Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of sampling methods
Advantages and disadvantages of non probability sampling techniques
Advantages and disadvantages of non probability sampling techniques
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of sampling methods
As it is impossible for researchers to study an entire population, sampling theory studies a target population under study. A target population refers to a group of individuals who meet the sampling criteria for a particular study. For example, male, 20 years with type 1 diabetes. The two different types of sampling design are probability and nonprobability sampling. Probability sampling is the type of sampling plan where each person in the population has an equal opportunity to be selected for the sample, whereas in nonprobability sampling methods, not every element or person in the population has a chance to be selected for a study. This type is a more common method used in nursing research because of the limitations of the availability of …show more content…
In determining whether the generalization of the study findings is appropriate based on the study sampling criteria, it is important to examine the sample inclusion and exclusion criteria (Grove, et al., 2015). It is important to have a strong research design and a rigorous research methodology (Shadish, et al., 2002), as well as valid measurement methods (Waltz, et al., 2010) and a large sample size (Cohen, 1988). For example, a researcher may conclude a research report that a significant difference was found in the number of surgical site infections between two samples, one in which the subjects had been given chlorhexidine baths and another in which the patients had not. The findings are generalized from the sample in the study. Generalizations provide specific suggestions for nurses on how practice can be modified to improve patient outcomes. For example, a study indicates that the use of chlorhexidine baths would decrease surgical site infections, the implications will state how chlorhexidine baths should be implemented before surgery. These types of research provide the basis for develop evidence based practice guidelines and ensuring a high quality, safe nursing practice (Grove, et al.,
Two sampling methods include mail surveys and convenience sampling, a variation of a nonprobability sample. Mail surveys, inexpensive way to contact individuals over a large geographical area, provide anonymity to the respondent, and eliminate interview bias. Convenience sampling, a nonprobability sample, the only criteria is the convenience of the unit to the researcher, fast and uncomplicated, but the sampling error not determined.
The very first step to the “Nine Step Stairway to Effective Evaluation” is to define the research population. Population can mean anybody. So, it is needs to be clear as to who we are focusing on. The specification of the focused population is defined by the evaluation researcher. This can include, age, gender, race, culture, or socio-economic status just to name a few (DiClemente et al., 2013).
Melnyk’s Hierarchy of Evidence is a system often use for assigning levels of evidence in nursing by integrates clinical expertise and patient choices with the best available research. It is represented by a pyramid that enumerates the levels of strength of the evidence from 1 to 7, of which level 1 is the higher level. The higher level on the pyramid, the more likelihood that the research is valid; therefore, answering a clinical or practice question. “The systematic review or meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials are at the top of the evidence pyramid and are typically assigned the highest level of evidence, due to the fact that the study design reduces the probability of bias” (Melnyk, 2011). The weakness of the system is that when
When performing evidence based practice research, the Iowa Model uses a team or individual approach to assist nurses in the journey to quality care. The Iowa Model begins by offering a process of selecting a proper clinical topic, which is often a recurring problematic issue (Polit & Beck, 2012). This topic is formulated as a question to improve a technique or procedure. Once the researcher determines that an ample amount of reported investigation exists on the desired question, information may be gathered and presented for approval (Polit & Beck, 2012). The research may lead to a gradual change in nursing practice.
It is essential that when using evidence-based practice guidelines to choose a treatment, that variety of research methods are applied so that the best relevant data can be produced. Such methods include qualitative/quantitative research, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. Both qualitative and quantative methods produce valuable data. Quantative research produces numeric evidence that is necessary for practice and can be measured and qualitative research produces descriptive data about the subject by using patients views etc. which can also be applied to clinical practice (Broeder et al, 2010)
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice extensively has been used in nursing focusing on assessing, developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence based practice protocols or guidelines; however, there are many sources of knowledge rather than evidenced based knowledge e.g. clinical experience, patient experience, and local data or information. Varaei, Salsali, Cheraghi, Tehrani, & Heshmat (2013) used IOWA model to assess the effect of evidence based nursing education program on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses who take care of patient with diabetes foot ulcer in Iran. After implementing the education intervention, the nurses’ performance in caring for patient with diabetes foot ulcer, nurses’ knowledge, and attitude improved. Using IOWA model, Haxton, Doering, Gingras, & Kelly (2012) implemented skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth for healthy term...
