Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis essay for act 2 shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis essay for act 2 shakespeare
An Inspector Calls Study Guide
Summary of Acts 1-3
Act 1
The Birling’s celebrate the engagement between Sheila Birling and Gerald Croft, who is the son of Lord and Lady Croft. Arthur Birling makes a number of speeches about the world and what state it is in and built-up relations, where he says that everyone should be responsible for themselves.
After Inspector Goole enters the house, he informs the Birling’s about the death of a lower class woman who had died due to swallowing a disinfectant. Afterwards, Arthur Birling admits he had sacked the girl after remembering what had happened two years ago due to her being one of the ring leaders in strike demanding higher wages.
The Inspector Continues on with the stories after Sheila enters the
…show more content…
room once again after leaving to talk with her mother. It is later revealed that Sheila Birling had also been involved, having sacked her from her job at a shop called Millwards. She reacts as horrified and sincerely remorseful. She then points out that the Inspector knows the details of the family’s involvement, who later informs them her name had been changed to Daisy Renton to which Gerald suddenly reacts, as if he’d knew her, who later verifies this by telling the Inspector he knew her. When Sheila is left with Gerald for a while he warns him to not hide anything from the inspector. Act 2 Gerald admits to having been involved with Eva Smith, who he knew as Daisy Renton previously at the summer. Sheila Returns her engagement ring to him and he temporarily leaves the house. After Mrs Birling arrives, Sheila warns her to which she tries to intimidate him, having been certain that she and Eva Smith were not related in any way.
When the Inspector reminds her of a pregnant girl request for help she turned away from a charity organisation she was the Chair of. She also argued that the girl was lying about the father of the child who had stolen money to try to support her which she refused. Mrs Birling then suggests that the father of the child should be made to pay. Meanwhile, Eric has been out and re-enters the house to see suspenseful faces, the reader at this point expect Eric to be the father.
Act 3
Eric realises that they all know of Eva and the following events that occurred. He also reveals that he had stolen money from his father’s business.
The Inspector leaves afterwards after making a speech about their responsibility towards the death of Eva Smith.
After Gerald re-enters, he reveals that there was no Inspector Goole and that this was a hoax, to which everyone except Sheila and Eric are delighted to hear of the news.
Sheila and Eric are convinced that this doesn’t change a thing. Just when Mr. Birling teases the family, he receives a telephone to find that there’s is a girl that has died in the infirmary and a police inspector is on his way to question
them.
On a drive on Highway 50, through Nevada to see a real ghost town, Agnes finds a little girl named Rebecca who has been separated by her family who was looking Leister 's gold. The capper of the whole thing is that Agnes saw the whole thing in a dream, but she gets to the Goldberg Hotel and Saloon, she realizes the whole thing was real, especially the inside of her room. She soon finds out that the entire hotel is haunted by all kinds of spirits from past guests; which only serves to make Agnes 's vacation that much more interesting. She wants to find out what happened to the family. She knows with every fiber of her being that it was not just a dream, and that a little girl really did go missing in the night before Agnes showed up. Will they be able to find the missing kid or will a killer (called “The Cutter”) ruin their
They tell her that they have found him but only a part of him. His jaw bone. This make Olivia trave back to her home town Medford. Terry’s family are having his funural so on her way there she decied to stop by her grandmothers old house. In the car she also decied that it would be a good idea to not tell any about who she really was.Olivia happens to meet a woman named Nora that lives next door and she is told that Nora was her grandmothers best friend. At this point Nora tells Olivia lots of information about her family and ends up asking her to take her to Terry’s feneral. This is a preferct cover for her. With being aroud family member that she doesn’t know or have been around makes it even harder to keep her past a sercret. After seeing and hearing lots of things from many different people Olivia wants to solve her perents murders. Along the way after she moves into her grandmother old house she picks up an frien named Duncan and the grow closer and
This is the concept of collective responsibility. Priestley says, 'things could really improve if only people were to become more socially responsible for the welfare of others'. We have to confront our mistakes and learn from them. The play starts off with the Birling family celebrating their daughter's engagement to Gerald Croft. The family included Mr Birling, Mrs Birling, Eric Birling, Sheila Birling and Gerald Croft.
Sheila Birling is another character in ?An Inspector Calls? who also points this out during the play, ?You fool- he knows. Of course he knows. And I hate to think how much he knows that we don?t know yet. You?ll see. You?ll see.?
