Emotional Intelligence and Leadership
It was Daniel Goleman who first brought the term “emotional
intelligence” to a wide audience with his 1995 book of that
name, and it was Goleman who first applied the concept to
business with his 1998 HBR article, reprinted here. In his
research at nearly 200 large, global companies, Goleman found
that while the qualities traditionally associated with
leadership—such as intelligence, toughness, determination, and
vision—are required for success, they are insufficient. Truly
effective leaders are also distinguished by a high degree of
emotional intelligence, which includes self-awareness,
self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skill.
These qualities may sound “soft” and unbusinesslike, but
Goleman found direct ties between emotional intelligence and
measurable business results. While emotional intelligence’s
relevance to business has continued to spark debate over the
past six years, Goleman’s article remains the definitive
reference on the subject, with a description of each component
of emotional intelligence and a detailed discussion of how to
recognize it in potential leaders, how and why it connects to
performance, and how it can be learned.
Every businessperson knows a story about a highly
intelligent, highly skilled executive who was promoted into a
leadership position only to fail at the job. And they also
know a story about someone with solid—but not
extraordinary—intellectual abilities and technical skills who
was promoted into a similar position and then soared.
Such anecdotes support the widespread belief that identifying
individuals with the “right stuff” to be leaders is more art
than science. After all, the personal styles of superb leaders
vary: Some leaders are subdued and analytical; others shout
their manifestos from the mountaintops. And just as important,
different situations call for different types of leadership.
Most mergers need a sensitive negotiator at the helm, whereas
many turnarounds require a more forceful authority.
I have found, however, that the most effective leaders are
alike in one crucial way: They all have a high degree of what
has come to be known as emotional intelligence. It’s not that
IQ and technical skills are irrelevant. They do matter, but
mainly as “threshold capabilities”; tha...
... middle of paper ...
...to
know intuitively that leaders need to manage relationships
effectively; no leader is an island. After all, the leader’s
task is to get work done through other people, and social
skill makes that possible. A leader who cannot express her
empathy may as well not have it at all. And a leader’s
motivation will be useless if he cannot communicate his
passion to the organization. Social skill allows leaders to
put their emotional intelligence to work.
It would be foolish to assert that good-old-fashioned IQ and
technical ability are not important ingredients in strong
leadership. But the recipe would not be complete without
emotional intelligence. It was once thought that the
components of emotional intelligence were “nice to have” in
business leaders. But now we know that, for the sake of
performance, these are ingredients that leaders “need to
have.”
It is fortunate, then, that emotional intelligence can be
learned. The process is not easy. It takes time and, most of
all, commitment. But the benefits that come from having a
well-developed emotional intelligence, both for the individual
and for the organization, make it worth the effort.
Leadership is a complex process with many different approaches. This is a summary of the leadership literature including the pros and cons of each approach. The trait approach implies successful leaders are born with those traits. This theory focuses on identifying certain traits that make people great leaders. Some of the major leadership traits identified in the trait approach are intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and social ability. There are many advantages to the trait approach. “First, it is intuitively appealing because it fits clearly into the popular idea that leaders are special people who are out front, leading ...
The term Emotional Intelligence was phrased by Salovey and Mayer in 1990. Though research on intelligence had been carried out years before and the value of cognitive emotion was first studied by psychologists from as early as 1940. David Wechsler was one of the first pioneers who recognized the importance of non-cognitive aspects of humans and proposed that non-intellective abilities are essential for predicting one’s ability to succeed in life. (Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations 2000)
386). Furthermore, research suggested that people who scored a high level of extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience on the Big Five personality test have an advantage with regards to leadership effectiveness (Robbins, Judge, 2009, p. 386). However, according to the week 6 presentation, having certain personality traits does not mean you will be a great leader (Fischer, 2009). Instead, research shows that a high level of emotional intelligence is associated with effective leadership because the leader is able to show their ability to influence by caring about the people around them (Fischer, 2009). In an article by Business Perspectives & Research, a test was completed on the effects of emotional intelligence, in which these managers displayed, “superior performance to their lower EQ peers both in terms of contextual (teamwork and cohesiveness) performance and task performance (quality of job completed)” (Dabke, 2016). In my professional experience, the leaders who can show they truly care about their employees retain a higher level of loyalty and dedication with a positive attitude. This is also similar to a Bible story in John 13, where Jesus washes the feet of his disciples – his humility and servant attitude showed that he genuinely cared for his followers, which inspired a deeper covenantal relationship with him (ESV). ?This is quite
When comparing my Big Five Personality scores to the class average, I received a score of 6 and the average was 5.7, one score did not come to a surprise. My personality is reliant on my strength of conscientiousness. Individuals who score high in conscientiousness tend to be methodical, well-organized, achievement orientated, and ethically guided. The conscientious personality type has a strong correlation to leader emergence which I can attest is true. I often am the first individual in the group to take reigns because of my organization, self-discipline, and need to create a plan before acting.