In gathering articles for this review, numerous methods were used to narrow journal articles that were relevant to nursing. A search was conducted on EBSCO HOST for key terms such as ________. This was narrowed down to articles which were between 2009 and 2014, plus articles which had full text...
Having a large sample size in a survey does not assure accurate statistics. What really matters is the sample diversity. For example: you wanted to find out how many of your workmates watch football, it would be foolish to only survey the men in your office and assume that the statistic applies for all the company’s employees. In order to get accurate statistics, you would have to expand the survey to include the female employees and the workers in other company offices.
In order for this policy to be properly implemented in a medical-surgical unit, the hospital must be in agreement to this evidence-based proposal. The nurses are responsible to abide by this policy, complete the MSAAT during their shift and document their findings on their computer system. The nurse managers are responsible in ensuring that the MSAAT criteria are met and that the scores are accurate by conducting regular patient reviews and nurse
230) in EBP. Clinical opinion, together with the best relevant research evidence, provides the framework to for the best patient outcome. The nurse’s clinical opinion is acquired through knowledge and skills developed from undergraduate, graduate, or continuing education, clinical experience, and clinical practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2010). Clinical opinion also includes internal evidence, which is generated within a clinical setting from quality improvement outcomes, management initiatives or EBP implementation projects (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2010). Nurses use their clinical opinion when they identify each patient’s condition, individual risks, personal values and expectations, benefits of possible interventions, and gather evidence for EBP. When searching for the best available evidence, there is a hierarchy in the strength of evidence. The highest level of evidence usually comes from a systematic review or an evidence-based clinical practice guideline based on a systematic review. Systematic reviews provide the strongest evidence through a summary combining the results from many relevant, unbiased studies, to answer a particular clinical question. Nurses critically assess the individual studies, to gather the best evidence available for patient care. Systematic
Quality of care and patient outcomes rely heavily on practice based on evidence found in systematic reviews of randomized-control trials. While administration often-times implements core measures that involve EBP in their regulations, it is ultimately the nurse’s responsibility to include EBP into their care of patients. Nurses have an obligation to include EBP into their care because “it leads to the highest quality of care and the best patient outcomes” (Melnyk & Overholt, 2015). The nurse leaders really have a responsibility here because it is their responsibility to stress the importance of EBP as well as reviewing research to determine the best possible findings to implement into their unit’s care. Careful monitoring must be performed to assure compliance because “despite the multitude of positive outcomes associated with EBP and the strong desire of clinicians to be the recipient of evidence-based care, an alarming number of healthcare providers do not consistently implement EBP” (Melnyk & Overholt, 2015). Often times, I find seasoned nurses act putout with anything that changes their methods of care. The important thing to remember is that seasoned nurses, while often-times set in their ways, are great nurses and presenting EBP findings and their success during implementation will keep them involved with EBP because they ultimately want to do what’s best
One of the most significant current discussions in nursing evidence-based practice is the effectiveness of hand hygiene interventions in reducing hospital-acquired infections. Much debate continues into the uncertainty that exists between the correlation of interventions and increased hand hygiene practices. This essay critically examines the relationship between interventions and the dubious increase in hand hygiene compliance by healthcare professionals by using the framework of evidence based practice to evaluate previous literature, identify barriers and note mechanisms used to measure effectiveness of interventions.
For nursing, research has played a major role in the way clinical practice is done. Research has allowed nurses to provide appropriate care to patients. It allows them to perform their job by providing them the tools and information they need in order to make the decisions on the concerns for caring the patient (Polit & Beck, 2006). Moreover, research can also take focus on the workers themselves in order to improve the practice both on a professional and personal level. An example of a study conducted by King, Vidourek, and Schweibert of University of Cincinnati created a study to determine if there is a correlation between ...
The author of the research study used a standardized test to determine the knowledge of ICU nurses on surgical site infections. The introduction allowed the readers to realize there is a country wide issue with surgical site infections (SSI). During the research, the quantitative approach was attempted by having a group of nurses take a multiple choice knowledge test consisting of three possible answers and the fourth choice of being I do not know. The test consisted of questions based on prevention guidelines. The group of 809 nurses attending the Flemish Society for critical care nurses were included in the study. Although, the test was timed the questions were reviewed by seven experts to determine the clearness of the questions. Statistics
The sampling design process includes five steps which are closely related and are important to all aspect of the marketing research project. The five steps are: defining the target population; determining the sample frame; selecting a sampling technique; determining the sample size; and executing the sampling process.