atlanta Compromise, pg.2). Washington argues for this workman-like approach from African-Americans throughout the speech and this quote embodies that. Washington comes from a background of slavery and makes reference to this in his speech as well. Even though the system at the time was still largely geared against African-Americans, Washington advocates for blacks to work with what they have and be grateful for opportunities
Dubois provides more details on the whole idea behind the thinking of this scholar and his vision for his people. Per this document, Washington’s speech seems to have shocked the nation to hear a Negro man encouraging his community to work together with the whites with goals of financial security. A first, many Negros struggled with supporting Booker’s vision of the black community not focusing on racial equality but working to gain financial freedoms but eventually it won “the admiration of the North and silenced the Negroes themselves.” Race relations amongst the blacks and whites were filled with a lot of tension which was all related to the little rights afforded to the blacks and the racial inequalities/injustices faced by blacks in
Washington’s feelings in regard to national unity encompass a majority of the points in his address. To Washington, the creation of political parties would serve only as a means of breaking the American people away from one another. He feared people would become so consumed in gaining political dominance for their political party that parties would forget or overlook the fact that all of them were still Americans and should be united by this. Washington’s foresight in this matter is an utterly precise prediction of the current political climates in America. The American political arena today appears to be a completely binary system divided between Democrats and Republicans and that views differing from the two are largely ignored. Washington was even able to predict the forming of modern parties “with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations”; this insight seems to hint at his realization at the inevitable split between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. (p. 6) Modern Republicans and Democrats seem much more interested in proving the other party corrupt or inept so that the American...
...t him, that he did not care about the hard work, assimilation, and education so much as he wanted to be popular and equal to the whites. These accusations, though, do not hold up when compared to the actions put forth by Mr. Washington. If a person did not truly stand up for what he believed in, then his actions would prove true to the accusations being brought against him. This was not the case though, and Washington’s actions spoke way louder than his words could have.
Washington devoted his life to changing the circumstances for African-Americans and improving their lives. Washington believed that the only way to solve the ethnic problems facing America was to cooperate and comply with white men and their ideals. Washington believed that a society could thrive in segregation just so long as white and black men shared equal rights and mutual respect. Though Washington openly supported black lives taking the “back seat” in society, he believed that it was the only way to achieve compromise and
He thought blacks should go along with the status quo and not fight for equal rights. He felt that blacks should not “rock the boat”. He thought that this only angered the white people even more. He believed that blacks would gain better economic and social status if they made themselves more valuable to the white man. They would do this by first obtaining an education that focused on skills and industry. He believed if blacks made themselves skilled laborers then this would mutually benefit both the blacks and the whites. Once the whites realized that these skills that the blacks had acquired made them prosper they would eventually accept blacks as their equal. “The philosophy of Washington was one of accommodation to white oppression” (Gibson
In his speech, he enlightens the audience with a phase which sums up his theme. He advised the White man, as well as the Black man, to “‘[c]ast down your bucket where you are’ – cast it down in making friends in every manly way of the people of all races by who we are surrounded” (1364). Here Washington advances the idea of colorblindness and suggests that the best way to assimilate into the White culture is to completely dismiss the idea of race. Thus, if we continuously “cast our buckets,” then eventually we will all become one unified being. Once the Blacks have assimilated into the White culture, Washington felt that they needed “to get a foundation in education, industry, and property” rather than “strive … for political preferment” (1359). Therefore, if we mirror economic rights and political rights to slavery and freedom from slavery, then we understand why Washington wishes for Blacks to gain economic rights beforehand. Economic rights can be identified as the hard work and learning Washington describes during his slavery, while political rights can be seen as “freedom.” Also, he paints a clear picture of this during his Atlanta Exposition Address: “It is at the bottom of life we must begin, and not at the top” (1365). In addition, he speculates that slavery was a “school” that prepared them for freedom, and now economic rights will be the “school” that will prepare them for political
When most people think “Diversity” they think of the most communal characteristics: such as: Age, race, gender, sexual orientation, body type, ethnicity, and a person’s