Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of Eliot's poetry
TS Eliot and his contribution
Critical analysis of Eliot's poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Eric Birling is the son of Mr. and Mrs. Birling who is ‘in his mid-twenties, not quite at ease, half shy, half assertive’; it is as if he has something to hide. He works in his father's firm. His odd behavior is used by Priestley to hint that his secrets will later disrupt and threaten the Birling's way of life.
At the beginning of the play, Eric acts suspicious and lacks confidence showing that he could be hiding something and suggests that he is isolated from the family. Eric's laugh interrupts the polite conversation earlier in the play("Suddenly I felt I just had to laugh"), just like how his behavior disrupts the illusion of respectability. Sheila accuses her brother of being somewhat drunk 'squiffy'. This forewarns us about his parent's
…show more content…
ignorance of his drinking habit. His parents clearly do not take him seriously and their lack of parental love may also have contributed to his low self-esteem and heavy drinking. Eric remarks upon Sheila's behavior "nasty temper sometimes - but she's not bad really". The 'Buffs' were an east-Kent Regiment (so-called because of the color of their uniforms). The phrase with its military meaning of standing firm against the enemy was first used by Rudyard Kipling, soon it became a slang phrase. Eric is, therefore, asking Sheila for more self-control. Everyone keeps up their appearance but Eric makes it obvious there is something murky underneath. He is treated as an irresponsible child by his father 'Just keep quiet, Eric, and don't get excited' expressing the separate relationship the family has. Birling is disappointed with Eric and gets better with Gerald, which must be upsetting for Eric. Eric takes a stance against his father's action "And I don't know why she should have been sacked just because she'd be a bit more than the others." This is the first of many of such attribution that will be of guilt that will be made throughout the play. He is portrayed as a troublesome son. Mr.Birling thinks that he knows more about life than Eric "That's something this public-school-and-Varsity life you've had doesn't seem to teach you" but this suggests that Eric has a superior education to Mr.Birling as he understands the situation and approaches more seriously. He has hidden some dirty secrets. We can see his "familiarity with quick heavy drinking" when he pours the whiskey in act 3. Eric lacks self-control so his secret gets out. He regrets his involvement with Eva Smith and recognizes that the validity of the inspector does not matter and represents the younger, impressionable people in society, giving hope. He does not give any detail about what happened, showing that he can barely bring himself to admit what he has done and leaving the audience to form their own conclusions about what happened. He is an alcoholic "I was in a state when a chap easily turns nasty" and apparently forced himself on Eva and got her 'pregnant' and can not even remember it happening. Thus showing his irresponsibility and he also stole money from his own father to support her. Eric is involved in what is arguably the most emotional moment of the play when he accuses his mother of murdering his unborn child(her grandchild), saying 'you turned her away- yes, and you killed her", revealing a standing inability to accept his own actions. His drunkenness represents the bad side of the Birling family. The theme of judgment is brought in when Gerald treats Daisy as his 'mistress' and when he ends the affair his reputation is not damaged and even Sheila would still like 'to start again'.
But Eric drunkenly gets Eva pregnant, steals money for her it is likely that he has brought a scandal to his family. This also reflects the state where Birling's respectable friends like the Alderman Meggarty. They behave badly but no one says anything because of the higher class superiority. Eric is not the only one, but due to his lack of self-control, he is the one to be found out. His parents do not want a scandal so they do not care about him as much as they care about what people will think. Eric is unloved and he shouts at his mother "you don't understand anything. You never did. You never even tried-" it might even be the angriest moment in the play. He feels isolated from the family and 'no one understands him.' The distant relationship between him and his mother is clarified when she says in act 1"your not the type, you don't get drunk" clearly stating her vague knowledge of her very own …show more content…
son. Eric does not have a very good relationship with his parents. He complains that neither of his parents is the type of people you could go to if you were seeking help, "your not the kind of father a chap could go to when he's in trouble." Priestley does this to present Mr. and Mrs. Birling as capitalists who are bad parents so that other parents will not want to be like them. Physical attraction was the main motive behind Eric's relationship with Eva. He did not love her, he just took advantage of her "she was pretty and a good sport."Priestley brings this in to show how in 1912 many men had relationships with women purely because of the sexual aspect. He concludes this with a tragic ending to try to deter men from treating women this way. In the play, Eric forces himself upon and takes advantage of Eva/Daisy "she told me she didn't want me to go in"I insisted."Through this, Priestley displays to his audience how because of the patriarchal society, men can easily take advantage of women. He hopes that this will encourage men to stop treating women badly or it could end in tragic consequences (In this case a suicide). Eric argued against Mr. Birling's (who represents the older generation) treatment of Eva Smith. This reinforces the audiences already forming an opinion that Eric is a better person than Birling. Priestley brings in this to convince his audience to be on Eric's side and therefore on the side of socialism. Along with Sheila, Eric represents the younger generation. He is shaken by the inspector's message and the role that he played Eva/Daisy's suicide, "my god - I'm not likely to forget" hence showing his sensitive nature. He and Sheila both take responsibility for their actions. He deeply regrets it "the fact remains I did what I did", he criticizes his parents for pretending nothing is happening, "You may be letting yourselves out nicely". Accordingly, he confesses his mistakes and by taking responsibility for his actions, he is doing the opposite to Mr. Birling, acting more socialist than a capitalist. Priestley manifests the theme of responsibility to make the readers trust the socialist characters more than the capitalist ones, in the hope that is audience will root for a more communally responsible and socialist future. Ultimately, Eric speaks against his parents and states how he feels and becomes stronger as he is in more control of his life and does not need to rely on his parents anymore.
