In a world facing climate change and other environmental threats, intersectional approaches are critical to solving these challenges. In particular, environmentalism and feminism have ideological and historical roots that crucially inform the understanding of one another. While conventional environmental ethicists maintain that anthropocentrism is the root cause of environmental degradation, ecofeminists build upon their position. They argue that anthropocentrism has historically functioned as androcentrism and that this reality must be addressed within the study of environmental ethics.
Ecofeminism is a discipline within environmental philosophy that posits an alliance between women and nature. Ecofeminists argue that the domination of nature
…show more content…
While women may participate in environmental organizations and movements, it is unclear whether these groups as a whole or their members subscribe to or promote ecofeminist ideals. In order to investigate the practical relationship between environmentalism and feminism, I hope to pursue a comparative study between the members of and causes supported by environmental groups in Italy and China in an effort to explore the possible applications ecofeminism in those nations. Specifically, I will look to whether environmentalists see a connection between environmentalism and feminism in the two countries and whether ecofeminist activism is taken up by environmental …show more content…
Here, subscribing to ecofeminist ideals would encompass acknowledging the dual subjugation framework and supporting initiatives specifically aimed at assisting women who face environmental problems. These initiatives could include sustainable agriculture and development, land conservation, or other types of environmental justice actions. Additionally, the rhetoric used in organization materials like information pamphlets could be analyzed for ecofeminist language or promotion of women’s role in environmental movements or as unique victims of environmental
This term emerged out of the values associated in the Republican Mothehood, providing a “different definition of women’s proper sphere (p. 54).” “True Womanhood” begins to take of more responsibility as the living conditions become more difficult due to capitalism and industrialization that “could not have been set than that provided by western expansion (p. 69)”. As protectors of the household, they had to use their principles of “womanhood” to change their environment to protect the household. The pace and purpose of the book becomes evident in her discussions of the Progressive Era. In these discussions Unger highlights the way women used their traditional roles to gain respect in the municipal and community spheres. She focuses on conservation efforts lead by middle-class white women and minority women movements. This transitions well into the movements against chemical and nuclear weapons and then into alternative lesbian communities, “remak[ing] the world” in “alternative environments” such as communes and the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival (pp. 163–65). Unger ends the book with a review of modern environmental justice movements. The review of women in environmental history is exceptionally important since women are not discussed in history. This is not because they didn’t have a role, but because history left
He delves into the history of the word “environmental” as well as the history of environmental activism. He pinpoints the beginning of the movement to Rachel Carson. According to Quammen, she began the revolution by publishing her book Silent Spring. He says the negative connotations of the word began with her book, pairing “environment” and “the survival of humankind” as if they go hand in hand. This played a major role in the distortion of the word and the intentions of environmentalists.
The Conservation movement was a driving force at the beginning of the twentieth century. It was a time during which Americans were coming to terms with their wasteful ways, and learning to conserve what they quickly realized to be limited resources. In the article from the Ladies’ Home Journal, the author points out that in times past, Americans took advantage of what they thought of as inexhaustible resources. For example, "if they wanted lumber for their houses, rails for their fences, fuel for their stoves, they would cut down half a forest at a time; and whatever they could not use or sell they would leave to rot on the ground. They never bothered their heads to inquire where more wood was coming from when this was gone" (33). The twentieth century opened with a vision towards the future, towards preserving the land that had previously been taken for granted. The Conservation movement came along around the same time as one of the first major waves of the feminist movement. With the two struggles going on: one for the freedom of nature and the other for the freedom of women, it stands to follow that they coincided. As homemakers, activists, and citizens of the United States of America, women have had an important role in Conservation.
In Belmont’s article “Ecofeminism and the Natural Disaster Heroine” she notes that the definition of ecofeminism stems from the “theory that the ideologies which authorize injustices based on gender, race, and class are related to the ideologies which sanction the exploitation and degradation of the environment” (351). In Jurassic Park, the film makes clear distinction of gender boundaries. For instance, when the group first meets th...
I have read a book written by Darlene E. Clover, which named Global Perspectives in Environmental Adult Education: Justice, Sustainability, and Transformation. This book outlines theories and practices in environmental adult education that are emerging worldwide. The need for environmental adult education arises not from a deficit platform of andlaquo; lack of awareness and andlaquo; individual behavior modification-but rather from the asset belief in an existing - if sometimes hidden - ecological knowledge of the need for a deeper sociopolitical, race, and gender analysis of environmental problems, and the power and potential of democratic participation and collective action. Authors from Canada, the Philippines, Kenya, India, Mexico, Fiji, Australia, Sudan, and the United States examine areas such as racism and the legacy of colonization, self-governance and community resistance, ecological, women's and indigenous knowledge, international development and globalization, feminist pedagogical and arts-based practices, and participatory research practice.
