Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The causes of conflicts in the post cold world war era
Consequences and impacts of domestic terrorism
Consequences and impacts of domestic terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Civil Liberties and Counter Terrorism
By: Jordan Drage (301166788)
Assignment 2 - Final Draft
POL 101 W – Andrew Heard
In recent decades terrorism has fueled many global conflicts and played a pivotal role in domestic and international politics. Domestic policies to combat terrorism continue to be hotly debated worldwide as the lines between freedom and security continue to blur. With an almost propagandistic anti-terrorism message being advertised throughout much of the developed world, one must ask if any progress has been made and whether or not governments have gone too far in trying to “protect” their citizens. Examining the current landscape of terrorism; the differing definitions found in the global community; what is currently being done to combat terrorism and the sustainability of these policies, it is clear that contemporary practices must be rethought in order to remain a viable and effective means to counter terrorism while protecting basic human rights moving forward.
Modern post-colonial states have been left with artificial borders that can encompass multiple historic groups (including enemies), while other groups (ethnic, religious etc.) straddle borders and can be divided between several states, which has led to conflicting leadership, and internal nationalism. The post Cold War world has seen a decline in inter-state conflicts and a rise of intra-state conflicts. While North America and Europe regained economic stability following World War II many newer states fell to oligarchies leaving large populations of disenfranchised classes. A wave of revolutions demanding redistribution of wealth and resources flowed through Asia and South America, many of which were fiercely condemned by the West during the...
... middle of paper ...
... feasible to continue with the same security, resources and spending on counter-terrorism as has been in the past decade. More importantly the world’s citizens must be able to trust in their governments to avoid increasing civil unrest. Perhaps it is time to focus on preventative measures and begin healing as a global community. An end to political strife and violence is unforeseeable but we may be able to be as successful with a combination of preventative surveillance and community betterment with an increase in diplomatic foreign relations. Acts of terrorism have been around since the beginnings of recorded history, and likely were around before that as well. It is ignorant to assume there is some battle to be won as opposed to putting in the effort and working to lessen the effects of terrorism and perhaps more importantly simply reduce the need for terrorism.
After World War II, Europe emerged as a continent torn between two very different political ideologies, Communism and Democracy. As the two major superpowers, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States, struggled to defend their respective governmental policies, the European Continent was caught in an intrinsic struggle to preserve the autonomy which had taken so long to achieve. During the Cold War, Eastern European nations struggled to achieve autonomy with the help of the West's dedication to break the Soviet sphere of influence. After the disintegration of the USSR, the struggle for autonomy among nations shifted from an intense, inward, nationalistic struggle to break away from a superpower to a commitment of international unity and cooperation as nations began to take moral and political responsibility for their actions.
In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).
...errorist attacks and endless wars are trivial compared to historical origins of Islamic extremism, oppressive leaders, gap in economic classes, unemployment and brutality suffered by these terrorists. Tightening up on airport security, bringing out the National Guard, and bomb sniffing dogs are not going to end the hatred that propelled the attack. So, the remote sources of this aggression are so deep rooted and far more numerous that it would require a global dialog to prevent such a tragedy in future.
Anything an empire or country expands passed its borders it may have to face new culture. During expansions, two contrasting culture often meet and is forced to combined into the other. When this happens countries not only the lose of a significant amount of culture but the lose of the ability to have their own leader. Being forced to lose some on its identify, oppressed, or generally weakened are among the greatest causes for the European nationalism seen from the 15th to the 20th century.
Bellavita, C. (2009). Changing homeland security: The year in review - 2008. Homeland Security Affairs, 5(1) Retrieved from http://ezproxy.fau.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1266212855?accountid=10902
Homeland security was developed by the United States government to protect the country from external aggression, reduce the likelihood of terrorist attacks and manage the damage that occurs in case of attacks. To this end, the government set up and reconstituted numerous agencies to aid in the fight against terrorism in the United States. The United States Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security constitute the most prominent departments under the United States law to champion the fight against any attacks by extremist groups. Federal, State and local law enforcement agencies, as well as the United States’ military also have a role to play in homeland security. With the increasing cases of attacks and acts of aggression towards the United States, the government sought to strengthen the resolve to curb any attacks aimed at killing or maiming the citizens or destruction of government institutions and installations. In the wake of the September 11 attacks, it was apparent that stringent measures were needed to prevent attacks on American soil and protect the citizens of the country. This paper examines the duties; responsibility and intelligence methods used by the military, federal, State and local law enforcement agencies, as well as homeland security agencies in the fight against terrorism, with the aim of drawing similarities and differences.
But still, will the world ever be free of terrorism? Works Cited O'Conner 2011 James 2005
The threat of global terrorism continues to rise with the total number of deaths reaching 32,685 in 2015, which is an 80 percent increase from 2014 (Global Index). With this said, terrorism remains a growing, and violent phenomenon that has dominated global debates. However, ‘terrorism’ remains a highly contested term; there is no global agreement on exactly what constitutes a terror act. An even more contested concept is whether to broaden the scope of terrorism to include non-state and state actors.
Al Qaeda, the organization that the United States is in a constant, never ending battle with, the organization that has made the most impact and changed the United States forever. Al Qaeda is always making headlines with their terrorist attacks, the most known attack September 11th, 2001. This essay is about the terrorist group Al Qaeda, its history and background, Osama bin Laden, their well-known leader, and the major attacks on America.
The concept of terrorism is exceedingly difficult to define. Author Gerald Seymour first said in his book Harry’s Game that, “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”. Each individual may view terrorism in a different light. Because of this, there is currently no universal definition of terrorism. However, in recent years, it has become increasingly more important to form a definition of terrorism, especially while working in the media.
Terrorism will happen again regardless of how prepared the U.S. thinks it may be. This means that it is the country’s job to ensure that there is a continuation of measures that should be taken to fight against terrorism. Others believe that the U.S. is fully prepared for another terrorist attack and that enough has been done. The question at hand is, should the U.S. still be concerned about terrorism. The United States needs to be concerned about terrorism to prevent tragedies like 9/11 from happening again, to address problems with domestic terrorism, and to improve homeland security.
...ctual demand of terrorism will consummate the underlying issue ("International Affairs"). Though the United States cannot currently “win the hearts and minds of the Middle East in the short run”, we can take immediate action that will contribute to the end of terrorism and stabilization of the Middle East.
Terrorism has many forms, and many definitions. “Elements from the American definitional model define terrorism as a premeditated and unlawful act in which groups or agents of some principal engage in a threatened or actual use o...
Seidenstat argues that security is a relative thing and that no set of policies or measures can eliminate all terrorist acts (Seidenstat 2009 ,4). Terrorists will stop at nothing to foil our defenses. They are very patient and creative in planning their attacks. Terrorists will continue to invent ways to defeat our security measures while we are busy with our lives and forgetting about the last attack. Sometimes they don’t need to do nothing but wait for us to let our guard down so they can easily slip passed security measures.
Terrorism is one of the most extensively discussed issues of our time and at the same time it is also one of the least understood. The term itself “terrorism” means many different things to different people, cultures, and races. As a result, trying to define or classify terrorism with one universal definition is nearly impossible. The definition of terrorism used in this research is a reflection of much of the Western and American way of defining it. The definition of terrorism is,