At the end of the play, he becomes a determined and reliable character as he understands what he has done and now has someone who understands him(Sheila). His concern about Eva, even after the inspector turned out to be a 'fake', "This girl's still dead, isn't she? Nobody's brought her to life, have they?","I still feel the same about it, and that's why I don't feel like sitting down and have a nice cozy talk" proves his sincerity for he will never forget what he has done. He admits his faults and is remorseful of his behavior. He has grown up considerably by the end of the play and the evening’s events can be seen as his path to adulthood and responsibility. His acknowledgment of guilt and acceptance of social responsibility leads to the audience sympathizing with him and Sheila stating ‘Eric’s absolutely right. And it’s the best thing any one of us has said tonight and it makes me feel a bit less ashamed of us.’ However, Priestley clearly wants the readers to understand that Eric is not a complete villain and that he is apparently an outcome of his upbringing and
environment.
Eric realises that they all know of Eva and the following events that occurred. He also reveals that he had stolen money from his father’s business.
Discuss Priestley's depiction of the Birling household and Gerald Croft, prior to the arrival of Inspector Goole In this submission I hope to fully discuss Priestley's depiction of the Birling household and Gerald Croft, prior to the arrival of Inspector Goole. The play is set in the fictional town of Brumley, an industrial town in the North Midlands. It is evening in the town, in the spring of 1912. At the moment the play starts the characters are celebrating the engagement between Gerald Croft and the Birling family's only daughter Sheila. They are all very pleased with themselves and are enjoying the occasion.
This is the concept of collective responsibility. Priestley says, 'things could really improve if only people were to become more socially responsible for the welfare of others'. We have to confront our mistakes and learn from them. The play starts off with the Birling family celebrating their daughter's engagement to Gerald Croft. The family included Mr Birling, Mrs Birling, Eric Birling, Sheila Birling and Gerald Croft.
Priestley mainly uses the characters in the play to present his views, especially Mr and Mrs Birling, to present his ideas about class and society. In the Birling family, Mrs Birling is the most upper class, and is always referring to the lower class female factory workers such as Eva Smith as ‘girls of that class’. She seems to think that working class people are not humans at all.
The theme of The Catcher in the Rye is simple. J. D. Salinger uses this novel to draw a clear distinction between the purity of childhood and the wickedness attained when one reaches adulthood. Salinger uses multiple literary devices including diction, symbolism, tone, and even the title of the novel to drive home his ideas about the innocence of children and the corruption of the world.
On overall, Priestley has presented the two characters, Arthur and Sheila Birling as completely differently. He wanted to match the story to the historical context of the 1910’s, but he has done this differently with Sheila. This is because the play was written in 1946 and the world had two wars and has started to comprehend the strength of community. She is the young generation of the 1910’s this means in a few years down the line, a war is going to break out and if they keep making the same mistake over and over again, it’s not going to turn out any better, by this, we see what happens in the second world war. This is why Sheila has been presented so that she understands consequences of what might happen if we don’t pull ourselves together.
