Essay On Camp David Negotiation

1094 Words3 Pages

Why Did the Negotiation fail?
Many disagreements would arise in the negotiation process of the Camp David 2000 Summit that would eventually lead it to be unsuccessful. Disagreements such as the division of territory, the dispute over Jerusalem, Security and Refugee arrangements arose in the negotiation. Unfortunately this paper cannot explain all of the disagreement, it will mention some.
Most of the criticism of the failure on Camp David 2000 Summit was pressed at the Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat. In Dennis Ross’s The Missing Peace: The Inside Story of the Fight for Middle East Peace, Dennis Ross states that Yasser Arafat came into the Camp David negotiations with an all or nothing mindset, such that “if the demands were not Arafat’s, he would not accept it”. It states that he would have nothing of it, if it was not what he wanted. In this book Dennis Ross stated that Yasser Arafat wanted a “one-state solution” instead of adjacent Israeli and Palestinian states, but a single Arab state encompassing all of Historic Palestine. Arafat’s unwillingness to accept any offers that wasn’t what he wanted lead to the failure of the Camp David 2000 Summit.
Disagreement on the “right of return” was one of the many reasons why the negotiation failed at the Camp David 2000 Summit. This disagreement correlates to the one above, due to Arafat’s all or nothing mindset; it transformed this easily negotiable agreement into one that would derange the negotiation. Palestinian insisted on the “right of return” of all scattered Palestinians to return to their old homes in Israel Proper. Israel would turn down this demand; Israel in there proposal, a maximum of 100,000 refugees would be allowed to return to Israel, however, at that ti...

... middle of paper ...

...d they will receive, whether if it is good land or bad land. An issue that the Parameter failed to resolve is the “right of return” issue. The Parameter states that Palestinians would have to waive their claim to an unlimited “right of return” to Israel Proper. This issue regarding the “right of return” was one of the main reasons why the Camp David 2000 Summit negotiation failed, and since this Parameters still hasn’t found a solution to this issue, it was bound to fail. Another issue the Parameters failed to find a solution is the sovereignty over the Temple Mount. As lenient as how Israel was in the Camp David Summit, they were strong on an issue; this issue was the sovereignty over the Temple Mount. Israel wants full sovereignty over the Temple Mount, since this Parameter would give the Palestinian sovereignty, the Israel would have to reject this Parameter.

Open Document