This extract comes at the end of act one, after Sheila confesses to her role in Daisy Renton’s sacking from Milwards. In this extract it appears the focus of the inspectors inquiry is moving towards Gerald. In the beginning of the extract Priestley creates tension through the persistent questioning by Sheila of Gerald and Gerald’s repeated denial of his knowledge of her even when it is obvious that he had had contact with Daisy. As the extract progresses tension is built due to Gerald confession to knowing daisy but his unwillingness to convey any further information and Sheila’s blunt refusal to comply to this lack of information. Lastly at the end of the passage tension is shown through Gerald’s apprehensive attitude to sharing this information …show more content…
to the inspector and his attempt to unite the truth agent: Sheila in his lies unbeknown to the omniscience of the inspector.
In the beginning of the extract, Priestley uses the unrelenting questioning of Gerald by Sheila and his repeated avoidance of the obvious truth to create tension between the characters. Priestley begins the extract by referring to the seemingly omniscient inspector, ‘the inspector looks from Sheila to Gerald’ by using the stage directions to show the interactions of the characters it suggests that the inspector has prefigures conflict or tension that will arise in the near future. Priestley continues to use the body language of the characters to display the uneasy atmosphere between Sheila and Gerald, ‘Gerald: trying to smile’ Gerald is revealed as uncomfortable and on edge however is trying to cover up this which suggests that it is something he is ashamed of, this create suspense as the audience is compelled to know this information. Priestley uses the from of dialogue to put pressure of the situation.’ How did you come to know this girl-Eva smith’ Priestley mimics the style of the inspector in Sheila’s …show more content…
language to show how she is now an agent of truth. This creates tension due to the conflicting information Sheila and Gerald’ relay about Gerald’s relationship with Daisy, ‘I didn’t’ this example of conflicting dialogue reveals the sheer quantity of lies at the base of this seemingly normal family. Gerald use of language creates a sense of hostility, ‘why should I have known her?’ this advertises Gerald’s untrustworthy nature as Priestley portrays him as his denial and deflection of the question posed by Sheila suggests he has something to avoid or hide. Priestley uses a sense of time to create suspense, ‘ oh don’t be stupid, we haven’t much time.’ The idea of a time limit creates pressure between the characters and suggests movement towards conflict, in combination with Sheila’s low level of trust in Gerald and her forthrightness, which adds to the tension in the extract. As the extract progresses tension is created due to the revelation of Gerald’s knowledge of Daisy but the absence of information that he provides and Sheila’s blunt refusal to accept this little information.
Priestley uses a change in toe and power in Gerald’s dialogue to show his discomfort in the situation of confession, ‘all right. I knew her. Lets leave it at that.’ These short, single syllable words and sentences show Gerald’s agitation and build suspense in the scene, the impact of the short sentences also provides a sense of impatience and irritation. ‘We can’t leave it at that’ Sheila’s blunt refusal increases the tension and conflict between the characters because she is mocking Gerald, her superior, this is key as it is shown that Gerald and the young capitalists of this era a ignorant in their ways and their supposedly superior views actually represent stupidity, power cannot protect from the source of truth. The imbalance and changing positions of power in the novel create a source of conflict and suspense ‘now listen darling’ Gerald’s warm tone shows he is uncomfortable with this power swap, as Sheila is now the person acting with the most authority, his attempt to exercise his power to regain control of the situation furthers this and tension is formed due to the apart discomfort and conflict in this situation. Sheila’s relentless bombardment of questions acts as a build in tension, ‘ but you knew her very well, when did you first get to know her’ her
accurate questioning and perceived knowledge of Gerald’s relationship adds suspense because it further proves Gerald Is lying, she is the dictator of this conversation and is therefore capable of the truth, she herself has come to an accurate conclusion of Gerald’s affair with daisy, by implying that he knew her very well, this again shows the ignorance in his shying from the truth and foreshadows future events where all will be revealed. Lastly Priestley uses the stage directions to show Gerald’s discomfort and guilt, ‘he doesn’t reply’ Priestley uses the silence of Gerald to put emphasis on the fact that Gerald can no longer avoid the truth he has been found guilt, this discomfort makes tension within the scene. Secondly, ‘he doesn’t reply but looks at her’ Gerald’s body language suggests that he has given in as Sheila has uncovered the truth, the repetition of his silence creates tension once again because of the suspense generated by the unknown answer and the questioning to whether the assumed answer is in fact true, it also shows Gerald’s guilt and how he is ashamed of the situation.
