Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the fear of death
Essay on the fear of death
On the fear of death summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the fear of death
Kosmos
Greek Philosopher, Epicurus has strong belief in universal settings and accounts for it very highly. Nothing stresses how strongly he feels about the universe more than his Three Principles. The first principle delves into the idea that nothing is created out of nothing. “For the primary signification of every term employed must be clearly seen, and ought to need no proving” (D.L., X, 38). The universe is created out of particles we know as atoms. Since these atomic particles join together to create the universe, Epicurus is essentially saying the atoms that the universe is composed of has always been in existence. If such elements didn’t always exist, then the possibility of any and everything emerging out of anything, would happen.
…show more content…
However, that is not the case because the one unchangeable thing about the kosmos are the atoms.
Atoms have and always remain the same. Then, there’s the second principle which states, nothing is destroyed into nothing. “And if that which disappears had been destroyed and become non-existent, everything would have perished, that into which that things were dissolved being non-existent” (D.L., X, 39). As straightforward as it is, the elements (the atoms) that the universe is made up of cannot be destroyed and vanish; rather it is destroyed and takes the form of something else. At some point, everything gets destroyed but it does not eradicate because if everything gets eradicated, nothing would ever exist. The third principle he talks about surrounds this concept that kosmos is ever same. “For outside the sum of things there is nothing which could enter into it and bring about the change” (D.L., X, 39). The kosmos are infinite. With that being said, it will never have beginning because it has always existed, nor will it ever have an end because nothing vanishes when it is destroyed; it becomes …show more content…
something else. Human Knowledge Sense perception is the foundation for human knowledge. “Next, we must by all means stick to you sensations that is, simply to the present impressions whether of the mind or any criterion whatever, and similarly to our actual feelings” (D.L., X, 39). Sense perception is important because it enables an individual to use their past experiences to help maneuver through life. Sense perception is experienced through our senses and it gives rise to the fact that whatever is being experience is actuality and not something that we are imagining. Sense perception allows for assurance and for there to be something that can we refer to in the event there’s doubt. All knowledge depends on this idea of sense perception because it produces the reliability needed. Confirmation is another enforcement of how knowledge of the kosmos and natural events are possible. The mind and reason are two distinct aspects that allows for the understanding of knowledge. “We must take into account as the end all that really exists and all clear evidence of sense to which we refer our opinions…” (D.L., X, 146). Our mind is what drives our senses. Meaning, the knowledge it is able to perceive is enforced through this idea of reasoning. If we seek the truth by way of reason, we are granting our mind the confirmation needed to comprehend how the kosmos, and natural world operates by enticing our senses to fulfill it’s craving for knowledge. Nature of Human Being The essential nature of being human being is to be free of pain and fear, and seek pleasure. As established, death is a major concern for human beings. To begin with ridding off pain and fear. It’s a challenge to eliminate the fears we have because it’s difficult to remove things that impart dismay and anxiety. However, discarding the fear of god’s intervention or not being able to experience pleasure, and even the fear of death, would subdue a life of happiness. The only way this can be done is by ensuring the soul and body stay align and not experience any pain. It is natural for us to desire pleasurable things; it pleases our mind and body. Pleasure is the native good; the more we limit our pleasures, the better chance or possibility we have of experiencing happiness and pleasure. Yes, we wonder how limiting our pleasure make us happier when we feel being able to attain all our pleasure will make us happy. The reason is that when we limit our pleasure, we are reducing a greater endurance of pain since sometimes the consequences of desires are far greater than the endurance of the pleasure. How Ought a Human Being Live His Life To this very day, I question myself what life is because it’s definitely not the definition provided in the dictionary.
