When one of the worst earthquakes ever hits the town of San Francisco panic ensues, but not for everyone. On April 18, 1906, at 5:15 am the city of San Francisco was demolished by a 7.8 magnitude earthquake which also led to many fires being started. There was $350m in estimated damages, and 400-750 people perished in the earthquake and fire. Around 490 city blocks were destroyed, causing 250,000 people to become homeless (A Brief Account, SF Tourism Tips). In the aftermath of the earthquake there were many eyewitness accounts written about it. The eyewitness account, “Comprehending the Calamity,” by Emma Burke and the eyewitness account,"Horrific Wreck of the City" by Fred Hewitt both describe the same event, but they both have very different …show more content…
opinions on it. The one similarity between the two accounts of the earthquake is that both texts are first hand accounts of the San Francisco earthquake and were majorly affected by it.
Page 1 paragraph 2 of Fred Hewitt’s account states,“I was within a stone’s throw of that city hall when the hand of an avenging God fell upon San Francisco.” This is quote also relates to Emma Burke’s account, which on page 1 paragraph 2 states,”No one can comprehend the calamity to San Francisco in its entirety. The individual experience can probably give the general public the clearest idea.” These quotes show that Emma Burke and Fred Hewitt both experienced the San Francisco earthquake and were majorly affected by it because Emma Burke says that her individual experience can help people understand the earth quake, which means that she experienced the earthquake. Emma’s experience relates to Fred’s because he says that he was in San Fransisco when the earthquake hit. Page 1 paragraph 10 of the,”Horrific Wreck of the City,” states,”The first portion of that shock was just a mild forerunning of what was to follow. The pause in the action of the earth’s surface couldn’t have been more than a …show more content…
fraction of a second.” This is similar to page paragraph of, ”Comprehending the Calamity,”I was one of the fortunate ones, for neither personal injury nor death visited my household…” These two quotes further prove Fred and Emma both experiencing the San Francisco earthquake. The quote from Emma Burke’s article shows that she experienced the earthquake because she says that none of her family was injured or killed by the earthquake, which shows that she did experience the earthquake. Fred Hewitt’s quote proves him experience because the quote shows him describing the earthquake in great detail which only someone who has experienced the earthquake can describe. So, both Emma Burke and Fred Hewitt experienced the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and were affected by it. A difference between Fred Hewitt’s the,”Horrific Wreck of the City,” and Emma Burke’s, “Comprehending the Calamity,” is that Emma has a more positive attitude than Fred.
My first piece of evidence is from page 2 paragraph 9 of the,”Horrific Wreck of the City,” which states,” “The city is ablaze. We will all be burned. This must be the end of this wicked world. Welcome to the inferno.” Then on the other end, page 3 paragraph 3 of, ”Comprehending the Calamity,” states,”people with packs on their backs, and all so good- natured and ready for a smile! I never saw one person crying.” This shows that Emma and Fred have opposing opinions on the earthquake because, Fred is saying the world is ending and everyone will dies, which is a very negative outlook on the situation. But, Emma says that no one was crying and everyone was smiling. While Emma is optimistic Fred is pessimistic. Another piece of evidence on page 2 paragraph 8 of Fred Hewitt’s account states, ”Strong men bellowed like babies in their furor. All humanity within eyesight was suffering. No one knew which way to turn, when on all sides of them destruction stared them in the very eye.” But then page 4 paragraph 14 of Emma Burke’s account states,”The all-prevailing cheerfulness and helpfulness were encouraging signs of our progress in practicing the golden rule, and humanity’s struggle upward toward the example of our Savior.” So this further supports my point because Fred Hewitt talks about how even the strongest
people fell apart, and everyone was lost, which again shows Fred having a negative outlook on the situation. Then Emma Burke is still saying that everyone helped each other, and were cheerful, which is a positive attitude. This then shows the difference between Emma and Fed is that Emma is positive and fred is pessimistic. Fred Hewitt and Emma Burke both did describe the same event, but had different opinions and reactions to it. But their stories are still extremely interesting. They both open up window to the past.
There was a massive earthquake in San Francisco during the year of 1906. The country of United States went through great loss because of this massacre. Nearly 250,000 people had become homeless as the result of this great earthquake. Winchester pointed out the question: How unprepared was America when this disaster hit? He compared the San Francisco earthquake to the Katrina hurricane in 2005.
The Fredonia Earthquake that took place in Fredonia, Arizona on July 21st, 1959 was the largest earthquake to ever strike the state and it triggered a rockslide at Mather Point in the Grand Canyon.
In the novel, a father had thoughtfully kept himself and his son some bread, but after his son saw he was hiding the bread, even though his father had him some too, the son attacked his father. The son didn’t care that his father had him bread aswell, he wanted it all to himself, so he could have more. In order to do so, the boy killed his father and took the bread for himself. Next, in New York City, an earthquake occurred and everyone inside of the buildings that were being demolished, falling in, etc all reacted differently to the situation. Some froze, others just screamed, and several other things.
