Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the political aspects of congressional term limits
What are the political aspects of congressional term limits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should Congressmen and Congresswomen Have Term Limits? Currently in the U.S. government, Congressmen and Congresswomen have terms that allow reelections after those terms finish, but no term limits. Therefore, Congressmen and Congresswomen should have term limits because it would result in diversity, citizen legislature, and competitiveness. In addition, Congressmen and Congresswomen can re elect themselves as many times as they want in the current system of the U.S. government. Congressmen and Congresswomen having term limits will lead to diversity because open seats in Congress will bring attention to new types of people. What is meant by new types of people is when Edward H. Crane mentions in his article Congressional Term Limits on paragraph 7 Proposition 140 in California, which is limiting the state Assembly to three two year terms. This proposition made the 1992 Assembly elections result in “ In an article on that freshman class, the Los Angeles Times wrote, “ Among the things making the group unusual is that most of them are true outsiders. For the first time in years, the freshman class did not include an abundance of former legislative aides who move up the ladder to become members….Among the 27 are a …show more content…
former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, a former sheriff coroner, a paralegal, a retired teacher, a video store owner, a business woman-homemaker, a children’s advocate, an interior designer, a retired Sheriff’s lieutenant, and a number of businessmen, lawyers, and former city council members.” This proves that congress members having term limits will attract new types of people, outsiders, that will want to work for congress by giving an example of how term limits for members of the state Assembly in California lead to new types of people wanting to work for the state Assembly. If an aspect of a local government having term limits will bring diversity then the federal government will too. Term limits for Congressmen and Congresswomen will result in citizen legislature because having no term limits will lead to them staying in their office in Washington D.C. for years without traveling to other states to represent the people in the U.S. According to paragraph 6 in Edward H. Crane’s article Congressional Term Limits, it states “ Such individuals might be willing to spend two, four, or even six years in Washington, but no if the legislative agenda is being set by others, who’ve gained their authority through seniority.” This proves that no term limits for Congress members will lead to them spending years in their office without going out to represent their people when it’s one for their main jobs. Therefore, term limits will make Congress members perform one of its main roles better, representing their people. Congressmen and Congresswomen having term limits will create competitiveness between the people running for open seats in Congress, which is a good thing.
Edward H. Crane mentions his own evidence of how term limits lead to competitiveness in his article Congressional Term Limits on paragraph 7, the evidence states “As Paul Jacob of U.S Term Limits has pointed out, the most competitive races (and the ones that bring out the largest number of primary candidacies) are for open seats.” This proves that term limits will bring out competitiveness for open seats in congress and that it is a good thing because it creates a large amount of candidates for Congressional elections. Term limits will lead to open seats in congress leading to
competitiveness. Congressmen and Congresswomen should have term limits because it will lead to diversity, citizen legislature, and competitiveness. Term limits will lead to diversity because the state Assembly in California having term limits lead to different kinds of people wanting to work for the Assembly during state Assembly elections. Term limits will lead to citizen legislature because no term limits on congress members lead to them staying in their office in Washington for years instead of leaving their office Partida 2 once in awhile to go represent their people in different states. Lastly, term limits will lead to competitiveness which is a good thing because it will bring out a large amount of candidates in Congressional elections. Overall, Congressmen and Congresswomen having term limits will create better results for Congress than having no term limits.
It is not uncommon to find members of Congress who have genuine goals of spearheading, designing or even just supporting good public policy. It would be harsh to say that every member of Congress is against good policy. However what is difficult for members of Congress is deciding what is more important, the wishes of their constituents or national policy. Although it is rare, members of Congress vote against the popular opinion of his or her district in order to make what would be considered good policy in the national interest. This hinders their chance of re-election but is necessary for America. In very rare cases members of Congress have gone against the wishes of their constituents for moral reasons like in the aftermath of 9/11. When voting on the 2002 Iraq War Resolution, I am certain that the last thing of the minds of members of Congress was re-election. A very conservative House of Representatives member Jimmy Duncan said ‘‘when I pushed that button to vote against the war back in 2002, I thought I might be ending my political career.” In times of crisis members of Congress have decide between what is right, not what their constituents believe is right. Another goal other than re-election that members of Congress have is their own future. For many, being a members of The House of Representatives is a mere stepping stone in their career on the way to better things. Therefore for some members of Congress, re-election does not worry them and gives them the freedom to act in an environment striped of the constant pressure of re-election. However, considering that most of the members of The House Of Representatives goals lie within the Senate or high executive positions, re-election is still on their mind, all be it in the form of a different
Most individuals with a general background knowledge of the United States Federal Government system are aware that in order for a bill to become a law, it must first pass a majority vote in Congress. There is, however, a very important step in the legislative process that sometimes goes unnoticed. The committee system of the legislation process ensures that the appropriate attention is given to each bill introduced to Congress. Each member of both chambers are assigned to committees and subcommittees, and are expected to become subject matter experts in their respective roles as committee members.
