Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The roles of ancient greek women
Women's role in ancient greek society
Role of women in classical greece
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The roles of ancient greek women
Due to a lack of primary source information in relation to the abundance of secondary source material regarding Aspasia and her influence within rhetorical history, tackling the question concerning the amount of influence she held is difficult and, therefore, tackling the question of whether or not her influence was gender-related is more challenging. When grappling with the latter, a significant amount of feminist scholars provide a pool of information, as they see it, to draw from. Scholars like Cheryl Glenn and Madeleine M. Henry share opinions that Aspasia’s individual identity within and influence on the masculine dominated traditions such as rhetoric and philosophy are important to pick out regardless of the fact that her ‘voice’ is completely accounted for by secondary source information. Of course, the problem centering on wading through the scholarly texts concerning Aspasia is the inability to stray away from bias when dealing with subjective scholars analyzing ancient secondary texts, whose authors were not objective, themselves. With this being said, both the writings of recent feminist scholars and of ancient rhetoricians and philosophers cannot omit the fact that Aspasia was a foreign woman, a quality that becomes important here (Jarratt 392); however, because of the absence of primary source information directly from Aspasia, “[her] voice is muted, for she only speaks through men” (Glenn 193). Here, I will explore the notion of foreign status and gender role through the portrayal of Plato’s Menexenus, Cicero’s De Inventione, and more recent scholarly work in order to reveal the effects of a male dominated intellectual society on a woman’s intellectual voice within the rhetorical tradition.
Aspasia’s influence on th...
... middle of paper ...
...cia Bizzell & Bruce Herzberg. New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001. 64A-B. Print.
Glenn, Cheryl. “Review of Prisoner of History: Aspasia of Miletus and Her Biographical Tradition by Madeleine M. Henry.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly. Vol. 27. Taylor & Francis, Ltd., 1997. 84-86. Jstor. Web.
Glenn, Cheryl. “Sex, Lies, and Manuscript: Refiguring Aspasia in the History of Rhetoric.” College Composition and Communication. Vol. 45. 2nd ed. National Council of Teachers of English, 1994. 180-199. Jstor. Web.
Jarratt, Susan C. “Rhetoric and Feminism: Together Again.” College English. Vol. 62. 3rd ed. National Council of Teachers of English, 2000. 390-393. Jstor. Web.
Plato. Menexenus. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. 2nd ed. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Ed. Patricia Bizzell & Bruce Herzberg. New York: Bedford/St. Martins, 2001. 60A-63B. Print.
Olson, Annie. “An Introduction to Rhetoric.” Le Tourneau U, May 2006. Web. 6 Dec. 2011.
Plato, Phaedo, In: The Collected Dialogues Of Plato Including The Letters, Editors: E. Hamilton and H. Cairns, Bollingen Series LXXI, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1961.
Deborah Tannen’s, “Fighting For Our Lives,” explores the ideas and concepts behind human sociology. She delves into the sociolinguistic relationship between women and men in conversation. Tannen amplifies the importance between language and gender and how they affect interpersonal relationships. Tannen showcases her analytical thinking processes by using rhetorical strategies to support her claim on conflicted communication within the argument culture. Specifically, focusing on politics, the law, education, spousal relationships, the media and within work environments. She gives many examples to support her claim by using figurative language and literary devices such as metaphors and logic and reasoning to accurately convey her message.
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
Gender Matters is a collection of various essays on feminist linguistic texts analysis, by Sara Mills. Mills develops methods of analyzing literary and non-literary texts, in addition to conversational analysis based on a feminist approach. The author draws on data from her collection of essays gathered over the last two decades on feminism during the 1990s. The essays focus on gender issues, the representation of gender in reading, writing, and in public speaking. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of feminists’ analysis of sexism in literature and the relation between gender and politeness. The article is informative for my research paper, as my topic is going to cover language analysis of the text and who women reading and writing differs according to the discourse analysis within linguistic, psychology, case studies audiences and surveys. The book would be helpful, particularly the last three essays that discusses gender, public speaking, the question of politeness and impoliteness in public speaking. Mills’ analysis is not complete without including the idea of global notions of both women and men, to see whether women and men write and read in the same way globally. Therefore, an update would enrich the book’s discussion section. Although, Mills addresses the class and race theme in language and public speaking, I will only look into the role of language that plays a part in doing or reducing gender in literary, non-literary texts and in conversation.
Plato. "Apology." The Longman Anthology of World Literature. Ed. David Damrosch and David L. Pike. Compact ed. New York: Pearson, 2008. 559-75. Print.