Discuss Priestley's depiction of the Birling household and Gerald Croft, prior to the arrival of Inspector Goole In this submission I hope to fully discuss Priestley's depiction of the Birling household and Gerald Croft, prior to the arrival of Inspector Goole. The play is set in the fictional town of Brumley, an industrial town in the North Midlands. It is evening in the town, in the spring of 1912. At the moment the play starts the characters are celebrating the engagement between Gerald Croft and the Birling family's only daughter Sheila. They are all very pleased with themselves and are enjoying the occasion.
family, but it must not be 'cosy’ or homely. The lighting is to be a
it will create. He makes a toast to the couple and to the fact that
Priestley shows that the tension is within Birling’s family in many ways. He has created the setting of the play in Birling’s dining room where all the traumatic situations occur, it’s also where they hear unpleasant news from Inspector’s arrival. This setting also makes it seem claustrophobic where the audience are controlled by Inspector’s enquiry which heightens the tension of the play between the exit and entrance in the play. An Inspector Calls starts off calmly with ‘pink and intimate’ lighting which once after Inspector’s arrival the atmosphere becomes ‘brighter and harder’. Priestley here is showing us the warning of the forthcoming quandaries. This could also mean the calmness will no longer last as the play goes on just as how Mr. Birling’s optimism is short-sighted.
she needed more money. So she said to him give me 25/6 because of that
The war was said to bring fire blood & anguish in to our lives. WW1 -
· The social class system at the time when the play is set, (rich and
...are lower class or upper class (‘[W]e don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.’). Priestley believed in socialism, he uses the Inspector to express his thoughts about this. This is the main message that he wanted the audience to take away.
Sheila is described as a ‘pretty girl in her early twenties, very pleased with life and rather excited.’ The fact that it says ‘very pleased with life’ and ‘rather excited’ shows that she is very proud of herself; this is typical with a girl in her twenties coming from an upper-class British family in the 1910’s. Priestley has done this carefully to blend in with the historical context of the play, which was set in 1912.
"And be quiet for a moment and listen to me. I don't need to know any
Examine Priestley's use of dramatic techniques to create tension in the play. Priestly was a socialist writer, and 'An Inspector Calls' is one of the plays in which he tried to display his socialist ideals in. The play was written in the 1940's, a little after the end of the Second World War, and it was first performed in 1946, in Russia, then later in England. Priestly had served in World War 1, and the terrible scenes he saw lead to him having socialist views. He was inspired by other writers whose views he shared, especially George Orwell and H.G.
At the start the playwright creates slight allusions that produce tension; Sheila wondered ‘half seriously what had happened to Gerald previous summer when Gerald never went near Sheila’. Lady Croft and Sir George have not come to the engagement feast and Eric is behaving quite anxiously. Eric’s strange behaviour on the cheerful occasion creates trepidation and foreshadows a rather surprising event which interests the audience.
The whole family’s actions are the cause of Eva’s death however the message about responsibility the Inspector presents is only take on board by Eric and Sheila. In conclusion, Priestley clearly gets across his message of responsibility towards others in the play. A clever script cunningly executed points out Priestley’s views to the audience. ‘Responsibility’ is the focal point of the play and is consistently addressed at the end of each interrogation, but the Birlings fail to recognise this.
The Inspector, straight form his introduction, is commanding and authoritative. Upon his entrance he creates, “…at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness.”(PG.11) The Inspector continues to create this impression as he progresses through his speeches and through his interrogation of the family. The Inspector remains confident, sturdy and composed, while people around him crumble and fall to pieces. His ‘solidity’ is proven by the fact he remains on task despite numerous attempts from Birling to digress from the points he is making. The Inspector is told to appear ‘purposeful’; this is shown where he explains to Birling that Birlings way of thinking “Every man must only look out for himself,” is not the case, and all warps of society are interlinked. The view is best illustrated in the Inspectors final speech, where he says, “We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.”(p.56). This idea is one that Priestley, himself believed in deeply, and many of Priestleys writing shared this very theme.
Shipley?s intimidating presence presents a plethora of problems for Grange Copeland and his family. Walker illustrates that the mere sight of Shipley strikes fear into the very soul of Grange, a feeling that his young son experiences as well, ?Brownfield was afraid of his father?s silence? his father?s face froze into an unnaturally bland mask, curious and unsettling to see?