We are all brought into this world by our parents, and once we hit a certain age, we’re sent off on our own and expected to know what to do. Growing up, I don’t think any of us know what the perfect life is, but we do have different views on the “ideal” life we seek to live. As a regular individual, we’d think a human being should live a life of good. By that we mean to go to school to get an education, get a job, get married, and have kids. However, from a more philosophical view point projected by Epicurus, he provides a more rational standing on how a human being ought to live his life. In his letter, Epicurus states “course is of service to all who take up natural science…continuous energy…calm enjoyment of life” (D.L., X, 37). It can’t be more evident that Epicurus advocates that natural science or as we know, study of nature not only helps us live life, but to eliminate whatever fear is instilled in us. Epicurus makes it clear that the number one fear instilled in individuals is the fear of death. Death is a constant fear since we find joy and pleasure of being alive nor do we want to have to endure a painful death; hence we develop this fear. With death, we’re never sure what to expect. Meaning, death is feared because it can be painful and the fact that we’re not sure what to expect after death is very intimidating. Eliminating this anxiety would
bring about tranquility of the mind and soul, rest assure they will live a pleasurable life. Whatever worries and distress that they might have had, would’ve been alleviated once the installment of the fear of death has been removed. Apart from just death, other fears include God’s intervention in our lives, pleasure, and pain. Such fears emphasize the need to understand the ways of natural science in order to conquer these fears. Beginning with the idea of God intervening in our lives, at first I was puzzled by this statement because I wasn’t too sure how God could really intervene, much less the intervention be a fear. Epicurus sort of categorizes Gods’ in their own state of being. “God is a living being immortal and blessed, according to the notion of God indicated by the common sense of mankind,” (D.L., X, 123) depicts how high God is accounted for. Nonetheless, because gods are immortal beings and are such a highly acclaimed, there’s the fear that whenever something wrong or sinful is performed, God will punish them. Where matters of pleasure is concerned, the inability to experience pleasure is what imbeds fear in an individual. “Pleasure is our first kindred good. It is the starting point of every choice and of every aversion…….pleasure is our first native good” (D.L., X, 129). The most accurate definition provided by Epicurus of the word “pleasure” is “the absence of pain in the body and trouble in the soul” (D.L., X, 132). We all seek to obtain pleasure because evidently it’s what enables us to live a good life. Although we seek pleasure, the issue with that is that we know that with some pleasure comes a greater endurance which isn’t necessarily positive. As a result, there’s a hindrance of wanting to attain the goal of pleasure. Last but not the least, we have pain. Who wouldn’t fear pain? I mean, if you don’t fear pain then you must be Superman. Pain is by far the worst thing one can endure or experience. The four fears Epicurus speaks of throughout the letter play an important in how a human ought to live his or her life. It’s essential that those fears that are instilled in them be removed or forgotten about because it only corrupts one’s mind and disrupt their way of living. The only way that we can fully disregard the fears we have consumed is by understanding the natural science. It’s the only way to proceed to attaining absence of pain in the body and trouble in the soul. Through this we will establish contentment for to body which enables us to live the perceived life of the body being free of pain and the soul being relieved of disturbance. As established already, the goal of life is to be free of pain in the body and disturbance of the soul. Epicurus also suggest man should live life by seeking security from other men. Security from other men provides a peace of mind. Why? Security puts us out of ways harm because we know there is constant competition when our neighboring bestow threats. “In order to obtain security from other men any means whatsoever of procuring this was a natural good” (D.L., X, 1411). To maintain a life of good and happiness, Epicurus proposes we live a life where we are isolated from those who seek to eliminate others based on this competition. From this we get peace of mind primarily since we don’t have to worry about being harmed and we limit ourselves from desiring too much which could bring about great pain.
When people ponder death they wonder about the unknown with trepidation. As a young man, William Cullen Bryant wrote the "Thanatopsis." His thoughts progress from the fear of death to the acceptance of the event. People should not fear death because everyone dies and becomes a part of nature.
Fear of the unknown, and fear of what is to come in our lives, has generations of people wondering what will our lives be like tomorrow or the next day. Death is always there and we cannot escape it. Death is a scary thing. Our own mortality or the mortality of our loved ones scares us to the point that we sometimes cannot control how we are dealing with such a thing as the thought of death. Why do we fear such a thing as death? We don’t know what happens after we don’t how it feels. The fear of death is different for most but it is most certain to come and we cannot hide from it. For death is just around the corner and maybe it’s will come tomorrow or the next day! We fear not death, but the unknown that comes from death, that is the
This characteristic of existence gives objects the ability to affect or cause an event. In On the Nature of the Universe, Lucretius describes objects that couldn’t be seen back then solely through the power of observation. The ideas that Lucretius discusses are now mostly found to be true. For example, “...things are not hemmed in by the pressure of solid bodies in a tight mass. This is because there is vacuity in things” (Lucretius 44). Lucretius discusses the vacuity, by definition is the “intangible and empty space” (44), which exists because if “it did not exist, things could not move at all” (44). For example, if water was solid, nothing would be able to move through it. In fact, we would be affixed to the water and unable to move ― like being trapped in ice ― but because water is not a solid, we are able to move through it and the space that we leave behind after we move, is filled by water. Lucretius was able to gain this knowledge by observing the natural world and determining the reasons why the natural world acts the way it does. Just like the way he speculated the existence “of bodies whose existence you must acknowledge though they cannot be seen” (43). Here, Lucretius is referring to atoms, which are not visible to the naked eye. Even though they are not visible to the eye, he is able to observe physical objects to
Many people seem to fear death, but philosophers such as Socrates and Epicurus would argue that one has no reason to fear it. Socrates sees death as a blessing to be wished for if death is either nothingness or a relocation of the soul, whereas Epicurus argues that one shouldn't worry themselves about death since, once we are gone, death is annihilation which is neither good nor bad. Epicurus believes that death itself is a total lack of perception, wherein there is no pleasure or pain. I agree with Epicurus because Socrates doesn't give a sound argument for death as a blessing, whereas Epicurus' argument is cogent. I would also argue personally that death is not something to be feared because, like Epicurus, I see no sufficient evidence showing we even exist after death.
