Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Charismatic Leader
Strengths of charismatic leadership
Charismatics and transformational leadership capter 9
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Charismatic Leader
Weber defined charismatic leadership as “resting on devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism, or exemplary character of an individual person, and of the normative patters or order revealed or ordained by him”. (QUOTE) Northouse defines charismatic leadership the same as transformational leadership. Many of history’s prominent leaders have been considered to be charismatic leaders. The question is often raised if charismatic leaders are formed by their surrounding environment or if the characteristics of a charismatic leader are innate and decided before birth. While the definitive opinion of Northouse on the debate is unknown, Weber believes the ability to be a charismatic leader is a divine right and of superhuman origin. While the origin of the ability to be charismatic is still looming, there is one thing that is for certain, charismatic leaders are extremely effective. Charismatic leaders are generally followed by those who unquestionably have faith in them. The followers relinquish all forms of independence from their follower and truly believe in them. These leaders have the ability to “run the room” so to speak, and they are able to captivate a room merely by their powerful and warming personality. Weber surrounds his theory around charisma being the idea that it is not a trait but rather a working and outstanding relationship between the leader and the followers. In this style of leadership, the charm of such an individual makes their followers seek their leadership without questioning them. Charismatic leaders are essentially very good communicators. They are able to relate and communicate with their followers in ways that a normal everyday individual would not be able to. Charismatic leaders are not only able to co... ... middle of paper ... ...tin Luther King Jr. Gandhi entered into the movement against Britain in the early 1900s and immediately became nationally recognized for his non-violent way of civil resistance. Gandhi’s life and movement became an inspiration to millions and his mission was one that became ideal to follow. Gandhi was able to unite a divided country using the key characteristic of a charismatic leader, the ability to communicate and become identifiable. The country was divided through religion (Hindu and Muslim), and were united through Gandhi’s peaceful seeking of the relinquishment of the Britain occupation of India. Gandhi won approval for his principle of non-violent civil protests which led him to achieve political and social progress. He completely transformed the Indian National Congress with peaceful boycotts of British goods and institutions ("Charisma of mahatma," 2012).
Charisma in a leader is defined in Leadership Theory, Application & Skill Development as “a social construct between the leader and follower, in which the leader offers a transformative vision or ideal which exceeds the status quo and then convinces followers to accept this course of action not because of its rational likelihood of success, but because of their implicit belief in the extraordinary qualities of the leader” (Lussier & Achua, 2013, p.325). Charismatic and transformational types of leadership styles are very similar, but a transformative leader may not have that special “it factor” that a charismatic leader possesses. Leadership Theory, Application & Skill Development gives examples of such leaders; “Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Abraham Lincoln, or Jack Welch are transformational, but few will label them charismatic” (Lussier & Achua, 2013, p.342). While these leaders have affected great change in their own ways, they were not notably charismatic.
Charismatic leadership is also known to have a large effect on their followers emotionally. In regards to a charismatic leader, Northouse (2013) stated that "the personality characteristics of a charismatic leader include being dominant, having a strong desire to influence others, being self-confident, and having a strong sense of one 's own moral values" (p. 188). Followers develop a loyalty to charismatic leaders because they can see themselves in the leader and they become emotionally involved in them, these factors tend to make it difficult for them to question them or their ideas. Many times followers of charismatic leaders look to the leader as a guide to help with different situations or problems they may be currently experiencing.
... foundation for higher-order change in followers (Bass, 1985; Waldman, Bass, and Einstein, 1987). The dark Side of Charisma The charismatic approach has a “dark” side. A list of famous charismatic leaders would include Adolph Hitler, Charles Manson, and David Koresh. There is an old saying “Failure is hard to handle, but success is even harder.” For the successful charismatic leader, it would be easy to slip into a totalitarian, exploitive, and self-aggrandizing mode. For followers, they can easily go overboard in a romance of leadership losing balance and perspective. Followers may willingly exploit themselves with negative consequences to their own health, their family, and the overall quality of their life. In the example of Hitler, a highly civilized German society became convinced uncivilized actions, such as mass murders, were acceptable.
...e enhanced by such a leader. This may require additional research to confirm. Nevertheless, this study favors empowerment through strategic planning. But, I believe a charismatic leader would give so much more.
