Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about term limits in congress
Essays about term limits in congress
Essays about term limits in congress
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about term limits in congress
Legislative service, playing politics, being a professional congressman, when did political office become a full time job? Up until the early 20th century, representatives have in large only served two terms in office. Serving in the legislative body for representatives has become a profession that has excluded itself from the community that has elected them. Does anything in the Constitution preclude term limitations? Our Founding Fathers did not include term limits when writing the Constitution. This could have been an oversight, and maybe it was deliberate. According to Jay Newton-Small, “When American democracy was being formed, many of its founders, including Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, supported congressional term limits, ‘to prevent every danger which might arise to American freedom by continuing too long in office the members of the Continental Congress,’ as Jefferson wrote”(Newton-Small 1). Setting term limits for public offices encourages popular participation, prevents politicians from acting solely to maintain rather than advance their offices, and helps prevent political corruption. Term limits would make Congress more responsive to the people as a whole and their constituents who elected them. At one time politicians dreaded the thought of long service in office. According to Issit, “Term limits were originally conceived as a way to ensure that citizen representatives, rather than professional politicians, led the government. They were also designed to protect against the development of authoritarian regimes” (Issitt 1). If term limits for all federal offices are to be established, constitutional amendments will be necessary and will therefore require the support o... ... middle of paper ... ...protecting their corporate contributions and self preservation than the public health, safety and service. Sundquist, James L. "Constitutional Reform." Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Ed. Leonard W. Levy and Kenneth L. Karst 2nd Ed. Vol. 2. Detroit: MacMillan Reference USA, 2000. 650-651, Gale Virtual Reference Library Separation of powers and checks and balances reflect the fact that the Constitution probably has the most difficult amending process of any constitution in the world. In the normal process, an amendment must be approved by two-thirds of each house of Congress and then be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. This makes the process of having term limits voted on by a majority almost impossible. And structural amendments redistribute power and hence create winners and losers among the political blocs.
Throughout the second chapter Levin states that there is a very small turnover in Congress and each time that election time comes into play, most of the same people are elected for position (Levin 19-32). He believes that while term limits are not enough to balance the power of the governing systems it is a step in the right direction and are necessary and a critical building block (Levin 22). In his next chapter Levin proposes an amendment that is to restore the Senate (Levin 33). This amendment would repeal the seventeenth amendment and make it to where all Senators are chosen by their state legislatures as prescribed by Article I (Levin 33). Prior to the seventeenth amendment the Senate had been chosen by legislators of each state (Levin 34). Throughout the chapter he goes on to talk about how the Framers of our nation intended the Senate to be chosen and also how we have branched away from that. He discusses several different people’s opinions on how it should be ran and also how it should be managed. He states that John Dickinson made a notion that the Senate should be chosen by the state legislatures (Levin
Story, J. (1987). Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.
2. Roche, John P. "The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action". American Politics. Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston, MA. 1999. (Pages 8 -- 20).
Initially, the Founders intended to have a limit on the amount of time any one person could serve. In the Articles of Confederation, a rotation in office system was described, so that no one person could remain in a position for decades on end. However, this was abandoned in the Constitution because it was deemed unnecessary. At the time of the nation’s founding, the occupation of “politician” did not exist. One could hold an office for a number of years, but it was not considered a career path. Originally, politicians were seen as making great sacrifices, because they stepped away from their family and primary jobs for a number of years to serve their country, before returning to their normal lives (Vance, 1994, p. 429). In the words of Founding Father Roger Sherman, “The representatives ought to return home and mix with the people. By remaining at the seat of the government, they will acquire the habits of the place, which might differ from those...
In conclusion, Congressional representatives should be limited to serving two terms. Limiting the terms of career politicians will promote fresh ideas and reduce the possibility of decisions being made for self-interest. It is in our Country’s best interest that our legislator’s decisions are equitable and that compromises are not made to ensure their own or their parties stay in office.
For David Mayhew Congress members are “single- minded reelection seekers”. He argues that member only think about their reelection and that it has to be reached in order to achieved other goals. He says that everything that members do revolves around their reelection and they only care about themselves. Mayhew says that there are only three actions that members of Congress can do to get themselves re-elected to Congress : credit claiming, advertising, and position taking.