...rms of power and source of pride in society. Emphasizing sexism in language and rising the concern with words can be a vital feminist strategy to provoke social change (Weatherall, 2002). Language can produce a false imagination and represents women and men unequally, as if members of one sex were somehow less wholly human, less complex, and has fewer rights than members of the other sex. Sexist language also characterizes serotypes of women and men, sometimes to the disadvantage of both, but more often to the disadvantage of women. (Wareing & Thomas, 2012). As a result, it is necessary that individuals have the right to define, and to redefine as their lives unfold, their own gender identities, without regard to genitalia, assigned birth sex, or initial gender role. Language about women is not a nonaligned or an insignificant issue but profoundly a political one.
Scholars working from a feminist perspective suggest that most theories of rhetoric are inadequate and misleading because they contain a patriarchal bias – they embody the experiences and concerns of the white male as standard, thereby distorting or omitting the experiences and concerns of women. One theory that clearly embodies a feminist perspective is that of Feminist Transformation. It is a system that values and highlights women-centered communicative practices, and its roots lie in “the woman-valuing, matristic, Goddess-centered cultures that underlie the beginnings of civilization.” Starhawk’s rhetorical theory describes two types of rhetorical systems – a rhetoric of inherent value and a rhetoric of domination.
The Phaedrus is a dialogue written by Plato regarding three characters: Socrates, Lysias, and Phaedrus. While it appears that the topic at hand is about love, the discussion really revolves around the true art of rhetoric and how it should be put into practice. The erotic action in the Phaedrus that comes from the erotic relationships of its characters causes the dialogue to resemble the true art of rhetoric. This can be seen through Plato’s dialogue as his plot and characterization consequently establishes the foundation regarding the true art of rhetoric.
In the 1995 United Nations Fourth World Conference of Women, First Lady Hillary Clinton delivered her speech: Women’s Rights are Human Rights. Clinton is notorious for her words and how powerful they can be. To have this effect, Clinton must have had extensive knowledge of how to properly utilize rhetorical devices. Throughout the iconic speech, Clinton uses several rhetorical devices in order to get her ideas across to the conference. In this rhetorical analysis, I will attempt to showcase how Hillary Clinton effectively used ethos, pathos, and logos in her Women’s Rights are Human Rights speech.
We live in the modern society where women can vote, work, have access to birth control, freedom of speech, and be independent. However, two articles written by feminist writers Jessica Valenti and bell hooks demonstrate that feminism still exist because of an inevitable inequality that women face in the society. Both writers are convinced that most of the people do not really know what feminism is about or they do not look at it closer in order to be able to understand the purpose of this movement. According to them, feminism is not about being anti-men and spreading hatred towards males as many individuals claim. As bell hooks states in her article “[…] I tend to hear about the evil of feminism […] how ‘they’ hate men […]” (11). Feminism does
For my Rhetorical Critique Essay, I decided to critique the speech by UN Women Goodwill Ambassador, Emma Watson, which she gave to United Nations Headquarters in 2014. The main purpose of this speech was to explain a new campaign for gender equality called “HeForShe”. In the speech Ms. Watson says uses personal stories, facts, and appeals to emotion. The thesis of this speech is that gender equality is everyone’s concern; that being feminist not something that means “man-hating (Watson),” but rather a term that simply implies the fact that a person believes that men and women should be treated equally. She makes this speech different from all the other speeches on gender equality by trying to appeal to her male audience the most. This worked
Plato. The Dialogues of Plato. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Great Books of the Western World. 54 vols. Chicago:Encyclopaedia Britannica 1952. Vol. 7.
In the beginning, Mills discusses theoretical elements and has labeled this section as “General Theoretical Issues” and the second part is comprised of analysis having three sub chapters. The main section of the book examines feminist models of the text and investigates language typologies. According to Sara Mills, language is a form of social communication, a tool to transfer information and a set of mutually decided linguistic choices in any system (Crystal: 1995, 18). Language functions as sharing of thoughts in a framework where options are equally exclusive. Mills criticizes the traditional method to deal with legendary writings which often neglect the fact that the writer has no command over the stuff, being delivered by him or her. Another drawback of this conventional approach is that only the texts which have literary worth are selected for analysis (e.g. the works of Shakespeare, D.H. Lawrence, Beckett and so on) and women’s writings for stylistic analysis are often overlooked. TorilMoi (1985) and Elaine Showalter (1978) are of the view that “women’s writings have frequently been barred from standard status, by the procedure named phallocentric
The English Language has been spreading over the centuries, imposing itself to the lives of the generation. As years pass by there is an addition of people learning/knowing how to speak English. As women’s role in society gain more power and status, there seems to be a shift from Standard English to Feminist English. Equality is a golden standard to all humans; it does not seem to be the case in the equality of genders in the English language. Thus, creating a negative attitude concerning Feministic influence in the language. This paper examines the language change in modern English, by describing how the Feminist language has effected and developed the English language, through Social, Political, and Educational implications of the change.