Goleman and Cherniss (2001) postulates that emotional competencies are learned abilities. Social awareness or skill at managing relationships does not guarantee the mastery of the additional learning required to handle a customer adeptly or to resolve a conflict. It only prognosticates that we have the potential to become skilled in these competencies.
Emotions are frequent companions in our lives. They come and go, and constantly change like the weather. They generate powerful chemicals that create positive and negative feelings, which have a powerful effect on leadership. Some emotions can either facilitate leadership, while others can detract from successful leadership. This course, Emotionally Intelligent Leadership, has truly opened my eyes to the affects that emotions have on being an effective leader. Peter Salovey and John Mayer defined emotional intelligence as “the ability to monitor one’s own and other’s feelings and emotions to use the information to guide one’s thinking and actions” (p. 5). This definition in itself states that emotions, whether it be ones own emotions or those of others, is the underlying factor that directs the actions of a leader. Therefore, throughout the progression (advancement) of this course, I have learned the importance of the development of emotional intelligence for being an effective leader, and because of this I plan on developing the capacities that contribute to being an emotionally intelligent leader for my own success, now and in the future.
(2013) separated emotional intelligence into four domains, self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management (pp. 30, 38). These domains are then broken into two competencies. Self-awareness, the understanding of one 's emotions and being clear about one 's purpose, and self-management, the focused drive and emotional self-control, make up the personal competence (pp. 39, 45-46). While social awareness, or empathy and service, and relationship management, the handling of other people 's emotions, make up the social competence (pp. 39, 48, 51). These emotional intelligence competencies are not innate talents, but learned abilities, each of which contribute to making leaders more resonant and effective (p. 38). This is good news for me because I still have much to develop in regards to emotional
There is an importance of leaders to first analyze the impact of their emotional manifestation. Leaders should own emotional intelligence. Those leaders that don’t possess emotional int...
There are many different positions in an organization that require different knowledge, skills and abilities. Supervisory and management positions encompass more than just technical knowledge, skill and expertise in their given area, but being leaders over others. This is of interest to organizations in having leaders who are able to motivate, understand and get their teams to work together. Many organizations are looking to improve their performance and productivity through finding and placing the right people in leadership positions. How the concept of emotional intelligence and its evolution has come to the forefront in assisting companies about leadership performance and decisions will be discussed along with the debate among researchers and the review of three assessments as to their impact and uses.
I would definitely talk to the people that are running the contest and inform them of situation and the plagiarism that went on. I would then talk to the person that was doing the plagiarizing and let them know of my disapproval as well as let that person know that I had talked to the people running the contest and informed them of the situation. I think that a person with high emotional intelligence would have handled the situation as I did. A person with medium emotional intelligence would have probably done all of the same things but in more of a (“in your face”) confrontational way. A person with low emotional intelligence would have probably just confronted the person doing the plagiarizing in a violent and confrontational way.
Rehman, R. (2011). Role of emotional intelligence among leadership styles, decision making styles and organizational performance: A review. Retrieved from: http://works.bepress.com/rashidrehman/2
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
Sy, T., & Cote, S. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A key ability to succeed in the matrix organization. Journal of Management Development. 23(5). 437-455
Fernandez-Araoz C.(2001) The challenge of hiring senior executives, The emotionally intelligent workplace: how to select for, measure, and improve emallenge emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations, Jossey-Bass Ch.6
Myers, L. L. & Tucker, M. L. (2005). Increasing Awareness of Emotional Intelligence In A Business Curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, pp. 44-50.