The theme of selfishness is central to An Inspector Calls. Priestley questions the morality of the Birling and Croft
Erick didn’t need a friend like him.” (Gilb 2) Erick found himself without any friends and without a father. Erick’s mother is the only family he has left and having her going out with men and feeling somewhat ashamed of him leaves him feeling abandoned. Now Erick is left in a foreign country with no father figure but his mom’s numerous dates. Getting used to something like this isn’t easy but his mother finally meets this engineer that Erick decides to finally accept in his life. Erick isn't a very social person and even though he uses his accent as an excuse there’s more to it. So when they eventually get invited to the engineer’s house and Erick sees the full view of the house with the two horses and a stable, a swimming pool and two convertibles in his driveway, he almost feels intimidated. While sitting around the dinner table, everyone around him is talking and trying to make conversation while Erick isolated himself and “was silent, chewing quietly, taking the smallest bites, because he didn’t want them to think he liked their food”(Gilb 3). However When his mom got fired, her and the engineer separated. Erick would’ve brushed it off and acted like her did with everyone else that came in and out of his mother’s life if it was for what he told
He uses the downfall of Eva Smith and a chain of events to demonstrate this. This leads to a very convincing and well-devised play, which puts across JB Priestley’s views clearly and precisely. In Edwardian Britain there was a great difference in the roles of men and women in society and the outlook of what and was not accepted differed substantially. A prime example of this in the play is when Mr Birling says ‘Nothing to do with you, Sheila.
This helped Priestley promote socialism against capitalism. JB Priestley uses dramatic devices to make An inspector calls a modern day morality play, to do this he uses dramatic devices, such as dramatic irony and tension in order to convey the message through the entire play. They are used accurately considering the time in which the play is set. Priestley also uses the characters as dramatic devices, they symbolise the dramatic devices, an example of this is Priestley makes us hate Mr. Birling because he symbolises capitalism, and in Priestley’s eyes capitalism is wrong. Throughout the play, Mr. Birling is the voice of capitalism....
Throughout the play, the good-hearted Earl of Gloucester suffers at the hands of his illegitimate child Edmund and the king’s evil daughters Goneril and Regan. Gloucester loves his son Edgar and has given him land as a result. Edmund wishes to take these lands from his brother but in order to do so he must make Edgar fall from his father’s good graces. Edmund hatches a plan and says, “A credulous father and a brother noble/ Whose nature is so far from doing harms/That he suspects none” (1.2.187-189). Edmund quickly and cleverly begins to place doubt in his father’s mind about Edgar and soon manages to falsely convince his trusting father that Edgar wants to kill him. By falsely believing his son Edmund, Gloucester believes his actions to bring Edgar to “justice” are appropriate and sends (search patrols to find his son in) order to do so. Gloucester also defends and helps King Lear although his two evil daughters told him not too. Gloucester cannot bear to see King Lear in such a miserable state and goes against his daughters’ wishes when he says, “I would not see thy cruel nails/ Pluck out his ...
Priestley presents Mrs. Birling as a snobbish, unfair and unkind woman. She feels herself to be above other people who are in a different class to the one she is, and when the inspector arrives she treats him like an inferior. She does not meet the inspector until Act Two. In the meantime, he has been questioning other characters and there has been an argument between Sheila and Gerald.
him to follow his brothers' foot step. As the result, Eric was afraid to try
Biff never kept a steady job during his young adult life, and did not possess a healthy relationship with anyone that was in his life. As the play progresses the reader sees how much Biff becomes more self- aware. An online source states, “Unlike the other members of his family, Biff grows to recognize that he and his family members consistently deceive themselves, and he fights to escape the vicious cycles of lies.” When Biff returns home it becomes a struggle to keep a healthy relationship with his parents. Once Willy and Biff decide together that Biff will go and ask Bill Oliver for a loan is when the differences between the two characters are truly seen. Biff accepts reality for the first time in his life, and realizes how ridiculous it is to ask Bill Oliver for a loan, when he barely knows the man and worked for him about ten years ago. When Biff meets up with Willy after the ‘meeting’ Biff is talking to his Father and says, “Why am I trying to become what I don’t want to be? What am I doing in an office, making a contemptuous, begging fool of myself, when all I want is out there, waiting for me the minute I say I know who I am!” This quote reveals that Biff recently has just experienced an epiphany, and realizes that what he was doing was making no sense. Biff is escaping the self- deception he was caught in with the rest of his
...eems unable to think for herself. She is closed minded to the fact that her new husband murdered her former husband. Despite her blindness, she loves her son and wants to protect him as well. By not listening to Hamlet, she herself is poisoned by Claudius on accident.