Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of organizational culture
Importance of group decision making
Effects of organizational culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of organizational culture
Advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons, of group decision-making Name: Course: Professor: Date: Introduction Keller & Price (2011) pointed out that an organisation that have to develop and maintain competitive advantage has to devise mechanisms of involving every employee into the decision making process. A study conducted by Freeman (1999) in an investigation of the importance of including employees in a decision making process documented that, organisations that include employees in decisions of the running of the organisation have higher chances of developing organisational culture that pushes the organisation to higher levels. In this regard, the facets of the success of any organisations are denoted by the strategic decisions made through initiatives such as group decision-making and other strategic positioning plans. Nevertheless, specific aspects of decisions should be avoided in order to make departments effective. Stone (2013) articulated on core aspects that touches on sensitive matters and which should be avoided for effective running of organisations. In fact, Freeman (1999) …show more content…
When a group is meeting to deliberate on different issues affecting the company, it is indispensable for the members to be given clearly defined policy guidance (Schermerhorn, 2010). This helps in clearing doubts about the intentions of such meetings. In addition, the desired outcomes are pointed out to have the theme of the meeting clearly spelt out. In addition, it is imperative to avoid low team authority. When there is no defined framework of what should be achieved or on how to achieve it, decisions are either ambiguous or unrealistic. When there is no authority in the group, the lead legacy gets confusing and it becomes difficult for members to constructively make sound decisions. Thus, designating roles in a group decision-making is critical in that it makes things run
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
When making a group decision, it is important to consider everybody’s opinion as important and with respect, so the fairest decision can be made.
Delegating leadership responsibilities to in-groups poses a challenge of building a strong structure with a clear understanding of procedure. On the other side, if the leader cuts followers out of the decision making process, the newly formed relationships will suffer. The Normative Decision Model offers a recommendation for the ways leaders “adjust their decision style depending on the degree to which the quality of the decision is important and the likelihood that employees will accept the decision (Nahavandi, 2015).” An easy first step for leaders is to understand how many people will be effected by the decision (Nahavandi, 2015). Does it only concern an individual or is the whole group going to be impacted? Using the decision tree on page 76 of Nahavandi’s The Art and Science of Leadership (2015), leaders can effectively identify the appropriate decision style needed. A leader must adopt an autocratic style when the quality of the decision is not significant, when employees disagree, and when the employees don’t see eye to eye with the organizations goals (Nahavandi, 2015). While a consultative style is necessary when the employees will hold the responsibility of implementation; especially when employees agree with the overall goals of the organization (Nahavandi, 2015). Finally, “group oriented decision style should be used when the leader does not have all the information, and
The group has reached the Norming stage when they begin the second stage. “The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectation for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are ne...
Engaging workers in decision-making processes is an important part of HRM. This is because it provides the management and staff with an opportunity to collaborate for the advancement of the company and its stakeholders. Further, it gives the management an opportunity to make use of vital information that workers obtain as the actual persons on the ground (Business case studies, 2016c).
They do this by questions the solutions another member gives or by providing new and different solutions. This forces group members to take into account both the positive or negative consequences of the solutions that have been suggested and if there are other, possibly better, options available. The recorder role is another role which is available and is pretty self-explanatory as it simply requires a member to do things like take the minutes of meetings and keep track of the groups’ actions by writing them down. This person may also have to create an agenda, make arrangement for the group, or be responsible for sending out emails to group
In this paper, I will identify and describe a group I recently observed. The description will include information about the group process and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the leader’s style. I will also consider what I might do differently if leading the group and think about how I could apply what I learned from this observation into my own work.
“What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions” by David A. Garvin and Michael A. Roberto explores the ways successful leaders can design an effective decision-making process, and the areas one needs to avoid. Some areas that are mention are how leaders should focus on maintaining an Inquiry style decision process, and avoid an Advocacy style decision process. They explore how constructive conflict is desired if its cognitive conflict which allows people to openly express their differences which allows everyone to introduce new ideas. Affective conflict is to be desired, as it is emotional based and cause problems amongst teams. Garvin and Roberto talk about how leaders need to show they were listening to the discussion, and once a final choice is made, leaders need to show logic as to why the decision was made. Garvin and Roberto discuss closure within deliberations, and they talk about a Litmus Test. Throughout the paper Garvin and Roberto discuss many do’s and don’ts about decision making and ways leaders can be successful in running a team.
Furthermore, when members of the department are given the opportunity to be heard and voice their opinions, leadership is perceived as legitimate and just. The penultimate process is to ensure that members does have an opportunity to vent their frustrations and be heard. So, “before selecting a solution for implementation, [leaders] should consider the merits of all possible solutions, without favoring any particular one” (Cloke and Goldsmith, 2011, p.190). A policy change must represent the core value of not only the organization, but the people that makes the organization. Lastly, once a consensus is reached, leaders have the obligation to ensure the solution is inclusive, representative, and legal. Therefore, the solution should be reaffirmed by “consulting with experts, critics, coaches, and anyone affected by the problem or the solution to solicit feedback on alternative solutions” (Cloke and Goldsmith, 2011, p.190). This last step ensures that members of the department are included in the decision making while protecting the interest of the
Decision making is a task which needs utmost balance on the part of the leader. One sided decisions when team input is necessary or resources going into a lot of group decision making process when the decision itself is not so crucial can turn out to be big result influencing part of the outcomes of a leadership experience. Leadership demands a lot of adaptability where the style of leadership to be followed, a complete leader driven or group driven is to chosen based on the type of decision to be taken and the situation in which the decision is to be taken.
Groupthink is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines which could have drastic results. It is the result of group polarization where discussions are enhance or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group. Therefore, if a group leans towards risky situation at the beginning of the discussion on average they will move toward an even riskier position. (Marks, 2015). The idea when everyone think the same no one is really thinking. The drastic outcomes result from people trying to avoid conflict with one another, being highly cohesive, and results is questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions
In today’s competitive business environment, effective management plays a crucial role. The article Five Minds of a Manager by Jonathan Gosling and Henry Mintzberg, identify some important aspects of effective managers. According to the author, “The world of the manager is complicated and confusing.” Consequently, mangers need to think above ordinary employees. In particular, managers should, think global and act local, collaborate through competitions, be agents of change and maintain order. This paper provides a reflective review of the article Five Minds of a Manager by Jonathan Gosling and Henry Mintzberg.
In order to evaluate my role within the group, it is important to identify what makes a group. A group must firstly consist of more than three members, “Two members have personal relationships; with three or more there is a change in quality” of the personal relationship. (Bion 1961, p26) The group must have a common purpose or a goal in order to succeed. Having now completed my group work task, I can look back and reflect upon the process that my group went through to get to the presentation end point.
Group decision making has many benefits for the individuals involved and the organization itself. In order for group decision making to be efficient, it is important for a creative environment to exist. “Creativity is the mental and social process used to generate ideas, concepts and associations that lead to the exploration of new ideas (May, 2011, para.3). This allows each employee to explore ideas and feel comfortable to share them without fear of rejection.
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.