Correctional institutions like jails or prisons have specific variables that put them a different category when compared to other business or organizations. However, the concepts related to being an effective leader or administrator are quite similar across the board. The objective is getting the job done as efficiently, resourcefully, and cost-effectively as possible and unfortunately, a charismatic personality is not necessary. I can think of two specific individuals in the sports world who are experiencing great careers with significant amounts of wins and accolades, who are not mentioned in the conversation as it relates to charismatic personalities. Let us start with Bill Belichick, the head coach of the New England Patriots who has been
What sets charismatic leaders apart is that they are “essentially very skilled communicators, individuals who are both verbally eloquent, but also able to communicate to followers on a deep, emotional level,” said Ronald E. Riggio, Ph.D., professor of leadership and organizational psychology at Claremont McKenna College, in his Psychology Today article “What is Charisma and Charismatic Leadership?”
Although, one style of leadership is better suited to different times and situations than another. However, it is important to understand which leadership style best fits the needs of a given situation. Even with the many traits, characteristics and strengths attributed to a charismatic leader, it is prudent to develop another leadership skill.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (2015). Towards a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership in organisational settings. Academy of management review, 12(4), 637-647.
The role of the charismatic leader in the emergence of a new society has been frequently commented on from within the studies of sociology and world leadership. The charismatic leader is unique, in the sense that the authority that the leader possesses is largely based on the individual traits of the leader, and his or her ability to maintain support from followers. As a result, the charisma of a leader is many times not enough to ensure a long lasting stabilized society. Max Weber has suggested in his study of leadership and authority, a process known as the routinization of charisma must take place in order for a movement or message to continue. The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of the routinization of charisma and demonstrate how Weber’s concept while vastly important in the understanding of authority and leadership, is to rigid in relation to the potential ends for charisma. By examining the emergence of Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and the Soviet Union, it will be shown that charisma can be repurposed to support an individual. While the transfer of power from Lenin and Stalin can be in part understood within Weber’s concept of charisma, it serves to demonstrate how the routinization of charisma can lead to the development of manufactured charisma and a new charismatic leader.
Gandhi led a peaceful protest against British rule. During the early 1900’s, the living conditions of his country were poor and unacceptable. Disappointed with the state of his country, Gandhi became involved. To begin, his first courageous act was in February of 1919 where he protested against a law allowing the British to imprison Indians without trial. In 1922 he was arrested for disobedience and released six years later. Additionally, he led the famous salt- tax reform in March of 1930. The march was acclaimed to be very successful protest, but it imprisoned over 60000 people. Later in September of 1932, while imprisoned, led a fast, protesting Brittan’s decision to segregate the lower classes of citizens. The fasting caused a major emotional uproar within the country and eventually affected the economic state of many citizens. Gandhi once again became politically active when war fledged around the world for a second time. This time, he tried to enact peace within the fighting nations, as well as instilling new ideas and reforms into India’s political system. Eventually, the war subsided and in August of 1947, India was divided into two smaller independent portions: Pakistan and India. Gandhi’s courageous efforts eventually lead to India’s independence from Europe. Therefore, it is easy to comprehend why Gandhi is portrayed as
The position that the charismatic leader has moral concerns are as the firefighter because emotion are involved. The affect of recognition the charismatic leader the “enhance productivity, lower accidents, and enhance job satisfaction,” according to DuBrin, 2013 p. g. 74.
Weber had rightly identified three different types of leadership that is; traditional, rational, and charismatic leadership. Rational leadership is developed when people choose their leader through logic decision making, traditional leadership runs in family and charismatic leadership is when people choose their leaders on basis of their charismatic personality and broad vision about future of people. A charismatic leader always involves local people and community in his decision making whereas; this element is least
There are different types of leadership, the top three a good leader should know are strategic, transformational, and charismatic. Charismatic leadership is a type of influence based on the leader’s charisma. Charismatic leaders are expected to have a lot of confidence in their beliefs and ideas and a strong need to influence people. They often feel the need to communicate expectations about performance. Martin Luther King Jr was a strong charismatic leader. If it was not for his strong beliefs and ideas to put an end to racism we could still be living in a racism world.
Charismatic individuals can brighten a room by genuinely expressing their feelings. By doing this they have the ability to affect the moods and emotions of others. They demonstrate an acute ability to read-off others emotions and adjust accordingly to make a stronger connection. They have the understanding and control over their own feelings that prevent them from an emotional outburst unless they mean it. (Riggio, 2010)
When Gandhi returned back to India from Europe in 1896 he was sickened. The British Raj had formally taken over, so he decided to make a change and stop the unfair treatment of everyone in India. As Gandhi said himself, “My ambition is no less than to convert the British people though nonviolence and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India..” (Document A, Gandhi). His whole reason of practicing civil disobedience was to show the British that no matter how hard they hit, the people of India would never give up. With these peaceful protests Gandhi made a point to the British, he but a mere man could but tame a ferocious lion. (Document D). Gandhi and his supporters were constantly being attacked and yet they never stopped protesting.