Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis of emma watson's speech
Emma Watson's speech on gender equality
Rhetorical analysis of emma watson's speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rhetorical analysis of emma watson's speech
On the 20th of September of 2014 the HeForShe campaign was launched at the United Nations Headquarters in New York. Emma Watson who is a major advocate for gender equality was chosen to represent and give a speech. The campaign was about gender equality and what the word ‘feminism’ really means. Emma Watson used many literacy devices to clearly put across the purpose of her speech. The techniques that she covered throughout her speech also help intertwine with some literary theories such as the Marxist Criticism and the Feminist Criticism.
Watson’s speech is clear and strategic in structure; which allows for her to elaborate on her purpose very clearly, an example of this is when she directly went to the dismissal of all misconceptions of
…show more content…
Watson’s use of literacy devices such as intertextuality throughout her speech helps her to argumentatively state in a formal way that “we want to end gender inequality—and to do that we need everyone to be involved”. Another literacy device that Watson uses throughout her speech is the amplification of sentences to help add extra meaning and understandability, as if the audience understands, they may take action to the purpose A literary theory that the above literacy devices connect into would be the Marxist Criticism as they help to provide a benefit to someone or something, for an example of the Marxist Criticism is when Watson says “Men – I would like to take this opportunity to extend your formal invitation. Gender equality is your issue too” this is showing that men will benefit from ending feminism. Marxist Criticism is when someone or something benefits from something so in this case, who is it that is benefiting from Watson’s speech? Women are the main people who benefit from Watson’s speech as she is advocating for women to have equal rights and opportunities as men have. However, she does state in her speech that “gender equality is your issue too”. When Watson states that, she begins to point out some of the stereotypes held against men like, mental illnesses, the need to be tough where feelings are hidden. You know what they don’t have to have hidden feelings because all that bottling up of emotion is leading to the UK’s suicide rates to be the, “biggest killer of men from age 20-49”, by doing this she is showing that “men don’t have the benefits of equality either” and that this speech can benefit them
Watson was an American psychologist that helped path the way for other researchers in psychology. He was born on January 9th, 1878, in South Carolina. His mother was devoted to religion and she pushed her ideals and morals onto him. She prohibited smoking, drinking, adultery, and other sinful acts. This led to Watson growing up hating religion and eventually, opposing it. Also, Watson was a delinquent when he was young, he was arrested twice and did poorly academically; but, with the help of his mother and her connections, it gave him an opportunity to attend Furman University of South Carolina. This gave him a second chance and he didn’t take it for granted. Watson graduated with a master’s when he was 21. After he finished his years in Furman University, he was presented with an offer from University of Chicago, for his graduates study in psychology. Once he finished his graduate degree, he stayed there as a research
The two biggest wars in the world were the Great War and The World War 2 that have ended a long time ago. However, there is still another war ongoing in the world, it is a “Women’s war.” In this war, women are fighting for their own rights in every country include American. In order to encourage women in this long fight, on September 5, 1995, Hillary Clinton gave the “Women’s right are Human’s right” speech at the United Nation’s Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. She argued for the equal rights of the women and against the abuse of women around the world. Logos, ethos, parallelism are three elements make “Women’s right are Human’s right” an effective speech.
“Women Rights” Hillary Rodham Clinton is a well-recognized woman in the United States. Her great contribution as secretary of State impact people’s lives. One of many remarkable speeches Hillary gave was the “The women rights speech”, in the 4th World Conference on Women Plenary Session where she uses strong words and emotions to appeal the audience. Even though the speech talks about women rights, she wants everyone, including men and children to listen and take action. Her use of ethos, logos and pathos throughout the speech made the audience believe in her words.
Jarratt, Susan C. “Rhetoric and Feminism: Together Again.” College English. Vol. 62. 3rd ed. National Council of Teachers of English, 2000. 390-393. Jstor. Web.
I chose Emma Watson’s speech at the UN about feminism because I had previously watched a clip on facebook and it stuck with me. Watson uses arguments to inform and to inspire as well as using all three of pathos, logos, and ethos. In the speech, Watson asks men to understand that gender inequality is their issue as well.
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a well-recognized woman in the United States. Her great contribution as Secretary of State impacted people’s lives. One of many remarkable speeches Clinton gave was the “The Women Rights Speech” at the 4th World Conference on Women Plenary Session, where she used strong words and emotions to appeal to the audience. Even though the speech talked about women's rights, she wanted everyone, including men and children, to listen and take action. Her use of ethos, logos and pathos throughout the speech helped people understand women live in a world where they suffer discrimination, and she proposes solutions to solve the issue.