On the Nature of the Universe Since their inception in the 17th century, the modern sciences have been given over to a majestic vision: there is nothing in nature but atoms and the void. This is hardly a new thought, of course; in the ancient world, it received its most memorable expression in Lucretius' On the Nature of Universe. Lucretius Carus wrote an Epicurean work entitled De rerum natura (On the Nature of Things); from all indications, he was faithful to Epicurus' system, changing nothing. History tells us very little of Titus Lucretius Carus, but one can see from reading his work that he has a sturdy abhor towards religious superstition, which he claims is the root of human fear and in turn the cause of impious acts. Although he does not deny the existence of a god, his work is aimed at proving that the world is not guided or controlled by a divinity. Lucretius proceeds with an extended explanation and proof of the materiality and mortality of the mind and soul. This explanation culminates in the climactic declaration, "Nil igitur mors est ad nos. . ." ("Therefore death is nothing to us."), a stark, simple statement which effectively epitomizes the main message and central doctrine of Epicureanism. Sterling Dow, "Dealing with Festschriften" in Articles on Antiquity in Festschriften, compiled by Dorothy Rounds, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962, p. 556. According to Lucretius, Sensations are irrefutable because they are necessary effects of known causes, the efflux of atoms from external objects; sensations can only originate when these thin replicas produce movement in the mind. Lucretius asserts that matter exists in the form of atoms, which move around the universe in an empty space. This empty space, or vacuit...
To fear death is to fear life itself. An overbearing concern for the end of life not only leads to much apprehension of the final moment but also allows that fear to occupy one’s whole life. The only answer that can possibly provide relief in the shadow of the awaited final absolution lies in another kind of absolution, one that brings a person to terms with their irrevocable mortality and squelches any futile desire for immortality. Myths are often the vehicles of this release, helping humanity to accept and handle their mortal and limited state. Different cultures have developed varying myths to coincide with their religious beliefs and give reprieve to their members in the face of irrevocable death. The same is true for the stories in the Book of Genesis and the Mesopotamians’ Epic of Gilgamesh. In these two myths similar paths are taken to this absolution are taken by the characters of Adam and Gilgamesh, respectively. These paths, often linked by their contradictions, end with the same conclusion for each man on the subject of immortality; that no amount of knowledge or innocence, power or humility, honoring or sinning, will achieve them immortality in the sense of a life without death. Eternal life for a mortal lies in memory by one’s friends and family after one’s death.
Philosophical thought begins with the Milesians, where intellectual curiosity propelled thinkers like Anaximander and Heraclitus to attempt to explain the phenomena of the universe by means of specific physical elements. During the 6th century BC, Eleatics, like Parmenides and Zeno, had rejected physical phenomena and propounded metaphysical paradoxes that cut at the roots of belief in the very existence of the natural world. Parmenides uproots the theories of his predecessors by bearing to light the logical possibilities of any philosophical inquiry. He argues that that the only things about which we can inquire about must exist, else our search is fruitless. Through deductive reasoning, Parmenides proves that if something exists, then it cannot come to be or perish, change or move, nor be the subject to any imperfection. His proteges were left with an enormous problem: how could one reconcile Parmenides’ rejection of change with the possibility of giving a rational account of the changing world of sense experience? By accepting only certain parts of his doctrine of being, his successors ultimately fail in their attempts to explain the changing universe in light of the Parmenidean paradox.
According to Aristotle, this theory can be applied to the origin of the world. Once the world was set in motion, it was given potential for that which moves is constantly changing and therefore has potential. Aristotle says that change is eternal. Since the world is constantly changing, it is eternal, meaning it had a beginning but has no end.