In 1989, seventy five percent of Americans identified themselves as environmentalists, and the number has continued to grow since then (Walls 1). Environmentalism is now the most popular social movement in the United States, with over five million American families donating regularly to environmental organizations (Walls 1). Environmentalists today focus on what kind of world they hope to see in the future, and largely deal with limiting pollution and changing consumption rates (Kent 1 and 9). Modern environmentalists also have much different issues than those Carson’s America faced. With climate change becoming more threatening each year, protection of the natural world is needed more than ever. Pollution has caused the warmest decade in history, the deterioration of the ozone layer, and species extinction in extreme numbers (Hunter 2). It not only threatens nature, but also human populations, who already suffer from lack of clean water and poisoning from toxic chemicals (Hunter 16). Unlike environmental actions in the 1960’s, which were mostly focused on protection, a massive increase in pollution has caused efforts to be focused on environmental restoration (Hunter 16). Like in the time of Silent Spring, environmentalists are not only concerned with one country. Protecting the environment remains a global issue, and every nation is threatened by the
There are many, different oppressions throughout human society that are intricately woven together and interconnected. Many of these oppressions are formed within a patriarchal, Christian theology and involve the body: the body of Earth, the bodies of women, the body of animals. Sallie McFague sets up a model of bodies to help break these connected oppressions. McFague’s work emphasizes that the body and its oppressions are what connects Christian theology, feminism, and ecology. Her model focuses on the metaphorical idea that the body of the earth is the body of God (McFague, 1993).
An ecocriticism is is a lens that looks at the relationship between people and the natural world. Thomas K. Dean gave a better description be stating, “Ecocriticism is a study of culture and cultural products (art works, writings, scientific theories, etc.) that is in some way connected with the human relationship to
... use. It is not sufficient to discuss oppression and injustice in one section as separate from the other topics we explore. In every issue we will encounter marginalized groups who are victims of environmental injustice, and I fear we may be tempted to blame them for environmental devastation. In reality, they may know part of the solution we seek. I would also ask that we expand the frameworks we use to include non-dominant frameworks, so that members of our class are not systematically alienated parallel to the groups we may discuss. Let's keep in mind our context, as students living in the upper-middle class, Anglo, patriarchal society of an elite college, as people who are born into conferred dominance. I think we will be able to discuss environmental ethics in a way that is inclusive, pluralistic, contextual and holistic, as recommended by ecofeminist thinkers.
This article is very interesting in emphasizing the role of women in environmental justice groups which provides support for the Idle No More project. It also provides useful insights at the reasons that lead to people’s mobilization in a movement. Women become environmental justice activists because of diverse range of social interests, including personal experience with activism, negative interactions with governmental entities, health concerns, etc. This article
Ecofeminism is in short deals with females who want to stand up for nature rights. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Ecofeminism is “a movement or theory that applies feminist principles and ideas to ecological issues” (60). So, ecofeminism is basically females who have a love of nature and want to protect it.
Anthropocentrism is the school of thought that human beings are the single most significant entity in the universe. As a result, the philosophies of those with this belief reflect the prioritization of human objectives over the well-being of one’s environment. However, this is not to say that anthropocentric views neglect to recognize the importance of preserving the Earth. In fact, it is often in the best interests of humans to make concerted efforts towards sustaining the environment. Even from a purely anthropocentric point of view, there are three main reasons why mankind has a moral duty to protect the natural world.
By this time in the late 1970’s, women’s liberation began to fade away and caused a shift in feminism in the 1980’s. The shift included many aspects such as academia, labor activism, peace movement, progressive reforms, and the increase in women’s shelters. The start of eco feminism also formed with a group of women that were actively involved in the environment/green movement. Women in this movement believed that a women’s natural cycle was aligned with Earth (Lecture 28: Backlash: A Cultural Shift, 30 April
Though in theory, ecological feminism has been around for a number of years, it emerged as a political movement in the 1970s. Francoise d’Eaubonne, a French feminist philosopher, coined the term “Ecofeminism” in 1974. Ecofeminism is a feminist approach to environmental ethics. Karen Warren, in her book Ecofeminist Philosophy, claims that feminist theorists question the source of the oppression of women, and seek to eliminate this oppression. Ecofeminists consider the oppression of women, (sexism) the oppression of other humans (racism, classism, ageism, colonialism), and the domination of nature (naturism) to be interconnected. In her book New Woman/New Earth, Rosemary Radford Reuther wrote, “Women must see that there can be no liberation for them and no solution to the ecological crisis within a society whose fundamental model of relationships continues to be one of domination. They must unite the demands of the women’s movement with those of the ecological movement to envision a radical reshaping of the basic socioeconomic relations and the underlying values of this society (204).”
Feminism has negative connotations in popular culture. When people think about feminism or feminists, they envision angry women who absolutely hate men. This may be true for some feminists, but not all. It may surprise a few people that feminism is integral in all facets of life. Its roots lie in a social and political movement, the women’s liberation movement, aimed at improving conditions for women. Feminism has many definitions, but one common definition features the concept of equality, such as the belief that women and men should have equal opportunities. Feminism also examines women's social roles, experiences, interests, and politics in a variety of fields. Common themes explored in feminist theory are discrimination, objectification (especially sexual objectification), oppression, patriarchy, stereotyping and so forth. These themes have developed over time and have created feminist theory. This section of paper will describe the three waves of feminism, the feminist rhetorical pioneers and their critics, and will explain how to use feminist criticism.