It is a declaration for the equal rights of man and women. The political significance of Mary Wollstonecraft cannot be overstated—her work is regarded as one of the first greatest feminist treatises in history and is also seen as the first step towards liberal feminism. She fought equality for women in the political sphere, but she also addressed the need for equality in the social, private realm. She emphasized the need for reform in women’s status, education, and maternal duties. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft argues that men and women are born with the same ability to reason. Therefore, men and woman should equally be able to exercise reason and attain knowledge. And conclusively, educated women would ultimately improve society; they would become better wives and mothers (72, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). She argues that the current education system (i.e. Rousseau’s ideas of women education) restricts women and subjects them into passivity. Women are not perceivably “smart” as men because they have not been given the opportunity to be; women receive a “disorderly kind of education” (46, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). Women are kept in passivity, forced to superficiality and shallowness. She derides these traits that are seen as inherent to a woman’s nature and asks the powerful question: how are women supposed to contribute to society if they have been reduced to their appearance and bodily function? For a thriving, modern and true civilization to succeed, each and every individual must be encouraged to seek moral and intellectual development, including
In her argumentative essay, Audre Lorde argued that feminism was not being equally represented since white woman represented the majority of attendees at the New York University Institute for the Humanities conference. Since she was one of two African-American women invited to the conference last minute, the issue of unequal representation of all races of women was brought to her attention. Lorde saw that if there is no difference or better yet diversity amongst feminist how can they hope to overcome a patriarchal structure that oppresses women’s freedom. Lorde's argument is persuasive because she uses rhetorical methods such as an author's identity and ethos to get her message about how she feels about feminism and how it should be represented.
This is clearly evident in Betty Warren’s condemnation of Professor Katherine Watson’s progressive, feminist ideals. Warren writes, “It is our duty- nay, obligation to reclaim our place in the home . . . Her [Watson] subversive and political teachings encourage our Wellesley girls to reject the roles they were born to fill” (01:08:01-01:08:28). By writing this, she clearly indicates that Watson’s denial of a traditional lifestyle is deplorable. Warren also implies that Watson is not a respectable woman, being as she lives a lifestyle that is not in accordance with what a woman is meant to do. The entire publication is a direct attack on Watson’s gender identity, being that it suggests that she is not feminine enough. Warren hopes that with this publication, Watson will quiet her voice. This is her way of maintaining the patriarchal elements of their society.
In her essay, Audre Lorde argued that feminism was not being equally represented since white woman represented the majority of attendees at the New York Institute conference. Since she was one of two African-American women invited to the conference last minute, the issue of unequal representation for all races of women was brought to her attention. Lorde saw that if there is no difference or better yet diversity amongst feminist how can they hope to overcome a patriarchal structure that oppresses women’s freedom. Lorde's argument is persuasive because she uses rhetorical methods such as author's identity and ethos to get her message about how she feels about feminism and how it should be represented.
- Why Watson is so important to the way the story works as an example
When introducing Watson to the new client, Count Von Kramm, Holmes admits of Watson’s usefulness stating: “This is my friend and colleague, Dr. Watson, who is occasionally good enough to help me in my case.” (Conan Doyle)
Adichie was born in Nigeria and is most known for giving a TEDxTalk in 2013 about modern feminism. After the overwhelming success of the talk, such as having millions of views on YouTube and being featured in the song “Flawless” by Beyoncé, she decided to publish the speech into an expanded essay named “We Should All Be Feminists.” In this essay, Adichie talks about her life and encounters of sexism from a young age, especially her introduction to the word “feminist” occurring at fourteen. She is having a normal day, playing and arguing with her friend Okoloma, until he “harmlessly” quips, “`You know, you’re a feminist’” (8), which in Nigeria, is not a compliment. She also spends a third of the essay addressing the fact all negativity towards gender inequality has the same root: unwavering tradition. She questions, “What if, in raising our children, we (the parents) focus on ability instead of gender… interest instead of gender” (36)? Simply, if negativity towards the opposite sex is eradicated in a new generation, there will be no more inequality to worry about. She also parallels Wollstonecraft in commenting on the fascinating diversity of males and females. She claims that if men are undeniably strong physically, women should be held in the same
For instance, Watson provides a concept that requires more confirmation: “It will take seventy-five years, or for me to be nearly 100, before women can expect to be paid the same as men for the same work” (2), there was no indication that her hypothesis makes a good testable comparison using empirical evidence (Logos), and there are no details of the connection between the standards of two or more variables. Consequently, this decreased Watson’s credibility to the audience, which will lead to further examining of her argument, and whether she should have the right to deliberate about gender inequality. Additionally, Watson does not take into consideration of the physical, mental, and natural capabilities of men and women, which obviously indicates that she needs to conduct more investigation to her theory. Lastly, Watson should offer more proof in her statement, rather than by attempting to make the audience feel particular emotions, which does not meet the requirements of the logical