Twain uses words such as vomiting, squirming, grinding, terrific, disgusted, and foolishness. Although the context surrounding each word is different, the words are there simply show the reader how intense the earthquake was or how ridiculous people acted when facing a frightening situation. The words are in place to not only add the emphasis on the earthquake, but they do it for the people and their actions, for the things that took place, and for what he witnessed in general. Just as Twain used words that intensify his writing, London's words are more violent rather than sweet and short, but they have the same intention. London uses words like, smashed, piled, humped, burst, twitching, and thrown. His words are more violent because London is trying to really emphasize the destruction rather than the actions of people. London's’ word choice adds more imagery for the reader and it adds more interest and
On February 4th 1975 in Haicheng China there was a magnitude 7.5 earthquake. Over a period of months there were changes in elevation in land, ground water and unusual animal behavior which are all precursors to an earthquake. Days before the 7.5 magnitude earthquake there were foreshocks that triggered an eviction warning that effectively saved over 150,000 lives or injuries. This is a pro as this forecast saved thousands of lives and had the people of this area (knowing this was a place of seismic activity) took precautions, like that of earthquake resistant buildings, evacuation points, preparing disaster supplies among other preparations the following may not have happened or would have been less of a disaster.
For example, on October 1, 1987, at 7:42 a.m. the residents of the Los Angeles basin got a jolting reminder of the perils of "living on the fault line." This was due to the so-called Whittier Narrows earthquake. Hardest hit by the quake, was Whittier (pop. 72,000). Whittier is twelve miles from downtown Los Angeles and was the community closest to the epicenter.
On the night of April 18, 1906, the whole town was woken by erratic shaking. Although the earthquake lasted under a measly minute, it caused significant damage. Many fires started all throughout the city; San Francisco burned in turmoil.
The San Francisco Earthquake commenced at five thirteen o’clock in the morning, with the epicenter offshore of San Francisco. The city carried more than 400,000 people during this event (Earthquake of 1906, 1). Most of the
Mrs. Rayfield wrote a great article about the devastation left over after this massive fire. I found that her accounts were very detailed and had good pictures to go along with them. I decided to use this source in my essay because she also showed the good effect that the fire had on the city not only the bad. She had a complete different point of view.
The 1906 San Francisco earthquake was one of the largest earthquakes in the United States. Even though it only lasted less than a minute, the damages and aftermath of the earthquake were disastrous. These damages were not just from the earthquake, but also from other hazards that occurred because of it. It also had a huge effect on the people living in San Francisco. Many people, the government, and other countries helped the city of San Francisco with relief goods like food and clothing. The city used up their resources in order to rebuild the city and spent a lot of money. This earthquake also started a scientific revolution about earthquakes and its effects.
At 5:12 a.m. on April 18th, 1906, the California city of San Francisco was awoken by a 7.8 magnitude earthquake. Chaos erupted with the earthquake leading to fire break outs throughout San Francisco (Cameron and Gordon. Pgs 69-73).The earthquake and the resulting fires caused destruction to majority of the city with buildings crumbling and igniting into flames. Many people died along with thousands and thousands of people being left homeless. This devastating earthquake left the city and United States in a financial crisis. Although the 1906 earthquake was one of the worst natural disasters in U.S. history, the city of San Francisco was able to overcome these substantial physical, social and economic impacts it had.
Hazards pose risk to everyone. Our acceptance of the risks associated with hazards dictates where and how we live. As humans, we accept a certain amount of risk when choosing to live our daily lives. From time to time, a hazard becomes an emergent situation. Tornadoes in the Midwest, hurricanes along the Gulf Coast or earthquakes in California are all hazards that residents in those regions accept and live with. This paper will examine one hazard that caused a disaster requiring a response from emergency management personnel. Specifically, the hazard more closely examined here is an earthquake. With the recent twenty year anniversary covered by many media outlets, the January 17, 1994, Northridge, California earthquake to date is the most expensive earthquake in American history.
October 17, 1989. Damage for this San Francisco Bay Area quake are close to 4 billion. The
An earthquake occurs abruptly and causes severs damage to people, property, landscape and more. A great mega-thrust earthquake, known as the Great Tohoku Earthquake has shaken Japan at 5:46:24 UTC on March 11, 2011. It caused a severe disaster, including tsunami and nuclear radiation exposure.. This mega-quake located at the latitude 38.297 degree North and longitude of 142.372 degree East, near the east coast of Honshu, Japan (USGS, 2013). An earthquake and tsunami waves caused widespread damage to many areas of Japan. People in Japan are still recovering from the damages.
It was a beautiful day like any other with the clear blue sky and the