Preventing federal judges to serve for life is a good concept, except when the judges become too old to continue presiding. Setting term limits for judges would be a great idea, because it would add diversity to the court systems every time a new judge arrives. Some judges are just too old, and senile, to still rule on cases and do their job effectively; therefore, setting term limits would ultimately benefit the courts because it would allow for diversity, and a new judge who may have different standards.
Government exists to serve the people, and not the politicians, American citizens know this. Polls show that Americans want term limitation by margins as high as three-to-one, even four-to-one. Congressional term limitation is the most important issue of our time because the future direction of our country depends upon it. There is no other way to restore government to, us, the people. There is no substitute for term limits. There are many second steps, depending upon where you sit, but there is only one first step toward turning the country around. It is con...
Term limits could increase the quality of the Supreme Court nominees. One of the driving factors behind a Supreme Court nominee is their age (Ringhand np). Individuals over 60 years of age are less likely to be appointed. This means presidents intentionally exclude a large number of highly qualified individuals from serving on our nation’s highest court (Ringhand np). Term limits resolve this problem. Furthermore, the threat of a justice’s cognitive decline may be reduced, since there would no longer be a temptation to hold out for a strategically timed retirement.
The Electoral College was created by the framers at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. They believe that it wasn’t a good idea for the people to elect the president directly because they did not trust that voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College basically chooses who the next president will be since it takes away our freedom to vote away. The Electoral College should be abolished because it’s undemocratic, the small states are overrepresented, and it hurts third parties.
When the United States was founded, the theme behind the new government was to establish an efficient system without doling out too much power to any one person. The Founders intended to prevent a rebirth of tyranny, which they had just escaped by breaking away from England. However, when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a Representative from 1964 through 1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, remain in the legislative system for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has not necessarily been eradicated from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term limits are a necessity to uphold the Founders’ intentions, to prevent unfair advantages given to incumbents, and to allow a multitude of additional benefits.
In conclusion, Congressional representatives should be limited to serving two terms. Limiting the terms of career politicians will promote fresh ideas and reduce the possibility of decisions being made for self-interest. It is in our Country’s best interest that our legislator’s decisions are equitable and that compromises are not made to ensure their own or their parties stay in office.
Congress has helped develop the Presidency as we know it today. This is because Congress argues over proposals and legislation proposed by the President. They are a major determent in whether bills turn into laws. But it’s not easy. One reason for this is because there are many powerful groups out there who argue about what should be discussed such as air pollution with the EPA or jobs.
Many Americans in today's society will find it difficult to answer the question of what Congress exactly does and why it exists. Others simply don't care and see Congress as a failed system where nothing gets done. Lee Hamilton, in his book Why Congress Works and Why you Should Care, proves these people wrong and gives an insider's look at what Congress actually does do and how it affects every American each day.
Yes, I think Congress has too much power. Because under the constitution, Congress has the most important power and that is to make/change laws. (The powers of Congress-http://www.ushistory.org/gov/6a.asp) In this paper I will explain to you how Congress has too much power by, it being split into two large bicameral legislatures, they have the power of impeachment, and they have the power to approve the spending of federal money.
Though, it would be refreshing to elect an official who remained focused on the best interest of their constituent, the reality is, special interest groups hold the purse. We must set term limits to prevent corruption and give the new comer on the block a fighting
In conclusion, the topic of Supreme court terms is an important issue today because many court decisions have taken place this year, like , gay marriage, obamacare and court rulings relating to clean air and the environment. My position on whether Supreme Court Justices Should Have life Tenures is the best one because I personally believe that our current system that's been put in place around the beginning of the Supreme Court should not be changed because the judges are getting “too old to make
When many people hear the words the Senate and the House of Representative they might think of Congress. They do not truly go into depth of what those two departments mean, and they do not understand how vital they are to our own government. Congress is part of the Legislative Branch and is a bicameral legislature. Which means that is a legislature that is separated into two houses, and in that case is the House of Representatives and the Senate. Many know the words "The Senate" and "The House of Representatives" but they do not truly know what those words entail, many do not know the contrast and comparisons of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Saad, L. (2013). Americans Call for Term Limits, End to Electoral College. Gallup Poll Briefing