Between 1787 and 1791 the Framers of the US Constitution established a system of government upon principles that had been discussed and partially implemented in many countries over the course of several centuries, but never before in such a pure and complete design, which we call a constitutional republic. Since then, the design has often been imitated, but important principles have often been ignored in those imitations, with the result that their governments fall short of being true republics or truly constitutional. The Framers of the Constitution tried very hard to design a system that would not allow any one person or group within the government to gain too much power. Personally, I think they succeeded. In order to guard against what one of the Founding Fathers called an "excess of democracy," the Constitution was built with many ways to limit the government's power. Among these methods were separating the three branches, splitting the legislature so laws are carefully considered, and requiring members of Congress to meet certain criteria to qualify for office. The Founders did leave a few problems along with their system.
Currently in the U.S. government, Congressmen and Congresswomen have terms that allow reelections after those terms finish, but no term limits. Therefore, Congressmen and Congresswomen should have term limits because it would result in diversity, citizen legislature, and competitiveness. In addition, Congressmen and Congresswomen can re elect themselves as many times as they want in the current system of the U.S. government.
The idea of term limits was first enumerated in the Articles of Confederation with the statement, “no person shall be capable of being a delegate [of Congress] for more than three years, in any term of six years” (Articles of Confederation Art. 5 §2). The founding fathers considered term limits would prevent abuse of the power held by congressmen as well as prevent unending political careerism. Without those term limits proposed in The Articles of Confederation, Congress has been saturated with the careerist attitude feared by our founding fathers as well as a low turnover of representatives, moving away from the purpose of giving
Term limits are not necessary because members of Congress must be regularly re-elected. If they are not doing a good job in office, we can simply vote for someone else. Thus, giving more power to bureaucrats and lobbyists, as turnover would not allow stability in congress. The problem is not how long the politicians stays in the office rather the real problem is the power and unconstitutional overreach of the federal government.
One of the most persuasive arguments for term limits is the very real possibility that a president in office long enough can appoint the entire Supreme Court and much of the federal judiciary in general, thus jeopardizing the independence of the judicial branch and influencing the political direction of the country for much longer than any tenure he could have (Cronin 2015, 87). President Franklin Roosevelt was actually successful in appointing all nine justices of the Supreme Court during his tenure, and although unsuccessful, he had attempted to pack the court with his own justices in his second term. Presidential appointment power has also grown beyond the judiciary to include many executive agencies that have wide-reaching and greatly unchecked
Our government has a system of checks and balances but without compromises, stalemate is inevitable. Constitutional amendments can be added, ratified and repealed over time. Through its amendments, our constitution is changed. Regular reviews of the constitution would ensure that is is relative to our world today.
Voters will have restricted choices although they want to vote for experienced incumbents who want to run for reelection. The term limit is not necessary because candidates have to be elected by their constituents. Jeff Biggs, press secretary for House Speaker Tom Foley, asserts that the term limit is unnecessary by saying "There are term limits in place every two years -- candidates have to go before constituents and get reelected." Although incumbents run for election again, they cannot be elected if they do not have good reputation among constituents. Other disadvantage caused by the term limit is limited power of small states, which used to reelect only few incumbents again and again. Because they have only few possible candidates, there are not enough people who can run for the next election after one person retires from Congress. However, I still do think that the term limit is necessary to distribute power evenly and keep equality. As certain people are elected for the same position again, they will get more “experience” and find much sneakier ways to keep their positions. Term limit also prevent new and young candidates who have not experienced from having less chance to work in Congress. As more skillful but unknown candidates get more chance, they will improve and change our
They wanted the power to be in the hands of the people which is why, it was decided that "The House of Representatives, the body of congress that directly represents the people, would be sent back to the people every two years for re- election" (Beckett) The framers thought this would help to keep politicians liable to the people. The issue of whether or not term limits for congress should be implemented, is a huge concern among many Americans. Some claim that congress have become corrupt, power hungry politicians, more concerned with getting re elected then, the needs of the people. While others say that term limits takes away the power of the people, and are not needed because of the already existing re
There are different factors and goals that motivate members of Congress. However, the number one goal for Congress members is to get re-elected in Congress. Therefore, they are motivated to raise funds, meets different groups of people, have trips back to their districts and choose their activities in a day to day basis. It is shocking to know that having power and influence in Congress, social prestige and making good policy are less important to most members of Congress than the primary goal which is getting re-elected. Several steps members of Congress take to get re-elected.