In BJ Millers TedTalk, “What Really Matters at the End of Life?” BJ Miller discusses on how we think on death and honor life. He speaks to the audience about how for the most people the scariest thing about death is not death itself, it is actually dying or suffering. The targeted audience is everyone in the world, because eventually everyone is going to die and everyone thinks about death. BJ 3 has big points in the article saying, Distinction between necessary and unnecessary suffering. Also by having a little ritual that helps with this shift in perspective. Another point is to lift and set our sights on well-being. We need to lift our sights, to set our sights on well-being, so that life and health and healthcare can become about making life more wonderful, rather than just less horrible.
Democritus, along with his teacher Leucippus, was an atomist. Atomists believed that nature is composed of two fundamental principles, atoms and void. Atoms came from the Greek word atomos which means indivisible or something that cannot be broken down further. Parmenides, another well-known pre-socratic philosopher, believed that everything in existence has always b...
We certainly know that our universe exists, however, this knowledge alone has not satisfied mankind's quest for further understanding. Our curiosity has led us to question our place in this universe and furthermore, the place of the universe itself. Throughout time we have asked ourselves these questions: How did our universe begin? How old is our universe? How did matter come to exist? Obviously, these are not simple questions and throughout our brief history on this planet much time and effort has been spent looking for some clue. Yet, after all this energy has been expended, much of what we know is still only speculation. Yet in 1927 a man by the name of Georges Lemaitre from Belgium proposed that the universe began with a bang. “He proposed that a primeval atom exploded and that is how the universe formed itself. His proposal came after observing the red shift in distant nebulas by astronomers to a model of the universe based on relativity.” Before I was enrolled in Survey of Astronomy I wasn’t sure what to believe. But after sitting through the class I started to realize that all the pieces are starting to fit together like, why the galaxies are increasing in velocity away from us and also explaining the cosmic background radiation.
As a young girl at 14, I used to reminisce about the future, how badly I wanted to grow up, to drive, to be popular in high school, go to college and land an amazing job, have a huge home, nice cars, and an extremely handsome husband. The older I got, the more I began to realize all of the things I once desired for were not what I truly wanted. I began to realize the value of happiness, adventure, and creating memories rather than the value of temporary popularity, material items, and physical appearances. What I realized was that when one is lying on their deathbed, because the only thing guaranteed in life is death, they will not think, “oh what a lovely car I drove” but rather, “I remember when I went on my first road trip with my friends.” As mentioned in “Tuesdays With Morrie” by Mitch Albom, Morrie emphasizes the idea, “once you learn how to die, you learn how to live,” meaning, remembering that one day we will all depart from this world, one will realize what it truly means to live. Another pointer that can essentially alter one’s vision of living life: to live simply, as discussed in “Where I Lived and What I Live For” by David Henry Thoreau. Although thinking about death is a harsh reality on a young teenager, it is rather helpful to wrap our heads around it at a young age. Why? because as one grows older, they will see more death. Living a simple life may seem boring to a young teenager, but as one grows older and their schedules become bustled with work, and responsibilities, they will wish that they could step back, and choose a simple lifestyle.
Which in turn creates formed matter. Without one you cannot have the other. Unlike with Plato where everything is perspective and that we only see copies that are lacking perfection because they are in this other world of Forms. Claiming that there are two worlds that run simultaneously but that we as humans may never see because we cannot break free of the chains. Aristotle states that everything is in one world. Which makes more sense since this other world from Plato cannot be seen. Also even the minutest objects have a meaning such as atoms which are smaller than the eye can see and yet they have a
It is worth mentioning that the understanding of physical reality as a set of different assemblies of events and relations, having as a result, the appearance of separated substantial material objects /N.Bohr, K.Hubner/. An important methodological role in modern cosmology is played by the so called antropic principle. According to that principle the significance of the universal physical constants - and that means all the outlook of the Universe known to us - is the only one possible for the appearance and existence of the human being in it /S.
Everyone has their own outlook on life. Most people feel like money and success brings them happiness, while others think love is all they need. “For no age is too early or too late for the health of the soul” (Epicurus). Our philosophies change over time as we grow older and wiser. As a child I thought the world was full of so much happiness, love, peace and joy. Once I grew older my philosophy became clear that there is more to life than just living. In the world today it is best to have something that makes you look forward to the next day. Like family, friends, and personal goals. Being able to have overall balance of happiness, pain and the existence of God, is my guide for living.