Arthur Birling is a very self centred man. and only thinks of what he will get out of this event. When his daughter Shelia, is getting married, the only thing he can think of is how. ‘when Crofts and Birlings are no longer competing but working together. for lower costs and higher prices.’
When we first meet the Birling family Sheila (the daughter) when she was having an engagement party as she had been recently been engaged to Gerald Croft. She is described as “a pretty girl in her early twenties, very Pleased with life and rather excited." This shows that she may be naïve and that it is quite unusual attitude in the patriarchal society. There are many ideas behind why she got engaged to Gerald this as it may be simply love but, some may argue
On overall, Priestley has presented the two characters, Arthur and Sheila Birling as completely differently. He wanted to match the story to the historical context of the 1910’s, but he has done this differently with Sheila. This is because the play was written in 1946 and the world had two wars and has started to comprehend the strength of community. She is the young generation of the 1910’s this means in a few years down the line, a war is going to break out and if they keep making the same mistake over and over again, it’s not going to turn out any better, by this, we see what happens in the second world war. This is why Sheila has been presented so that she understands consequences of what might happen if we don’t pull ourselves together.
The Inspector, has a reputation of a figure of authority and he wants to keep it. Inspector Goole is a man who is very eerie and mysterious. Like I said before, he is a figure of authority as he deals with each member of the family very firmly and several times we see him taking charge we know this because in the text (stage directions) it says “ taking charge, masterfully”. His character doesn’t change throughout the play, however, he seems to gain more control over the characters as the play progresses. He uses aggressive, shocking language to make the characters feel guilty for the part they played in Eva Smith’s death “she died in misery and agony”. At the end of the play, his final speech was a message for the family; he says “We are responsible for each other” and warns them of the “fire and blood and anguish” this means that that will be the result if they do not pay attention to what he has taught them. For Abigail Williams, she has an eerie sense of how to manipulate others, to gain control over them. For example when she manipulated Tituba to put a curse on Elizabeth we know this as in the text it says “You beg me to conjure! She beg me to charm…”Abigail's main skill seems to be finding people's flaws, and weaknesses, then manipulating them to her
He uses the downfall of Eva Smith and a chain of events to demonstrate this. This leads to a very convincing and well-devised play, which puts across JB Priestley’s views clearly and precisely. In Edwardian Britain there was a great difference in the roles of men and women in society and the outlook of what and was not accepted differed substantially. A prime example of this in the play is when Mr Birling says ‘Nothing to do with you, Sheila.
The history of the time the play was written helps us to understand the views and the feelings expressed by Priestley in the play. The inspector transfers Priestley’s views and he shows the difference in social classes at the time. A gap which he wants to diminish. He illustrates the reason for this in the play, via the inspector, where he outlines the ways each of the Birlings have influenced someone from a completely different background and social class. This is the way Priestley viewed pre-war England.
on to work before you is late. And don't let on like you know nothing about that boy being killed before Mrs. Burke them. Just do your work like you don't know nothing. That boy's a lot better off in heaven than he is here."1
In this section at the end of Act Two we find out that Mrs Birling
In the beginning of the extract, Priestley uses the unrelenting questioning of Gerald by Sheila and his repeated avoidance of the obvious truth to create tension between the characters. Priestley begins the extract by referring to the seemingly omniscient inspector, ‘the inspector looks from Sheila to Gerald’ by using the stage directions to show the interactions of the characters it suggests that the inspector has prefigures conflict or tension that will arise in the near future. Priestley continues to use the body language of the characters to display the uneasy atmosphere between Sheila and Gerald, ‘Gerald: trying to smile’ Gerald is revealed as uncomfortable and on edge however is trying to cover up this which suggests that it is something he is ashamed of, this create suspense as the audience is compelled to know this information. Priestley uses the from of dialogue to put pressure of the situation.’ How did you come to know this girl-Eva smith’ Priestley mimics the style of the inspector in Sheila’s
Mr Birling is the father, and leader of the Birling family. He is described by Priestly as a ''Portentous'' man. Throughout the first act, we see Arthur Birling being conveyed by the play write as a rather pompous and foolish character. He shows no remorse or concern for his wrongful actions, unless they affect his reputation. Birling is also portrayed as a defiant capitalist and extremely narrow minded.
Mr Birling acts just the same way through the whole play. He is a selfish character that only thinks for himself and his family. “If we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be very awkward, wouldn’t it?” Mr Birling only care for himself and takes no responsibility to her death. As we go near the end of the play, he shows that he’s more worried about the money instead of Eva Smith and his grandchild.